Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for BBE: графический дизайн

Channel

BBE: графический дизайн

@bbegraph

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,259subscribers

+9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001796627999
TypeChannel
Username@bbegraph
DescriptionКанал школы дизайна и технологий Bang Bang Education, посвященный графическому дизайну ⚫️ Сайт школы: https://tinyurl.com/yrt9hy2e ⚫️ Чат канала: https://t.me/+ZzfeNd-eRNpmM2Qy № 4799766870
Created3 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held62
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/bbegraph

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 4 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 6 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@bbe_school/135726 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTC@bbegraph/3938 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 11:03 UTC1.0062 minutes
@bbegraph/3946 · this entry17 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTC@bbe_school/1362517 Aug 2026, 15:04 UTC1.0032 minutes
@bbe_school/1363118 Aug 2026, 08:50 UTC@bbegraph/3952 · this entry20 Aug 2026, 17:10 UTC1.002 days
@bbe_school/1367225 Aug 2026, 16:05 UTC@bbegraph/3963 · this entry27 Aug 2026, 08:47 UTC1.0041 hours
@bbe_school/1390613 Oct 2026, 07:49 UTC@bbegraph/4006 · this entry13 Oct 2026, 16:50 UTC1.009.0 hours
@bbe_school/140063 Nov 2026, 08:20 UTC@bbegraph/4032 · this entry6 Nov 2026, 09:02 UTC1.003 days
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@bbe_school16 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0031 hours@bbe_school (14–2)
@bbeuxui7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0019 hoursthis entry (5–2)
@bbe_webinars5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0017 hours@bbe_webinars (4–1)
@illustrationbbe5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.002 days@illustrationbbe (3–2)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 23 of the 23 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 22 comparable posts for this entry, running 29 July 2026 to 9 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 6 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @bbe_school. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 6 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

12,24812,32712,287.512,2597 August 202611 November 2026
62 measurements spanning 96 days, net +9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,236–12,339 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 07:0412,259-2
9 Nov 2026, 15:3612,261-8
8 Nov 2026, 09:5112,269-1
7 Nov 2026, 03:1912,270-3
6 Nov 2026, 02:1112,273-2
5 Nov 2026, 03:0512,275-2
4 Nov 2026, 02:2912,277-1
3 Nov 2026, 05:2712,278-2
2 Nov 2026, 08:2712,280-1
1 Nov 2026, 08:5012,281-8
31 Oct 2026, 11:1412,289-3
30 Oct 2026, 09:4612,292-2
29 Oct 2026, 11:5512,294-2
28 Oct 2026, 11:2912,296-6
27 Oct 2026, 08:1512,302-4
26 Oct 2026, 06:4412,306-4
25 Oct 2026, 05:1612,310+3
24 Oct 2026, 08:4812,307-7
23 Oct 2026, 06:0712,314-4
22 Oct 2026, 06:1012,318first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 65 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.32%
avg views ÷ 12,259 subscribers
Avg views / post
775
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.955%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held23 (29 July 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total7,747
Reactions total74
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 20:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,460
Videos
≈178
Links
≈1,480

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3s
Average length
3s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

144 reactions across 22 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤9566.0%
🔥139.03%
👍128.33%
🤔85.56%
❤‍🔥74.86%
⚡32.08%
🥰32.08%
👏21.39%
😁10.694%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 144 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 10 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 09:53 UTC311 views7 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Сомнения в профессии не исчезают с опытом У каждого этапа в дизайне свои поводы для тревоги. Тот, кто только присматривается к индустрии, переживает из-за неумения рисовать от руки, а опытный специалист боится застрять в рутине и пропустить технологический скачок. В карточках собрали четыре ступени профессионального пути и страхи, которые приходят на каждом уровне. → А в честь чёрной пятницы у нас скидки и курс по…

❤4👍3

9 Nov 2026, 08:10 UTC526 views11 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Если вы боитесь сову Duolingo, значит, она работает правильно Хороший маскот не обязан быть милым — главное, чтобы у него были характер и понятная роль в коммуникации. На примерах Duolingo, Michelin, GitHub и «Сбера» разбираемся, чем маскот отличается от логотипа и талисмана, какие задачи бизнеса он решает и из-за каких ошибок персонаж остаётся просто картинкой. → Прочитать статью в журнале «Точка зрения»

❤11

6 Nov 2026, 09:02 UTC716 views2 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Как в команде «Битрикс24» нашли замену Figma Когда генеративная модель собирает рабочий прототип за несколько минут, владение графическим редактором перестаёт быть главным преимуществом дизайнера. На первый план выходит умение сравнивать десятки вариантов и понимать контекст продукта. В карточках ИИ-дизайн-директор «Битрикс24» Роман Горшков разбирает на опыте своей команды, как изменилась повседневная работа продук…

❤2

3 Nov 2026, 08:09 UTC863 views6 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Из мира исчез дизайн Плакаты на улицах потеряли цвет, на всех вывесках остался один шрифт, а из макетов пропала сетка. Мы запускаем игру «Верни дизайн» к чёрной пятнице. За три дня в боте Telegram вы пройдёте квест, вернёте дизайн миру и соберёте скидку до 30% на обучение. Как играть: Каждый день бот открывает новый слой и присылает пять коротких заданий: на цвет, шрифт или композицию. В финале дня макет оживает, а…

❤6

30 Oct 2026, 15:59 UTC859 views5 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Честный разбор работы — это полезная оценка Первая реакция на замечания и правки к проекту бывает эмоциональной. Кажется, что оценивают не сетку и логику решений, а автора. Похвала приятна, но навыки формируются иначе — когда решение нужно аргументировать и дорабатывать. Диалог с наставником помогает собрать портфолио и спокойно относиться к правкам. В карточках показали, как устроен разбор домашних заданий и итог…

❤4👏1

26 Oct 2026, 15:40 UTC941 views14 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Без Figma и Photoshop: как ИИ меняет работу дизайнера Figma долго была главным инструментом дизайнера: в ней собирались макеты, прототипы, компоненты. Но сейчас как среда для проектирования интерфейсов она себя исчерпала. Роман Горшков, AI-дизайн-директор «Битрикс24», рассказал журналу BBE, за что теперь по-настоящему отвечает дизайнер и как в работу уезжает не макет, а ветка в репозитории. → Прочитать статью в жу…

❤5🤔5⚡2👍1😁1

24 Oct 2026, 13:03 UTC901 views5 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Работа дизайнера начинается с понимания того, какую задачу нужно решить Поговорили с Юлией Урасовой, преподавательницей курса «Карта пути клиента (CJM)», о том, как меняется профессия с развитием искусственного интеллекта и почему важно уметь обосновывать свои решения. В интервью — как карта помогает понять опыт пользователя, увидеть пробелы в данных и определить, что действительно стоит менять в продукте. → Прочи…

❤5

22 Oct 2026, 08:02 UTC835 views11 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Ставка только на знание программы — стратегический тупик Каждый год в индустрии появляется софт, который обещает перевернуть рабочие процессы. В этой бесконечной гонке за обновлениями легко забыть: знание кнопок не подскажет, как найти точную метафору, удержать внимание зрителя и решить задачу бизнеса. В карточках разбираемся, какие навыки накапливают ценность с годами, а какие рискуют потерять актуальность. → Есл…

❤6❤‍🔥2🔥2🤔1

20 Oct 2026, 14:35 UTC808 views4 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Бетон, кран и хорошая вёрстка Стройплощадку трудно представить местом для графических экспериментов: среди пыли и спецтехники утилитарность всегда казалась важнее формы. Однако за последние годы подход к оформлению строек кардинально изменился. То, как сегодня выглядят заборы, паспорта объектов или указатели, диктует не украшательство, а городские правила, безопасность горожан и борьба за доверие покупателей. Как и…

❤4

13 Oct 2026, 16:50 UTC987 views9 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

Долгая подготовка — это иллюзия занятости Читать статьи о дизайне или сохранять референсы часто приятнее, чем открыть графический редактор и собрать первый экран. Потребление теории создаёт ощущение бурной деятельности. Кажется, что ещё пара лекций — и проект получится идеальным. Но на практике это безопасный способ отложить столкновение с реальностью. Как справиться с подготовкой и начать действовать, разобрали в…

❤7🤔2

2 Sept 2026, 08:10 UTC363 views11 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Год назад мы закрыли «Дизайн-библиотеку» — каталог из 80+ курсов, доступных по подписке. В свое время именно этот проект сделал Bang Bang Education широко известным: мы открыли бесплатный доступ к ней в ковид, и в дизайн потянулись тысячи новых людей. Нам казалось, что этот проект отжил свое — изменились время, дизайн и его сообщество. Но за год мы поняли, что есть вещи вне времени, и «Дизайн-библиотека» одна из ни…

❤11

29 Aug 2026, 11:46 UTC546 views7 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Какой шрифт подойдёт для проекта? Удачно подобранный шрифт делает макет собранным и помогает транслировать смыслы без лишнего визуального шума. Чтобы типографика работала правильно, выбирать её стоит через системный подход. → На курсе «Графический дизайнер Плюс» с нуля изучаем типографику, айдентику и основы дизайна цифровых коммуникаций. А если базовые навыки у вас уже есть, освоить работу с текстом поможет курс «…

❤5👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @bbegraph. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Bang Bang Education
@bbe_school · 25,220
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 September 2026
Точка входа
@bbe_jobs · 25,562
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 14 September 2026
поле
@poledsgn · 22,219
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 20 September 2026
Щёлочь®
@sholotch · 26,018
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 September 2026
Школа дизайна НИУ ВШЭ
@hsedesign · 18,843
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 5 October 2026
Дизайн-снайпер
@designsniper · 27,989
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 September 2026
unid | графический дизайн
@unid_gd · 39,849
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 30 August 2026
Ustinov CREATE | Графический дизайн
@UstinovCreate · 23,098
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 September 2026
Секретный канал Логомашины
@logomachinee · 30,685
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 5 September 2026
Posterino | искусство плаката
@posterino · 57,032
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 23 August 2026
Magazine Design
@magazine_design · 23,865
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 September 2026
Design Hunters
@designhunters · 79,894
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 August 2026
ФРИЛАНСИКИ
@polyaluzjob · 60,178
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 22 August 2026
Package Design
@package_design · 23,098
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 September 2026
ИЩУ_ДИЗАЙНЕРА
@designer_ru · 81,619
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 19 August 2026
Вакансии для дизайнеров
@designer_vacancies · 23,615
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 20 September 2026

This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BBE: графический дизайн” (@bbegraph), 12,259 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bbegraph.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.