Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for НЕпросто PR🦧🧉

Channel

НЕпросто PR🦧🧉

@prforlove

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,549subscribers

+272 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001715218266
TypeChannel
Username@prforlove
Created6 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/prforlove

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 46% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,2776,5586,417.56 August 2026 — 6,277 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,277 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,280 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,289 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,282 subscribers15 August 2026 — 6,321 subscribers18 August 2026 — 6,314 subscribers21 August 2026 — 6,313 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,302 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,295 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,315 subscribers8 September 2026 — 6,323 subscribers12 September 2026 — 6,309 subscribers15 September 2026 — 6,314 subscribers26 September 2026 — 6,371 subscribers5 October 2026 — 6,348 subscribers12 October 2026 — 6,427 subscribers15 October 2026 — 6,430 subscribers18 October 2026 — 6,434 subscribers21 October 2026 — 6,430 subscribers23 October 2026 — 6,503 subscribers26 October 2026 — 6,492 subscribers30 October 2026 — 6,491 subscribers2 November 2026 — 6,484 subscribers4 November 2026 — 6,537 subscribers7 November 2026 — 6,558 subscribers11 November 2026 — 6,549 subscribers6,5496 August 202611 November 2026
27 measurements spanning 97 days, net +272. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,235–6,600 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 11:366,549-9
7 Nov 2026, 18:586,558+21
4 Nov 2026, 22:496,537+53
2 Nov 2026, 01:406,484-7
30 Oct 2026, 03:066,491-1
26 Oct 2026, 19:386,492-11
23 Oct 2026, 22:256,503+73
21 Oct 2026, 02:106,430-4
18 Oct 2026, 04:116,434+4
15 Oct 2026, 04:086,430+3
12 Oct 2026, 05:586,427+79
5 Oct 2026, 05:576,348-23
26 Sept 2026, 19:416,371+57
15 Sept 2026, 19:216,314+5
12 Sept 2026, 12:176,309-14
8 Sept 2026, 03:006,323+8
2 Sept 2026, 17:026,315+20
30 Aug 2026, 19:296,295-7
25 Aug 2026, 03:156,302-11
21 Aug 2026, 23:266,313first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.94%
avg views ÷ 6,549 subscribers
Avg views / post
389
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.91%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 26 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held26 (28 July 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total5,447
Reactions total213
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Nov 2026, 09:56 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 27s
Average length
1m 09s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

281 reactions across 23 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤10637.7%
🔥7526.7%
🤣2910.3%
👍165.69%
🎉103.56%
😁82.85%
👏72.49%
🤓62.14%
❤‍🔥51.78%
😍41.42%
🤗41.42%
🫡41.42%
🤡20.712%
🍓10.356%
💊10.356%
💩10.356%
🕊10.356%
😎10.356%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 299 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 15 posts held from the last 30 days (40.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

8 Nov 2026, 17:10 UTC164 views3 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Video

Пост по мотивам популярных мультфильмов, у себя в соц сетях разместил президент Америки Дональд Трамп… Что на видео? Прославление России, Дагестанских бойцов или попытка унизить демократов до конца непонятно, но выглядит зрелищно🤔

❤3

7 Nov 2026, 07:09 UTC183 views12 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Книжный клуб #PRMSK. Очная встреча с PR-писателями. Это было бомбяо. Мы могнули и не раз 😂 Друзья, спасибо всем, кто пришел. Также спасибо всем тем, кто не дошел, ибо мест хватило тютелька в тютельку 🤭 Тот случай, когда завидовал сам себе. Очень душевные и приятные получились у нас посиделки. Отдельная благодарность всем спикерам. Провести в дружной компании #PRMsK вечер пятницы с 19.00 до 21.45 - это дорогого сто…

❤6❤‍🔥3🔥3

4 Nov 2026, 07:46 UTC393 views20 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

❤️Такого для пиарщиков еще никто не делал. Дни PR посвященные 35-летию РАСО назначены, спикеры объявлены! Высший уровень коммуникаций. Приоритетная регистрация для действующих членов ассоциации, кого еще нет в списках предлагаю использовать шанс, чтобы стать частью главного PR-события десятилетия. Подробности 🫶

❤8🔥7😁4💩1

3 Nov 2026, 14:09 UTC381 views16 reactionsread 9 November 2026

Posted without readable text

🤣11😁3❤‍🔥2

2 Nov 2026, 08:08 UTC455 views12 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Хороший пиарщик должен уметь показывать свою компанию/бренд/персону под правильным углом. Это касается, как проблемных зон и недостатков, так и преимуществ. Главное не путайте с врать/лгать/пиздить, это другое!

🤣5🔥4❤3

30 Oct 2026, 09:06 UTC518 views19 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Video

26 октября я, как председатель рабочей группы по детской медиабезопасности при комитете Госдумы по защите семьи, выступил на круглом столе. Говорил(более подробно у коллеги) несколько минут о текстах и образах популярных у молодежи артистов, ротации и алгоритмах. Дальше включилась медиамашина. На видео скролл мониторинга с упоминанием именно меня. Две минуты листания, и это далеко не всё. Как разгонялся инфоповод: …

❤10👏7🤡2

29 Oct 2026, 06:43 UTC376 views13 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Чему сегодня нужно учиться пиарщику? Работать с репутацией, понимать аудиторию, выстраивать коммуникации — задачи знакомые. Но инструменты меняются, а вместе с ними и требования к специалистам. Где обмениваться опытом в этой сфере? У моих друзей из Мастерской новых медиа как раз стартовал конкурсный отбор на обучение в 2027 году. Одно из трёх направлений — «Связи с общественностью» — посвящено работе с репутацией…

🔥5❤4🍓1👍1🤓1😎1

28 Oct 2026, 16:27 UTC342 views18 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Иногда пиарщик приходит уже после того, как все случилось В новом PRофайле говорим с Юрием Нестеренко, владельцем агентства «НЕпросто PR» и автором одноименного канала. Разобрали антикризисный кейс, который начался с переписки, поговорили о работе с негативом, устаревающих инструментах и проектах, которые хочется делать без оглядки на бюджет. Читаем и учимся, коллеги! И вообще просто подпишись! ❤TG ❤Max ❤️#PRофай…

🔥6👍5😍4❤2💊1

27 Oct 2026, 17:50 UTC370 views15 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

Только путь добра найдет пароль от дна

🔥10❤5

24 Oct 2026, 07:58 UTC430 views9 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

🖤 5 ноября в Москве — Конференция Brand Analytics 2026 За год многое из того, на что опирались коммуникации и маркетинг, сдвинулось — от того, где теперь аудитория, до роли нейросетей в выборе бренда. Собрали программу этого года вокруг вопросов, на которые пока нет готовых ответов. О чём будем говорить: 🔹 Где теперь аудитория и куда вести бюджеты — исследование «Соцсети России, осень 2026» и дискуссия с цифровыми…

❤4👍3🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @prforlove. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @prforlove as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
12 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
12 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
4 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

КиберЯР
@prbyyar · 20,347
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 26 September 2026
Форумчанка
@forumchanka_on_air · 23,914
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 September 2026
UnderПяр
@underpyar · 22,427
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 21 September 2026
Журналисты и медийщики
@mediatusovka · 18,784
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 5 October 2026
Надо было вчера
@nadobulovchera · 27,814
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 13 September 2026
Есть контакт?
@estcontact · 29,426
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 9 September 2026
Недвижимый пиарщик
@prmebaby · 19,148
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 4 October 2026
Про tech и этих
@protechietich · 20,851
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 27 September 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“НЕпросто PR🦧🧉” (@prforlove), 6,549 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prforlove.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.