Channel
@rwvfilm
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,736subscribers
-23 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001749379327 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rwvfilm |
| Description | Билеты на наши фильмы по ссылке: https://rwvfilm.taplink.ws Наш сайт: rwvfilm.com |
| Created | 22 August 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rwvfilm |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:44 | 6,736 | -9 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:53 | 6,745 | -6 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:31 | 6,751 | -8 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:41 | 6,759 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:37 | 6,759 | first reading |
24 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 20 of 24 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 24 (3 August 2026 – 17 August 2026) |
| Views total | 5,536 |
| Reactions total | 68 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 18 Aug 2026, 11:24 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
58 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 34 | 58.6% | |
| 👍 | 17 | 29.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 3.45% | |
| 🆒 | 2 | 3.45% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 3.45% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 1.72% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 68reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
20 августа наши друзья из Киномании выпускают в прокат «Электрический поцелуй» Пьера Сальвадори — фильм, открывший 79-й Каннский кинофестиваль. Париж, 1928 год. Художник Антуан после смерти жены больше не может вернуться к работе и однажды решает обратиться к медиуму. Только никакого потустороннего мира здесь нет: за «голосом» умершей стоит Сюзанна — ловкая артистка бродячего цирка. Её маленькая афера постепенно воз…
👍1
Кажется, ехать одной в дом без связи было не самой лучшей идеей… «Астрал.Медиум» — спецпоказ 26 августа!
Сегодня Пьеру Ришару — 92! Кажется, мы знаем о нём всё: высокий блондин, вечный неудачник и один из главных комиков французского кино. Но за знаменитым образом скрывается немало любопытного. Собрали несколько фактов о Пьере Ришаре — листайте карточки ❤️
❤4
Кино, музыка и немного французского настроения в центре Петербурга! Сегодня «Шербурские зонтики» смотрим в кинотеатре "Michele" с атмосферой «Полночи в Париже», где собирают авторское, фестивальное и культовое кино. Франция 1960-х, юная Катрин Денев и история Женевьевы и Ги, которым кажется, что первая любовь способна пережить всё. Деми превращает простую историю о разлуке и взрослении в яркий, почти сказочный мир.…
👍3
Кажется, в мире Гибли все друг друга немного знают 👀 Пока Сидзуку ищет книги, пишет свою первую историю и пытается разобраться в себе, вокруг неё прячется целая компания знакомых героев. И это только часть деталей, которые Ёсифуми Кондо и команда спрятали в «Шёпоте сердца»! Собрали пасхалки, ради которых фильм хочется пересмотреть ещё внимательнее 🤍 Уже в широком прокате! 🎟 Полное расписание и билеты.
❤3
Виму Вендерсу — 81! Кажется, хороший повод узнать режиссёра чуть ближе. Например, Вендерса когда-то не приняли в киношколу, «Париж, Техас» дописывали уже во время съёмок, а «Идеальные дни» выросли из совсем другого проекта. Подробнее рассказали в карточках!
Классика мирового кинематографа в одном из самых атмосферных пространств Петербурга ☂️ 15 августа в Северной столице пройдет специальный показ «Шербурских зонтиков» Жака Деми — фильма, который уже больше 60 лет доказывает: мюзикл может быть одновременно ослепительно красивым и очень грустным. Юная Катрин Денев, музыка Мишеля Леграна, город будто из коробки с пастелью — и история первой любви, которой предстоит стол…
А что, если прошлое на самом деле ярче настоящего? В «Кодексе Данте» Джулиан Шнабель переворачивает привычную кинологику: XIV век снимает в насыщенном цвете, а XXI — превращает в чёрно-белый нуар. И это не просто красивый способ разделить две временные линии. За цветом стоят Джотто и средневековая живопись, за монохромом — классическое кино и ощущение современности как своеобразного чистилища. Разбираемся в карточ…
Любовь, которая могла случиться иначе 💔 15 августа смотрим на большом экране «Шербурские зонтики» Жака Деми — один из самых красивых и необычных мюзиклов в истории кино. Здесь не произносят ни одной реплики без музыки: весь фильм буквально пропет под мелодии Мишеля Леграна. А за пастельными фасадами Шербура, яркими платьями и юной Катрин Денев скрывается история первой любви, которой приходится столкнуться с куда м…
❤4
Что общего у «Шёпота сердца» и «Порко Россо»? И почему именно эта тихая история о взрослении стала технологическим экспериментом для Ghibli? Заглядываем за кулисы фильма и собираем факты, которые легко пропустить при просмотре. С 13 августа — в широком прокате! 🎟 Полное расписание и билеты.
❤5🔥2🙏1
А что, если любовь всей жизни начинается со слова «слабо»? 13 августа наши друзья из Киномании покажут на больших экранах легендарную картину «Влюбись в меня, если осмелишься» — французская романтическая драма с Марион Котийяр и Гийомом Кане. Жюльен и Софи знакомы с детства, и всё это время между ними продолжается одна бесконечная игра на смелость. С каждым годом ставки становятся выше, шутки — опаснее, а граница м…
❤4👍1
Ирландский хоррор умеет находить источник тревоги в самом привычном! Новый дом превращает жизнь в бесконечную петлю, старый отель хранит слишком реальные легенды, а безобидная на первый взгляд вещь становится предвестником кошмара. Собрали три фильма для тех, кому мало обычных скримеров. «Астрал. Медиум», «Вивариум» и «Хокум» — в онлайн-кинотеатрах.
❤2👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @rwvfilm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 169,237 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“RWV Film | Кино, сериалы и анимация” (@rwvfilm), 6,736 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rwvfilm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.