Проект для тех, кто хочет изучить военное дело и применять полученные знания.
Мерч: https://finist-tac.ru/futbolka-plan-av
Бот для анонимов: @InformatorGU_bot
Писать админу: t.me/naukapobezhdatZ?direct
РКН: https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=67503581894518
Created
7 October 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
11 measurements spanning 10 days, net -58. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 51,598–51,687 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 03:27
51,608
-5
14 Aug 2026, 16:48
51,613
-7
13 Aug 2026, 08:16
51,620
-6
12 Aug 2026, 07:02
51,626
-6
11 Aug 2026, 08:43
51,632
-19
10 Aug 2026, 10:55
51,651
+4
9 Aug 2026, 14:15
51,647
-30
8 Aug 2026, 17:32
51,677
+5
6 Aug 2026, 18:11
51,672
+6
6 Aug 2026, 01:46
51,666
no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:56
51,666
first reading
Engagement
82 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.12%
avg views ÷ 51,608 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,680
81 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.68%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
82
of 82 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 80 of 81 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026
Posts held
82 (3 August 2026 – 16 August 2026)
Views total
297,810
Reactions total
4,957
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
16 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈4,840
Videos
≈3,110
Links
≈3,030
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
32m 11s
Average length
1m 00s
Measured directly from 32 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,520 reactions across 70 posts, in 35 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
881
19.5%
😁
627
13.9%
🔥
539
11.9%
🙏
504
11.2%
❤
407
9.00%
🫡
393
8.69%
🤣
338
7.48%
✍
203
4.49%
💯
184
4.07%
😢
68
1.50%
👏
67
1.48%
🤔
64
1.42%
❤🔥
54
1.19%
🤬
40
0.885%
🤩
24
0.531%
💔
18
0.398%
🤝
16
0.354%
🙈
14
0.31%
💊
13
0.288%
👀
12
0.265%
15 further kinds
54
1.19%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 80 of the 82 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,957reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 82 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 81 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @naukapobezhdatZ. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 82 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 16 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Когда работаешь достаточно долго, твоей скромной личностью начинают иногда интересоваться разного рода журналисты.
Большинство из них задают одни и те же вопросы, на которые хочется ответить так, чтобы ни в одной прессе это не опубликовали.
-Как ты оказалась на СВО?
Так и тянет ответить что-то вроде: «для учебы - слишком тупая, для онлифанс - слишком старая, и вот - я здесь». Но шутку не оценят - у них вообще с чу…
Наши. Сплав
Интересные у нас сочетания наград складываются: в одном наборе можно увидеть и медаль Вагнера, и медаль ДНР, и госку. Самое интересное, что это никого давно не удивляет. Вот наш подписчик, например, за Бахмут получил памятную от Вагнера, а от ДНР — за Артемовск. Там недалеко))
Перед вами — крепкий комплект наград, по которому сразу видно, где человек был и что делал. Давайте посмотрим (справа налево и с…
Игра вдолгую.
Пока у нас кричат, что фронт вот-вот рухнет и хохол побежит, в Харьковской области противник развернул пока что пилотный проект по обучению детей ряду дисциплин, необходимых для потенциальных бойцов. Самое интересное, что данный перечень дисциплин наиболее подходит операторам БПЛА и командирам. И сейчас мы более подробно раскроем нашу мысль.
Подготовка расчётов.
При грамотном подходе научить человека …
Спортклуб.
Вот вам, товарищи, очередной спортуголок от подписчика. Похоже, когда-то это был лекционный класс или зал. И организовать спортуголок в таком помещении — это круто. Сейчас расскажем, почему.
Если тренироваться, то вместе.
Большая площадь спортуголка, особенно в нормальном тылу, позволяет проводить тренировки не просто двум или трём бойцам, а целому подразделению (например, отделению). И вот в целях укреп…
Вместе с поэмой «Двенадцать», стихотворение «Скифы» стало последней работой Александра Блока, опубликованной при его жизни. Дело было в 1918 году, еще вовсю шла Гражданская. А пишет, будто про Великую Отечественную. Или про нас. Или это история у нас такая, куда ни ткни.
Дослушайте до конца — оно острое, как бритва, и красивое, как Россия:
Виновны ль мы, коль хрустнет ваш скелет
В тяжелых, нежных наших лапах?
Тала…
Друг познается в беде.
Вот вам видео про оказание первой помощи раненому бойцу после попадания дрона в технику. И вот в таком состоянии нам непонятно:
1. Какого хера все проехали, когда видно, что боец жив?
2. Какого хера боец не оказал самопомощь?
Вот давайте эти два момента и разберём.
Равнодушие.
Прекрасно понятно, что любое промедление на такой «открытке», как на видео, может закончиться приветом дрона в вашу…
Этого бойца ранило ещё в апреле, сегодня 07 июля (3 месяца прошло).
Эвакуации нет. Сидел в подвале. Еду и воду изредка сбрасывали с дронов. Из фармы - Амоксиклав 10 дней.
Рану обрабатывал собственной мочой, ткани сгнили, сгнившую ткань съели опарыши. Был наложен жгут на нижней третьей голени, выше - флегмона.
От момента ранения до того, как его довезли до этапа, где ему смогли оказать полноценную помощь, прошло бол…
🙏62😢28❤8🔥3🤬2🫡2❤🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 82 posts we hold for @naukapobezhdatZ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Вы уже поняли, что сегодня мы будем душить вас эвакуацией до конца дня ;) Так что разбавим серьезное блиц-опросом.
Итак: вы в ситуации, когда можете выбрать что-то одно, второго не дадут. Что выберете? Погнали ;)
Жгут54%
Турникет46%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 82 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 16 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 14,284 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 31 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ХИЛЕР l HEALER @HealerTacMed · 131,935 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Наука побеждать” (@naukapobezhdatZ), 51,608 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/naukapobezhdatZ.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
