Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
30 measurements spanning 42 days, net +234. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,643–23,964 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 09:20
23,927
+100
15 Sept 2026, 06:21
23,827
+113
13 Sept 2026, 12:37
23,714
-2
11 Sept 2026, 13:20
23,716
+13
8 Sept 2026, 19:16
23,703
+10
5 Sept 2026, 12:56
23,693
+13
3 Sept 2026, 12:18
23,680
-11
2 Sept 2026, 09:53
23,691
-11
1 Sept 2026, 09:24
23,702
-16
31 Aug 2026, 08:24
23,718
+3
30 Aug 2026, 08:36
23,715
+4
29 Aug 2026, 06:54
23,711
-4
27 Aug 2026, 06:36
23,715
+6
26 Aug 2026, 10:03
23,709
-1
25 Aug 2026, 11:14
23,710
-2
24 Aug 2026, 12:56
23,712
-4
23 Aug 2026, 00:09
23,716
-15
20 Aug 2026, 15:42
23,731
-5
19 Aug 2026, 13:43
23,736
+11
18 Aug 2026, 13:19
23,725
first reading
Engagement
73 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
13.8%
avg views ÷ 23,927 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,310
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.15%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 73 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held
73 (3 August 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total
49,590
Reactions total
1,068
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 11:04 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 47s
Average length
18s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,620 reactions across 66 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,118
45.8%
❤🔥
700
15.2%
🔥
534
11.6%
👍
396
8.57%
🥰
189
4.09%
💋
159
3.44%
⚡
105
2.27%
✍
85
1.84%
😍
79
1.71%
💘
54
1.17%
🍓
30
0.649%
🤣
26
0.563%
😁
14
0.303%
😈
14
0.303%
🏆
12
0.26%
💯
12
0.26%
💔
11
0.238%
🍌
9
0.195%
🌚
8
0.173%
👏
8
0.173%
13 further kinds
57
1.23%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 72 of the 73 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,061 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 73 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
👁️ Какую цену придется заплатить человечеству, чтобы выжить в катастрофе?
Новинка: «Здравствуй, брат, умри», Эдуард Веркин
✨ История понравится тем, кто ищет напряженный сюжет о выживании, фантастику с моральным выбором и ответ на вопрос, что остается от человека после катастрофы.
😊 От автора бестселлеров «Сорока на виселице», «Остров Сахалин», «снарк снарк».
👋 Книга из серии «Tok. Мертвый город»
😊 Аннотация 😊
Мер…
🎇 Эта осень будет яркой!
Совместно с Nova Bubble Tea создали чаи по мотивам захватывающих ромэнтези-историй.
🎁 Подарки начинаются с первого глотка:
- За 1️⃣ чай — свопка с обложкой книги и сахарным напылением, а также бинго-карточка.
- За 3️⃣ чая — книга нашего издательства.
- А первые 150 гостей получат дополнительный подарок – обвес!
⏰ Примите участие в акции до 1 октября! Количество подарков ограничено.
📚 Вкусы…
🕯 Начинаем готовиться к самому холодному сезону...
Новинка: «Рождество с подвохом», Вероника Хэли
✨ Новое зимнее расследование неутомимой Элли Квик, вдовы, страстной любительницы чая, а с недавних пор и опытной сыщицы.
☕️ Идеальное уютное чтение для поклонников «Убийств и кексиков» Питера Боланда, «Опасной игры бабули» Кристен Перрин и «Рецепта убийства для настоящей лентяйки» М. С. Битон.
🤩🤩🤩Аннотация🤩🤩🤩
Вернувши…
⚡ Уже сегодня стартует ярмарка ММКЯ!
Предлагаем сыграть в книжное бинго из наших рекомендаций. Не забудьте поделиться в комментариях, если соберете диагональ, вертикаль или горизонталь 🐸
⚡️ А чтобы играть в бинго было еще приятнее, дарим скидку -50% на вторую книгу!
Ищите нас на стенде d10e7, ориентир — огромный красный остров ;)
@Inspiria_books
🌺 Здесь закопаны тайны: Рассказываем, почему вам стоит прочитать роман Сары Блейдс «Спрячь мои тайны в саду»
🌟 Абсолютный бестселлер Amazon.
🌸 Вырастите свой тайный сад: в подарок за предзаказ идет открытка на бумаге с семенами цветов.
👉 Больше о книге писали здесь
🪻 Оформить предзаказ ⬇️
Читай-город
@Inspiria_books
☄️ Когда привычный мир рушится, остается одно — сохранить достоинство и не потерять себя.
Новинка: «Ну и шутник же вы, мастер», Мо Янь
🌒🌘 Соединяя беспощадный реализм с притчей, гротеском и почти фантастическими образами, Мо Янь создает мир, в котором трагедия нередко оборачивается черной комедией, а абсурд оказывается точнее любого документального свидетельства.
✨ Книга из серии «Loft. Лучшие произведения Мо Яня»
…
🦋 Иногда за свою доброту приходится дорого платить: Рассказываем, почему вас стоит прочитать новинку Стива Каваны «Два типа незнакомцев»
🗯 «Стив Кавана возрождает юридический триллер».
— Financial Times.
💬 «Сплошные повороты сюжета. Не пропустите!»
— Daily Mail.
🗯 «Поверьте мне: вы будете гадать, кто виновен, до самого конца».
— Иэн Рэнкин.
🧷 Больше о книге писали в посте
🔪 Оформить предзаказ
Читай-город
*В книге…
🩶🩶 В мире без правил так сложно сохранить свое сердце.
Новинка: «Осужденные грешники», Сомма Скетчер
💋 Вторая книга цикла «Опасные грешники». Она продолжает события романа «Анонимные грешники» и начинает отдельную историю Рафаэля Висконти и Пенни Прайс.
✨ Скоро покажем обложку!
⛓️💥 Аннотация ⛓️💥
Пенни Прайс пытается собрать жизнь заново, но встреча с Рафаэлем Висконти втягивает ее в новую опасную игру. Она врыва…
Сообщение гласило: «Когда я только о тебе услышала, мы с моей няней сошлись во мнении, что у тебя нет друзей и ты странная».
Нормальное такое начало, да? Впрочем, оба определения были точны. Может, друзей и нет. И я странная. Зато осознанная!
🔜 «Клуб друзей по убийствам», Кэтлин Уэст
@Inspiria_books
👼 Как далеко вы готовы зайти, защищая собственного ребенка?
Новинка: «Что случилось с Ниной», Дервла Мактирнан
❤️ Лучший триллер года по версии New York Times от признанного автора бестселлеров.
👉 Напряженный психологический роман на стыке драмы о масштабном противостоянии «правд», сломанных судьбах и безусловной родительской любви.
🔗 Аннотация 🔗
Нина и Саймон – идеальная пара. Молодые, веселые и безмерно влюбленн…
🤍 Разворот во всей красе: Это новинка Слоун Сент-Джеймс «Чернила и алхимия»!
🃏 Роман, в котором чувства переплетаются с тайной и скрытой угрозой.
🧡 Слоуберн между коллегами в тату-салоне с многолетней историей дружбы — идеальное сочетание напряжения и эмоциональной близости.
👉 Больше о книге писали здесь
💋 Предзаказ 👇
Читай-город
@Inspiria_books
❤36❤🔥14👍13🍌4🤣3🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 73 posts we hold for @inspiria_books. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Боюсь, что новая книга любимого автора разочарует38%
Боюсь, что книга закончится, а я не захочу прощаться с персонажами31%
Боюсь, что куплю слишком много книг и не успею прочитать33%
Боюсь оставить книгу недочитанной18%
Боюсь взять с собой книгу в поездку и не открыть ее ни разу15%
Боюсь испортить книгу (загнуть страницу, пролить чай и т.д.)39%
Свой страх напишу в комментариях!1%
The shares total 222%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 73 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 80 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 17 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Азбука.Книгоголики @azbookaknigogoliki · 27,254 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 September 2026
Имена | Издательство Эксмо @eksmo_fiction · 22,173 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 21 September 2026
Издательство МИФ @mifbooks · 54,686 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 August 2026
Издательство Эксмо | Книги @eksmo · 57,808 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 22 August 2026
БОМБОРА 🌊 Книги, акции и океан интересного @bombora · 55,342 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
LiveLib | Лайвлиб @livelib_official · 30,402 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 7 September 2026
Литрес @LitRes_ebooks · 53,683 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 24 August 2026
Книжный Лис 🦊📚 @booksfox · 47,971 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 26 August 2026
Soda Press @sodapress · 61,558 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 21 August 2026
О2 Young adult книги @o2_books · 33,945 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 3 September 2026
Редакция Мейнстрим (Mainstream) @ast_mainstream · 21,598 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 September 2026
Сорри, я не твоя лав стори @not_love_story · 23,523 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 18 September 2026
Издательство Freedom 💜 @eksmofreedom · 39,257 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 31 August 2026
Читай-город @chitai_gorod_official · 143,111 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 13 August 2026
Издательство Like Book @likebook_ya · 35,105 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 3 September 2026
МИФ.Проза @mifproza · 51,569 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 25 August 2026
Парс и фоны @parslivres · 25,480 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 September 2026
Издательство АСТ @izdatelstvoast · 40,929 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 30 August 2026
Яндекс Книги @booksyandex · 145,276 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 13 August 2026
Bookspace @anya_bookspace · 27,301 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 September 2026
Books around me @booksaroundme · 21,787 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 September 2026
This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Издательство Inspiria” (@inspiria_books), 23,927 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/inspiria_books.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.