Channel
@RegaPlus
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · View velocity · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
1,448,037subscribers
+3,958 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among the largest entries.
| Telegram ID | -1001624311298 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RegaPlus |
| Description | ببخشید که براتون پلو درست نکردم. ارتباط: @Schatzberg | تبلیغات: @Helicaon |
| Created | 7 April 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RegaPlus |
Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:28 | 1,448,037 | +1,096 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:11 | 1,446,941 | +760 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:02 | 1,446,181 | +1,062 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:02 | 1,445,119 | +599 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:22 | 1,444,520 | -296 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:37 | 1,444,816 | +657 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:11 | 1,444,159 | +80 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:34 | 1,444,079 | first reading |
77 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 77 (3 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 18,953,400 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 01:56 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 70 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days: across 45of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 6.3 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 31.6% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 59.5% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 211,000 views — 14.6% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 222,000).
| Post | Readings | Latest reading | Curve | 24h reach | Half of last-observed views by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| /2327012 Aug 2026, 21:00 UTC | 927 minutes – 4.9 hours old | 58,700 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 39,300 → 3.0 hours: 54,511 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 33 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /2326912 Aug 2026, 20:50 UTC | 106 minutes – 5.1 hours old | 80,800 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 58,668 interp. → 3.0 hours: 75,500still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 25 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /2326812 Aug 2026, 20:45 UTC | 1011 minutes – 5.2 hours old | 89,200 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 66,048 interp. → 3.0 hours: 84,400still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 22 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /2326712 Aug 2026, 20:30 UTC | 1026 minutes – 5.4 hours old | 103,000 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 78,792 interp. → 3.0 hours: 97,974 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 26 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading · provisional — final view count still climbing |
| /2326512 Aug 2026, 19:20 UTC | 1231 minutes – 6.6 hours old | 138,000 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 72,900 → 3.0 hours: 127,737 interp. → 6.0 hours: 137,000still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 55 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /2326412 Aug 2026, 16:30 UTC | 1731 minutes – 9.4 hours old | 166,000 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 57,842 interp. → 3.0 hours: 99,364 interp. → 6.0 hours: 160,000still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 2.3 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /2326312 Aug 2026, 12:30 UTC | 131 minutes – 31 minutes old | 39,500 views ~no reaction reading | no checkpoint reading yet | not yet at 24h | not measurable yet |
| /2326212 Aug 2026, 11:30 UTC | 126 minutes – 26 minutes old | 39,300 views ~no reaction reading | no checkpoint reading yet | not yet at 24h | not measurable yet |
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed viewsis the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
با 30 هزار تومن فیلترشکن نامحدود خودتو بخر !!! 🔥 کاربر و زمان نامحدود 🚀 بدون قطعی و کندی 📱 پشتیبانی 24 ساعت 🛍️ خرید خودکار و تحویل آنی از ربات : 👤 @iProPingBOT 📈 پایین ترین قیمت، بالاترین کیفیت
@RegaPlus
@RegaPlus
ناراحتکنندهست که من قسمتی از روزت نیستم.
خورشیدگرفتگی امشب در اسپانیا: @RegaPlus
@RegaPlus
@RegaPlus
@RegaPlus
امروز ۳ تا اتفاق نجومی قراره همزمان تو آسمون رخ بده: خورشیدگرفتگی، همنشینی ۶ سیاره و اوج بارش شهابی. @RegaPlus
امروز روز جهانی بچهی وسطیه. @RegaPlus
⚽ پاری سن ژرمن 🇫🇷 - 🏴 استون ویلا 🏆 فینال سوپر جام اروپا 🇪🇺 🕔 چهارشنبه ساعت ۲۲:۳۰ 🏟 ورزشگاه ردبول آرنا، سالزبورگ 🎲 با بیش از ۵۰۰ نوع آپشن پیشبینی 👆 با بالاترین ضرایب پیشبینی 📊 نگاهی به آمار دو تیم: ✅ پیاسجی در ۱۰ دیدار اخیر خود، ۴ برد و ۲ تساوی کسب کرده و در ۴ بازی شکست خورده است. ✅ استون ویلا در ۱۰ دیدار اخیر خود، ۶ برد و ۱ تساوی کسب کرده و در ۳ بازی شکست خورده است. 📈 میانگین گل در ۱۰ دیدار اخیر پیاسجی ۳.۱ گ…
❤️رفیق! بیا روراست باشیم… الان با 50 تومن چی میتونی بخری؟ یه چیپسم نه! ولی ما با همون پول، یه ماه اکانت وی پی ان میدیم بهت! 🔥 سرویس تست رایگان : 👇👇👇 ▶️https://t.me/WIZARD_XRAY_BOT ▶️https://t.me/WIZARD_XRAY_BOT
Showing the 12 most recent of 77 posts we hold for @RegaPlus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 472 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 199 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 380 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
2 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“RegaPlus” (@RegaPlus), 1,448,037 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RegaPlus.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.