Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

НЕпросто PR🦧🧉

@prforlove

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,282subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001715218266
TypeChannel
Username@prforlove
DescriptionНеобычный взгляд на тренды, новости, экспертные мнения с рынка PR. От эксперта по интегрированным коммуникациям Юрия НЕстеренко, с любовью❤️ @neprostoPR
Created6 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/prforlove

Growth

6,2776,2896,2836 August 2026 — 6,277 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,277 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,280 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,289 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,282 subscribers6,2826 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,275–6,291 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 01:436,282-7
9 Aug 2026, 07:126,289+9
6 Aug 2026, 10:006,280+3
6 Aug 2026, 03:216,277no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:526,277first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.36%
avg views ÷ 6,282 subscribers
Avg views / post
462
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.69%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held11 (28 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total5,084
Reactions total86
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 04:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,570
Videos
98
Links
776

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

68 reactions across 9 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2536.8%
🔥1725.0%
🤣1319.1%
👍710.3%
🤓57.35%
😁11.47%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 86reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 15:38 UTC246 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Кате Чаковской, PR-директору журнала Москвичка желаю скорейшего выздоровления! Молюсь, чтобы все было хорошо.

9

7 Aug 2026, 14:12 UTC336 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @prrussiaPhoto

🫣 Колобок прокатился мимо зрителей в кинотеатрах Если вы хотели узнать, как своими руками закопать собственную премьеру, доставайте блокноты и учитесь у создателей фильма «Последний богатырь. Колобок». Что произошло и почему все спорят: Прокат нового «Человека-паука» в России сдвинули на две недели ради отечественной киносказки. Стратегия дистрибьютора вызвала волну негатива, которая быстро переросла в хейт команд

👍7🤓52

7 Aug 2026, 06:18 UTC354 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Иногда хочется сделать простое сложным, а сложное простым) На одном фото целых 2 ведущих Федеральных Каналов, 2 блогера, 1 президент ассоциации блогеров, 1 психолог, 1 пиарщик и 4 члена рабочей группы по детской медиа безопасности при Комитете Госдумы по Защите Семьи.

🔥3🤣1

6 Aug 2026, 15:20 UTC339 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Всякий знает, что, хоть он расподличайся, никто ему спасибо не скажет и не даст ни 5 рублей – так лучше ж даром быть благородным человеком. А.Пушкин, Российский писатель, пиарщик 1825 год, август 26 лет

4🤣4

5 Aug 2026, 08:59 UTC346 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня день начался великолепно. Ассоциация Менеджеров России провела заключительную верификационную встречу главного рейтинга страны ТОП-1000, которая проходила в охрененном бутик-отеле Cosmos на Новом Арбате. На ней мы увидели тех кто в скором времени появится на главной странице ИД Коммерсантъ в разделе высшие руководители. Благодарю сердечно организаторов и особенно директора по развитию АМР Максима Черноусова

5🔥3

31 Jul 2026, 12:58 UTC432 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

💜Вот эти красивые люди в авангарде PR-десанта тряхнули стариной на Loud в День Пиарщика. Было полезно и очень интересно. Скоро продолжим 🩷

🔥53

29 Jul 2026, 12:07 UTC621 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Я в последнее время часто оказываюсь в офисах партнеров, клиентов, друзей. У кого-то пицца по пятницам, у кого-то психолог, массажист и тренажерка. У моих друзей из ДЗЕН больше всего люблю начинать день со свежевымытого сока, а у РБК с чашки кофе из Кофемании. Кстати уже встречал корты для тенниса и падла, волны для серфа и астрологов с раскладчиками карт ТАРО. Чтобы понять кто же лучший всех заботиться о здоровье

2🔥2

29 Jul 2026, 09:39 UTC377 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Предлагаю вместо блокировки ТГ для взрослых, ограничить детям ВК. Через год гарантирую рост экономики и прочие блага.

🤣8😁1

29 Jul 2026, 08:27 UTC≈410 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Представители этой профессии втрое чаще ассоциируют свою работу с жизнью и любовью, чем с ненавистью 🫶Сегодня в Exit Loft Москва состоится вечеринка в честь дня пиарщика. На ней охрененно тусанём. 🩷Это безусловное счастье, а про другие эмоции пиарщиков можно почитать в исследовании моих друзей из Brand Analytics.

28 Jul 2026, 16:26 UTC≈283 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Продолжаем наш марафон Ностальгии много не бывает, как и пиарщиков. Поэтому делимся ещё одной порцией архивных снимков. Теперь официально можно поздравить всех коллег! Сегодня наш день. Светлана Баранова – директор департамента по связям с общественностью в Ассоциация менеджеров. Лиля Глазова – генеральный директор исследовательской компании «PR News», доцент Школы коммуникаций НИУ ВШЭ, вице-президент РАСО. Юрий

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @prforlove. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 67,986 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“НЕпросто PR🦧🧉” (@prforlove), 6,282 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prforlove.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.