Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for PRexplore

Channel

PRexplore

@prexplore

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,916subscribers

+955 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001081004414
TypeChannel
Username@prexplore
DescriptionКанал про технологии, PR и медиа. Все, что нужно знать о диджитал трендах и новых инструментах. 👉 Новости и пресс-релизы — [email protected] По вопросам сотрудничества — @prexplore_bot При поддержке PREX.RU
Created23 August 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/prexplore

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,9508,9168,4335 August 2026 — 7,961 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,961 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,959 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,956 subscribers15 August 2026 — 7,950 subscribers18 August 2026 — 7,977 subscribers21 August 2026 — 8,064 subscribers28 August 2026 — 8,144 subscribers30 August 2026 — 8,181 subscribers3 September 2026 — 8,246 subscribers8 September 2026 — 8,248 subscribers12 September 2026 — 8,449 subscribers16 September 2026 — 8,495 subscribers1 October 2026 — 8,604 subscribers8 October 2026 — 8,725 subscribers13 October 2026 — 8,754 subscribers17 October 2026 — 8,751 subscribers23 October 2026 — 8,745 subscribers25 October 2026 — 8,755 subscribers28 October 2026 — 8,760 subscribers31 October 2026 — 8,798 subscribers4 November 2026 — 8,848 subscribers7 November 2026 — 8,899 subscribers11 November 2026 — 8,916 subscribers5 August 202611 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 97 days, net +955. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,805–9,061 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 00:208,916+17
7 Nov 2026, 08:598,899+51
4 Nov 2026, 05:578,848+50
31 Oct 2026, 19:108,798+38
28 Oct 2026, 18:198,760+5
25 Oct 2026, 20:578,755+10
23 Oct 2026, 03:178,745-6
17 Oct 2026, 03:498,751-3
13 Oct 2026, 18:088,754+29
8 Oct 2026, 03:188,725+121
1 Oct 2026, 13:368,604+109
16 Sept 2026, 13:188,495+46
12 Sept 2026, 09:558,449+201
8 Sept 2026, 03:568,248+2
3 Sept 2026, 08:178,246+65
30 Aug 2026, 20:398,181+37
28 Aug 2026, 01:268,144+80
21 Aug 2026, 08:078,064+87
18 Aug 2026, 11:467,977+27
15 Aug 2026, 19:587,950first reading

Engagement

79 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.9%
avg views ÷ 8,916 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,860
34 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.01%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
34
of 79 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held79 (17 July 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total63,330
Reactions total1,276
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 12:34 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,250
Videos
≈63
Links
≈2,710

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 01s
Average length
1m 01s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3,525 reactions across 78 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,59945.4%
🔥51514.6%
❤3499.90%
🤝3058.65%
👏1664.71%
🤔1333.77%
💅1173.32%
😈892.52%
❤‍🔥571.62%
😁431.22%
👎401.13%
🥴240.681%
💯230.652%
🎉130.369%
🌚120.34%
😱80.227%
🙈50.142%
🤩50.142%
👾40.113%
👨‍💻30.085%
10 further kinds150.426%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 79 of the 79 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,566 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 79 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 79 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @prexplore. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 79 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 7 of 34 posts held from the last 30 days (20.6%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 13:46 UTC≈1,910 views21 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Рекламный рынок может выдохнуть, хотя и не до конца: штрафовать за рекламу в Telegram с 1 января 2027 года, скорее всего, не начнут. 😅 Как сообщает канал «Пост-» со ссылкой на источник в аппарате правительства, переходный период продлится дольше, чем обещала ФАС. Если не случится форс-мажора, для рекламодателей и владельцев каналов в новом году ничего не изменится. Напомним, в марте ФАС объявила переходный период дл…

👍15❤‍🔥3❤1🌚1🤬1

8 Nov 2026, 17:45 UTC≈1,920 views57 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Пять стадий согласования пресс-релиза Элизабет Кюблер-Росс, автор знаменитых пяти стадий принятия, такого не описывала, но ей и не приходилось сверять цитату спикера с юристами. 1️⃣ Отрицание. «Да тут нечего согласовывать, отправим в обед». 2️⃣ Гнев. Юристы вычеркнули цифры, маркетинг вписал «лидер рынка». 3️⃣ Торг. «Давайте без цитаты спикера, но с его фото». 4️⃣ Депрессия. Версия final_v7_точно_финал.docx. 5️…

👍26😁9🔥8💯5❤4🤩3🤔2

8 Nov 2026, 10:43 UTC≈1,790 views40 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Говорящая голова в буквальном смысле: китайское агентство «Синьхуа» показало «первых в мире» бионических роботов-ведущих новостей. Синьюй и Синьянь сделаны в человеческий рост, с искусственной кожей, мимикой и «эмоциональной» языковой моделью, а над их внешностью работал не кто-нибудь, а режиссёр Чжан Имоу, автор «Героя» и «Дома летающих кинжалов». Дебют состоялся на Всемирном медиасаммите в Пекине, собирали роботов …

👍14🔥10🤔9👎3😁2❤1👾1

8 Nov 2026, 08:15 UTC≈2,220 views48 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Классика, которую стоит показывать студентам PR-факультетов. Или, наоборот, прятать от них, тут как посмотреть. В «Плутовстве» Барри Левинсона (1997) президента США меньше чем за две недели до выборов ловят на секс-скандале, и в Белый дом вызывают кризисного консультанта (Роберт Де Ниро). Он не оправдывается и не опровергает, а меняет повестку: вместе с голливудским продюсером (Дастин Хоффман) сочиняет войну с Албан…

👍22❤10🔥7💯4😁3🤔1🥴1

7 Nov 2026, 19:46 UTC≈1,900 views36 reactions6 Starsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Чистосердечное признание смягчает наказание и к тому же неплохо продаётся: в 2012 году Райан Холидей, тогда директор по маркетингу American Apparel, выпустил книгу «Верьте мне — я лгу! Откровения медиаманипулятора». По-русски она вышла годом позже в «Азбуке-Бизнес», и на выходных её самое время достать с полки. Холидей на кейсах из собственной практики разбирает схему, которую назвал «торговлей вверх по цепочке»: вб…

❤17👍15🔥2👏1🤔1

6 Nov 2026, 11:15 UTC≈1,850 views33 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Отечественные видеоплатформы начали переманивать авторов не охватами, а рублём, заметил Лобушкин. Агентство Krasavin Media Group, которое продюсирует блогеров и звёзд, подвело итоги полугода работы с RUTUBE: CPM, по их словам, оказался выше, чем на YouTube «даже в лучшие годы, до 2021-го», а выплаты приходят стабильно каждый месяц. Порог входа у площадок тоже разный. RUTUBE пускает в монетизацию после двух публичных…

👍16❤8👏6🔥2🤔1

6 Nov 2026, 07:57 UTC≈1,900 views51 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Пиарщикам, которые поручают нейросети комментарии спикеров, пора пересчитать риски: каждый пятый журналист деловых СМИ прекращает работу с тем, кто прислал сгенерированный текст, выяснила Ирина Питерсон, автор канала «Честное PR-нерское». А трое из четырёх просто не возьмут ИИ-комментарий или колонку от спикера. Проблема не надуманная: ИИ-тексты хотя бы изредка получают больше 90% опрошенных, почти 40% говорят, что …

👍25🔥15💯6🤔3❤2

5 Nov 2026, 12:13 UTC≈1,840 views43 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Детекторы ИИ дошли до картинок: Pangram, прославившийся распознаванием сгенерированных текстов, выпустил модели для фото и видео. Это тот самый стартап, чей инструмент весной насчитал около 9% ИИ-статей в СМИ. Image 1.0 проверяет снимки и рисует тепловую карту: где именно в настоящей фотографии поработала нейросеть. Image Flash 1.0 покадрово разбирает видео. Цифры впечатляют: 99,2% пойманных ИИ-картинок при 0,27% ло…

👍23🔥8👏4🤔4❤3👎1

5 Nov 2026, 06:48 UTC≈1,720 views19 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Anthropic снова переобулся в воздухе: компания, которая доказывала, что учить ИИ на чужих текстах можно и без оплаты, впервые заплатила новостному издателю. Как выяснилось, накануне промежуточных выборов в США Anthropic заключила лицензионную сделку с Associated Press, и в ночь голосования Claude отвечал на вопросы о результатах свежими данными со ссылкой на агентство. Условия и сроки не раскрываются, сами компании …

👍7🤔6❤2👏2😁1😈1

4 Nov 2026, 06:04 UTC≈1,910 views44 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Красиво говорит, значит, умный: коммуникационщики из нидерландского Радбаудского университета выяснили, что гладкая речь прощает чат-боту почти всё, включая выдуманные факты. Участникам эксперимента показывали переписку пользователя с ботом о «Властелине колец» в одной из четырёх версий: бот отвечал либо живо и по-человечески, либо сухо и по-деловому, а факты у него были либо верные, либо с аккуратно подмешанной выд…

👍21👎7🔥5🤔5❤3🥴1😡1😱1

3 Nov 2026, 18:15 UTC≈1,640 views24 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Отработали кризис, извинились, подождали, пока всё забудется, и успокоились? А зря. Нейросеть не забыла: австралийское агентство Sefiani (входит в Clarity Global) выяснило, что ИИ-поиск охотно достаёт из архива давно закрытые утечки данных. Причём ровно тогда, когда клиент решает, можно ли компании доверять. Взяли три организации с крупными утечками, урегулированными несколько лет назад, и прогнали по 30 запросов на…

🤔8❤6👍3🔥3👎2🤬1😱1

3 Nov 2026, 16:17 UTC≈1,830 views22 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Хотели как лучше: британский Channel 4 в воскресенье показал в прайм-тайм новое гейм-шоу «Million Pound Shot» с Брэдли Уолшем, где участники рискуют собственными деньгами ради миллиона фунтов. Один из них, учитель Рис, на глазах у зала спустил тысячи, его девушка расплакалась, зрители в студии возмутились, и героев увели со сцены. После рекламной паузы Уолш раскрыл карты: это была постановка, участники и даже возмущё…

👍12🤔3❤2🔥2🌚1👎1😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 79 posts we hold for @prexplore. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

UnderПяр
@underpyar · 22,427
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 21 September 2026
Надо было вчера
@nadobulovchera · 27,814
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 13 September 2026
КиберЯР
@prbyyar · 20,347
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 26 September 2026
Есть контакт?
@estcontact · 29,426
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 9 September 2026
Недвижимый пиарщик
@prmebaby · 19,148
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 4 October 2026
Про tech и этих
@protechietich · 20,851
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 27 September 2026
Форумчанка
@forumchanka_on_air · 23,914
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 September 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PRexplore” (@prexplore), 8,916 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prexplore.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.