Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Светский хроник

@svetskyhronik

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

47,328subscribers

-59 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001822769481
TypeChannel
Username@svetskyhronik
Created18 March 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/svetskyhronik

Growth

47,32847,40747,367.56 August 2026 — 47,387 subscribers6 August 2026 — 47,387 subscribers6 August 2026 — 47,395 subscribers7 August 2026 — 47,407 subscribers8 August 2026 — 47,389 subscribers9 August 2026 — 47,380 subscribers10 August 2026 — 47,358 subscribers11 August 2026 — 47,348 subscribers12 August 2026 — 47,328 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -59. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 47,316–47,419 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 21:5647,328-20
11 Aug 2026, 21:4547,348-10
10 Aug 2026, 18:2647,358-22
9 Aug 2026, 17:0147,380-9
8 Aug 2026, 20:0347,389-18
7 Aug 2026, 18:1247,407+12
6 Aug 2026, 15:2247,395+8
6 Aug 2026, 01:4647,387no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:3747,387first reading

Engagement

75 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.2%
avg views ÷ 47,328 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,220
75 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.41%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
75
of 75 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held75 (5 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total541,280
Reactions total18,446
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 19:54 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
10m 56s
Average length
31s

Measured directly from 21 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

16,221 reactions across 64 posts, in 46 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣3,86523.8%
custom 53278829690654830803,14819.4%
😁1,4008.63%
💯1,0666.57%
🔥9746.00%
💩9715.99%
8585.29%
🙈7164.41%
👍4923.03%
custom 54543194103260278194602.84%
🤡3121.92%
custom 60330050458830796502631.62%
💊2491.54%
🤯2461.52%
😱2221.37%
🍾1550.956%
💔1020.629%
custom 5460800374241774960830.512%
custom 5393472234981445851720.444%
👎540.333%
26 further kinds5133.16%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 75 of the 75 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18,446reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 75 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 18:50 UTC≈1,910 views111 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Как админ с криками «твою мать!» затмение смотрела😂 Хроник в МАХ

🔥74custom 53278829690654830801411🤣8😱2👍1custom 53934722349814458511

12 Aug 2026, 17:50 UTC≈3,120 views231 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

На Мальдивах пахнуло искусством! Хроник в МАХ

💊89😁57custom 532788296906548308055🤣20👍32🙈2🙉2

12 Aug 2026, 16:37 UTC≈4,150 views169 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Самка переобулась. Спустя сутки после своего скандального заявления об уходе из России сообщила, что никуда не денется и выкатила покаянную православную песню. Сидя в Дубае. Пиарщики, вы что там курите? Хроник в МАХ

💩79😁38custom 545431941032602781921🍌12custom 532788296906548308010💯4🦄31

12 Aug 2026, 16:02 UTC≈4,430 views110 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Папин бродяга, мамин симпатяга *Прилучный Хроник в МАХ

💩69😁19custom 54543194103260278198🤡64custom 53278829690654830802🔥1🗿1

12 Aug 2026, 14:47 UTC≈4,990 views155 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Фильтры видите? А они есть. Скачут как блохи на утонченном стане жены Газманова Хроник в МАХ

custom 532788296906548308096🙈29🔥13👎5😁5🤣4🤯21

12 Aug 2026, 14:07 UTC≈5,370 views221 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Еще одна в Голливуде потеряла лицо. Дженна Ортега, 23 года Хроник в МАХ

😱130😭41🙈25custom 532788296906548308011👍5🤬3🤯32

12 Aug 2026, 12:21 UTC≈5,920 views145 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Самойлову теперь выдают вместе с комбо на сдачу Хроник в МАХ

💩80custom 532788296906548308036🍌11🙈10🤡32👍1🦄1

12 Aug 2026, 11:35 UTC≈6,190 views216 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Жители Мальдивска спешат испить последние запасы к приезду Волочковой. Предупрежден - значит вооружен☝️ Хроник в МАХ

🤣144custom 532788296906548308047😁143🍾3💩3custom 54543194103260278192

12 Aug 2026, 11:05 UTC≈6,240 views42 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Девы, аларм. Почему мы выбираем мужчин уровнем ниже? Админ наконец нашла нормальное объяснение без глупых советов «избавьтесь от комплексов». А главное, это не проблема, если у партнера есть вот эти 3 качества. Проверьте своего👇🏻 https://t.me/pleskacheva/1402 Похоже, Бородина это узнала еще раньше нас и теперь реально счастлива со своим Колясиком

💩258custom 53278829690654830807💯2

12 Aug 2026, 10:47 UTC≈6,600 views203 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Проша готов отстреляться за террориста Дурова Хроник в МАХ

🤣119🤡34🦄1411custom 532788296906548308010🔥7💩5💯2

12 Aug 2026, 10:12 UTC≈6,580 views510 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Очередная нимфа подбивает клинья к Тимати. Легких родов, милая! Хроник в МАХ

🤣345custom 5327882969065483080112💩37💯7🤡3custom 52021086013085690402custom 54608003742417749602🍌1

12 Aug 2026, 08:48 UTC≈6,840 views304 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Час от часу не легче. Где-то на Лазурных берегах объявили кастинг женихов для Синяка. Запойным повезло. Остальные в опасности *движение ЛГБТ признано экстремистским и запрещено в РФ Хроник в МАХ

custom 5327882969065483080128🤣106custom 545431941032602781934💩21🙈6🦄53😨1

Showing the 12 most recent of 75 posts we hold for @svetskyhronik. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 12,649 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Лера Кудрявцева
@lerakudryavtseva · 239,831
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 August 2026
Алёна, Блин!
@neopra_blin · 156,375
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 August 2026
Администрация Аншлага
@klaragavrilovnanews · 157,649
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Светский хроник” (@svetskyhronik), 47,328 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/svetskyhronik.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.