Channel
@irrealart
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
937subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001644017343 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @irrealart |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/irrealart |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:42 | 937 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:32 | 937 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 20 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
117 reactions across 5 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 50 | 42.7% | |
| ❤ | 45 | 38.5% | |
| 💅 | 11 | 9.40% | |
| 🌚 | 4 | 3.42% | |
| 🤯 | 4 | 3.42% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 1.71% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.855% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 117reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2026 to 16 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Пора признать, что виар очки это уже не просто устарело, но еще и очень скучно - где обещанные космические технологии? Где радость, от которой танцует душа? К счастью, кажется альтернатива есть - я нашла забытую разработку свердловских ученых, которая дает нам всем шанс избавиться от бесконечной гегемонии виара: Параорбитальные Дэнс-Очки
🔥25💅11❤7🤯4
На ярмарке PAF в Севкабеле вы можете найти две моих работы: одна в виде пластификации на стенде Охры, а вторая - интерактивная, на стенде журнала Сноб. Там мой рисунок можно дополнить своими деталями или стереть из него то, что считаете нужным. А еще приглашаю вас завтра в 15:00 на дискуссию, в которой я участвую - о том, что ждет художников в эпоху генерации, ИИ и других технологий
❤22🔥8🙏2
В специальном blank-номере журнала «Сноб» «(не)исчезающий вид» мы размышляем, можно ли создать произведение искусства путем стирания и что происходит с самим глянцем. Blank-номер будет представлен на Port Art Fair в Санкт-Петербурге с 21 по 24 мая. Для создания этого номера мы пригласили 17 художников. О первой восьмерке авторов уже рассказывали ранее, о следующих подробнее — в карточках. 🖤 Telegram | VK | MAX
❤9🌚2🔥1
Раз в тысячелетие делаю ручную графику, и особенно наслаждаюсь тем, что её можно распутывать по смыслам так же долго, как и мои виарные пространства
🌚2❤1🤔1
Год назад для выставки в Калининградском ГМИИ под кураторством Дмитрия Булатова я придумала VR инструмент, который позволяет соединить в единый перформанс звук, графику и движение - Omniharmony. Механизм его работы мне пришел в голову ночью в полусне (как и полагается всему гениальному). Уже тогда я понимала, что это должно ощущаться как терменвокс, помноженный на 3д пространство. К сожалению, из-за смены руководства…
🔥16❤6
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @irrealart. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Irreal art / Надя из VR” (@irrealart), 937 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/irrealart.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.