Новости: @snob_news
Здесь о личном: @snob_private
Почта отдела рекламы: [email protected]
Включена Роскомнадзором в перечень персональных страниц https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=674656431039886b1d233155®istryType=bloggersPermission
Created
7 December 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Previous handles
Recorded in 2019 as “Проект Сноб.” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
Growth
37 measurements spanning 52 days, net +310. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 38,896–39,562 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 37
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 19:15
39,288
-5
19 Sept 2026, 17:42
39,293
-22
17 Sept 2026, 06:56
39,315
-28
15 Sept 2026, 05:16
39,343
-19
13 Sept 2026, 13:01
39,362
-25
11 Sept 2026, 18:16
39,387
-88
9 Sept 2026, 04:58
39,475
-10
5 Sept 2026, 18:58
39,485
+21
3 Sept 2026, 18:18
39,464
+179
2 Sept 2026, 12:13
39,285
-47
1 Sept 2026, 10:48
39,332
+9
31 Aug 2026, 13:42
39,323
-16
30 Aug 2026, 13:23
39,339
-12
29 Aug 2026, 16:25
39,351
+11
28 Aug 2026, 16:07
39,340
+18
27 Aug 2026, 17:05
39,322
+14
26 Aug 2026, 19:54
39,308
+63
25 Aug 2026, 19:15
39,245
-12
24 Aug 2026, 19:48
39,257
-11
23 Aug 2026, 06:07
39,268
first reading
Engagement
408 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 95 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.90%
avg views ÷ 39,288 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,530
230 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.27%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
230
of 408 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026
Posts held
408 (4 August 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Views total
352,169
Reactions total
4,488
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Sept 2026, 13:01 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈18,800
Videos
≈1,130
Links
≈24,400
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 34s
Average length
31s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
7,863 reactions across 392 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
3,562
45.3%
👍
1,581
20.1%
😁
1,122
14.3%
🔥
835
10.6%
👏
144
1.83%
😱
131
1.67%
👎
99
1.26%
💔
97
1.23%
🤯
71
0.903%
😢
65
0.827%
🐳
53
0.674%
🍾
41
0.521%
🗿
31
0.394%
🤬
31
0.394%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 406 of the 408 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,077 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 408 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
0.735%
3 of 408 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
3
posts carrying an erid · 3 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
1,450
over 3 measured posts
Median views · rest
1,560
over 405 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
F7NfYUJCUneVdxJEqJcw
1
28 August 2026
28 August 2026
F7NfYUJCUneVeSW9gUJQ
1
8 September 2026
8 September 2026
F7NfYUJCUneVeSWFdmH6
1
10 September 2026
10 September 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 408 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 27 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Конец прекрасной эпохи и другие поводы для побега — в главных текстах недели
🖤 Итальянский фотограф с русскими корнями Бардо Фабиани рассказал нам о Vogue Italia и конце прекрасной эпохи;
🖤 Иногда люди уходят даже из благополучных семей. Катерина Мурашова решила разобраться в причинах;
🖤 Большое интервью с тренером фигуристов Даниилом Глейхенгаузом — коллегой Этери Тутберидзе по штабу, с программами которого олимп…
Астрид Линдгрен столкнулась с налоговой ставкой 102%. Она написала сказку про это — и правительство Швеции проиграло выборы
В 1976 году Астрид Линдгрен обнаружила, что её предельная налоговая ставка составляет 102% от дохода. Получалось, что с каждой дополнительной заработанной кроны она должна была отдавать государству больше одной кроны. В ответ писательница написала сатирическую сказку «Помперипосса из Монисмании…
«Сноб» завершил приём заявок на 15-ю премию «Сделано в России». В материале рассказываем о новых номинантах. Среди них:
🖤 «Ясный сад» — цветочная мастерская, где молодые люди с ментальными особенностями и опытом сиротства собирают букеты, общаются с клиентами и получают трудовые навыки.
🖤 «Носи Стихи» — ювелирный бренд, который переносит строки поэтессы Яны Мкртычевой на кольца, серьги и каффы в виде гравировок.
🖤…
В поисках редкого кукольного домика Михаил попадает во двор из собственного детства — с железной паутинкой, старым подъездом и дверью, за которой, кажется, живет он сам, семилетний. Но «Росинка» не значится ни на одной карте, а наутро исчезает вместе с двором — чтобы неожиданно вернуться к Михаилу в образе курьера. Рассказ Веры Богдановой, опубликованный в осеннем номере «Сноба»:
На площадке играли дети. Один мальчи…
Сыграть в литературную мафию и посмотреть Годара: подготовили гид по Московской книжной неделе
📓 Стать героем книги: «Литературная мафия»
Когда: 2 октября, 18:00. Где: Библиотека им. Ф. М. Достоевского на Чистопрудном бульваре
Если обсуждать литературных героев в книжном клубе уже недостаточно, можно попробовать ими стать. Библиотека Достоевского превращает классическую «Мафию» в литературную игру: участники получа…
Вечером 26 сентября 1960 года примерно 70 миллионов американцев включили телевизоры. В прямом эфире сенатор Джон Кеннеди и вице-президент Ричард Никсон отвечали на вопросы журналистов и парировали аргументы друг друга. Эти дебаты создали систему, по которой американская политика функционирует до сих пор.
Сама идея теледебатов долгое время казалась неосуществимой из-за Закона о коммуникациях, требовавшего от телекана…
На Digital Rain связь можно будет буквально потрогать руками. В одной из инсталляций два человека одновременно касаются сенсоров — и между ними на полу появляется графический узор. Стоит одному убрать руку, изображение распадается.
Ещё на фестивале можно будет услышать, как звучит дождь в отсутствии дождя, увидеть, как записи мёртвых языков превращают в свет, и посмотреть перформанс, где вместе с музыкантами выступа…
Альпинист Денис Урубко и издатель «Сноба» Марина Геворкян представили проект «Высота 8848 Урубко»
Урубко поднялся на все 14 восьмитысячников планеты без дополнительного кислорода. Программа, которую альпинисты называют «короной», завершилась для него в 2009 году новым маршрутом на Чо-Ойю. Мы собрали самые яркие вопросы альпинисту:
Что помогает альпинисту справляться с неожиданностями в горах?
К экспедициям он готов…
Эдгар Аллан По в детстве учился по надгробиям и боялся темноты
Школа, в которую ходил маленький Эдгар По в шотландском Ирвине, находилась рядом с кладбищем. По сохранившимся свидетельствам, ученикам давали необычное задание – переписывать эпитафии с соседних надгробий. Шестилетний По тоже бывал на кладбище и работал с надписями на могильных плитах как с учебным материалом.
Известно и то, что в детстве По действител…
Микроорганизмы с Земли выжили в лабораторной копии океана Энцелада при уровне pH 11. Это не доказывает наличие жизни на спутнике Сатурна, но подтверждает, что она теоретически возможна.
Фото: NASA / JPL / Space Science Institute
Фильмы-концерты снова в моде: осенью на экраны выходят Oasis, Pulp и Queen, а Пол Томас Андерсон покажет концерт фронтмена Geese в Карнеги-холле. И это не просто записи выступлений.
Самый радикальный пример — Live! Tonight! Sold Out!!, задуманный Куртом Кобейном. Вместо ровной хроники тура перед зрителем хаотичный коллаж: концерты, интервью, дурачество в самолёте, кадры из подвалов и стадионов, склейки в самых неожи…
👏11❤7👍6🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 408 posts we hold for @snobru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@snobru edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
26 August 2026
Most recent edit
21 September 2026
Polls
The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Среди своих студентов Бакст особо выделял нескольких, в том числе Марка Шагала и Николая Тырсу. «У меня два ученика, один ходит на голове, второй на ногах, но я не знаю, который из них лучше», — говорил он. Как долго Шагал занимался в школе?
Полгода60%
Год27%
Два года12%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Надежду Лермонтову Лев Бакст считал одной из лучших своих студенток, а соученица Юлия Оболенская называла «неподражаемой». Что в её работах больше всего восхищало других званцевцев?
Внимание к деталям31%
Цвет41%
Композиция28%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 408 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 27 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 82 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@snobru named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@natgeo named in 3 posts, 19 September 2026 – 21 September 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 30 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Forbes Woman Russia @ForbesWomanRussia · 20,541 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 27 September 2026
Вокруг Света | Путешествия • История • Наука @vokrugsveta1861 · 34,407 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 3 September 2026
Серебряный Дождь @Silverrainradio · 42,140 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 22 September 2026
Журнал НОЖ @knifemedia · 101,812 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 15 August 2026
Психология | Psychologies @PsychologiesRussia · 53,601 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 24 August 2026
Йод | Лайфхакер @lh_health · 22,821 Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 19 September 2026
Дилетант | Официальный канал @diletantmagazine · 24,128 Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 September 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Сноб” (@snobru), 39,288 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/snobru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.