Правила публикации →
https://taplink.cc/frilansikiii_channel
Канал с вакансиями, стажировка и мероприятиями из креативных индустрий 🙃
Отправить вакансию → @frilansiki_support
Created
20 February 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 3 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 220 comparable posts for this entry, running 3 August 2026 to 13 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 14 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
65 measurements spanning 98 days, net +1,485. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 58,484–60,415 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 65
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 21:36
60,192
+14
10 Nov 2026, 01:58
60,178
+44
8 Nov 2026, 16:00
60,134
+34
7 Nov 2026, 08:37
60,100
+33
6 Nov 2026, 08:06
60,067
+30
5 Nov 2026, 07:08
60,037
+16
4 Nov 2026, 04:55
60,021
+22
3 Nov 2026, 03:20
59,999
+52
2 Nov 2026, 02:20
59,947
+37
1 Nov 2026, 04:49
59,910
+8
31 Oct 2026, 01:57
59,902
+5
29 Oct 2026, 22:29
59,897
+13
28 Oct 2026, 19:09
59,884
+7
27 Oct 2026, 17:30
59,877
+35
26 Oct 2026, 17:06
59,842
+17
25 Oct 2026, 16:48
59,825
+10
24 Oct 2026, 19:08
59,815
+2
23 Oct 2026, 16:44
59,813
+18
22 Oct 2026, 14:36
59,795
+50
21 Oct 2026, 10:35
59,745
first reading
Engagement
275 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 206 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.80%
avg views ÷ 60,192 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,490
60 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.41%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
60
of 275 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 55 of 60 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held
275 (3 August 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total
209,370
Reactions total
803
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Nov 2026, 04:34 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,040
Videos
≈177
Links
≈1,030
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
59m 48s
Average length
3m 59s
Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,394 reactions across 228 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,252
36.9%
🗿
1,002
29.5%
🔥
359
10.6%
🌚
289
8.52%
❤🔥
163
4.80%
🤔
75
2.21%
🤯
68
2.00%
👀
51
1.50%
🥰
50
1.47%
🤩
34
1.00%
🕊
29
0.854%
🎉
9
0.265%
😱
9
0.265%
💋
2
0.059%
💯
2
0.059%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 249 of the 275 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,615 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 275 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 60 posts held from the last 30 days (1.67%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Восьмой год я провожу исследование: какие дизайн-команды в отечественных продуктовых компаниях самые сильные?
Такой рейтинг будет полезен рынку. Дизайнерам — лучше понимать, где есть хорошие вызовы и комфортная среда для профессионального роста. Компаниям и дизайн-командам — видеть, что нужно докачать.
Буду благодарен, если вы пройдёте опрос. Результаты исследования опубликую в январе. Вы найдёте отчёт в крупных ди…
#находки
Курс «Допечатная подготовка»
Для дизайнеров, менеджеров и всех, кто хоть раз отправлял макет в печать с молитвой и надеждой на лучшее
Курс подойдёт тем, кто хочет уверенно работать с печатными проектами и получать предсказуемый результат. Все уроки собраны из реальных кейсов и собственных ошибок авторов
Программа состоит из трёх частей.
Первая уже доступна на Степике, вторая откроется 12 января. А дальше …
#портфолио
Привет! Я Саша, senior креатор и креативный копирайтер
Ищу проекты или фулл-тайм. Мои работы лежат в портфолио - https://guryanova.tilda.ws/creator
Вот что я делаю:
• Разрабатываю концепции рекламы: от big idea до механик активаций, от нейминга до кампаний 360.
• Пишу сценарии: рилсы, классические рекламные ролики, корпоративные видео и интервью.
• Лидирую коммуникацию бренда: от стратегии и TOV до полир…
Ищем Marketing & PR Lead (AI-native) в Воронеж или на удаленку 🙌
Это человек, который сам делает маркетинг и PR и строит систему, где часть работы берут на себя агенты, а часть люди. Подчиняется напрямую CEO. В помощь у него будут 2–3 человека и столько агентов, сколько он соберет сам.
Что предстоит делать:
— упаковывать и запускать наши AI-услуги;
— договариваться с медиа, партнерами и организаторами событий;
— от…
🐸 Ищем коллегу!
Мы в поиске младшего менеджера в команду Академии.
Обязанности:
— коммуникация с подрядчиками и бэк-офисом Музея, ведение документооборота, работа с бюджетами и 1С;
— сопровождение образовательных программ: формирование расписания, помощь в подготовке занятий, поддержка преподавателей во время учебного процесса, сбор и анализ обратной связи от студентов и преподавателей.
Условия:
— занятость 5/2, н…
Коллажные мастер-классы в ноябре
Возвращаемся к офлайн-встречам 🤍 Я поселилась в небольшой мастерской на Бауманской. Теперь наши встречи еще камернее и уютнее — как раз к наступлению холодов.
🔹 15 ноября 12:00–15:00. Поэтический коллаж. Превратим стихотворение в коллажную иллюстрацию. Приносите любимые стихи или выбирайте текст на месте. Разберем, как передать содержание и настроение стихотворения через образы, мет…
Привет, друзья.
Наконец-то этот день настал! Встречайте шорт-лист Фестиваля нового дизайна СРЕДА 2026.
В этом сезоне работы участников оценивают 5 составов жюри: Дизайн-жюри, Цифровое жюри, Шрифтовое жюри, Рекламное жюри и Ритейл-жюри. На этом этапе они завершили свою работу по формированию шорт-листов Фестиваля нового дизайна «СРЕДА 2026».
299 заявок вошли в шорт-лист. В процентном соотношении к общему числу заяво…
⚙️ 27 ноября. Москва. Робоцех.
ИИ-агенты уже работают внутри банков, помогают создавать продукты и меняют инженерные процессы. 27 ноября на Робоцехе будем разбираться, как именно всё это устроено. Раньше мы собирали в нём только своих, а теперь впервые открываем двери для всех.
На одной площадке встретятся инженеры и руководители, которым есть что показать из собственной практики и о чём поспорить.
🥚 MWS: Данил Бу…
#портфолио
Всем привет! Меня зовут Арина, я ищу работу на проектной и постоянной основе — как креатор, креативный стратег или бренд-лид.
Я работаю на пересечении смыслов, креатива и коммуникации.
Специализируюсь на разработке:
🌟креативных концепций — брендов, ивентов, коллабораций, спецпроектов,
🌟позиционирования проектов,
🌟коммуникационных и бренд-платформ (ДНК, УТП, ToV, RTB),
🌟нейминга и ключевых сообщений,
🌟виз…
Ищем креативного продюсера в Bold Friday
Мы — студия дизайна и разработки. Занимаемся брендингом и создаём цифровые продукты, работаем с AI, генеративной графикой и интерактивными форматами.
Ищем креативного продюсера, который будет развивать личный бренд основателя и публичные проекты студии: находить истории, придумывать форматы, организовывать производство и доводить работу до аудитории.
Работать будешь напряму…
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 275 posts we hold for @polyaluzjob. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@polyaluzjob edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
20 September 2026
Most recent edit
10 November 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 8 posts on @polyaluzjob as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
24 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
13 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
3 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
6
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@polyaluzjob named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@designbysber named in 2 posts, 9 September 2026 – 13 September 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Точка входа @bbe_jobs · 25,593 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 14 September 2026
Я работаю в digital, детка 🚀 @digital_rabota · 34,231 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 3 September 2026
ИЩУ_ДИЗАЙНЕРА @designer_ru · 81,398 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 19 August 2026
Design Hunters @designhunters · 79,907 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 August 2026
Ищу ИЛЛЮСТРАТОРА фриланс @rabota_illustrator · 19,757 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 1 October 2026
Вакансии для дизайнеров @designer_vacancies · 23,649 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 20 September 2026
поле @poledsgn · 22,203 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 20 September 2026
ФРИЛАНС @uvetrovoi · 22,825 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 September 2026
Вакансии для Дизайнеров @design_jobs_uxui · 26,721 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 September 2026
Дизайн-биржа 💵 @designbirzha · 52,020 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 26 August 2026
Работа в диджитал и медиа @workasap · 75,594 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 19 August 2026
Удаленка - вся творческая работа @rueventjob · 93,697 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 August 2026
Эйч Вакансии @hcareers_jobs · 45,517 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 30 August 2026
Работа видеопродакшн 🎬 @prodjob · 19,715 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 4 October 2026
ЗАКАЗЫ НА ДИЗАЙН | ДИЗАЙНЕРЫ | ВАКАНСИИ @zakaz_design · 26,398 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 16 September 2026
Аптуми (up to me) @uptume · 26,997 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 September 2026
Jobpower – креативные вакансии, работа в творческих сферах @jobpower · 45,141 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 28 August 2026
ParaGraph @paradigm_graphics · 34,168 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 2 September 2026
МИР КРЕАТОРОВ | Вакансии @mirkreatorovjob · 76,878 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 20 August 2026
Школа дизайна НИУ ВШЭ @hsedesign · 18,845 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 5 October 2026
«Карьера» The Blueprint @theblueprintcareer · 144,049 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 13 August 2026
CG Freelance @cgfreelance · 60,955 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 August 2026
[WORK IN ART] Работа в сфере искусства @workinart · 72,312 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 August 2026
Creative Freelancer @vakansi_rus · 22,681 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 September 2026
This channel appears in 87 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ФРИЛАНСИКИ” (@polyaluzjob), 60,192 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/polyaluzjob.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.