Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for خالد عزیزی

Channel

خالد عزیزی

@Khaled_azizi1

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,204subscribers

+252 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001232812136
TypeChannel
Username@Khaled_azizi1
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Khaled_azizi1

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,9527,2047,0786 August 2026 — 6,952 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,952 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,955 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,967 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,993 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,009 subscribers18 August 2026 — 7,066 subscribers22 August 2026 — 7,079 subscribers25 August 2026 — 7,101 subscribers27 August 2026 — 7,113 subscribers31 August 2026 — 7,123 subscribers3 September 2026 — 7,128 subscribers9 September 2026 — 7,150 subscribers13 September 2026 — 7,137 subscribers17 September 2026 — 7,140 subscribers26 September 2026 — 7,147 subscribers5 October 2026 — 7,164 subscribers11 October 2026 — 7,170 subscribers15 October 2026 — 7,172 subscribers18 October 2026 — 7,173 subscribers21 October 2026 — 7,167 subscribers24 October 2026 — 7,158 subscribers27 October 2026 — 7,166 subscribers30 October 2026 — 7,161 subscribers3 November 2026 — 7,176 subscribers5 November 2026 — 7,204 subscribers6 August 20265 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 92 days, net +252. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,914–7,242 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 23:017,204+28
3 Nov 2026, 03:467,176+15
30 Oct 2026, 17:067,161-5
27 Oct 2026, 15:457,166+8
24 Oct 2026, 12:177,158-9
21 Oct 2026, 07:097,167-6
18 Oct 2026, 10:167,173+1
15 Oct 2026, 03:367,172+2
11 Oct 2026, 23:367,170+6
5 Oct 2026, 07:207,164+17
26 Sept 2026, 17:387,147+7
17 Sept 2026, 13:177,140+3
13 Sept 2026, 05:187,137-13
9 Sept 2026, 00:167,150+22
3 Sept 2026, 23:417,128+5
31 Aug 2026, 05:457,123+10
27 Aug 2026, 23:157,113+12
25 Aug 2026, 05:237,101+22
22 Aug 2026, 09:597,079+13
18 Aug 2026, 22:577,066first reading

Engagement

98 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.5%
avg views ÷ 7,204 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,050
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
23
of 98 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held98 (31 July 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total24,108
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 14:08 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
600
Videos
586
Links
315

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
22m 42s
Average length
3m 47s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 23 posts held from the last 30 days (13.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 19:55 UTC736 viewsread 7 November 2026
File

✅ توصیاتی برای این روزها.... - خطبه جمعه مدت زمان: ۲۳ دقیقه

5 Nov 2026, 16:11 UTC≈1,030 viewsread 7 November 2026
Poll

چالش صلوات «۵۰۰بار»

  1. الحمدلله کامل انجام شد ❤️47%
  2. کمتر از ۵۰۰ بار شد.. 🤍54%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Nov 2026, 16:06 UTC≈1,150 viewsread 7 November 2026

🌸 چالش ۵۰۰ صلوات در شب و روز جمعه 🌸 🕌 جمعه، روز صلوات بر پیامبر مهربانی‌ها ﷺ رسول الله ﷺ فرمودند: «فَأَكْثِرُوا عَلَيَّ مِنَ الصَّلَاةِ فِيهِ» «در روز جمعه بر من بسیار صلوات بفرستید.» 🌿 چند صیغه ساده و زیبا برای صلوات: 🌷 ۱. اللَّهُمَّ صَلِّ عَلَى مُحَمَّدٍ 🌷 ۲. اللَّهُمَّ صَلِّ وَسَلِّمْ عَلَى مُحَمَّدٍ 🌷 ۳. اللَّهُمَّ صَلِّ وَسَلِّمْ عَلَى نَبِيِّنَا مُحَمَّدٍ 🌷 ۴. اللَّهُمَّ صَلِّ عَلَى مُحَمَّدٍ وَعَلَى آلِ مُحَ…

3 Nov 2026, 18:52 UTC≈1,390 viewsread 7 November 2026

کانال ماموستا قادری رو هم در روبیکا دنبال کنید: https://rubika.ir/mortaqasaed

3 Nov 2026, 18:50 UTC≈1,430 viewsread 7 November 2026

🔹 اگر اینترنت در اینجا دوباره قطع شد در آدرس زیر بنده را در روبیکا دنبال کنید: https://rubika.ir/khaled_azizi3 مطلبی اگر باشد در اینجا نشر میدهم...إن شاء الله..

2 Nov 2026, 13:50 UTC≈2,120 viewsread 7 November 2026
Photo

۶ توصیه برای روزهای سخت اقتصادی

2 Nov 2026, 12:39 UTC≈1,570 viewsread 7 November 2026

و بارک فیک... نه برای ایجاد ترس و هراس نیست این صحبتها. این توصیات اخلاقی و شرعی رو ما بهش خیلی نیاز داریم. در وضعیت آرامش و به ظاهر صلح و امنیت فعلی باز هم ما آن همکاری و تعاون و تکالف اجتماعی لازم و باید و شاید رو در جامعه مسلمان خودمان مشاهده نمی‌کنیم. قطعا در وضعیت بحران و جنگ و ناامنی نیاز به این همبستگی شدیدتر خواهد بود. البته خود همین همکاری مولد امنیته. خیلی از رفتارهای شرعی و اخلاقهای پسندیده در وقت سختی بای…

Showing the 12 most recent of 98 posts we hold for @Khaled_azizi1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 Nov 2026, 16:11 UTCAnonymous Poll98 voters

چالش صلوات «۵۰۰بار»

  1. الحمدلله کامل انجام شد ❤️47%
  2. کمتر از ۵۰۰ بار شد.. 🤍54%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

17 Aug 2026, 09:39 UTCAnonymous Poll77 voters

✅️ انجامش دادی؟

  1. الحمدلله انجامش دادم 🤍not shown

Results were not being shown when we read this poll, so no share was published for any option. That is not zero — it is an absence, and we record it as one.

16 Aug 2026, 13:37 UTCAnonymous Poll67 voters

✅️ انجامش دادی؟

  1. الحمدلله انجام شد🤍not shown

Results were not being shown when we read this poll, so no share was published for any option. That is not zero — it is an absence, and we record it as one.

11 Aug 2026, 16:54 UTCAnonymous Poll91 voters

👈 انجامش دادی؟

  1. بله انجامش دادم 🤚not shown

Results were not being shown when we read this poll, so no share was published for any option. That is not zero — it is an absence, and we record it as one.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 98 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

•••❥⚘حجـاب_قلــبها⚘❥•••
@banoyehejabe · 2,324
3 posts
🌸قـڐم بہ قڐم ٺا فـࢪڐوس ا؏ـلے🌸
@Ferdows_Aala · 19
2 posts
فَاقْرَءُوا مَا تَيَسَّرَ مِنَ الْقُرْآنِ🌺___________،آوای قرآن
@QPICS · 194
2 posts
عبدالله
@abdollah1400 · 4,649
2 posts
عبدالله محمد
@akseMahtab · 10,082
2 posts
آنتی فراماسون
@antiimason · 120
2 posts
فقط اللهﷻ
@faghattt_allah · 154
2 posts
《کانال صدقه جاریه》
@islamtype · 199
2 posts
مسجد ابراهیم خلیل الله سنندج
@m_ebrahimkhalilolah · 624
2 posts
کانال حفظ قرآن مجید
@madraseyehefz · 2,779
2 posts
محاضرات ثلاث باباجانی
@mohazeratsalas · 91
2 posts
رد بر منکرین فرموده های پیامبر(قرآنیون)
@oza99m · 83
2 posts
ادعیه ونیایش ودلنوشته خواجه احرار
@ADEIEH_Delnevesht · 183
1 post
نـــیـھــان🌿
@Alhosna_99 · 3,638
1 post
🌴 کانال رقیه شرعی برکت 🌴
@BARAKAT_MAF1440 · 4,960
1 post
دکتر ذاکرنایک
@Doctor_nick · 5,290
1 post
کانال « اقبال امینی »
@Eqbal_Amini · 439
1 post
غلام فاروق کریمی
@Ghulamfarooqkaremi · 54
1 post
عکس نوشته اسلامی
@Hanasehphoto · 117
1 post
حقیقت ناسیونالیسم و سکولاریسم
@Haqiqates · 672
1 post
حجاب سرای راستین
@HejabsarayeRastin · 213
1 post
کانال رسمی ماموستا ادریس شریفپور
@MamostaEdris · 4,328
1 post
قبسِ معرفت | انور احمدی
@QabasMarfat · 1,198
1 post
صبورانه
@SABOURANE · 75
1 post
عادل حیدری
@adelheidari · 1,640
1 post
وَالْعَصْر🪶
@almisbah8 · 912
1 post
⌝القَلـﮩ٨ـღ‌ـﮩ٨ﮩـبِ التوحید❥⌞
@alqlbetaohed · 482
1 post
آنتی شبهات - محافظ
@anti_shobahaat · 35
1 post
♡ ربیع القلوب ♡
@bahardel · 101
1 post
حجاب بنات المصطفی
@banatolmostafa · 86
1 post
مسجد النبي ﷺ
@mosqueAlnabiyy · 198
1 post
🇵🇸مُصْلِحُون | Reformers🇵🇸
@muslehoon · 2,109
1 post
صَوارم
@sawaremjournal · 491
1 post
یاسای ژین
@yasaizhin · 2,642
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

شبهه از شما، پاسخ از ما
@shobahat99 · 20,741
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 September 2026
مرکز هدایت؛ رد اسلام‌ستیزان
@Hedayat1442 · 19,996
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 1 October 2026
سید عقیل هاشمی
@seyedaqilhashemi · 18,950
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 1 October 2026
دارالافتاء مجازی اهل سنت
@Canale_pasokh · 24,014
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 16 September 2026
محمد رسول الله (ﷺ)
@Rasolollah_Shahrakeshahed · 18,994
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 4 October 2026
شبكه كلمه Kalemeh TV Iran
@kalemehtv · 47,379
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“خالد عزیزی” (@Khaled_azizi1), 7,204 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Khaled_azizi1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.