Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

BBE: графический дизайн

@bbegraph

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

12,264subscribers

+14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001796627999
TypeChannel
Username@bbegraph
Created3 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/bbegraph

Growth

12,24812,26412,2567 August 2026 — 12,250 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,248 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,249 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,258 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,261 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,264 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 6 days, net +14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,246–12,266 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 07:0712,264+3
12 Aug 2026, 07:3112,261+3
11 Aug 2026, 06:3412,258+9
9 Aug 2026, 06:4112,249+1
8 Aug 2026, 07:1812,248-2
7 Aug 2026, 08:0112,250first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.83%
avg views ÷ 12,264 subscribers
Avg views / post
592
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.892%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 7 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held7 (29 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total4,146
Reactions total37
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 03:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3s
Average length
3s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

37 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2156.8%
🔥1129.7%
🥰38.11%
12.70%
👏12.70%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC255 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Гигантские объекты и реалистичная компьютерная графика уже не гарантируют внимания. В карусели разбираем, почему виртуальная наружная реклама перестала удивлять, что сегодня важнее технического эффекта и как сделать такой дизайн снова заметным без лишнего усложнения и масштабного производства. → На курсе «Дизайнер трёхмерной графики» научим создавать виртуальную рекламу и модели, которые привлекают внимание.

31🔥1

10 Aug 2026, 11:24 UTC443 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Как построить карьеру в творческой сфере От идеи до собственного дела или управляющей должности: путь в креативных индустриях требует не только таланта, но и понятной системы. 13 августа в 19:00 ждём вас на бесплатной онлайн-встрече — дне открытых дверей магистратуры «Бизнес и управление в креативных индустриях» от школы Bang Bang Education и Московского института психоанализа. Расскажем, как устроена программа, к

🔥1

7 Aug 2026, 09:30 UTC601 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Как принципы советской школы монтажа используются в фильмах, рекламе и видеоконтенте сегодня? Рассказываем в нашем совместном гайде с журналом о кино ORNAMENT. Узнаете, как сочетание кадров передает идеи автора и формирует эмоции зрителя. И освоите ключевые техники монтажа на примерах из классического и современного кино. → Забрать гайд и сформировать монтажное мышление.

4

6 Aug 2026, 11:03 UTC614 views3 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

ИИ-шпаргалки и арт-директор в новом мире Собрали полезные материалы от Андрея Сергунина, дизайн- директора в студии «ЦЕХ» и преподавателя курса «Управление случайностью. Нейросети в задачах дизайнера». ● Как мыслит нейросеть? Теория, кейсы «ЦЕХа» и «сломанный нейротелефон» Андрей рассказал о принципах работы с нейросетями, правилах промптов и особенностях постпродакшна. ● «Попаданцы» и мультивселенные: генерируем

3

3 Aug 2026, 10:33 UTC692 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Когда главный шедевр — это профиль в соцсетях Вместе с академией маркетинга MAED разобрали популярные профили арт-директоров, художников и дизайнеров и попытались понять, что делает их такими цепляющими для десятков тысяч подписчиков. → Научитесь дизайнить всё и соберете портфолио, чтобы делиться им в социальных сетях — на годовой программе «Графический дизайнер Plus».

4

31 Jul 2026, 09:00 UTC817 views8 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Почему дизайнеры не любят кириллицу и что с этим можно сделать? Хорошей кириллицы всегда было меньше, чем латиницы. Хорошей кириллицы для цифровых продуктов — еще меньше. Почему так сложилось? Разбираем изнанку этой проблемы вместе с Денисом Суворовым, старшим дизайн-лидом юнита «Коммуникационный Дизайн». А главное — как Pragmatica решала эту проблему на примере их нового шрифта! → Разобраться в типографике — на

4🥰3👏1

29 Jul 2026, 10:31 UTC724 views12 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

❌ Дизайнить за деньги ✅ Дизайнить деньги Банкноты евро обновятся — дизайнеры со всей Европы предложили свои варианты их нового оформления, и один из этих проектов ляжет в основу будущего дизайна банкнот. Выбрали самые интерсные работы. → Научим дизайнить всё — на годовой программе «Графический дизайнер Plus». А мы со своей стороны окажем вам финансовую поддержку в виде субсидии. Для этого необходимо оставить заявку

🔥93

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @bbegraph. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 569,709 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BBE: графический дизайн” (@bbegraph), 12,264 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bbegraph.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.