Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
65 measurements spanning 98 days, net -3,204. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 65,587–69,842 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 65
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 22:22
66,078
-55
10 Nov 2026, 01:39
66,133
-41
8 Nov 2026, 14:16
66,174
-46
7 Nov 2026, 08:49
66,220
-25
6 Nov 2026, 10:15
66,245
-32
5 Nov 2026, 11:34
66,277
-62
4 Nov 2026, 07:50
66,339
-44
3 Nov 2026, 06:27
66,383
-23
2 Nov 2026, 06:57
66,406
-35
1 Nov 2026, 06:38
66,441
-33
31 Oct 2026, 03:47
66,474
-52
30 Oct 2026, 01:48
66,526
-41
29 Oct 2026, 04:58
66,567
-65
28 Oct 2026, 06:00
66,632
-63
27 Oct 2026, 09:05
66,695
-83
26 Oct 2026, 10:36
66,778
-77
25 Oct 2026, 12:15
66,855
-43
24 Oct 2026, 13:10
66,898
-42
23 Oct 2026, 14:47
66,940
-50
22 Oct 2026, 13:36
66,990
first reading
Engagement
187 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 197 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.30%
avg views ÷ 66,078 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,840
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.28%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 187 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 20 of 23 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held
187 (1 August 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total
65,380
Reactions total
1,880
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Nov 2026, 08:54 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,210
Videos
≈3,180
Links
≈703
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2h 24m
Average length
1m 31s
Measured directly from 95 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,382 reactions across 155 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,395
54.7%
🔥
670
15.3%
🙏
583
13.3%
👍
197
4.50%
❤🔥
146
3.33%
🥰
120
2.74%
🎉
55
1.26%
👏
51
1.16%
💯
51
1.16%
😢
42
0.958%
😁
13
0.297%
😍
12
0.274%
🕊
11
0.251%
😨
7
0.16%
😱
7
0.16%
🤗
5
0.114%
🤣
5
0.114%
💔
4
0.091%
🤩
4
0.091%
🤝
2
0.046%
2 further kinds
2
0.046%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 157 of the 187 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,382 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 187 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 23 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Понемногу возвращаемся к любимому всеми контенту❤️
Скоро начнем восстановление кишечника, микробиома и печени после антибиотиков и тонны обезболов😢
А муж все хвалится заготовками моими
Ну в таком восторге он😁сказал — это гениально, как ЮПИ — просто добавь воды😁помните такое?только это полезно питательно и по-домашнему🥰😊
Друзья, как и обещали, мы добавили 10 дней доступа в подарок всем, у кого он был активен с 11 по 20 октября.
В эти дни из-за неполадок в дата-центрах Яндекса платформа работала с перебоями, и нам важно, чтобы эти дни у вас не пропали 😊
Ничего делать не нужно: новая дата окончания доступа уже отражается в вашем личном кабинете.
Если у вас появятся вопросы по доступу, пожалуйста, обращайтесь в службу заботы:
https:…
У меня почему- то не возникло ни разу злости к сбившему
Я сама водитель и понимаю, что ситуации бывают разные. Тем более дети, которые могут резко выскочить или совершить опасный маневр😭
К тому же, никто не знает до конца как оно было…только со слов детей, которые кричали, что он был в телефоне(
У него у самого сломана ключица в двух местах
Это был Вьетнамец из бедной семьи. Муж с ним встречался и они подписали ми…
Здесь как мы менялись и как росли наши детки с 2021 по 2026 год
Дни Рождения нашей Милашки🥰
Всем огромное спасибо за поздравления и очень нужные нам пожелания!🫶🏼
Все читаем!наворачиваются слезы от того, какие вы🥹!искренние и добродушные!🫶🏼
Вы будете в шоке, но у нашей Милашки еще и День Рождения!на следующий день после выписки🫠
Милану сбил байк ровно за неделю до ее дня Рождения, которого она очень ждала и продолжала ждать не смотря ни на что
Поэтому мы не смотря на бессонные ночи и невероятную усталость нашли в себе силы заниматься еще и организацией праздника
Спасибо Вам за вашу поддержку, за ваши молитвы и любовь, которую вы нам посылали!мы справи…
Боже, как важно уметь переключаться на благодарность💔
(муж записывал голосовое в наш семейный чат)
Послушайте
Я не знаю, как бы мы справились с этим всем, если бы не благодарность, за то, что она жива и в разуме🙏🏻
19.10 нашу Милашу сбил байк. Это была самая страшная ночь в моей жизни. Все это время держимся только на благодарности, что все произошло так, а не иначе. Что нет тяжелых травм головы. Открытый перелом голени со смещением. Сделали операцию.Множественные порезы на лице и теле зашили
Самое страшное позади. Будем восстанавливаться
Благодарю всех за поддержку🙏🏽все читаю. Простите, что не всем отвечаю, но все вижу, очень…
🙏272❤73😢41🕊7
Showing the 12 most recent of 187 posts we hold for @razumteloeda. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@razumteloeda edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
20 August 2026
Most recent edit
20 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Канал травницы Светланы Калмыковой @frutorianka @frutorianka_official · 39,181 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 30 August 2026
Moloday | Снижение биологического возраста @recipes_prozdorovie · 23,405 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 17 September 2026
Vegansearth @vegansearth · 35,553 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
YANCHEVSKAYALERA @yanchevskaya_lera · 37,595 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 31 August 2026
@100_sv @sveta100_sv · 63,178 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 21 August 2026
Камила Цейтлина @kamilatseitlina · 50,573 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 25 August 2026
Veganstvo_syroedenie @vegsyr · 33,198 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 4 September 2026
Позитивное воспитание. Вика Минасян @positivepsychology1 · 54,846 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 23 August 2026
MOLODAY @molodayproduct · 146,814 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Разум Тело и Еда” (@razumteloeda), 66,078 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/razumteloeda.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.