Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Журналисты и медийщики

Channel

Журналисты и медийщики

@mediatusovka

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

18,661subscribers

-222 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001405859382
TypeChannel
Username@mediatusovka
DescriptionРедакционная курилка. Размещаем ваши посты ✅Обсудить проблемы редакции ✅Разместить вакансию/резюме ✅Поболтать с коллегами Реклама и сотрудничество: @e_adm Наш основной канал: @planerka_org Регистрация РКН: https://clck.ru/3GS8hN
Created30 January 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mediatusovka

Growth

18,66118,89618,778.55 August 2026 — 18,883 subscribers6 August 2026 — 18,877 subscribers6 August 2026 — 18,877 subscribers7 August 2026 — 18,896 subscribers8 August 2026 — 18,879 subscribers9 August 2026 — 18,847 subscribers10 August 2026 — 18,820 subscribers11 August 2026 — 18,780 subscribers12 August 2026 — 18,758 subscribers13 August 2026 — 18,737 subscribers14 August 2026 — 18,711 subscribers16 August 2026 — 18,661 subscribers5 August 202616 August 2026
12 measurements spanning 10 days, net -222. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,626–18,931 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 07:1218,661-50
14 Aug 2026, 15:0818,711-26
13 Aug 2026, 04:3318,737-21
12 Aug 2026, 07:4718,758-22
11 Aug 2026, 08:5318,780-40
10 Aug 2026, 09:1018,820-27
9 Aug 2026, 07:5418,847-32
8 Aug 2026, 05:4218,879-17
7 Aug 2026, 04:3218,896+19
6 Aug 2026, 02:1618,877no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:2018,877-6
5 Aug 2026, 19:5318,883first reading

Engagement

50 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
37.1%
avg views ÷ 18,661 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,920
50 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.656%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
50
of 50 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 49 of 50 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held50 (30 July 202615 August 2026)
Views total345,970
Reactions total2,238
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Aug 2026, 08:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
810
Videos
95
Links
860

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

1,775 reactions across 42 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁77343.5%
🤣1729.69%
1629.13%
👍1488.34%
😢1206.76%
🔥663.72%
💊583.27%
👏362.03%
💯341.92%
👌281.58%
🥴281.58%
👎261.46%
🤝211.18%
💔191.07%
🤮170.958%
🫡140.789%
🤓120.676%
💩80.451%
🖕60.338%
🤬60.338%
12 further kinds211.18%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 49 of the 50 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,238reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
2.00%
1 of 50 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
5,180
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
5,140
over 49 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFHXZGv513 August 20263 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 15 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 19:33 UTC≈2,590 views7 reactionsread 16 August 2026

Вопрос к нашим подписчикам из маленьких городов (уровень ниже областного центра). Скажите, из какого вы города?) Интересно, насколько широка наша аудитория) Спасибо за ответы!

😁4👍3

15 Aug 2026, 16:20 UTC≈2,940 views21 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Заголовок потерял сознание

🤣13😁61🙈1

15 Aug 2026, 12:26 UTC≈3,270 views50 reactionsread 16 August 2026

— Молодой человек, на каждой планёрке вы яростно ругаете нашу газету, наше руководство и наших учредителей. Почему же вы у нас работаете и получаете за это деньги? — В знак протеста!

😁416👏3

14 Aug 2026, 18:36 UTC≈4,000 views9 reactionsread 16 August 2026

Народ, у кого-то в редакциях существует практика исчисления зарплаты не в рублях? То есть не то, какой валютой вам в итоге платят, а то, в какой валюте измеряют. А то тут у нас похоже возобновляется подобная практика. Анонимно

7👏2

14 Aug 2026, 13:24 UTC≈3,860 views31 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Forwarded from @planerka_orgPhoto

Как страшно жить

😁31

14 Aug 2026, 10:51 UTC≈4,540 views75 reactionsread 16 August 2026

Как вы думаете, если бы Владислав Листьев дожил до наших дней, он был бы директором Первого канала или иностранным агентом? Работник Первого канала

😁48😢22🤔3🎃1💩1

13 Aug 2026, 15:45 UTC≈22,800 views39 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Великий человек Великое интервью Великий заголовок

🤣32💩7

13 Aug 2026, 10:43 UTC≈6,290 views52 reactionsread 16 August 2026

Мастер-класс по вёрстке страницы современного новостного интернет-сайта 1. Реклама на заднем фоне страницы 2. Реклама около логотипа 3. Реклама под логотипом 4. Реклама в новостной ленте сбоку 5. Заголовок важной городской новости 6. Начало текста важной городской новости 7. Реклама, включающаяся перед видео к новости 8. Рекламный баннер под тем местом, где должно было быть видео к новости 9. Всплывающие рекламные б

😁32💯107👏2🔥1

13 Aug 2026, 07:56 UTC≈4,860 views72 reactionsread 16 August 2026

#вакансия Ищу журналиста / креативного продюсера / пиарщика в команду ATATI за % от прибыли. Мы запускаем федеральный проект на стыке современного искусства, digital - технологий, transformation economy У нас разряд - по управлению вниманием и созданию вирусных инфоповодов. От охватных событий до создания культурных феноменов города. Из последних кейсов - подняли на уши город - публикации в сми, журналистское рас

😁33🥴22💊152

12 Aug 2026, 15:41 UTC≈4,210 views40 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Forwarded from @planerka_orgPhoto

РБК на полном серьёзе пишет «новость» о том, что Россия стала популярным направлением у... россиян! Видимо до этого российские туристы по России не ездили. На самом деле журналисты взяли данные с какого-то онлайн-сервиса (пиар-пиар), который левой пяткой посчитал только «пакетные туры». И соорудили заголовок настолько же громкий, насколько глупый. После РБК новость хорошо разошлась по другим медиа.

😁34🤬6

12 Aug 2026, 12:16 UTC≈4,730 views11 reactionsread 16 August 2026

🔥Разместите вашу вакансию в нашем канале бесплатно! Если вы или ваше медиа прямо сейчас ищете талантливых и профессиональных журналистов-редакторов-контентщиков, кидайте ваши вакансии нашему админу. И мы разместим их бесплатно! А ваше предложение увидят тысячи медийщиков. Предложение действует сутки с момента публикации этого поста. 👉Прислать вакансию: @e_adm

4👍4🔥2🤮1

12 Aug 2026, 09:43 UTC≈4,840 views43 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Всем привет. Давно работаю в печатной журналистике (дай бог ей здоровья). Мне одной кажется, что МК ооочень странно верстает свою первую полосу? Хаотично, неудобно читать, спорные размеры ключевых элементов… Или я придираюсь? Оксана, Москва

22👍8👏6🥴6😐1

Showing the 12 most recent of 50 posts we hold for @mediatusovka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Aug 2026, 12:56 UTCAnonymous Poll483 voters

Является ли инфоповод социально значимым, если журналист едет на него только ради фуршета?

  1. Да47%
  2. Нет19%
  3. Единая Россия33%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Aug 2026, 11:17 UTCAnonymous Poll424 voters

Самоцензура

  1. У меня бывает91%
  2. У меня не бывает9%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 15 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 49,036 of 1,481,346entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Журналистика
@dddjournalism · 130,906
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 August 2026
ПроСМИсь
@prosmis · 100,892
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 15 August 2026
Работа в медиа
@dddwork · 102,025
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Журналисты и медийщики” (@mediatusovka), 18,661 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mediatusovka.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.