Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

توییتر دانشجویان علوم پزشکی

@medtweeet

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

84,458subscribers

-95 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001076033516
TypeChannel
Username@medtweeet
Created21 April 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/medtweeet

Growth

84,45884,55384,505.56 August 2026 — 84,553 subscribers6 August 2026 — 84,553 subscribers6 August 2026 — 84,529 subscribers7 August 2026 — 84,522 subscribers8 August 2026 — 84,502 subscribers9 August 2026 — 84,543 subscribers10 August 2026 — 84,544 subscribers11 August 2026 — 84,513 subscribers12 August 2026 — 84,501 subscribers14 August 2026 — 84,488 subscribers15 August 2026 — 84,458 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 10 days, net -95. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 84,444–84,567 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 16:1784,458-30
14 Aug 2026, 04:0684,488-13
12 Aug 2026, 22:3684,501-12
11 Aug 2026, 22:4284,513-31
10 Aug 2026, 21:3184,544+1
9 Aug 2026, 20:3184,543+41
8 Aug 2026, 19:2484,502-20
7 Aug 2026, 21:2084,522-7
6 Aug 2026, 23:1284,529-24
6 Aug 2026, 01:3484,553no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:0784,553first reading

Engagement

269 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.5%
avg views ÷ 84,458 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,680
269 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
269
of 269 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held269 (5 August 202615 August 2026)
Views total2,603,631
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 08:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 33s
Average length
47s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 08:31 UTC≈1,570 viewsread 15 August 2026

‏این قضیه که هر کی رو بیشتر چک کنی تو اینستا براش ساجست میشی درسته؟ میخوام بدونم اینکه داره دیویدبکامو ساجست می‌کنه چقدر جدیه؟ #این_جانب_فلانی @medtweeet | مدتوئیت Instagram | اینستاگرام

15 Aug 2026, 08:15 UTC≈2,750 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

🔴کلید سوم آزمون دستیاری پزشکی دوره ۵۳‌ ( اصلاحیه کلید نهایی) دفترچه D منتشر شد @medtweeet | مدتوئیت Instagram | اینستاگرام

15 Aug 2026, 08:15 UTC≈2,510 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

🔴کلید سوم آزمون دستیاری پزشکی دوره ۵۳‌ ( اصلاحیه کلید نهایی) دفترچه A منتشر شد @medtweeet | مدتوئیت Instagram | اینستاگرام

15 Aug 2026, 08:15 UTC≈2,540 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

🔴کلید سوم آزمون دستیاری پزشکی دوره ۵۳‌ ( اصلاحیه کلید نهایی) دفترچه B منتشر شد @medtweeet | مدتوئیت Instagram | اینستاگرام

15 Aug 2026, 08:15 UTC≈2,660 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

🔴کلید سوم آزمون دستیاری پزشکی دوره ۵۳‌ ( اصلاحیه کلید نهایی) دفترچه C منتشر شد @medtweeet | مدتوئیت Instagram | اینستاگرام

15 Aug 2026, 08:10 UTC≈2,930 viewsread 15 August 2026

‏دختر تخس و نچسب و بی تربیت فامیلمون اومد گفت تبلتتو بده بازی کنم گفتم نمیدم نشست گوشه مبل همینجوری که با اخم داشت نگام میکرد خیلی ریلکس قلمشو درآوردم گفتم‌ قلمم داره ‏الان داره جیغ میکشه =))))))))))))=))=)))) #sara @medtweeet | مدتوئیت Instagram | اینستاگرام

15 Aug 2026, 07:50 UTC≈3,990 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

برای جامعه هم خوب نیست. وقتی پزشک فله‌ای آموزش می‌بینه و درآمد هم نداره درمان غیراصولی و سمبل کاری جای درمان دقیق و اصولی رو می‌گیره. #spaceoccupying @medtweeet | مدتوئیت Instagram | اینستاگرام

15 Aug 2026, 07:32 UTC≈4,980 viewsread 15 August 2026

‏اومدیم مراسم فوت یکی از بستگان ،تا وارد مسجد شدم دیدم صدای فرد فوت شد از بلند گوها میاد، پشمای همه ریخته بود ‏داداش احمقش گرفته بود با صدای داداشش یه متن ازین کسشرای انگیزشی با هوش مصنوعی درست کرده بود و وسط مراسم پلی کرده بود ‏مادرش داشت خودشو جر میداد ‏خوب کسخلین واسه خودتون. #aryan @medtweeet | مدتوئیت Instagram | اینستاگرام

15 Aug 2026, 06:32 UTC≈6,160 viewsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @bionova_acPhoto

همه‌مون یه بار گفتیم «باید مقاله بنویسم»…📝 بعدش هم دقیقاً هیچ کاری نکردیم :))🤷🏻 چون موضوع نداریم، مقاله‌نویسی بلد نیستیم و نمی‌دونیم اصلاً باید از کجا شروع کنیم.🤔 دقیقا BioNOVA برای همینه.🎯 آموزش مقاله و پژوهش، ژورنال‌کلاب، منتورشیپ، کارگاه‌های رایگان، AI در پژوهش، پادکست، اخبار پژوهشی و تمرین با دیتاست‌های پزشکی. #هوش_مصنوعی #مقاله #کارگاه_رایگان حتی قبل از ارسال مقاله، Peer Review یک‌روزه هم داریم.💪🏻 اگه بالا

15 Aug 2026, 06:15 UTC≈6,670 viewsread 15 August 2026

‏کتاب‌فروشی‌ها یکی‌یکی دارن تعطیل می‌شن، بعد علتش رو کاهش سرانه مطالعه مردم اعلام می‌کنن. واقعاً انتظار دارید توی کشوری که قیمت یه کتاب کوچیک که نهایتاً یه روزه تموم میشه نزدیک یه میلیون تومنه، مردم بخشی از همون چص‌تومنی که اسمش حقوقه و برای خرج روزمره هم کمه رو بدن کتاب؟ #Hossein @medtweeet | مدتوئیت Instagram | اینستاگرام

15 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC≈7,090 viewsread 15 August 2026

‏بچه ها شما بی عرضه نیستید ، شما دارید گران ترین تورم بعد جنگ جهانی دوم رو تجربه میکنید. #نقطه @medtweeet | مدتوئیت Instagram | اینستاگرام

15 Aug 2026, 05:45 UTC≈7,330 viewsread 15 August 2026

‏هنوز گاهی به اون روزی فکر می‌کنم که رزیدنت جراحی از اون ور بخش داد زد ریحانه بیا بریم چست تیوب مریضو دی سی کنیم. گفتم دکتر من دیگه اینترن شما نیستم الان اینترن اطفالم، یه ذره فکر کرد گفت نه تو همیشه اینترن مایی بیا بریم، منم رفتم. چرا واقعا؟ #آغاج @medtweeet | مدتوئیت Instagram | اینستاگرام

Showing the 12 most recent of 269 posts we hold for @medtweeet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Aug 2026, 20:04 UTCAnonymous Poll6,460 voters approx.

بنظرتون ازدواج بهتره یا مجرد موندن!؟

  1. ازدواج👩🏼‍❤️‍👨🏻29%
  2. مجردی 🦅35%
  3. دیدن نتایج 👁️👁️41%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 269 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 233,354 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Med stu | پزشکی🩺🖤
@Medicine_stu · 191,606
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 11 August 2026
توییتر دانشگاه تهرانی ها
@uttweet · 142,099
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 August 2026
لینک ورود به چنل اصلی
@Daneshjoo · 408
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
Virauniversity | ویرا
@virauniversitycom · 382,305
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 August 2026
مدیکال استوز | مشاوره کنکور
@medicalstus_ir · 132,980
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 August 2026
سیب ترش | آموزش و مشاوره کنکور
@siiibtorsh · 542,544
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 9 August 2026
چرندیجات
@Charandiijaat · 126,217
Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“توییتر دانشجویان علوم پزشکی” (@medtweeet), 84,458 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/medtweeet.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.