Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Самые СЛИВки

Channel

Самые СЛИВки

@samye_slyvky

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

52,704subscribers

-139 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001210280279
TypeChannel
Username@samye_slyvky
DescriptionНикакого пиетета к западным звездам. Голливуд плачет! 18+ По рекламе: @Slyvky_bot
Created31 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/samye_slyvky

Growth

52,70452,84352,773.56 August 2026 — 52,843 subscribers7 August 2026 — 52,827 subscribers7 August 2026 — 52,815 subscribers8 August 2026 — 52,797 subscribers9 August 2026 — 52,790 subscribers10 August 2026 — 52,777 subscribers11 August 2026 — 52,758 subscribers13 August 2026 — 52,740 subscribers14 August 2026 — 52,733 subscribers15 August 2026 — 52,704 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 9 days, net -139. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 52,683–52,864 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 16:1252,704-29
14 Aug 2026, 03:5852,733-7
13 Aug 2026, 01:0352,740-18
11 Aug 2026, 23:1252,758-19
10 Aug 2026, 20:3652,777-13
9 Aug 2026, 20:5352,790-7
8 Aug 2026, 23:0252,797-18
7 Aug 2026, 23:2852,815-12
7 Aug 2026, 00:1652,827-16
6 Aug 2026, 04:5252,843first reading

Engagement

177 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.09%
avg views ÷ 52,704 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,790
177 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.35%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
177
of 177 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held177 (5 August 202615 August 2026)
Views total848,158
Reactions total19,892
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Aug 2026, 02:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
18,200
Videos
5,300
Links
3,080

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
35m 55s
Average length
28s

Measured directly from 76 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

18,430 reactions across 164 posts, in 53 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤮4,34823.6%
🤣2,62414.2%
😁2,27012.3%
💩2,08611.3%
1,3167.14%
👍9235.01%
💊8804.77%
🤡8574.65%
🔥6763.67%
😱3261.77%
🙈2501.36%
😢2311.25%
🍌1901.03%
💯1490.808%
🤬1250.678%
🦄1240.673%
🥱1210.657%
🌚1200.651%
🤯1180.64%
👏1120.608%
33 further kinds5843.17%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 177 of the 177 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19,892reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 177 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 21:44 UTC≈1,810 views60 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Когда змеей вползла в чужую семью Мы в МАХ с новым названием

💩36🤮21😁21

15 Aug 2026, 20:55 UTC≈2,380 views89 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Счастливый папаша отпустил козлиную бороду Мы в МАХ с новым названием

🤮69🦄54😁4🌚2🖕2💩1🤡1

15 Aug 2026, 20:08 UTC≈2,940 views49 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video

Киркоров присмотрел себе новые зубки Мы в МАХ с новым названием

🤮339😁5🤔2

15 Aug 2026, 19:19 UTC≈3,440 views64 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video

Тамада на вашу свадьбу! Дорого! Мы в МАХ с новым названием

🤮37🤡19🤣4💩21😡1

15 Aug 2026, 18:29 UTC≈3,840 views75 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Старенький Виторган мерзнет в Юрмале Мы в МАХ с новым названием

🤮645🤡2😢2💩1🥱1

15 Aug 2026, 17:42 UTC≈4,250 views100 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Волочкова опубликовала вид «из нашей спалн.». Этой больше не наливат Мы в МАХ с новым названием

😁62🤮21🍾102💊1💋1🔥1🤡1

15 Aug 2026, 17:32 UTC≈4,260 views69 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Админ в Гаграх сумку купила Мы в МАХ с новым названием

😁40🤣23🤡3👍2🔥1

15 Aug 2026, 16:43 UTC≈4,430 views67 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video

Не знаем, к чему готовится Влад Топалов, но он точно не готов. Со звуком Мы в МАХ с новым названием

💩39😁16🤡92🤮1

15 Aug 2026, 15:55 UTC≈4,640 views65 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Дочь Анастасии Заворотнюк перебралась из Испании в Монако Мы в МАХ с новым названием

👎26👍20💩109

15 Aug 2026, 11:39 UTC396 views11 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

41-летняя Келли Осборн красуется в купальнике Мы в МАХ с новым названием

🔥71👍1🥱1😱1

15 Aug 2026, 10:47 UTC≈1,390 views18 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Сына Валерии разыскивают судебные приставы: 27-летний Арсений Шульгин должен 2,8 млн рублей. Кроме того, на днях суд признал его банкротом. Шульгин взял в долг под инвестиции в бизнес 23 млн рублей, но не вернул их. Теперь его имущество будут распродавать с молотка, чтобы погасить долги. Отпрыск звезды при этом красиво живет в Дубае. Оформлено ли него какое-то имущество в России, неизвестно. Мы в МАХ с новым назван

💩13🤬4🤩1

15 Aug 2026, 09:59 UTC≈1,880 views71 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Холли Берри разменяла седьмой десяток Мы в МАХ с новым названием

🔥5710🙈3🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 177 posts we hold for @samye_slyvky. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@samye_slyvky edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
14 August 2026
Most recent edit
14 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

11 Aug 2026, 09:03 UTCAnonymous Poll1,140 voters approx.

Инстасамка заявила, что не вернется в Россию из Дубая и будет штурмовать мировой шоу-бизнес хитами на english

  1. Ура! Скатертью дорожка57%
  2. Ждем в мировых чартах8%
  3. 100% попросится обратно23%
  4. Знавали мы таких рэперов…19%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 177 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 72,745 of 1,481,346entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

НеМалахов
@nemalahov · 127,634
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 August 2026
Starhit.ru
@starhitru · 112,546
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 August 2026
Алёна, Блин!
@neopra_blin · 156,184
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 August 2026
Новости Шоу-Бизнеса
@novostishowbiz · 161,518
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 12 August 2026
Коза кричала
@kozakrichala · 180,943
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
Лера Кудрявцева
@lerakudryavtseva · 239,535
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 August 2026
Администрация Аншлага
@klaragavrilovnanews · 157,608
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
Super.ru
@SuperRu · 198,247
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 August 2026
Светские хроники
@SVETSKlE_HRONIKI · 134,381
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 August 2026
YOBAJUR
@yobajur · 189,749
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
ТОВАРИЩ СОРЯН
@TovarishchSoryan · 139,204
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 August 2026
Блокнот Старс
@bloknot_star · 127,904
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Самые СЛИВки” (@samye_slyvky), 52,704 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/samye_slyvky.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.