Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Kit

@getkit

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

21,034subscribers

-60 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001501975328
TypeChannel
Username@getkit
Description><{{{.______) Kit — это рассылка с большими текстами. Мы пишем о политике, климате, войне, технологиях, детях и многом другом. Подписывайтесь: https://getkit.news
Created10 September 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/getkit

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. They sit inside a group of 377 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (3 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@getkit/1644 · this entry7 Aug 2025, 15:30 UTC@meduzalive/1305777 Aug 2025, 16:28 UTC1.0058 minutes
@getkit/1658 · this entry3 Sept 2025, 14:23 UTC@meduzalive/1316163 Sept 2025, 14:25 UTC1.002 minutes
@getkit/1661 · this entry13 Nov 2025, 13:03 UTC@meduzalive/13438413 Nov 2025, 13:12 UTC1.0010 minutes
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@meduzalive10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0021 minuteseven

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 18 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 August 2025 to 18 March 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 377, the earliest publisher we hold is @mash. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 376 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Pavel Durov
@durov · Channel
11,232,257 subscribers
Notcoin Community
@notcoin · Channel
9,200,677 subscribers
Gram of TON
@gram · Channel
7,033,222 subscribers
Леонардо Дайвинчик
@leoday · Channel
5,502,239 subscribers
МЕМАЧ
@memachh · Channel
4,424,672 subscribers
Not Pixel Channel
@notpixel_channel · Channel
4,347,895 subscribers
Москвач • Новости Москвы
@moscowach · Channel
4,225,732 subscribers
Топор Live
@toporlive · Channel
4,072,183 subscribers
Прямой Эфир • Новости
@novosti_efir · Channel
4,033,927 subscribers
Catizen Announcement
@catizenann · Channel
3,808,247 subscribers
Wallet News
@cryptowallet_news_en · Channel
3,671,792 subscribers
Тачки и Точка
@tachki · Channel
3,664,597 subscribers
Binance Announcements
@binance_announcements · Channel
3,649,632 subscribers
Builders
@builders · Channel
3,590,321 subscribers
OKX Web3 Announcement
@okxwalletannouncement · Channel
3,571,099 subscribers
Москва - это интересно
@mskint · Channel
3,372,647 subscribers
Чё по трендам?
@trendswhat · Channel
3,370,046 subscribers
Труха⚡️Україна
@truexanewsua · Channel
3,167,312 subscribers
Первый Московский
@mosguru · Channel
3,146,089 subscribers
Mash
@mash · Channel
3,112,068 subscribers
Мир трендов
@Novosty_Glavnyei · Channel
3,059,045 subscribers
Техночат
@technomedia · Channel
3,033,961 subscribers
TRNDX.
@TRND_X · Channel
2,873,923 subscribers
Москва сегодня
@moscow · Channel
2,740,789 subscribers
Новости Москвы
@moscowmap · Channel
2,723,573 subscribers
Мир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка"
@yurasumy · Channel
2,682,871 subscribers
Николаевский Ванёк
@vanek_nikolaev · Channel
2,669,113 subscribers
Times of Ukraine: Новини | Україна
@times_ukraina · Channel
2,639,303 subscribers
Техномотель
@technomotel · Channel
2,636,502 subscribers
Московская Хроника
@mosnews · Channel
2,462,078 subscribers
Москва 24/7
@msk7days · Channel
2,223,004 subscribers
Невероятно, но факт…
@N_NO_F · Channel
2,210,076 subscribers
Architecton Wallet MEDIA ARC🦄
@architecton_tech · Channel
2,207,960 subscribers
Yescoin Foundation
@therealyescoin · Channel
2,207,523 subscribers
INSIDER UA
@insiderukr · Channel
2,168,347 subscribers
ЖЕСТЬ ВИДЕО | ЧП 18+
@voinarev · Channel
2,119,135 subscribers
Readovka
@readovkanews · Channel
2,014,818 subscribers
Автомания
@auto_manya · Channel
2,010,452 subscribers
Раньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · Channel
1,972,542 subscribers
DeCenter — блокчейн, биткоин, инвестиции
@DeCenter · Channel
1,963,428 subscribers
LIVE — Telegram, AI и технологии
@tlive · Channel
1,879,229 subscribers
Москва Live
@msk_live · Channel
1,823,709 subscribers
Дмитрий Медведев
@medvedev_telegram · Channel
1,717,717 subscribers
Анатолий Шарий
@asupersharij · Channel
1,655,013 subscribers
Осторожно, новости
@ostorozhno_novosti · Channel
1,609,168 subscribers
Лачен пише
@lachentyt · Channel
1,564,655 subscribers
Україна Online: Новини | Політика
@UaOnlii · Channel
1,561,387 subscribers
Рыбарь
@rybar · Channel
1,545,838 subscribers
Baza
@bazabazon · Channel
1,543,278 subscribers
Реальний Київ | Украина
@kievreal1 · Channel
1,536,516 subscribers

326 more channels are in this same group but not listed individually here.

Growth

21,03421,09421,0645 August 2026 — 21,094 subscribers6 August 2026 — 21,094 subscribers6 August 2026 — 21,091 subscribers7 August 2026 — 21,078 subscribers8 August 2026 — 21,069 subscribers9 August 2026 — 21,063 subscribers10 August 2026 — 21,052 subscribers11 August 2026 — 21,043 subscribers12 August 2026 — 21,034 subscribers5 August 202612 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -60. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,025–21,103 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 11:3321,034-9
11 Aug 2026, 09:1221,043-9
10 Aug 2026, 12:4121,052-11
9 Aug 2026, 15:3321,063-6
8 Aug 2026, 17:3121,069-9
7 Aug 2026, 14:1021,078-13
6 Aug 2026, 11:5221,091-3
6 Aug 2026, 02:0521,094no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:2221,094first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 7 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,200
Videos
7
Links
644

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

1,652 reactions across 18 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
53732.5%
💔39724.0%
👍20312.3%
🕊1287.75%
🐳1106.66%
😨1056.36%
👎684.12%
🔥674.06%
👾372.24%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,652reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2025 to 18 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Mar 2026, 16:33 UTC≈7,060 views153 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Kit вернулся, чтобы сообщить вам важное: телеграм блокируют Привет! В последние недели стало очевидно, что скоро телеграм в России полностью заблокируют. И случится это, вероятно, в самое ближайшее время. Поэтому мы буквально призываем вас: если вы еще не установили VPN, сделайте это сами и помогите установить его родным и близким. Сейчас как никогда важно не лишиться связи и информации. Мы подготовили очень прос

95👍32🔥13👾5💔4🕊4

30 Dec 2025, 17:02 UTC≈203,000 views108 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Как отключиться от коллективного разума? 人 ● ‿ ● 人 ● ︵ ● 人 Привет, меня зовут Александр Амзин. Я медиааналитик и ведущий телеграм-канала @themedia. Мне скоро 45, и я понимаю, что 25 лет назад — да что там, всего пять лет назад — я совсем другими глазами смотрел на реальность. И дело не в возрастных изменениях и не в том, что я, как и все мы, постепенно меняю свое мнение или узнаю больше. Просто меняется сам подход

64👍24🐳12👎3🕊3😨2

29 Dec 2025, 15:49 UTC≈216,000 views80 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Устали от погони за лучшей жизнью? Это письмо для вас (°ε° ) В конце ноября завершился климатический саммит ООН COP30. Вопреки ожиданиям многих делегаций, участники так и не согласовали план обязательного перехода на возобновляемые источники энергии вместо угля, нефти и газа. Незадолго до саммита окоончательно стало понятно, что цель Парижского соглашения — удержать прирост средней глобальной температуры ниже полу

🐳38👍15👎97🔥5😨4🕊2

24 Dec 2025, 16:16 UTC≈223,000 views92 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Все вокруг овершерят. И я тоже?! Что делать? (⸝⸝⸝>﹏<⸝⸝⸝) Привет! Меня зовут Ася Амерханова, я журналистка и редакторка. Люди часто рассказывают мне свои истории — веселые, грустные, личные. С одной стороны, я всегда стараюсь быть чуткой и дать человеку высказаться. С другой — иногда это случается так внезапно, что застает врасплох. Словно кто-то резко перемотал кинопленку: вот мы обсуждали погоду, еду и сериалы, а

40👍19👎16🐳8🕊5👾4

20 Nov 2025, 10:41 UTC≈8,960 views73 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @meduzalive

Плагин «Медузы» для браузера — новый способ читать нас в обход блокировок. Сделали его с ❤️ и специально для вас! Две главные фишки плагина: 1. Он для тех, кто предпочитать читать «Медузу» с компьютера или не предпочитает, но делает так, потому что мобильный интернет не работает. 2. Он открывает «Медузу» без VPN — не важно, будете ли вы читать наши материалы через плагин или все же решите зайти на сайт. Не будем

🔥4223🐳5😨2👍1

13 Nov 2025, 13:03 UTC≈190,000 views97 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Помогает ли психотерапия, когда живешь в диктатуре? ヾ(`ヘ´)ノ゙ Привет, меня зовут Вадим, и я из России. Я не живу в Курске или Белгороде (или тем более в украинских городах) и не сталкиваюсь с войной физически. Поэтому понимаю, что мои переживания о ней могут выглядеть нелепо для тех, кто вынужден несколько раз на дню бросать все и бежать в укрытие. Но мне все равно тяжело от того, что страна, которую я люблю и граж

52🕊25👍9🐳4👎3👾3😨1

24 Oct 2025, 15:58 UTC≈10,800 views58 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @meduzalive

ООН — 80 лет. Действительно ли организация совсем бесполезна? И как ее можно улучшить? Отвечает рассылка Kit 24 октября отмечается День ООН — в этот день в 1945-м вступил в силу ее Устав. Организации Объединенных Наций исполняется 80 лет, однако очевидно, что с основной своей целью — поддержанием мира — она не справилась. Войны разгораются одна за другой, и уже десятки лет идут разговоры о бесполезности организации

30🐳14👍9😨3👾2

3 Sept 2025, 14:23 UTC≈199,000 views108 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Почему нельзя просто взять и посадить триллион деревьев? ᨒ↟ 𖠰𖥧˚ Привет! Меня зовут Ася Амерханова, я журналистка и редакторка. Возможно, вы, как и я, замечали, что люди ПОСТОЯННО высаживают деревья — и даже соревнуются между собой, кто больше посадит. Так в 2006 году ООН запустила кампанию Billion Tree Campaign с простой задачей — посадить миллиард деревьев по всему миру. Цели достигли всего за год. Вскоре планка

46🕊40👎15👾5🐳1👍1

2 Sept 2025, 09:45 UTC≈6,880 views204 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @meduzalivePhoto

Нам нужна ваша помощь. Экстренное обращение «Медузы» 4 года назад мы почти закрыли «Медузу», когда нас объявили «иноагентом». Тогда «Медузу» спасли читатели: донаты заменили нам рекламу. Та кампания просуществовала меньше года. Мы отказались от платежей из РФ, чтобы не рисковать вашей безопасностью. Теперь нас поддерживают иностранцы и россияне, живущие за границей. Этих денег никогда не хватало. Мы сочетали крауд

💔10546😨26🕊12👍6👎6🐳3

25 Aug 2025, 11:50 UTC≈7,650 views77 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @lifelongmooc

Что я узнал этим летом Собрал в своей рассылке Hypertextual (обязательно подпишитесь!) пятнадцать фактов, которые узнал в последние месяцы. Вот самые невероятные личные открытия: — Эволюция упорно продолжает создавать крабов. Крабовидная форма тела появлялась независимо как минимум пять раз за последние 250 миллионов лет. — Запах свежескошенной травы, который многие из нас так любят — это, на самом деле, сигнал бе

48👍21👾8

25 Aug 2025, 11:50 UTC≈6,190 views26 reactionsread 12 August 2026

(ᵔ.ᵔ) А вот еще одна рассылка, которую мы горячо рекомендуем. Она посвящена образованию, науке и технологиям, а ведет ее научный журналист и автор нескольких писем Kit Илья Кабанов. Одно из них, кстати, тоже посвящено научным открытиям — причем тем, которые должны если не починить, то хотя бы улучшить мир. Например, окончательной победе над гриппом или телепортации энергии.

26

18 Aug 2025, 15:55 UTC≈7,120 views36 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @meduzalive

Еще одни переговоры зашли в тупик… На этот раз — по пластиковому загрязнению. Рассылка Kit объясняет, почему это важно 15 августа завершились международные переговоры по борьбе с загрязнением пластиком. Они обернулись полным провалом. Комитет из представителей 184 стран, а также множества компаний и НКО со всего мира не смог ничего решить уже в шестой раз за три года. Рассылка Kit еще после предыдущего раунда перег

💔30👾4😨2

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @getkit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 195,191 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Kit” (@getkit), 21,034 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/getkit.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.