Channel
@rationalisti1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,547subscribers
-38 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001532386762 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rationalisti1 |
| Description | مکتوبات یک ذهن خردگرا |
| Created | 30 September 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rationalisti1 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 15:07 | 9,547 | -21 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:17 | 9,568 | -11 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:20 | 9,579 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:30 | 9,585 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:21 | 9,585 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
7,528 reactions across 20 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 95.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 7,213 | 95.8% | |
| 👎 | 315 | 4.18% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,528reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 December 2025 to 8 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
یعنی بعضی از این مردم یه صحنههایی از شهامت خلق میکنن که اصن آدم حیرت میکنه! یعنی شما چند نفری تو روز روشن اومدید وسط خیابون، سر فرصت جک کامیون رو زدید. بعد سوار شدی فس فس با نفربر هیدرولیک رفتی اون بالا ۱۵ متر بنر نوشتی؟! مسابقهٔ سایز جیگره؟ فستیوال انتخاب برترین وطنپرستهای تاریخه؟ با لرها قرار گذاشتید آبروی بقیهٔ ایرانیها رو ببرید؟ @Rationalisti1
👍636👎45
به روزی فکر کن که اتفاق افتاده. به لحظهٔ شنیدنش.
👍281👎11
میخوام یه سوالی رو جواب بدم که میدونم رو مخ خیلیهاتونه. هیچ جواب درست و سرراستی هم براش ندارید. سوال اینه: چرا بعضیا رو هرچقدر توجیه میکنی و استدلال میاری باز هم نظرشون عوض نمیشه؟ جمهوری اسلامی هر کاری که بکنه بازم تو لحظههای حساس اینا دست از طرفداری ازش بر نمیدارن و سعی میکنن یه جوری نگهش دارن. فقط هم ارزشیها و منتفعین حکومت نیستن، توی اپوزیسیون هم زیادن. کسایی مثل شهرام همایون، مسعود بهنود، فرخ نگهدار، فرنا…
👍514👎16
قشنگ بود. ترانهٔ ساده و دلنشین، اجرای قوی، نوتهای بالا و فریادهاش بدجوری به جان میشینه.
👍183👎5
ویدیو تهدید مردم توسط این ارتشیه خیلی وایرال شده. اکثرا هم در انتهاش یه تیکه پاسخ مثل این آقا اضافه کردن. اینکه مسلح باشی و ملت ازت بترسن معنی خاصی نداره. به یه بچهٔ دوازده ساله هم اسلحه بدی میتونه ۵۰۰ نفر آدم غیر مسلح رو فراری بده. این صرفا یک برتری تسلیحاتیه نه سلحشوری. تازه دو تا نکته دیگه هم داره که باعث میشه این حس اعتماد به نفست مسخرهتر و احمقانهتر هم به نظر بیاد. ۱- تو بابت این کارت داری پول و مزایا میگ…
👍451👎7
چجوری انقدر حرکت لبهاش خوب و تمیز درومده؟ :)
👍261👎12
این ویدیوها رو هم هر روز دارن بهتر و قشنگتر میسازن. هم ایدهٔ هنری و اثرگذاری داشت، هم جزئیات و اجرای خوبی رو دراورده بود. سینک و هماهنگی تصاویر با موسیقی هم تو هر ویدیو داره بهتر میشه.
👍270👎9
برای اون دوستانی که میگید وقتی دلیری این بچهها تو خیابون رو میبینید عذاب وجدان میگیرید و فکر میکنید کاش باشهامتتر بودید و میتونستید در خیزش مفیدتر باشن. اگر ایرانید و میتونید به ترستون غلبه کنید، تو اعتراضات شرکت کنید. ولو کمرنگ و کوتاه و در جاهای کمریسکتر. از اونکارهایی خواهد بود که تا آخر عمر برای همه تعریف میکنید و بهش افتخار خواهید کرد. اگر هم نمیتونید، در همین فضای مجازی و «شعار از پنجره» و اینها فعال…
👍334👎9
خوشبختانه بعد از این خیزش اخیر هر روز تعداد بیشتری از جمهوری خواهها دارن علنی وخیلی محکم رضا پهلوی رو به عنوان نماد انقلاب قبول میکنن. یکی دو تا گروهشون حتی بیانیه رسمی هم دادن. کارشون کاملا منطقیه. اولا اینکه بالاخره یه رهبر و آلترناتیو پیدا شده که مردم داخل دارن اسمش رو صدا میزنن. این خطر بزرگی برای جمهوری اسلامیه و باید خیلی کودن باشی که چنین فرصت مهمی رو از دست مردم بگیری. دوما اینکه رضا پهلوی اصولا هیچ خط…
👍372👎75
با بعضی از دوستام حرف میزدم اکثرا از حس عذاب وجدان ناله میکردن. از اینکه میبینن یه عدهای آدم شجاع تو تظاهراتن و اینا نشستن کنار، نهایتا دو تا پست و استوری میذارن و اخبار رو منتقل میکنن. حسشون رو درک میکنم. انقدر همه جور آدمی تو هر سن و شرایطی تو این تظاهراتها دیدیم که دیگه هیچکس تا تو خیابون نرفته نمیتونه احساس خوبی به خودش داشته باشه. از دختر و پسرای ریزه میزهٔ ۴۰-۵۰ کیلویی، تا ورزشکارهای تنومند تو تظاه…
👍367👎7
بعضی از طرفدارهای جمهوری اسلامی تو پستهاشون به خودشون دلداری میدن که نه بابا جمعیت اونقدرام نیس. اکثر جاها نهایتا ۴۰۰-۵۰۰ نفر بشن. واقعیت اینه که در انقلاب ۵۷ هم اکثر اوقات تمام شهر در امن و امان بوده و ملت داشتن نون و ماستشون رو میخوردن. فقط یکی دو تا خیابون چند ساعت شلوغ میشده و تمام. در آبان ۵۷ شاه میگه صدای انقلابتون رو شنیدم و با این حرفش عملا مجوز تظاهرات رو صادر میکنه. تا قبل از اون، اکثر تظاهراتها کو…
👍497👎11
در روزهای آخر یک حکومت، همه در سیستم دنبال یه راه خروجن. حالا یا برن خارج، یا با فروختن اطلاعات سازمان و همکارها بپیوندن به انقلاب و تحولات. یا اگر جایی رو داشته باشن جمع کنن برن ولایتهاشون یا جایی که نشناسنشون. این الگو در همه جا بارها تکرار شده. عراق، سوریه، لیبی، ایران ۵۷، تونس، رومانی، افغانستان، آلمان شرقی، آلمان نازی اون «نفرات آخر بودن» برای همکارهای یک سیستمِ درحال فروپاشی، خیلی ترسناکه. چون یهو میبینی …
👍333👎3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rationalisti1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,046,245 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“رشنالیست” (@rationalisti1), 9,547 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rationalisti1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.