Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Elizaium

Channel

Elizaium

@NewElizaium

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry

46,129subscribers

+480 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002706267945
TypeChannel
Username@NewElizaium
Description" اِلیزایُم " انجامِ وظیفه‌یِ اجتماعی از طریق ارتقای سطح دانش جامعه در حوزه هوش مصنوعی جهت تهیه انواعِ سرویس‌هایِ هوش مصنوعی می‌تونید با @ElizaiumHelp در ارتباط باشید.
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 October 2026
Measurements held37
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/NewElizaium

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

43,900 average views per post against 46,129 subscribers — an engagement rate of 95.2%. Across the 3,487 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,624–99,943 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 2.07% and 10.9%, with a median of 5.03%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (5 September 2026 – 5 October 2026)
Posts measured47 of 47 published in the window (0 exact, 47 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled2,064,870
Mature posts only95.2% over 47 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers46,129 measured 5 October 2026
Cohortb31623:fas · 3,487 channels · p10 0.713% · p25 2.07% · p50 5.03% · p75 10.9% · p90 20.6%
Position in cohort99.512th percentile · 18.9× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.022% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languagePersian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 5 October 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

40,19946,55343,3765 August 2026 — 45,649 subscribers6 August 2026 — 45,649 subscribers6 August 2026 — 45,432 subscribers7 August 2026 — 45,286 subscribers8 August 2026 — 44,849 subscribers9 August 2026 — 44,586 subscribers10 August 2026 — 44,410 subscribers11 August 2026 — 44,107 subscribers12 August 2026 — 43,881 subscribers13 August 2026 — 43,805 subscribers14 August 2026 — 44,032 subscribers16 August 2026 — 43,726 subscribers17 August 2026 — 43,405 subscribers18 August 2026 — 43,202 subscribers19 August 2026 — 43,046 subscribers20 August 2026 — 42,903 subscribers21 August 2026 — 42,790 subscribers23 August 2026 — 42,643 subscribers24 August 2026 — 42,504 subscribers25 August 2026 — 42,320 subscribers26 August 2026 — 42,082 subscribers27 August 2026 — 41,925 subscribers28 August 2026 — 42,126 subscribers29 August 2026 — 41,747 subscribers30 August 2026 — 41,330 subscribers1 September 2026 — 41,058 subscribers2 September 2026 — 40,720 subscribers3 September 2026 — 40,199 subscribers5 September 2026 — 44,642 subscribers8 September 2026 — 43,652 subscribers11 September 2026 — 42,883 subscribers12 September 2026 — 42,245 subscribers14 September 2026 — 41,711 subscribers16 September 2026 — 41,122 subscribers18 September 2026 — 40,694 subscribers29 September 2026 — 46,553 subscribers5 October 2026 — 46,129 subscribers46,1295 August 20265 October 2026
37 measurements spanning 61 days, net +480. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 39,246–47,506 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 37
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Oct 2026, 12:2146,129-424
29 Sept 2026, 14:2046,553+5,859
18 Sept 2026, 02:5540,694-428
16 Sept 2026, 00:1941,122-589
14 Sept 2026, 08:3641,711-534
12 Sept 2026, 20:4042,245-638
11 Sept 2026, 00:5742,883-769
8 Sept 2026, 05:0143,652-990
5 Sept 2026, 03:0244,642+4,443
3 Sept 2026, 09:5840,199-521
2 Sept 2026, 02:5340,720-338
1 Sept 2026, 01:2841,058-272
30 Aug 2026, 22:0741,330-417
29 Aug 2026, 20:5441,747-379
28 Aug 2026, 20:2442,126+201
27 Aug 2026, 19:3241,925-157
26 Aug 2026, 17:1242,082-238
25 Aug 2026, 14:5642,320-184
24 Aug 2026, 17:3642,504-139
23 Aug 2026, 05:3442,643first reading

Engagement

101 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 114 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
95.2%
avg views ÷ 46,129 subscribers
Avg views / post
43,900
47 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.477%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
47
of 101 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 October 2026
Posts held101 (24 July 2026 – 2 October 2026)
Views total2,064,870
Reactions total9,854
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Oct 2026, 14:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
142
Videos
86
Links
172

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
41m 51s
Average length
49s

Measured directly from 51 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

27,495 reactions across 99 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 95.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤26,14395.1%
👍1,0773.92%
💔2310.84%
👎440.16%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 101 of the 101 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28,021 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 101 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 2 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Oct 2026, 10:06 UTC≈3,170 views134 reactionsread 5 October 2026

طبقِ مقاله‌یِ Nieuwerburgh سرمایه‌گذاری روی زیرساخت AI در آمریکا از ۲۰۲۵ تا ۲۰۳۲ به حدود ۱۰٫۳ تریلیون دلار می‌رسه؛ یعنی سالی به‌طور میانگین ۳٫۶ درصد تولید ناخالص داخلی. برای اینکه این سرمایه با بازده ۱۰ درصدی برگرده، صنعت AI باید تا ۲۰۳۲ سالانه حدود ۳٫۷ تریلیون دلار درآمد داشته باشه. درآمد فعلی این صنعت حدود ۲۰۰ میلیارد دلاره. طبقِ گفته‌ی Acemoglu برنده‌ی نوبلِ اقتصاد، صنعت به این سطح درآمد نمی‌رسه، به سه دلیل: اس…

👍75❤36👎23

1 Oct 2026, 15:58 UTC≈30,300 views137 reactionsread 5 October 2026
Photo

📜 با کمک GPT-6 Astra یک نامه رمزی از سال ۱۸۰۹ رمزگشایی شده. این نامه برای مارمون، یکی از ژنرال‌های ناپلئون، فرستاده شده بوده و تا حالا کسی نتونسته بود کامل رمزگشاییش کنه. تنها نسخه در دسترسش هم تصویری بود که سال ۱۹۶۹ توی یک مجله تاریخ نظامی فرانسوی چاپ شده بود. این کار حدود شش ساعت از مدل وقت گرفته. ساتوشی توموکیو، گرداننده پایگاه رمزهای تاریخی Cryptiana، راه‌حل رو بررسی کرده و حالا نامه توی این پایگاه حل‌ و ثبت ش…

❤131👍6

1 Oct 2026, 12:20 UTC≈30,500 views136 reactionsread 5 October 2026

یک مدل نوشتاری که متن رو به سبک نویسنده یا شخصیتی که انتخاب می‌کنید می‌نویسه؛ از داستان و مقاله تا توضیح فنی یا یک گفت‌وگوی معمولی. اسم نویسنده رو وارد می‌کنید و درخواست‌تون رو می‌نویسید. مثلاً می‌تونید بخواید یک مفهوم فنی رو به سبک Emily Dickinson، شاعر آمریکایی، توضیح بده. با نویسنده‌های شناخته‌شده بهترین نتیجه رو می‌ده. اگه می‌خواید به سبک کسی بنویسه که مدل نمی‌شناستش، مثل خودتون یا یک دوست، چند نمونه از نوشته‌…

❤129👍7

30 Sept 2026, 19:29 UTC≈31,500 views158 reactionsread 5 October 2026

متنی که خودتون نوشتید یا با کمک AI آماده کردید رو واردِ Walter Writes AI کنید و احتمال AI بودنش رو به‌صورت درصد نشون می‌ده. بخش‌هایی رو هم که به نظرش مشکوک‌ترن مشخص می‌کنه. بعد می‌تونید جمله‌بندی و انتخاب کلمات رو بازنویسی کنید تا متن طبیعی‌تر خونده بشه. شدت بازنویسی‌ در سه سطحِ Simple ، Standard و Enhanced تنظیم می‌شه. بررسی متن با Detector هم رایگانه. ورود به Walter Writes AI @Elizaium

❤147👍11

30 Sept 2026, 06:40 UTC≈31,100 views161 reactionsread 5 October 2026
Photo

👤 پروفایل قابل‌اشتراک به ChatGPT اضافه شده. با این قابلیت، چیزهایی رو که با ChatGPT ساختید در یک صفحه جمع می‌کنید و می‌تونید لینکش رو برای دیگران بفرستید. در این صفحه، کنار نام، عکس و بیوگرافی، تا ۱۲ سایت از ساخته‌هاتون رو نشون می‌دید. پلاگین‌هاتون هم در بخش جداگانه‌ای میان تا بقیه راحت‌تر پیداشون کنن و ازشون استفاده کنن. آدرس پروفایل به شکلِ chatgpt.com/u/username میشه. موقع تنظیم پروفایل می‌تونید: نام کاربری، عکس،…

❤158👍3

29 Sept 2026, 19:18 UTC≈41,500 views116 reactionsread 5 October 2026
Photo

✍️ با Jenni AI وقتی روی مقاله، Essay یا پیشینهٔ پژوهش کار می‌کنید، نوشتن، خوندن منابع و ارجاع‌دادن رو یکجا در اختیار می‌ذاره. هم‌زمان با نوشتن، ادامهٔ جمله رو پیشنهاد می‌ده و می‌تونه برای اون از منابع خودتون یا مقاله‌های علمی ارجاع بیاره. پیشنهاد رو با Tab قبول می‌کنید یا ازش رد می‌شید. 📄 برای ادعاهای متن هم می‌تونید منبع پیدا کنید. جمله رو انتخاب می‌کنید، روی Cite می‌زنید و ارجاع رو از بین مقاله‌های پیشنهادی اضافه…

❤111👍5

29 Sept 2026, 10:53 UTC≈30,700 views135 reactionsread 5 October 2026
Video

🎬 ایده‌گرفتن از ۳۸۹ ویدیوی ساخته‌شده با Opus 5.5 اگه می‌خواید ببینید با Claude Opus 5.5 چه ویدیوهایی ساختن، Skillry ویدئو‌ها رو همراه با پرامپتی که سازنده‌هاشون نوشتن یکجا جمع کرده؛ از موشن‌گرافیک و ویدیوی توضیحی تا صحنهٔ سه‌بعدی و بازی. این ویدیوها با کد ساخته شدن. Opus 5.5 انیمیشن رو با ابزارهایی مثل HTML، Canvas یا Three.js می‌نویسه. پرامپت‌ها رو فقط کپی نکنید. بخونیدشون، با ایده و محتوای خودتون تغییرشون بدید ت…

❤130👍5

28 Sept 2026, 16:50 UTC≈31,000 views136 reactionsread 5 October 2026
Video

📊 نمودارهای آماده و انیمیشن‌دار مجموعه‌ای رایگان از نمودارهای آماده برای اپ‌ها و داشبوردهای React. لازم نیست نمودار رو از صفر طراحی و پیاده‌سازی کنید؛ نمونهٔ مناسب رو انتخاب می‌کنید و مستقیم به پروژه اضافه‌اش می‌کنید. هر نمودار با یک دستور shadcn نصب می‌شه و کدش داخل پروژهٔ خودتون قرار می‌گیره. می‌تونید داده‌ها، رنگ‌ها و رفتارش رو با رابط کاربری دلخواهتون هماهنگ کنید. چند قابلیت کاربردی رو یکجا داره: ● نمودارهای…

❤136

28 Sept 2026, 13:47 UTC≈30,900 views148 reactionsread 5 October 2026
Video

🖥 اگه با Claude Code، Codex یا Cursor کار می‌کنید، open-slide کمک می‌کنه ارائه‌هاتون رو هم با همین Agentها بسازید. موضوع، ساختار و سبک ارائه رو برای Agent توضیح می‌دید؛ Agent هر اسلاید رو به‌صورت کد React می‌نویسه و نتیجه رو همون لحظه در مرورگر می‌بینید. بعد از ساخته‌شدن ارائه، این امکانات رو دارید: ● ویرایشگر بصری جدید برای تغییر متن، رنگ و اندازه، جابه‌جاکردن اجزای اسلاید و برش یا عوض‌کردن تصویرها ● گذاشتن کامن…

❤148

27 Sept 2026, 17:57 UTC≈31,200 views147 reactionsread 5 October 2026
Photo

تولید صدا و دوبله با VoiceStudio یک نرم‌افزار رایگان برای تولید گفتار، شبیه‌سازی صدا و دوبله‌ست که می‌تونید روی کامپیوتر خودتون اجراش کنید. برای شبیه‌سازی صدا، یک نمونهٔ کوتاه و واضح از صدای خودتون وارد می‌کنید، متن جدید رو می‌نویسید و خروجی صوتی می‌گیرید. امکان انتخاب مدل‌های مختلف تولید صدا هم وجود داره. چند قابلیت کاربردی رو یکجا داره: - طراحی صدای جدید با مشخص‌کردن ویژگی‌هایی مثل سن، زیر و بمی و لهجه. - دوب…

❤147

27 Sept 2026, 09:29 UTC≈31,000 views141 reactionsread 5 October 2026
Photo

🙂محاسبهٔ ۹حلقه‌ای در فیزیک نظری ذرات با Claude مدل Fable 5.1 در محیط Claude Science تونسته یک دامنهٔ پراکندگی شش‌ذره‌ای رو در نظریهٔ N=4 super Yang Mills تا مرتبهٔ ۹ حلقه محاسبه کنه. پژوهشگرا سالِ ۲۰۲۳ تونسته بودن تا ۸ حلقه رو محاسبه کنن! دامنهٔ پراکندگی کمیتیه که برای محاسبهٔ احتمال برهم‌کنش‌های ذرات استفاده میشه. ۹ حلقه‌ای هم به مرتبهٔ تصحیح‌های کوانتومیِ لحاظ‌شده هست؛ بالابردن این مرتبه، محاسبات رو خیلی پیچیده…

❤132👍6💔3

26 Sept 2026, 09:09 UTC≈31,200 views208 reactionsread 5 October 2026
Photo

🎧 مقاله‌های علمی رو با Listening می‌تونید گوش کنید. ابزارِ تبدیل متن به صدا برای دانشجوها و پژوهشگرهاست. فایل PDF مقاله، کتاب یا لینک صفحه وب رو وارد می‌کنید تا متن رو با صدای هوش مصنوعی براتون بخونه؛ مثلاً هنگام پیاده‌روی یا رفت‌وآمد. چند قابلیت کاربردی داره: • انتخاب بخش مقاله: می‌تونید مستقیم سراغ چکیده، روش تحقیق یا نتایج برید. • ردکردن ارجاع‌ها و پاورقی‌ها: موقع روخوانی از این بخش‌ها عبور می‌کنه تا شنیدن متن…

❤202👍4👎2

Showing the 12 most recent of 101 posts we hold for @NewElizaium. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@NewElizaium edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
18 September 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 25 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Domains linked from posts

12 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.

acritch.com2 posts · 2 August 2026 – 4 August 2026 · example post
arxiv.org2 posts · 2 August 2026 – 4 August 2026 · example post
chatgpt.com2 posts · 1 August 2026 – 1 August 2026 · example post
www.math.utoronto.caregistrable domain: utoronto.ca2 posts · 2 August 2026 – 4 August 2026 · example post
anatomy-livid.vercel.app1 post · 3 August 2026 – 3 August 2026 · example post
docs.anthropic.comregistrable domain: anthropic.com1 post · 7 August 2026 – 7 August 2026 · example post
discord.gg1 post · 28 July 2026 – 28 July 2026 · example post
github.com1 post · 6 August 2026 – 6 August 2026 · example post
chromewebstore.google.comregistrable domain: google.com1 post · 31 July 2026 – 31 July 2026 · example post
www.linkedin.comregistrable domain: linkedin.com1 post · 2 August 2026 – 2 August 2026 · example post
portfolio.ui8.devregistrable domain: ui8.dev1 post · 6 August 2026 – 6 August 2026 · example post
vids.new1 post · 27 July 2026 – 27 July 2026 · example post

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Elizaium” (@NewElizaium), 46,129 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NewElizaium.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.