гиперфикс на сливовом продолжается сумка шапочка перчатки @show_girls_irinakey
custom 530094733077671663917

Channel
@show_girls_irinakey
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,128subscribers
-279 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001296916893 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @missadrenalinK @show_girls_irinakey |
| Created | 24 October 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/show_girls_irinakey |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 10:38 | 6,128 | +6,121 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 00:08 | 7 | -6,141 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 04:19 | 6,148 | -22 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 09:54 | 6,170 | +22 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 00:39 | 6,148 | +36 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 11:45 | 6,112 | -18 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 23:16 | 6,130 | -18 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 06:29 | 6,148 | -10 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 19:56 | 6,158 | -20 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 09:17 | 6,178 | -4 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 21:14 | 6,182 | -13 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 04:38 | 6,195 | -8 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 12:22 | 6,203 | no change |
| 17 Sept 2026, 11:47 | 6,203 | -8 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 15:55 | 6,211 | -24 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 12:58 | 6,235 | -7 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 08:54 | 6,242 | -31 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 14:00 | 6,273 | -49 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 04:13 | 6,322 | -107 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 20:47 | 6,429 | first reading |
33 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 33 (5 August 2026 – 3 November 2026) |
| Views total | 3,930 |
| Reactions total | 134 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Nov 2026, 12:56 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
695 reactions across 30 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5848244520700875510 | 500 | 71.9% | |
| custom 5300947330776716639 | 121 | 17.4% | |
| custom 5276191113512760411 | 35 | 5.04% | |
| custom 5303483225497154111 | 24 | 3.45% | |
| custom 5271952865554870703 | 6 | 0.863% | |
| custom 5267395643260813115 | 5 | 0.719% | |
| custom 5278669756319154355 | 4 | 0.576% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 695 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @show_girls_irinakey. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 33 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 3 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 7 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
гиперфикс на сливовом продолжается сумка шапочка перчатки @show_girls_irinakey
custom 530094733077671663917
Trouble in paradise: в индустрии уже почти не секрет, что после 6 с лишним лет «вместе» Раф и Миучча перестали ладить. Дошло до того, что команды внутри Prada разделились: кто-то работает с Миуччей, кто-то с Рафом, и между собой они почти не пересекаются. Я по-прежнему считаю Рафа талантливейшим дизайнером, которого, к сожалению, много раз становился жертвой мискаста: для Dior он был слишком концептуальным, для Calvi…
custom 530094733077671663911custom 52761911135127604118
Как прекрасна в своей архитектурности и идее линия прет-а-порте Дома YUDASHKIN —— намеренно сдержанные и графичные силуэты без избыточного декора, то, что я особенно люблю Важный принцип производства —— отсутствие компромиссов в качестве: от лекал и посадки до выбора фурнитуры и внутренней обработки - это считывается даже по фото В скором времени запланирую визит, чтобы лично познакомиться с изделиями Как вам в…
custom 584824452070087551023custom 52673956432608131153
«К востоку от Эдема» ——— пожалуй лучший сериал, который я смотрю в этом году Осталось 3 серии и я вернусь с рефлексией. Заранее обозначу ——— мне нравится как выстроен процесс развития сюжета и смыла этой картины. Забегая вперед скажу лишь одно, для меня в этой картине нет главного злодея, нет плохого героя, потому что я понимаю каждого и понимаю из каких побуждений они делали свой выбор Вы смотрели / смотрите с…
custom 530094733077671663913
Так забавно наблюдать как маркетологи делают из нас идиотов, которые бесятся жиру и уже не знают что эдакого прикупить, чтобы максимально подчеркнуть степень собственного идиотизма (?) ——— что ж, работа у них такая Я все еще не могу понять для себя ПРЕШАМПУНИ, как выясняется, что к ПРЕШАМПУНЯМ, можно прикупить ПАРФЮМЕРНЫЙ ПРАЙМЕР т.е. база под аромат——— специальное средство (часто в виде спрея, геля или жидкости), …
custom 527619111351276041118
Девочки, я нашла какой-то по-настоящему симпатично-дофаминовый бренд —— Nineteen Four 🌟🌟 @show_girls_irinakey
custom 584824452070087551018custom 52673956432608131152
Dry Clean Only Архивная съемка i-D 2004 года Фото by Bianca Pilet Стиль by Kanako B Koga
custom 530094733077671663913custom 58482445207008755108
ОЖИДАНИЕ VS РЕАЛЬНОСТЬ Именно поэтому я не очень-то любительница покупать вещи, которые "ах, как прекрасно на подиуме и в лукбуке бренда", я, как стилист, прекрасно понимаю где будет подвох —— поэтому прежде чем купить вещь, важно посмотреть как она сидит на реальной женщине (с грудью там, бедрами, животиком, а не точеной модели, которую пригласили сняться в рекламной кампании) Образ Balenciaga
custom 530094733077671663914custom 58482445207008755102
Иной раз листаю ленту, восхищаюсь работой селебрити стилистов, а потом «хоп» и нарываешься на такие решения, от которых глазки слезой наполняются Это вот скажите, для чего в такие образы наряжать девушку? А после официальной части еще и апдейт футболкой сделать? Но ведь не осуждения ради, а для наглядности: посмотрите как работает вертикаль в верхней части образа. Как декольте облегчает портретную зону и как фут…
custom 52761911135127604119custom 52786697563191543554
У многих в И. возник вопрос: "Ирина, почему ничего не купили из одежды?" Отвечаю: потому что локальный рынок в полной мере закрывает мою потребность в покупке актуальной, качественной одежды. Да, я ради интереса зашла в ZARA, H&M STUDIO, ARKET, COS, но там настолько все пресно, скучно, в первых двух просто горы наваленной синтетической одежды, что мне даже ходить среди рейлов не хотелось В люкс зашла, но не испыт…
custom 584824452070087551030
«Что Ирина Кей купила в Европах?» Часть 2 1. Сумка Massimo Dutti 2. Аромат Diptique L'Ombre Dans L'Eau 3. Крем для рук Loewe 4. Бальзам для губ Hermes 5. Тушь для ресниц коричневая Hermes 6. Шторы ZARA 7. Кошка LEGO 🌟🌟
custom 584824452070087551022
Ух ты, а вы знали, что у бренда Saint Laurent есть дочерняя кинопроизводственная компания, созданная знаменитым французским домом моды в апреле 2023 года? Я узнала и искренне порадовалась этому потому что люблю кино —— это один из видов интеллектуального отдыха для меня Бренд стал первым в истории модным домом, который официально занялся полным циклом производства художественных фильмов. Проект инициировал креативны…
custom 584824452070087551019custom 53009473307767166393
Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @show_girls_irinakey. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Интересно, знаете ли вы свой психотип?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Был ли у вас опыт приема Оземпик / Мунджаро / Тирзетта?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 3 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“• ШОУ ГЁРЛЗ • ИРИНА КЕЙ” (@show_girls_irinakey), 6,128 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/show_girls_irinakey.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.