Channel
@nayawatching
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,430subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001343103486 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nayawatching |
| Created | 11 September 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nayawatching |
Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Sept 2026, 22:01 | 4,430 | -22 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 00:21 | 4,452 | +10 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 20:16 | 4,442 | +6 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 20:35 | 4,436 | -3 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:18 | 4,439 | -7 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 19:23 | 4,446 | -9 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 19:44 | 4,455 | +14 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:18 | 4,441 | +4 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 15:57 | 4,437 | -4 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 16:33 | 4,441 | +4 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 09:16 | 4,437 | -5 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 18:46 | 4,442 | +4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:51 | 4,438 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:31 | 4,439 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:50 | 4,439 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
428 reactions across 9 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 374 | 87.4% | |
| 💔 | 54 | 12.6% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 428 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
В воскресенье смотрим на Гийома Кане и Марион Котийяр под дождем — то есть «Влюбись в меня, если осмелишься» Яна Сэмюэля. Билеты здесь: https://illusion-cinema.ru/event-25697/ До встречи!
❤16💔5
Посмотрела «Одиссею». Грандиозный фильм по методичке Кристофера Нолана, который ничтожно мало общего имеет с Гомером, так что относиться к нему как к экранизации — так себе идея. Женских персонажей Нолан прописывать все еще не умеет и либо выкидывает их из сюжета, либо дает пять минут экранного времени. Людвиг Йоранссон — умница, Бенни Сэфди в роли Агамемнона — абсолютный smash (я бы даже сказала the smashing machine…
❤59💔24
Я думала, что достаточно остра на язык, а потом прочитала послание Эмили Уилсон и поняла, что надо еще потренироваться.
❤34
Кинопоказ «Грации» Паоло Соррентино — первая встреча клуба в новом сезоне. Приглашаем вас на вечер, который объединит просмотр фильма и его профессиональный разбор. Сначала мы посмотрим новую работу одного из самых узнаваемых режиссеров современности, а затем вместе с кинокритиком Наей Гусевой разберем художественный язык Соррентино, ключевые темы фильма, его место в фильмографии режиссера и детали, которые легко уп…
❤23
Мне сегодня 25! Некоторые коллеги говорят, что я еще молода и невинна, другие советуют проверить ранние признаки старения. Шесть лет назад, когда создавался этот канал, я и не думала, что смогу писать в нем о всяких важных вещах — и вот мы здесь. Очень благодарна каждому, кто читает, смотрит, поддерживает — значит, все не зря, а это главное. Надеюсь, продолжим в том же духе. Как говорится, seize the day, boys — ma…
❤123💔16
МШК × Film.ru: конкурс видеоэссе У фильма может быть точная режиссура, сильный сценарий и свой взгляд на мир, но по разным причинам они проходят мимо широкой аудитории. Вместе с Film.ru запускаем конкурс видеоэссе о таких картинах — тех, которые вы считаете важными, недооценёнными и точно достойными большего внимания. Задание: сделать видеоэссе на 1–3 минуты о фильме, которому не хватило зрительского внимания, но к…
❤24
В отпуске посмотрела милейший «Следствие ведут овечки», который собрал кучу громких имен: Хью Джекман, Молли Гордон, Эмма Томпсон и Николас Браун — в кадре, Белла Рамзи, Брайан Крэнстон и Патрик Стюарт — в голосах. Режиссер Кайл Балда (воздержитесь от шуток) работал над «Миньонами» и «Лораксом», так что юмор соответствующий: неприлично громко хрюкнула над диалогом про Бога, который invisible, made of bread and damns…
❤45
Разбираемся, как большие дяди решили, что большое кино надо смотреть на маленьких экранах. https://www.film.ru/articles/netflix-protiv-kinoteatrov-kto-na-samom-dele-proigryvaet
❤29
Есть у меня мечта — погрузиться в историю искусств, не только визуальных. Во многом из-за этого и поступила на культурологическую магистратуру: хотелось заполнить лакуны и недостающие пробелы, которые остались еще после журфака (конечно, прочитать «Житие протопопа Аввакума» было интересным индивидуальным опытом, но недостаточным). Надеюсь, когда-нибудь мой график выстроится таким образом, что томными вечерами я смогу…
❤21💔9
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @nayawatching. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“кабинет доктора хали-гали” (@nayawatching), 4,430 subscribers as measured 24 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nayawatching.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.