Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (5 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 1,004 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 13 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 14 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
68 measurements spanning 101 days, net -18,396. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 271,346–295,260 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 68
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Nov 2026, 12:48
274,105
-485
11 Nov 2026, 16:55
274,590
-321
9 Nov 2026, 19:57
274,911
-262
8 Nov 2026, 09:17
275,173
-176
7 Nov 2026, 04:36
275,349
-178
6 Nov 2026, 07:15
275,527
-142
5 Nov 2026, 08:36
275,669
-171
4 Nov 2026, 04:50
275,840
-136
3 Nov 2026, 06:38
275,976
-176
2 Nov 2026, 04:19
276,152
-207
1 Nov 2026, 01:20
276,359
-160
31 Oct 2026, 03:39
276,519
-203
30 Oct 2026, 01:30
276,722
-177
29 Oct 2026, 03:11
276,899
-218
27 Oct 2026, 23:39
277,117
-211
26 Oct 2026, 22:37
277,328
-173
26 Oct 2026, 00:35
277,501
-177
25 Oct 2026, 03:58
277,678
-202
24 Oct 2026, 01:57
277,880
-261
23 Oct 2026, 02:07
278,141
first reading
Engagement
1,539 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 206 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.55%
avg views ÷ 274,105 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,730
475 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
475
of 1,539 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 25 of 475 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026
Posts held
1,539 (4 August 2026 – 14 November 2026)
Views total
4,621,242
Reactions total
0
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Nov 2026, 03:21 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈24,500
Videos
≈7,250
Links
≈18,500
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
6h 44m
Average length
1m 10s
Measured directly from 349 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
91
across the posts below
Posts paid on
50
of 1,000 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @MyCinemaFact2. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 12 September 2026 to 14 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 34 of 475 posts held from the last 30 days (7.16%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
۵۰ سال پیش در چنین روزهایی، فیلم دارک کمدی و درام هجوآمیز Network ساخته سیدنی لومت در سینماها به اکران درآمد.
فیلمی که شاید بیش از هر اثر دیگری توانست آینده رسانهها و تلویزیون را پیشبینی کند. آرون سورکین درباره این فیلم میگوید: "هیچکس، حتی جورج اورول، نتونسته به اندازه پدی چایفسکی در زمان نوشتن فیلمنامه «شبکه»، آینده رو اینقدر دقیق پیشبینی کنه."
پیتر فینچ با اجرای ماندگار مونولوگاش در نقش هاوارد بیل، مجری تل…
نامه آل پاچینو به رابرت دنیرو پس از تماشای فیلم Raging Bull ساخته مارتین اسکورسیزی:
"سلام بابی، فقط میخواستم بهت بگم که شنبه برای اولین بار «گاو خشمگین» رو دیدم. هنوز هم تحتتأثیرشم و سرخوشی تماشای فیلم از سرم نپریده... این فیلم یک اثر هنری عظیم و الهامبخش برای منه. همونطور که میدونی، من هیچوقت از این کارها نمیکنم. چون اگه از همین حالا بخوام برای تکتک کارهایی که انجام میدی یادداشت بنویسم، اگه یه بار این کار …
"از صحنه حمام فیلم «روانی» (۱۹۶۰) ساخته هیچکاک بهعنوان الگویی برای یکی از لحظات مهم فیلم «گاو خشمگین» (۱۹۸۰) استفاده کردم، یعنی صحنه مبارزه."
— مارتین اسکورسیزی
▫️۴۶ سال از اکران فیلم شاهکار Raging Bull با بازی رابرت دنیرو گذشت.
🤖ربات دانلود فیلم و سریال
@MyCinemaFact
لیست ۱۰ فیلم خوب که داستانشان در فصل پاییز میگذرد، به انتخاب بنیاد فیلم بریتانیا:
● The Stranger (1946)
Directed by Orson Welles
● All That Heaven Allows (1955)
Directed by Douglas Sirk
● The Trouble with Harry (1955)
Directed by Alfred Hitchcock
● An Autumn Afternoon (1962)
Directed by Yasujiro Ozu
● Autumn Sonata (1978)
Directed by Ingmar Bergman
● Halloween (1978)
Directed by John Carpenter
● An Autumn Tal…
فصل دوم سریال Avatar: Seven Havens در تاریخ ۲۱ می ۲۰۲۷ (۳۱ اردیبهشت ۱۴۰۶) با انتشار سه قسمت ابتدایی از پارامونت پلاس پخش خود را آغاز میکند.
این فصل در مجموع ۱۳ قسمت خواهد داشت. فصل سوم نیز در نیمه دوم سال ۲۰۲۷ منتشر میشود.
همچنین تایید شد که داستان این سریال ۲۲۵ سال پس از وقایع The Legend of Korra جریان دارد.
🤖ربات دانلود فیلم و سریال
@MyCinemaFact
چند بار وسط یک فیلم گفتی «من جاش بودم، یه تصمیم دیگه میگرفتم»؟ 🎬
در TellAria نوبت توئه.
داستان رو میخونی، به دوراهی میرسی و انتخاب میکنی ادامهاش چی بشه. در رو باز میکنی یا برمیگردی؟ به غریبه اعتماد میکنی یا راه خودت رو میری؟
این بار، ادامهٔ داستان به انتخاب تو بستگی داره.
دریافت برای آیفون 👇
https://apps.apple.com/us/app/tellaria-interactive-stories/id6811522620
دریافت برای اندروید 👇
https://play.googl…
وایرال شدن ویدیوی زمین خوردن اما واتسون هنگام ورود به مهمانی پنجشنبه شب GQ's Men of the Year در لسآنجلس
واتسون که بهخاطر کفشهای پاشنهبلندش تعادلش را از دست داد، خیلی زود بلند شد، به اتفاق پیشآمده خندید و با خونسردی به مسیرش ادامه داد.
🤖ربات دانلود فیلم و سریال
@MyCinemaFact
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,539 posts we hold for @MyCinemaFact2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@MyCinemaFact2 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
30 August 2026
Most recent edit
30 August 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 3 posts on @MyCinemaFact2 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
9 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
5 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
25 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
30nama @OfficialCinama · 57,408 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 23 August 2026
سینما گوزنایت @CinemaGoznight · 21,340 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 23 September 2026
ظرایف فیلم @MovieDetail · 40,322 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 1 September 2026
HIGH MOVIES @high_moviess · 52,497 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 24 August 2026
Cinema | سینما دارک @CinemaDL_ir · 56,108 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 24 August 2026
سینما پارادیـزو @CinemaParadisooo · 22,984 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 20 September 2026
Cinema Tweet @cinema_twittt · 29,438 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 9 September 2026
MovieTwitte | مووی توییت @MovieTwitte · 45,281 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 27 August 2026
سینما توییتر فارسی ⚫⚫ @Cinema_Twitter_Farsi · 67,561 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 August 2026
سینما توییتر @OfficialCinemaTwitter · 21,508 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 23 September 2026
Chosefilm @Chosefilm · 80,013 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 24 August 2026
Cinema Freak @cinemaafreak · 216,371 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 18 September 2026
سینما یعنی . . . @cinemayanii · 24,186 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 17 September 2026
Animationix | انیمیشن @Animationix · 82,330 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 30 August 2026
ادبیات، فلسفه و سینما @NazariyehAdabi · 43,381 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 29 August 2026
Filmnews | فیلم نیوز @Film_news · 75,628 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 29 August 2026
Persiana Media Group @Persianatv · 74,359 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 16 August 2026
مووی کاتیج @CottageOrg · 742,325 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
Hollywood Daily @hollywooddaily · 27,109 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 19 September 2026
پنتاگون فارسی @Pentagon_Farsi · 123,541 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 7 September 2026
وستروس نیوز / اخبار سینمایی @WesterosNews · 76,377 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 24 August 2026
GifGlass (Thinking) @GifGlass · 25,390 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 2 October 2026
🕊 فرازتد⚡️(روشنگری) @FarazTed · 21,173 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 26 September 2026
نشریه دیجیتالی سینما🛰 @CooFilm · 41,847 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 2 September 2026
This channel appears in 134 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🎥 CinemaFact 📺” (@MyCinemaFact2), 274,105 subscribers as measured 14 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MyCinemaFact2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.