Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Чеченские флешбеки каждый день

@flashback_94

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,182subscribers

-9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001192868416
TypeChannel
Username@flashback_94
Created18 January 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/flashback_94

Growth

3,1823,1913,186.57 August 2026 — 3,191 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,191 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,185 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,182 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,181–3,192 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 04:573,182-3
10 Aug 2026, 09:253,185-6
7 Aug 2026, 05:153,191no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:053,191first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 21 May 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 41s
Average length
56s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,820 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
48426.6%
🔥43223.7%
👍43123.7%
😢30816.9%
😁1548.46%
👎110.604%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,820reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 21 May 2024 to 11 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Mar 2025, 10:06 UTC≈5,940 views151 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#офотоп Штурмовики в одном из накопителей перед штурмом, где-то у Суджи. Из репортажа Первого канала

🔥113👍19😁108😢1

22 Feb 2025, 10:04 UTC≈7,050 views75 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

"Новое - это хорошо забытое старое" На первом видео наши бойцы в зоне СВО тестируют самодельную установку для стрельбы НАР. На втором боевики делают тоже самое, только в 00х годах.

😢45👍12😁9🔥63

11 Feb 2025, 07:06 UTC≈6,400 views56 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Своего рода #эксклюзив от подписчицы «Есть семьи, в которых о чем-то знают не понаслышке. Надо есть кашу!»

👍409🔥7

9 Feb 2025, 10:06 UTC≈5,460 views100 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

На фото настоящий боевой осел где-то в середине нулевых. Начал он свою службу после насильственной мобилизации в доблестной разведывательной роте и вполне бодро таскал по горам Веденского района всякие-разные нужности. Пока однажды, под покровом ночи, попутав берега, осел издал могучее «Ы-АААААААА», пехерив всю скрытность и свою карьеру разведчика - залетчик был сослан в штрафбат возить на тачке отходы. Что с ним был

😁86👍93🔥1😢1

1 Jan 2025, 11:37 UTC≈5,170 views124 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Савин наконец осознает, что помощь не придет и положение безнадежно: — Надо срочно отсюда выходить! Всё, блядь, по мне тут уже долбят, блядь! Какая будет моя дальнейшая задача, прием?! — Сейчас уточню! — Уточните мне дальнейшую задачу! Мне тут пиздец приходит, блядь, уже нахуй

😢10911😁2👍1🔥1

31 Dec 2024, 12:58 UTC≈4,800 views145 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Всех благ. Нашим Воинам везения и стойкости. С наступающим Новым годом. 31 декабря, помним, гордимся!

132👍13

11 Dec 2024, 08:35 UTC≈5,660 views173 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @TyzemsovetPhoto

30 лет назад началась эпоха Чеченских войн, официально продолжавшаяся 15 лет, до 2009 года, по факту - еще в течение десятилетия, а круги от нее расходятся по сей день, забирая жизни. География и идеология конфликта вышли далеко за пределы Чечни и это наметилось в самом начале. Первые потери были понесены, когда ВС РФ не успели даже заехать в Чечню. 11 декабря 1994 в Ингушетии в районе с. Яндаре (в районе этого села

😢152👍109🔥2

22 Oct 2024, 10:01 UTC≈6,040 views170 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#эксклюзив Красноярский милиционер, Итум-Кале 2001 год.

128👍25🔥17

20 Jul 2024, 16:05 UTC≈13,500 views106 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

#видео Момент из разговора генерала Шаманова с главой сельского поселения(?).

🔥86👍14👎41😁1

24 Jun 2024, 09:04 UTC≈8,780 views106 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

#видео Ликвидированные в ходе КТО террористы, Дагестан, 23 июня 2024 год.

🔥88👍162

11 Jun 2024, 06:02 UTC≈8,440 views109 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#эксклюзив Бойцы 691-ооСпН (67-я ОБрСпН) в лесах Чечни.

👍8815🔥5👎1

6 Jun 2024, 06:02 UTC≈7,780 views114 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#эксклюзив Бойцы 691-ооСпН (67-я ОБрСпН) в Бамуте.

🔥91👍157👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @flashback_94. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Чеченские флешбеки каждый день” (@flashback_94), 3,182 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/flashback_94.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.