Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Теледжина

Channel

Теледжина

@katya_telegina

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

9,373subscribers

-41 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001203942742
TypeChannel
Username@katya_telegina
DescriptionРежиссер рассказывает о работе художников-постановщиков, интерьерах, архитектуре и современном искусстве в кино. Лекции в записи, курсы и консультации visualstorytelling.space Рассказывает Катя Телегина vimeo.com/telegina Для связи: @telegina_k
Created6 September 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/katya_telegina

Growth

9,3739,4149,393.56 August 2026 — 9,414 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,408 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,391 subscribers11 August 2026 — 9,386 subscribers14 August 2026 — 9,373 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 9 days, net -41. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,367–9,420 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 22:189,373-13
11 Aug 2026, 23:529,386-5
9 Aug 2026, 06:419,391-17
6 Aug 2026, 15:029,408-6
6 Aug 2026, 06:029,414first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.50%
avg views ÷ 9,373 subscribers
Avg views / post
891
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.69%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held15 (1 August 202614 August 2026)
Views total12,470
Reactions total335
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 08:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
7,830
Videos
175
Links
459

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

319 reactions across 13 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
21266.5%
🔥7122.3%
154.70%
💘123.76%
❤‍🔥51.57%
🍓30.94%
🥰10.313%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 335reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 14 we hold a reading for · 14%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @katya_telegina. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 06:25 UTC586 views66 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Второй раз в жизни лицезрела Млечный Путь. Реальный гигантский Млечный Путь. Непередаваемые ощущения. Это фото с моего телефона не передает примерно ничего, лишь намек и фрагмент, от того, что обозревали глаза на самом деле. И по всему этому метеоры, то тут, то там. Две самые яркие точки - Лира и Альтаир ✨

44🔥138🥰1

13 Aug 2026, 17:51 UTC667 views28 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Как человек, который когда-то постоянно смотрел «Билли Эллиота», и который любит коллекционировтаь примеры, когда создатели кино вдохновлялись именно фотографиями — прибываю в восторге от ЭТОГО поста (как хорошо, что редкие каналы, что я читаю, делятся особенными находками среди небольших каналов). Цитирую кусочек поста: Сценарист “Билли Эллиота” Ли Холл вручил книгу команде художников-постановщиков (каждому по экз

244

13 Aug 2026, 12:36 UTC763 views13 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Ксати прямо сейчас в повторном прокате идет «Грозовой перевал» Андреи Арнольд 2011 года Живая камера, которую словно продувает ветром (и нас вместе с ней) и эмоционально-поэтический сторителл. Не зависимо от того, как вы относитесь к роману, и отнесетесь к повествованию фильма, это очень красиво. Старый трейлер. Фильм прокатывает Киномания. Я правда чуть поздно написала, и сеансов уже немного, поэтому если вас инт

🔥13

13 Aug 2026, 09:19 UTC695 views4 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Ребята, так как много сохраненок и есть вопросы в личку, Важно: После регистрации не идти дальше по сайту, а снова открыть эту же ссылку

4

12 Aug 2026, 11:55 UTC911 views43 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Мне тут напомнили, что существует запись лекции «Визуальные тренды в кино и сериалах» Лекция проходила в начале июня в рамках форума VidMK. Запись доступна бесплатно. Для чего нужно пройти небольшую регистрацию, а потом снова нажать на саму ссылку - тогда лекция разблокируется. 🧚‍♀️Лекция здесь Не стесняйтесь делиться обратной связью, пожалуйста🙏🏻 Особенно, если есть что обсудить, подискутировать, или сделать инте

25🔥15🍓3

10 Aug 2026, 18:22 UTC≈1,000 views36 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Киноклуб «Сентиментальный сентябрь: разум, чувства и визуальные решения в романтических экранизациях» Что делаем: смотрим много разных романтических фильмов (и экранизаций, и нет). Сравниваем, обсуждаем разницу в художественных подходах. По желанию читаем Джейн Остин. И придумываем, как бы сняли сами! В программе: Четыре лекции от меня и приглашенных гостей, Две встречи-обсуждения, Творческое задание на месяц Филь

🔥18💘1053

10 Aug 2026, 18:18 UTC848 views24 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Я обычно в лекциях, киноклубах и курсах стараюсь ходить в не самые популярные зоны, а туда где интересно покопаться. Но тут под влиянием внутренних процессов и под натиском всех внешних процессов мира (Привет всем чутким товарищам!) захотелось чего-то попроще. В ожидании осенних релизов «Гордости и предубеждения» и «Разума и чувств» решила сделать большой разбор и сравнение романтических экранизаций. Но потом понял

17❤‍🔥5💘2

6 Aug 2026, 10:56 UTC≈1,460 views30 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026
Photo

Даже если вы никогда не слышали про итальянского архитектора Карло Скарпу, вы точно видели фильмы или сериалы, на художественное решение которых он оказал влияние. Чаще всего его след заметен в придуманных декорациях, иногда более, а иногда менее явно. Художники-постановщики любят называть его имя в интервью и открыто рассказывать, почему они им вдохновлялись. На карточках некоторые из примеров: «Дюна», «Злая: сказ

30

6 Aug 2026, 10:56 UTC938 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Решила немного пояснить, почему крут Скарпа и почему стоит посмотреть док про него через примеры из кино:

4

4 Aug 2026, 17:00 UTC≈1,120 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

«Чтобы понять, что такое красота, нужно посещать места, где ее можно встретить». Эти слова Карло Скарпы идеально описывают фильм «Павильон на воде» — медитативное путешествие по миру архитектора. Вместе с CoolConnections разыгрываем 2 пары билетов на премьеру фильма в рамках фестиваля ЛАФ 9 августа в кинотеатре «Художественный» Для участия в розыгрыше: 🩵подпишитесь на Теледжина и CoolConnections 🩵 нажмите кнопку «

18🔥1

Signed Randomize Bot 🎲 [Рандомайзер]

3 Aug 2026, 09:42 UTC≈1,060 views20 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Если можно было для меня придумать фестиваль, то это ЛАФ — Летний Архитектурный Фестиваль. С 8 по 21 августа в «Художественном» и в других городах России можно будет увидеть лучшие игровые и документальные фильмы об архитектуре. Я хочу посмотреть почти что всё и в кои веки (это бывает крайне редко) жалею, что не в Москве. Дальше парочка слов про некоторые фильмы. «Арка» — история создания арки Дефанс, знаменитого п

15🔥5

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @katya_telegina. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@katya_telegina edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
15 August 2026
Most recent edit
15 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 93,471 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Теледжина” (@katya_telegina), 9,373 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/katya_telegina.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.