Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Security Wine (бывший - DevSecOps Wine)

Channel

Security Wine (бывший - DevSecOps Wine)

@sec_devops

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,051subscribers

-73 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001479110870
TypeChannel
Username@sec_devops
Descriptionhttps://radcop.online/ "Security everywhere!" 🐛🦋Канал, в котором публикуются материалы о "выращивании" безопасности в организации (а начиналось все с безопасного DevOps и shift security left!) По всем вопросам: @surmatmg
Created26 December 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/sec_devops

Topic

Hacking & security — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,0517,1367,093.56 August 2026 — 7,124 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,124 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,126 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,123 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,122 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,129 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,130 subscribers22 August 2026 — 7,136 subscribers25 August 2026 — 7,135 subscribers28 August 2026 — 7,134 subscribers31 August 2026 — 7,131 subscribers3 September 2026 — 7,123 subscribers8 September 2026 — 7,117 subscribers12 September 2026 — 7,108 subscribers16 September 2026 — 7,110 subscribers30 September 2026 — 7,092 subscribers7 October 2026 — 7,103 subscribers16 October 2026 — 7,074 subscribers19 October 2026 — 7,067 subscribers26 October 2026 — 7,075 subscribers28 October 2026 — 7,088 subscribers31 October 2026 — 7,091 subscribers6 November 2026 — 7,090 subscribers10 November 2026 — 7,051 subscribers6 August 202610 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 96 days, net -73. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,038–7,149 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 07:477,051-39
6 Nov 2026, 21:377,090-1
31 Oct 2026, 17:267,091+3
28 Oct 2026, 17:117,088+13
26 Oct 2026, 01:477,075+8
19 Oct 2026, 18:277,067-7
16 Oct 2026, 08:207,074-29
7 Oct 2026, 05:007,103+11
30 Sept 2026, 12:417,092-18
16 Sept 2026, 11:567,110+2
12 Sept 2026, 17:367,108-9
8 Sept 2026, 23:377,117-6
3 Sept 2026, 21:577,123-8
31 Aug 2026, 21:357,131-3
28 Aug 2026, 20:137,134-1
25 Aug 2026, 09:347,135-1
22 Aug 2026, 20:057,136+6
19 Aug 2026, 08:157,130+1
16 Aug 2026, 13:467,129+7
13 Aug 2026, 03:247,122first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 20 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 28 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.7%
avg views ÷ 7,051 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,880
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.798%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held23 (20 September 2024 – 9 November 2026)
Views total3,760
Reactions total30
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 18:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
282
Videos
1
Links
497

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

456 reactions across 21 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍21948.0%
🔥7115.6%
❤7015.4%
🥴183.95%
👏173.73%
🤡143.07%
😁132.85%
🤯81.75%
🫡81.75%
✍51.10%
💩51.10%
👎30.658%
😨20.439%
🍾10.219%
💯10.219%
🙏10.219%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 456 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 20 September 2024 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 3 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

9 Nov 2026, 05:36 UTCviews —

Security Wine (бывший - DevSecOps Wine) pinned «Security Wine. Возвращения в эфир пост ✅ Привет, канал. Меня зовут Рустам Гусейнов. И я устал от насильственной безопасности, когда бюджеты осваиваются ради галочки и принуждения других к прекрасному. С 2012 года прошёл путь от сержанта в военно-следственном…»

9 Nov 2026, 05:36 UTC≈1,110 views27 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Security Wine. Возвращения в эфир пост ✅ Привет, канал. Меня зовут Рустам Гусейнов. И я устал от насильственной безопасности, когда бюджеты осваиваются ради галочки и принуждения других к прекрасному. С 2012 года прошёл путь от сержанта в военно-следственном отделе до председателя кооператива: был администратором средств защиты, методологом, аудитором, CISO, продавцом, консультантом. Поэтому говорю на разных языках…

🔥9👍6🫡6❤4💩2

14 Oct 2026, 08:09 UTC≈2,650 views3 reactionsread 11 November 2026
File

Банальность и здравый смысл как точка отсчета ⏳ В суете и шуме полезно останавливаться и заземляться. Делать глубокий вдох и выдох, вспоминать банальности и "очевидные" вещи. Пока мы с вами остаемся "белковыми субъектами" наша "продуктивность" и "эффективность" принципиально ограничены биологией: сном, едой, отдыхом, необходимостью свободного времени для усвоения полученной информации. Когда-то развитие сетей связи…

❤1👍1👏1

23 Apr 2026, 14:10 UTC≈5,690 views28 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Немного об ИИшнице 🕵‍♂️ Как давно вы не размышляли об ИИ? В экосистемах, продуктах, сервисах, повседневной работе и личной эффективности - оно повсюду. Но как оно соотносится с Кибербезом и насколько нам стоит бежать/игнорировать/бояться/любить ИИшницу? Готовясь к ИБ-митапу подсобрал некоторый фактаж в презентацию "Безопасника ИИ заменить нельзя терпеть" (см. вложение с содержательными картиночками и графиками в ко…

❤16🔥5👍2💩2👎1👏1🤡1

2 Oct 2025, 14:56 UTC≈7,710 views19 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @radcop_onlinePhoto

Если вы давно не виделись с командой РАД КОП и хотели бы пообщаться с нами лично, то этот пост для вас 🕵‍♂️ Встречаемся на конференции АБИСС! 8 октября наша команда будет участвовать в ежегодной конференции ассоциации АБИСС. Эксперты Александр Осипов и Владимир Алферов выступят в роли спикера и модератора на двух сессиях. ⚪ Сессия 5: «Информационная безопасность финансовых организаций» Спикер: Александр Осипов, …

👍9🔥4🤡2❤1👏1💩1🙏1

2 Oct 2025, 14:56 UTC≈5,640 views15 reactionsread 11 November 2026

‼️ Официальное объявление ниже, в приложении. Если кратко - приходите, потусим и позагружаемся мудротой на профильной конференции по ИБ от АБИСС. Наш кооператив растет и слава богу "шапочку единственного фронтмена" можно снимать - у нас пока не "Ласковый май" с пятью составами музыкантов, но уже уверенная "рок-н-ролл банда". Конкретном мы будем говорить про трансформацию ИБ в нечто явно ценное для организаций + про б…

🤡8👍6🍾1

14 Sept 2025, 08:52 UTC≈6,360 views15 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @pro_pentest

В этом видео я показываю свой майндмэп по внешней разведке для физического пентеста. Мы разберём основные направления: OSINT — поиск информации в открытых источниках; GEOINT — анализ геолокационных данных и карт; SIGINT — перехват и анализ радиосигналов; А также вспомогательные техники, которые помогают на подготовительном этапе Red Team и физического теста на проникновение.

❤6👍3🔥3🤡3

11 Sept 2025, 07:39 UTC≈10,800 views24 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Искусство ради искусства, или чем полезна безопасность? 🪨 🖋 О проблеме результативной ИБ и ценности ИБ для организаций, сегодня в России не говорит только ленивый. Отрасль становится более зрелой. Вендоры, интеграторы и консультанты стараются развивать рынок на фоне общеэкономического кризиса и создавать спрос, несмотря на высокую ставку и другие проблемы. Профессиональное сообщество окончательно сформировалось и пр…

👍10🔥7❤5👎2

25 Jun 2025, 11:46 UTC≈8,680 views36 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Кадры решают все 🤝 Находясь на одной ESG конференции (так называется популярная в мире и России повестка: экология-общество-руководство, призванная воплотить тренды чистоты и человеколюбия на Земле) и слушая про пресловутый "дефицит кадров" вспоминаю наш путь мытарств и ошибок. 🪨 ‼️ С кадрами, как и с devsecops, отлично работает парадигма shift left. Чем раньше мы выявляем подходящего или неподходящего человека, те…

🥴18👍9❤8👏1

22 May 2025, 09:42 UTC≈7,690 views7 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Не о PHD, а об уровне развития DevOps/DevSecOps в этой стране🕵‍♂️ Пока значительная часть ИБв и всех им сочувствующих находится на PHD, мы предлагаем вашему вниманию опрос: https://anketolog.ru/service/survey/fill/extraLink/98347249/Qq2EcVbF ‼️ 🤝 Партнер кооператива РАД КОП — компания Экспресс 42 — проводит ежегодное исследование DevOps в России. Когда-то этот канал начинался как производная от DevSecOps и личной …

👍6❤1

3 Apr 2025, 08:02 UTC≈8,410 views22 reactionsread 11 November 2026

🤝 На Территории безопасности в секции Алексея Лукацкого обсуждаем "вечный вопрос" - как оценить результативность ИБ и как нашему брату коммуницировать с лицами принимающими решения 🖋 Вариант 1. Смотреть как это устроено у других (сюда же отнесем стандарты и бенчмарки), похожих на тебя, и выделять такой же бюджет, людей, средства защиты, и делать по аналогии❔ Вариант 2. Использовать риск-ориентированный подход, рисо…

👍15❤4👏2😁1

23 Feb 2025, 05:20 UTC≈9,540 views74 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Posted without readable text

👍50❤11👏7🫡2😨2💯1🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @sec_devops. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Информация опасносте
@alexmakus · 18,748
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 5 October 2026
DevOps&SRE Library
@devopslibrary · 19,870
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 30 September 2026
Devops Jobs — вакансии и резюме
@devops_jobs_feed · 22,291
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 22 September 2026
SecAtor
@true_secator · 42,213
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 29 August 2026
DevOps community for love
@devopsforlove · 44,606
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 9 September 2026
DevOps by REBRAIN
@rebrain_devops · 28,720
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 9 September 2026
Пост Лукацкого
@alukatsky · 38,465
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 31 August 2026
Codeby
@codeby_sec · 37,083
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 1 September 2026
Листок бюрократической защиты информации
@bureaucraticsecurity · 19,134
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 4 October 2026
IT STAND
@ITSTAND_ORG · 164,814
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 9 September 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Security Wine (бывший - DevSecOps Wine)” (@sec_devops), 7,051 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sec_devops.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.