Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Асланов PR

@aslanovPR

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

11,665subscribers

-18 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001115569834
TypeChannel
Username@aslanovPR
DescriptionКанал Тимура Асланова о PR, медиа, рекламе, маркетинге и коммуникациях. Связаться: @timur_aslanov Реклама в канале: http://timuraslanov.ru/telegram Тимур Асланов – бизнес-тренер, бизнес-спикер, автор книг, главный редактор журнала "Пресс-служба"
Created8 July 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/aslanovPR

Growth

11,66411,68311,673.55 August 2026 — 11,683 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,683 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,682 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,681 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,673 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,674 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,669 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,664 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,665 subscribers11,6655 August 202612 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 6 days, net -18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,661–11,686 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 07:4211,665+1
11 Aug 2026, 07:5411,664-5
10 Aug 2026, 04:3711,669-5
9 Aug 2026, 08:0711,674+1
8 Aug 2026, 10:5511,673-8
7 Aug 2026, 12:1511,681-1
6 Aug 2026, 14:2511,682-1
6 Aug 2026, 02:3511,683no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:0611,683first reading

Engagement

35 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.03%
avg views ÷ 11,665 subscribers
Avg views / post
354
35 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.28%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
35
of 35 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 33 of 35 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held35 (31 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total12,376
Reactions total153
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 03:58 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
8,480
Videos
582
Links
2,810

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

137 reactions across 29 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍4935.8%
4532.8%
🔥2014.6%
❤‍🔥107.30%
😁75.11%
💯21.46%
🤔21.46%
👏10.73%
🥱10.73%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 153reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 14:59 UTC124 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Каналов в телеграме сегодня великое множество. Как находить те, которые действительно полезны вам? 1. Подписываться на каналы людей, которых вы знаете. 2. Изучать подборки каналов, сделанные по определенному тематическому принципу. Коллеги подготовили очередную папку, посвященную одной из самых актуальных тем современности — коммуникациям в сфере пиара и политики. 📢 Посмотрите, изучите, подпишитесь, почитайте. По

12 Aug 2026, 06:47 UTC175 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @speakerN1Photo

Три модели парных публичных выступлений, которые реально работают Продолжаю серию про парные выступления. В прошлом посте мы говорили о том, почему они обычно проваливаются. Сегодня же обсудим, как избежать провала. Для успешного парного выступления нам нужно четко определить роли спикеров и закрепить их за ними. Вот три модели, которые мы отрабатываем со спикерами на моих тренингах. И отлично применяем потом на пр

2

12 Aug 2026, 05:16 UTC196 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Установилась хорошая летная погода #обложкадня от журнала "Крокодил" за август 1959 года посвящена намечавшемуся обмену визитами руководителей СССР и США Никиты Хрущёва и Дуайта Эйзенхауэра. 3 августа 1959 года официально объявили, что Хрущёв посетит Соединённые Штаты, а Эйзенхауэр затем приедет с ответным визитом в Советский Союз. Для периода холодной войны это воспринималось как признак заметного улучшения отноше

🔥1

11 Aug 2026, 10:48 UTC244 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @speakerN1Photo

Почему парные выступления спикеров обычно проваливаются CEO и коммерческий директор выходят на сцену деловой конференции. Изначальный план: «расскажем в диалоге, будет живо, зал вовлечётся». Реальность: через 10 минут аудитория уже не понимает, кто из них ведёт и о чём вообще речь. Через 20 минут все уходят в телефоны. Я видел десятки таких сцен за 15 лет проведения деловых и обучающих мероприятий. И почти каждый р

❤‍🔥51

11 Aug 2026, 07:03 UTC227 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Андрей Ермошкин: лучше быть интересным, чем правильным! Как увеличить шансы вашей заявки на конкурс корпоративных СМИ? Какой критерий может стать решающим в глазах представителей экспертного совета конкурса? Сегодня говорим об этом с исполнительным директором Digital-агентства "Интериум", руководителем Комитета по международным связям АКОС Андреем Ермошкиным. – На что вы в первую очередь обращаете внимание при оцен

3👍1

11 Aug 2026, 05:16 UTC268 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

#обложкадня Playboy, август 1975. Немецкое издание. Очень крутая обложка, с моей точки зрения. Здесь нет лица. Нет имени модели крупным шрифтом. Нет обнаженной женской груди или других запретных плодов. Есть загорелый живот, расстёгнутая молния джинсов и рука с ярко-красным маникюром, которая тянет её вниз. Кадрирование обрезает всё лишнее и оставляет зрителя ровно в той точке, где начинается интрига. Это работа на

❤‍🔥3👏1

10 Aug 2026, 14:36 UTC460 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Как бесплатно попасть на нашу конференцию "СММ-ПРОРЫВ-2026"? Конференция пройдет в Москве 19-21 августа 2026 года. Если вы очень хотите стать участником, но у вас нет бюджета на билет, есть одна возможность, которую можно использовать – стать волонтером оргкомитета. Если вы читаете мой канал, вы знаете, что я время от времени даю своим подписчикам разные интересные возможности.; Конференция – это всегда много орга

👍2

10 Aug 2026, 05:16 UTC291 views9 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Августовский номер British Vogue 1981 года вышел накануне свадьбы принца Чарльза и леди Дианы Спенсер, состоявшейся 29 июля. Vogue выпускает номер с портретом Дианы на обложке и небольшой строкой: The Day of the Wedding. Что особенно интересно: журнал почти ничего не делает, чтобы усилить драматизм события. Никаких гигантских заголовков. Никакого «Свадьба века!». Никаких десятков анонсов вокруг лица. Практически

👍7❤‍🔥2

9 Aug 2026, 05:16 UTC297 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

#обложкадня от журнала Ray Gun за август 1997 года, специальный выпуск о кино и музыке. На обложке – режиссёр Вим Вендерс и Майкл Стайп из R.E.M. – Можно ли закрыть название журнала фотографией? – Можно ли разорвать логотип на две строки? – Можно ли напечатать анонсы так, чтобы их пришлось буквально расшифровывать? Ray Gun отвечал на все эти вопросы: да. Огромное RAYGUN не помещается в строку, буквы перекрывают лиц

5

8 Aug 2026, 07:16 UTC639 views12 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Пиар не продаёт. Маркетинг не продаёт. А бизнес всё равно требует лиды. Что делать и где деньги? В новом выпуске подкаста «PR-директор» у меня в гостях Кристина Ляпцева – директор по маркетингу и партнёр AGIMA. Мы поговорили о том, почему привычное разделение на PR, маркетинг и продажи в сложном B2B уже не актуально. Если сделка длится 9 месяцев, год или полтора, попробуйте потом доказать, что контракт случился и

🔥63👍2🤔1

8 Aug 2026, 05:16 UTC331 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

#обложкадня от журнала TIME, 8 августа 1960 года. Тут нет ничего случайного. Ярко-красный фон, портреты – всё работает на задачу. В центре – Че Гевара. Нарисованный портрет, а не фотография: TIME тогда славился рисованными обложками, где художник мог подчеркнуть то, что не даст объектив. И он подчёркивает. Че смотрит слегка в сторону, чуть улыбается, он расслаблен, уверен, обаятелен. Звезда на берете, оливковая фор

🔥1

7 Aug 2026, 17:32 UTC298 views7 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Всем веселой пятницы и отличных выходных! 😜

😁7

Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @aslanovPR. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@aslanovPR edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Aug 2026, 20:54 UTCAnonymous Quiz117 voters

ПРОВЕРЬ СЕБЯ. В каком примере нет ошибки в пунктуации?

  1. Вместо того, чтобы ответить, он просто от меня отвернулся20%
  2. Мы приехали заранее, однако, у входа уже была длинная очередь20%
  3. Вы не подскажете где здесь банкомат?5%
  4. Подумайте на какой вопрос вы хотите найти ответ3%
  5. Он не помнил ни что он сказал, ни кому30%
  6. Подъезжая к станции , поезд замедлил ход23%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 43,053 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Асланов PR” (@aslanovPR), 11,665 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aslanovPR.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.