Channel
@nabayad_m
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
39,189subscribers
-15 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001315862770 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nabayad_m |
| Description | Moein Dehaz | معین دهاز شاعر، عکاس و ولگردِ معاصر |
| Created | 9 June 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nabayad_m |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 08:09 | 39,189 | -12 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:25 | 39,201 | -9 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:56 | 39,210 | -15 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:01 | 39,225 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:42 | 39,228 | -5 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:01 | 39,233 | +5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:23 | 39,228 | +14 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:11 | 39,214 | +10 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:45 | 39,204 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:37 | 39,204 | first reading |
25 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 25 (30 July 2026 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 308,520 |
| Reactions total | 12,638 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 14:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
12,638 reactions across 25 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 12,638 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12,638reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nabayad_m. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 25 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
اگر چیزی مینویسیم (شعر، نثر، قطعه، داستان...) و دوست داریم بدونیم چه کیفیتی داره، یکی از مطمئنترین کارها اینه که فعلا بذاریمش کنار. رهاش کنیم و عطش انتشار، حتی برای دوستان، نداشته باشیم. چند هفته بگذره یا حتی چند ماه. بعد دوباره میریم سراغش و اینبار که بخونیم، عیارِ چيزی که نوشتیم معلوم میشه. بهش میگن "آزمون زمان". خودت میتونی بهترین منتقد اثرت باشی، ولی باید زمان بدی. گذر زمان بین تو و اون "فضای هیجانی و تپش…
❤531
با این قیمت جدید بنزین (نرخ آزاد کرمان که گویا ۸۷ تومان شده) یک باک پنجاه لیتری بنزین بیش از ۴ میلیون تومان میشه. معادل حدود ۲۵درصد حقوق ماهانه (۱۶ تومن پایه) است. فقط یک باک. کسانی که در باب ارزانی بنزین در ایران حرفهای مسخره میزنند، بروند و این نسبت رو برای آمریکا و اروپا محاسبه کنند. اگر اشتباه نکرده باشم، یک باک بنزینشون چیزی در حدود سه درصد پایهدرآمدهاشون (کمدرآمدها) است. کاپیتالیسمِ بیرحم! بدون در نظر گر…
❤634
صفحهی اولِ واقعا خوبی داره. کار خوب مترجم در ایجاد لحن رو هم میشه دید. صفحههای اول داستانها مهم و جذابن. لحظهی ورود به جهان داستان. اینجا ببینید چطوری فوری و فشرده، بدون حرف اضافه میره سراغ اصل داستان. مارکز هم همینطوره.
❤191
پدرو پارامو: احتمالا مهمترین رمان معاصر مکزیک و یکی از تاثیرگذارترین آثار بر ادبیات اسپانیاییزبان؛ طوری که میگن اگر نوشته نمیشد، "صد سال تنهایی" مارکز هم شاید نوشته نمیشد. بهشدت تکنیکیه، فشرده است، با شکستهای زمانی فراوان و تغییرهای راوی و زاویه دید. سختخوانه در کل. مطالعهش به تمرکز احتیاج داره و بهتره زیاد وقفه نندازید بین هربار که سراغش میرید. گیجی حین مطالعه احتمالا بخشی از طراحی و میل خود نویسنده هم بود…
❤141
خیلیا به این شخص پریدن که "اینبار دمش گرم ثبت احوال که جلوت رو گرفت و نذاشت اسم بچهت رو بذاری میرا که در فارسی یعنی مردنی" راستش بنظرم هر جا که میبینیم آزادی افراد نقض شده، بایستی به این مداخله دولتی و اعمال زور معترض باشیم. حتی مواردی که فکر میکنیم "اینبار استثنائا کار خوبی کردن". اینبار و یکبار هم زیاده. چون اتفاقا دشمنان آزادی با تکیه به همین استثناها و موردها، دشمنی کلی با آزادی فرد رو توجیه و تطهیر میکنند.…
❤621
اول اسب را میبینم. هنوز فاصله هست بین من با تصویر. از لحظهای به بعد کل صحنه را به درون میکشم. اینجاست که خودم را میبینم. پشت این ماشین؟ اینجا کجاست؟ هر جا. همهجاست. فورا استعارهها، بیاینکه دعوتشان کنم، کل قاب را پُر میکنند. اسب دیگر به چیزی فراتر از موجودیتِ تنهای خود تبدیل میشود. موضوعی در روان من میشود. این ویدئو چيزی را در درونم مورد خطاب قرار داد که دوست داشتم آرام باشد. مثل اینکه زخمی را دستکاری کنی. …
❤271
شما آدمها رو راحت از زندگیتون حذف میکنید اما من حتی این رو-جلدیهای پاره و کهنهی کتاب رو هم نمیتونم بندازم بره. ممکنه بگید چه ربطی داره؟ نمیدونم. ولی واقعا این روجلدیها رو دوست ندارم و دور ریختنشون رو هم دوست ندارم. پارهای از تن کتابه و خیلی بیشتر از خود کتاب لمس شده. ناتوانی در گسستن! حتی گسستن از اشیا. آدمها ممکنه خطایی کنند و این کمک میکنه ازشون دل بکنیم. اشیا چی؟ #معین_دهاز
❤594
یک جنایتکار [عموما] قبول نمیکنه که جنایتکاره. حتی اگر با دست خودش آدم کشته باشه. اسم این عمل رو نمیذاره جنایت. چون زیر فشار اين عبارت هولناک (= من یک جانی هستم!) روانش له میشه. و برای روانش و زندگیش زنجیرههزینههایی در پی داره که نمیتونه تحمل کنه. مکبث هم بخاطر کاری که کرد، روانش بههم ریخت. شما دوست ندارید با یک جنایتکار سلام و علیک کنید یا باهاش دست بدید، چون چندشتون میشه. حسی که خود اون جانی نسبت به خودش…
❤456
درختی کاشتم. بزرگش خواهم کرد. هرچه که پیش آید به عقب باز نمیگردم. یانیس ریتسوس، ترجمهی فریاد
❤401
اینجور وقتها فقط برخی مذهبیهای دگم، مورد سرزنش قرار میگیرند. که انگار فقط این جماعت دشمن تجدد بودن و هستن. اما نه. گروههای فکری دیگری هم با دلایل خاص خودشون با تجدد و دیگران (این دیگری گاهی غربه و گاهی حتی شهری دیگر) مشکل داشتند و دارند. این گروهها با همه تفاوتها، البته در دهه پنجاه همگی با هم متحد شدند که به انفجار نور ختم شد.
❤500
از همون زمان که گروهی از مردم با واکسن آبله مخالفت کردند و بعد با مدارس نوین مخالفت کردند و بعدتر با هر چیزی که رنگوبوی نوگرایی، مدرنیسم، فرهنگ شهری و گاهی خدایینکرده غربی رو میداد، حتی با کراوات مقابله کردند، تا همین امروز، ما دو گروه داریم که با هم درگیرند: گروه اول مخالفین تجدد و گرده دوم متجددها. مخالفین تجدد و توسعه، یکبار به بهانههای مذهبی، یکبار بخاطر غربستیزی و اخیرا عدهای هم به بهانه حفظ "اصالت و هویت…
❤573
بر او ببخشایید بر او که از درون متلاشیست _ فروغ
❤618
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @nabayad_m. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
@nabayad_m edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 22,185 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“نباید میماندیم - معین دهاز” (@nabayad_m), 39,189 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nabayad_m.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.