На фоне ШЕСТИДЕСЯТИ ШЕСТИ МИЛЛИАРДОВ НА ЦИРК в Москве вспоминаю о деревянных храмах Русского Севера Всем миром, по рублику, собирают на спасение бесценных шедевров русского зодчества. Есть храмы XVII века. Деревянные! Допетровские! Для русской культуры они немножечко поважнее клоунов и акробатов. На картинке — потребности фонда "Вереница", который с 2013 года спасает наше наследие. Речь не о миллиардах, а о милли…

Channel
Zаписки мичмана Птичкина
@rusfleet
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
48,638subscribers
-992 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001122846719 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rusfleet |
| Description | ВМФ / морской ВПК — события, инсайды, хроники боли. Неуютный дневничок мичмана Птичкина. 18+ Россия — наше Отечество. Смерть неизбежна. Канал-курилка: @vmfrus Обратная связь: @vmf_bot Cотрудничество и реклама: @Letasgo |
| Created | 15 September 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 65 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rusfleet |
Topic
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 27% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Nov 2026, 16:57 | 48,638 | -10 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 11:57 | 48,648 | -13 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 03:26 | 48,661 | -15 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 00:19 | 48,676 | -16 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 02:28 | 48,692 | -16 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 05:38 | 48,708 | -9 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 07:19 | 48,717 | -8 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 09:55 | 48,725 | -11 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 11:41 | 48,736 | -7 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 13:06 | 48,743 | -6 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 11:16 | 48,749 | -6 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 11:09 | 48,755 | -8 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 11:54 | 48,763 | -11 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 13:49 | 48,774 | -16 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 12:38 | 48,790 | -6 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 15:51 | 48,796 | -7 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 16:31 | 48,803 | -14 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 18:28 | 48,817 | -8 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 13:27 | 48,825 | -20 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 12:30 | 48,845 | first reading |
Engagement
104 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 195 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 18.5%
- avg views ÷ 48,638 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 8,980
- 30 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 30
- of 104 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 30 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 104 (20 July 2026 – 11 November 2026) |
| Views total | 269,390 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 12:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈8,470
- Videos
- ≈1,180
- Links
- ≈2,220
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 21m 52s
- Average length
- 1m 41s
Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 247
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 14
- of 104 we hold a reading for · 13%
- Most on one post
- 108
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @rusfleet. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 104 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 19 of 30 posts held from the last 30 days (63.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
И ещё про московский цирк за ₽66 млрд Доходы бюджета Вологодской области на 2027 год прогнозируются на уровне ₽141,4 млрд рублей, расходы — ₽137,6 млрд. В Архангельской области цифры похожи — ₽155,1 млрд доходов и ₽158,5 млрд расходов. Почти половину годовых расходов миллионного русского региона можно покрыть за счёт... цирка в Москве. "Две России".
В Москве построят новый цирк за ₽66 млрд Это ~два фрегата. С 2006 года ВМФ получил всего три фрегата проекта 22350. Которые с гиперзвуком, которые основа флота дальней морской зоны. Три таких корабля. За двадцать лет. Фрегаты... ...Или цирк в Москве.
Наши американские "партнёры" тем временем вполне официально залезли в нашу зону влияния на Каспии ...Бывшую зону влияния. США намерены пресекать поставки в Иран через Каспийское море. Американское центральное командование (CENTCOM) создало группу из 20 человек. Команда называется "Железные ворота", она займётся отслеживанием иранской логистики. Ранее Штаты залезли в Прибалтику, на Украину, в Молдавию, Закавказье …
«Здравствуйте! Меня зовут Зинаида Александровна. Всю жизнь я прожила в Костроме. Одна вырастила двух дочерей. Работала старшим преподавателем в ВУЗе, шила на заказ, написала учебник. Любила театр, путешествия и живопись. Вела дневник и сочиняла стихи. Первый инсульт случился у меня в 27 лет. Потом ещё три. Каждый раз я с трудом, но восстанавливалась. Но пятый, в сентябре 2025 года, оказался совсем другим. Я упала и…
Остатки океанского флота Горшкова: "Кузнецов" и "Нахимов" Оба пока не могут выполнять боевые задачи. Но если "Нахимыч" совсем скоро вернётся в строй, то судьба "Кузи" не ясна. Как и судьба модернизации "Петра", а также "Варяга". Всего же старых советских крейсеров у нас осталось пять: два "Орлана", два "Атланта" и один "Кречет". Из них модернизацию прошли только два.
Пишут, Северный мост в Киеве ловит нашу баллистику. Результаты будут понятны чуть позже. Кстати, историческое название моста — Московский, переправа носила его до 2018 года.
Что общего у писанины 90% аффтаров о выборах в США и о волонтёре Романове? 90% аффтаров не разбираются в первом и не владеют фактурой по второму. "Уровень экспертизы и осведомлённости". Вот и хоронят, болезные — то республиканцев, то Романова. А ещё блокируемая "тележенька" постепенно возвращается к состоянию конца 2010-х, когда многие каналы работали "для читателей" и "для себя", а не ради денег или отработки спу…
Представьте, если энергию всяческих депутатов, "военблогеров" (никогда не бывавших на фронте), общественных деятелей, публицистов и проч. ... ...взять да и перенаправить — с морализаторского обсуждения ужжжаасного Хэллоуина — на что-то полезное... В этом смысле Няш-Мяш с её "силой рода" и "духом предков" как-то честнее.
В Польше якобы ГОСПЕРЕВОРОТ, КУРВА! Здоровья всем погибшим! Сувалкский коридор будет свободным!! Поморская народная республика с центром в Гданьске — тоже!!! #ВВЕДИВОЙСКА
С Днём основания современного ВМФ России! Комментировать происходящее в отечественном судоремонте не хочется, но придётся.
Сегодня много говорят об Африке Идёт передел Чёрного континента. Тех же лягушатников двигаем вполне бодренько. И тут не стоит забывать про наши военные базы в Африке. — Прежде всего военно-морские. — Которых сейчас нет ни одной. Кораблики оперативного соединения в Средиземке надо где-то обслуживать и чинить. Про Атлантику — молчу. Наша "африканская" логистика нынче идёт через Сирию. Этот маршрут практически беза…
Showing the 12 most recent of 104 posts we hold for @rusfleet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@rusfleet edited 12 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 8 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 8 November 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@neoborona · 2,1036 postsКарго-корабли
@kargoships · 863 postsМинная дивизия
@ASWman · 32,7342 postsПриZрак Новороссии
@ghost_of_novorossia · 139,9472 postsКурилка мичмана Птичкина
@vmfrus · 6,1952 postsМир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка"
@yurasumy · 2,662,2482 postsАгитплакат
@AgitPostes · 141 postАлександр Белов на минималках
@Belov_minimal · 2591 postФедоров НОД
@FedorovNOD · 1671 postImperium Invicta
@ImperiumInvicta · 21 postМорская пехота России
@Morskaya_pehota_Russia · 8,4991 postЗаписки на полях Новороссии
@Notes_of_Novorossiya · 661 postКирилл Стремоусов
@Stremousov_Kirill · 21,9391 postВспомнить о войне
@Vspomni_o_Voine_neraz · 8,8061 postArtemeiy
@artemeiy · 41 postБедлам ✌️ Киеве
@bedlamVkieve · 51 postFPV-Кузня. Ничего доброго, всего страшного
@content84 · 10,4901 postМорской отряд СпН
@marine_gru · 5,4971 postВидоизмененный Водород
@modyhydro · 2981 post#МОНТЯН! Без купюр
@montian_official2 · 45,9701 postNINJAC 🅉 - Пропаганда Здравого Смысла
@ninjac_z · 221 postОсведомительное Агентство
@osvagentstvo · 8411 postПисьма к ближним | Михаил Меньшиков
@pismakblizhnim · 2981 postПредисло́вие
@predslovo · 1311 postПутин🇷🇺
@putinkremlinrf · 201 postVerum Regnum|Наш Regnum
@regnum_na · 67,9341 post🍾 Ру⚡️⚡️кая Швабра 🧹
@rosshvabraru · 341 postКоготь Леопольда
@russianbelgium · 1171 postГоворит Старик
@starikpol · 1701 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 22 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@ZXYSXNONE · 14,11810 postsКарго-корабли
@kargoships · 865 postsРаньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,975,4364 postsМинистерство Нападения
@neoborona · 2,1034 postsНа Zzzzzападном фронте без перемен
@ve4niyvoy · 112,4843 postsМорской отряд СпН
@marine_gru · 5,4972 postsПолитНавигатор. Новости и аналитика
@Politnavigator · 85,1502 postsZERGULIO
@SergeyKolyasnikov · 443,8792 postsТаврический экспедиционный корпус
@tavria22 · 982 postsКурилка мичмана Птичкина
@vmfrus · 6,1952 postsМир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка"
@yurasumy · 2,662,2482 postsАНОНСАЧ 📺📻🎙🌴
@anonsa4 · 2481 postБелВПО
@Bel_VPO · 61 postFPV-Кузня. Ничего доброго, всего страшного
@content84 · 10,4901 postДоктор Z прописал
@docpro · 142,1651 postKotus per aquam in ore gladii
@KotusMarineRusarmy · 1,2891 postЗаписки на полях Новороссии
@Notes_of_Novorossiya · 661 postОсведомительное Агентство
@osvagentstvo · 8411 postРыбарь
@rybar · 1,511,7311 postRussian Submarine
@submarineru · 7,5341 postRussian Video Posts
@video_posts · 1621 postДмитрий Жаворонков
@zhavoronkov_d · 1381 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@mod_russia · 649,7463 postsБНБ | Бывших не бывает
@bnbshnick · 28,6362 postsФилолог в засаде
@philologist_zov · 59,0581 postШТУРМ БАХМУТА
@PMC_book · 15,9501 postНаталья Поклонская
@poklonskaya_nv · 36,9871 postData distributor
@sterngang · 21,1751 postВЕСТИ
@vestiru · 163,3831 postЖИВОВЪ
@zhivoff · 131,3781 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@dva_majors · 1,161,954#1
@notes_veterans · 273,805#2
@ZOV_Voevoda · 166,392#3
@mig41 · 476,724#4
@warhistoryalconafter · 478,135#5
@asupersharij · 1,735,796#6
@Love_Russia_Beauty · 114,670#7
@zhivoff · 131,378#8
@Mestb_Dobroj_Voli · 100,052#9
@RSaponkov · 101,627#10
@svarschiki · 123,963#11
@rvvoenkor · 1,452,307#12
@sladkov_plus · 692,737#13
@vmfrus · 6,195#14
@ramzayiegokomanda · 150,922#15
@oper_goblin · 490,249#16
@wargonzo · 738,065#17
@kramnikcat · 38,914#18
@bmpd_cast · 46,716#19
@bolshiepushki · 322,779#20
@Alekhin_Telega · 115,954#21
@epoddubny · 568,057#22
@lobaev_vlad · 71,954#23
@obrazbuduschego2 · 163,839#24
@bomber_fighter · 525,130#25
@vysokygovorit · 485,001#26
@boris_rozhin · 750,635#27
@belarusian_silovik · 449,848#28
@voenacher · 658,288#29
@SergeyKolyasnikov · 443,879#30
@rustroyka1945 · 188,687#31
@voenkorKotenok · 308,803#32
@infantmilitario · 275,861#33
@sashakots · 469,475#34
@bbbreaking · 1,975,436#35
@milinfolive · 614,488#36
@NeoficialniyBeZsonoV · 241,915#37
@arx_spn · 1,018,125#38
@Aviahub34 · 94,013#39
@rusengineer · 124,120#40
@yurasumy · 2,662,248#41
@rezident_ua · 956,216#42
@apwagner · 313,265#43
@readovkanews · 2,012,342#44
@iamhumancatcher · 118,266#45
@olegtsarov · 401,214#46
@mash · 3,140,033#47
@ice_inii · 36,666#48
@zerada1 · 423,271#49
@Z13_Separ · 208,541#50
@filatovcorr · 167,220#51
@karga4 · 22,206#52
@razvedosaa · 137,293#53
@infomil_live · 95,368#54
@MedvedevVesti · 182,276#55
@donrf22 · 67,494#56
@bazabazon · 1,557,057#57
@legitimniy · 1,041,883#58
@aleksandr_skif · 313,405#59
@ejdailyru · 664,380#60
@lost_armour · 88,616#61
@victorstepanych · 155,203#62
@SIL0VIKI · 182,030#63
@prolivstalina · 41,366#64
@NgP_raZVedka · 94,121#65
@DmitriySteshin · 135,855#66
@ChDambiev · 102,114#67
@dimsmirnov175 · 331,028#68
@russ_orientalist · 129,177#69
@OpenUkraine · 179,338#70
@brussinf · 106,805#71
@solovievlive · 1,113,787#72
@A_S_Sukonkin · 40,647#73
@bayraktar1070 · 82,757#74
@ghost_of_novorossia · 139,947#75
@insect_life · 192,654#76
@dontstopwar · 250,248#77
@istrkalkglk · 123,361#78
@new_militarycolumnist · 204,409#79
@luka_ebkov · 429,055#80
@norinea · 40,665#81
@philologist_zov · 59,058#82
@politjoystic · 250,548#83
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 29 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@kramnikcat · 38,914
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 31 August 2026
@BattleSailor13 · 50,064
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 31 August 2026
@tretyakov_n · 26,311
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 13 September 2026
@wingsofwar · 23,618
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 17 September 2026
@peredovaya_culture · 30,736
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 7 September 2026
@polkovnikt · 20,345
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 27 September 2026
@ASWman · 32,734
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 5 September 2026
@A_S_Sukonkin · 40,647
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 29 August 2026
@veles_v_okope · 49,037
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 7 September 2026
@prolivstalina · 41,366
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 30 August 2026
@operline_ru · 40,838
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 30 August 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Zаписки мичмана Птичкина” (@rusfleet), 48,638 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rusfleet.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.