Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 43 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 576–583 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 21:01
577
-3
9 Sept 2026, 16:02
580
-2
31 Aug 2026, 04:35
582
+3
23 Aug 2026, 09:33
579
+1
14 Aug 2026, 23:35
578
-1
7 Aug 2026, 10:42
579
no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:32
579
first reading
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
149 reactions across 9 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
52
34.9%
❤
28
18.8%
🤣
25
16.8%
😁
10
6.71%
🍾
7
4.70%
😍
5
3.36%
👏
4
2.68%
🙏
4
2.68%
🤝
4
2.68%
👍
3
2.01%
👾
3
2.01%
😭
3
2.01%
❤🔥
1
0.671%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 149 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 9 we hold a reading for · 89%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ilatovskaya_d. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
У меня на яхтах за 7 лет много чего заканчивалось.
Алкоголь, еда, топливо, клиентский депозит на все это дело. Я заканчивалась, как человек. Все это можно восполнить, даже последнее.
Но так чтобы на третий день у капитана закончилась наличка… это сейчас происходит впервые. Тоже знаете ли не самая неразрешимая проблема: идешь в банкомат и снимаешь с карты, на которой этот депозит лежит. Но у человека банк заблокиров…
Люблю коллекционировать забавные клиентские запросы. Но вчера взяла и сама кому-то пополнила эту коллекцию. Ночью в номер залетел большой клоп. А я боюсь насекомых. Иногда во мне просыпается что-то геройское и я могу разобраться с этим сама. Но вчера не проснулось.
Зато выяснила, что для сотрудников отеля в такой просьбе нет ничего такого. Посреди ночи приходит специально обученный человек с салфеточкой и смывает кр…
Новости к этому часу
*За вчерашний день две разные службы просили меня подписать бумагу об отсутствии у меня гражданства РФ. Один арабский банк и один турецкий юрист. Всем это очень надо и все в один голос утверждают,
да подпиши, ничего не будет
Объясняю, что русские не сдаются и не врут. Зато умеют неплохо менять формулировки.
*в Турции одна гостья на борту свалилась с гидроцикла в воду, гидрик закружился на месте…
Нравилось очень разглагольствовать на тему того, что русских можно встретить везде. Что ну нет такой точки на карте, где нас бы не бывало. До встречи с городом Тисно, Хорватия. Тут на стойке регистрации в отеле с романтичным названием Borovnik🐽 парень, который работает два года, сегодня впервые подержал в руках российский паспорт. Он был так удивлен, что не смог сдержать удивленного возгласа - exotic! И это не тонкий…
Поспорили тут с капитаном, какая марина в Castellammare di Stabia лучше:
Castellammare Stabia Port, куда мы в итоге встали или Marina Stabia
Вторая объективно больше и хорошо устроена. Правда только внутри. Ближайшая внешняя от нее цивилизация в получасе ходьбы пешком. Ночью возвращаться из ресторанов только на трансфере. У гостей в целом в любом случае все, что про рядом с Неаполем ассоциируется с криминалом и пеш…
Хочу | могу на турецком авторынке
Я люблю водить. Особенно в Турции, потому что тут аренда машины существенно выгоднее такси. Если надо за день скататься в несколько марин, это вообще единственный экономически разумный выбор. Но если где-то в Черногории при бюджете €70-90 в день я легко сяду за руль Volkswagen Tiguan, то в Бодруме в этом бюджете мой роскошный максимум Opel Crossland, Renault Clio, Dacia Duster. А хо…
И пока я буду дальше рассуждать на тему наш / не наш уровень в турецком люксе, вам всем привет от нас с Ларисой и Валентиной с берегов Неаполитанского побережья
🛥️ Lady Lara
🛥️ Valentina
Не наш уровень
Очень часто слышу это в отношении лодок в Турции. Не потому что лодки плохие. Или клиенты капризные. Просто никто не хочет признавать, что в Турции никогда не будет так же совпадать цена/качество, как в Европе. Я сейчас в основном про участок Бодрум - Гочек, здесь просто все дорого. Сейчас даже кое-где дороже чем в Монако.
Если здесь машины, импортный алкоголь и техника дороже, чем везде, с чего вдруг…
🔥7❤5😭3
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @ilatovskaya_d. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Плавали, знаем” (@ilatovskaya_d), 577 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ilatovskaya_d.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.