13 Aug 2026, 21:48 UTC≈3,480 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo
گفتم ازت عکس بگیرم؟ گفت نگیری بهتره. نگفت "نگیر". Photo: @moein_dehaz
Channel
Moein Dehaz
@moein_dehaz
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
12,230subscribers
-13 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001008266644 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @moein_dehaz |
| Created | Between 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/moein_dehaz |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:48 | 12,230 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 03:49 | 12,229 | +6 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 11:37 | 12,223 | -8 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:14 | 12,231 | +1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 00:18 | 12,230 | +2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:21 | 12,228 | -6 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:53 | 12,234 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:54 | 12,237 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:08 | 12,239 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:00 | 12,240 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:33 | 12,243 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 20:50 | 12,243 | first reading |
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 19 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 53.9%
- avg views ÷ 12,230 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 6,590
- 3 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 3
- of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (19 December 2025 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 19,760 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 13:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 9s
- Average length
- 9s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
2 Aug 2026, 20:38 UTC≈7,080 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo
من شبنم خوابآلود یک ستارهام که روی علفهای تاریکی چکیدهام. جایم اینجا نبود. نجوای نمناک علفها را میشنوم. جایم اینجا نبود. _ سهراب سپهری Photo: @moein_dehaz
23 Jul 2026, 17:52 UTC≈9,200 viewsread 15 August 2026
Video
از وقتی یادداشت قبلی رو توی اینستاگرام گذاشتم، خیلی زیاد پیام گرفتم. عزیزانی گفتند که برم ببینم بچه هنوز بهم سلام میده یا نه! بالاخره دیدمش و سلام کرد.
16 Jul 2026, 16:11 UTC≈11,400 viewsread 15 August 2026
تو مسیر ولگردیهام از جلوی یه مغازه رد میشم. یک پسربچهی حدودا پنج ساله اونجا بازی میکنه، گویا مغازه مادرشه. چند ماهه هر بار منو میبینه میگه "سلام عمو!". اخیراً جلو میاد و باهام دست میده و سلام عمو رو حتما میگه. نمیدونم معنی این سلامعموها چیه. ما هیچ آشنایی با هم نداریم و مکالمهای جز این سلامها هم نبود. امروز روی سهچرخهش بود، سلام کرد. بعد از سلام، برگشتم بهش گفتم "اسمت چیه؟". مثل اینکه بعد چند م…
8 Jul 2026, 21:18 UTC≈13,400 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo
چای آلبالو، خیلی ایرانیه.
3 Jul 2026, 13:29 UTC≈14,300 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo
چه رویاها که پاره نشد! و چه نزدیکها که دور نرفت! و من بر رشته صدایی ره سپردم که پایانش در تو بود _ سهراب سپهری Photo: @moein_dehaz [آنالوگ]
28 Jun 2026, 18:51 UTC≈12,900 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo
گاه در گرمای یک نیمروز تابستان آشنایی خودم را با هستی گم میکردم و گاه بههنگام پوستکندنِ یک سیب، مهر مادری و پیوند میان خود و بستگانم را به مسخره میگرفتم. چه آسان تنها میشدم. و چه تنهاییِ بیدروپیکری _ سهراب سپهری Photo: @moein_dehaz
24 Jun 2026, 10:33 UTC≈30,900 viewsread 15 August 2026
پرسیدم "میترسی چه چیزی در آینده برات اتفاق نیفته؟" کسی نوشت "معشوق بودن". البته معشوق بودن شیرینه، وقتی طرفِ توجه، تایید و مهری، حتما خوبه؛ اما این موقعیت، طبق ذاتش همراه با انفعال و انتظاره. چرا در پیِ عاشق بودن نباشی؟ عاشق، فعال و کنشگره. نیروگذاره. اگرچه گویا سرانجام این نظر معشوقه که تعیینکننده است، اما اگر "عاشق"ی نباشه، معشوق حتی تعریف نمیپذیره. معشوق، مخلوقِ دیگری است. گاهی به این فکر میکنم یک عاشق بعد …
12 Jun 2026, 22:25 UTC≈16,000 viewsread 15 August 2026
لبخند بزن و امیدوار بمان به روزی که نخواهد آمد #معین_دهاز از شعری، اسب من، نشرچشمه
4 Jun 2026, 22:56 UTC≈16,400 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo
برای چه یک دیوار کاهگلی که روزی از سایهاش گذشتهایم، نتواند در زندگی ما رخنه کند؟ چرا یک کلاغ که بر شاخهی کاجی دیدهایم نتواند جای پای خودش را روی احساس ما بگذارد؟ _ سهراب سپهری Photo: @moein_dehaz [عکاسی آنالوگ]
31 May 2026, 11:26 UTC≈19,700 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo
... کجا بروی؟ و به هوای کدام فراموشیِ تند؟ بامداد که برخیزی، گیاهها میرویند. گلها میشکفند، و تو کنار همان دریچهی آشنا، و هر روزی _ سهراب سپهری Photo: @moein_dehaz
17 May 2026, 09:50 UTC≈28,600 viewsread 15 August 2026
وقتی نفس عمیق میکشیم، انگار دست میاندازیم به آن پایینهای ریه، آن ته، قعر و مقداری هوای بهجامانده و مطرود و سنگین را بیرون میکشیم. چند ثانیه سبک میشویم. کاش میشد دست انداخت و آنجایی که در کلهی آدم پر از باتلاق و خستگی و فکر است، یعنی آن ته را پیدا کرد، آنجا که قیرگون و رسوب شده، بیرون آورد و بقول هدایت انداخت جلو سگ. #معین_دهاز @moein_dehaz
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @moein_dehaz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 458,670 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Mohsen Chavoshi
@mohsenchavoshi · 244,109
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
@mohsenchavoshi · 244,109
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Moein Dehaz” (@moein_dehaz), 12,230 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/moein_dehaz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.