Channel
@SoulofDream
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
169,132subscribers
-231 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001293365682 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SoulofDream |
| Description | 🔹️سفارش تبلیغات: @Infosouls 🔹️اینستاگرام ما: Instagram.com/SoulofDreamz 🔹️پیج دوم: Instagram.com/Dreamymomentz |
| Created | 12 January 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SoulofDream |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:16 | 169,132 | -68 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:06 | 169,200 | -47 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:31 | 169,247 | -27 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:02 | 169,274 | -53 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:25 | 169,327 | -24 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:35 | 169,351 | -12 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:31 | 169,363 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:21 | 169,363 | first reading |
36 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 36 (3 August 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 427,200 |
| Reactions total | 4,455 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 18:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
4,285 reactions across 33 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,939 | 45.3% | |
| 👍 | 1,516 | 35.4% | |
| 💔 | 570 | 13.3% | |
| 😢 | 75 | 1.75% | |
| 🔥 | 54 | 1.26% | |
| 💯 | 52 | 1.21% | |
| 🤣 | 17 | 0.397% | |
| ❤🔥 | 13 | 0.303% | |
| 🤝 | 13 | 0.303% | |
| 🙏 | 8 | 0.187% | |
| 🍾 | 7 | 0.163% | |
| 👀 | 4 | 0.093% | |
| 💅 | 4 | 0.093% | |
| 💋 | 4 | 0.093% | |
| 😭 | 3 | 0.07% | |
| 🤗 | 3 | 0.07% | |
| ☃ | 1 | 0.023% | |
| 🎄 | 1 | 0.023% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.023% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,455reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
در تئوری سیستمها، «فیدبک مثبت» یعنی سیستمی که خروجیاش، ورودیِ خودش را تشدید میکند تا جایی که به انفجار یا فروپاشی منجر شود. این دقیقاً همان بلایی است که اضطراب بر سر ما میآورد: از شکست میترسی، پس اقدام نمیکنی؛ چون اقدام نمیکنی، شکست میخوری؛ و چون شکست خوردهای، ترست از قبل هم بیشتر میشود. چرخهای خودتغذیه که تنها راهِ شکستنِ آن، وارد کردنِ یک شوکِ خارجیِ بیرحمانه است: اقدامِ کورکورانه، بدونِ تحلیلِ عواقب...…
👍64❤31💯2🔥2
فرناندو پسوآ در کتابِ دلتنگی گزارهی عجیبی دارد: «من همیشه یک بازیگر بودهام، آنهم بازیگری که نقشِ خودش را بازی میکند.» ما از همان کودکی یاد میگیریم که برای هر سیستم، یک پروتکلِ رفتاری طراحی کنیم: در خانه: فرزندِ مطیع یا سرکش. در دانشگاه و کار: متخصصِ خونسرد و بینقص. در شبکههای اجتماعی: انسانی موفق، عمیق و بینیاز. اما خطرِ واقعی زمانی رخ میدهد که این لایههای حفاظتی (Protective Layers) به قدری ضخیم میشوند که …
❤53👍23😢4💔2
امیل سیوران در یکی از گزینگویههایش مینویسد: «ما نه از فقدانِ امید، بلکه از زنده ماندنِ امیدهای واهیمان رنج میبریم.» بزرگترین شکنجهی یک رابطه یا یک مسیرِ شغلی، تمام شدنِ آن نیست؛ بلکه آن «شاید»ِ کوچکی است که تهِ ذهنت نگه میداری. همان بارقهی ضعیفی که میگوید: شاید اوضاع درست شد، شاید تغییر کرد. همین امیدِ مسموم است که تو را در برزخ نگه میدارد، به زنجیر میکشد و اجازه نمیدهد سوگواریات را تمام کنی. تا زمانی ک…
❤52👍14💯5💔4😢4
آیزاک نیوتن قانونِ اولش را روی حرکت اجسام نوشت، اما این قانون روی روانِ ما هم صادق است: هر جانی که در مسیرِ سقوط قرار بگیرد، تمایل دارد به سقوطِ خود ادامه دهد، مگر اینکه نیرویی خارجی به آن وارد شود. وقتی در افسردگی، تنهایی یا یک رابطهی فرساینده فرو میروی، نیروی جاذبهی رنج تو را پایین میکشد. انتظار نداشته باش یک روز صبح بیدار شوی و خودبهخود همهچیز خوب شود. قانونِ اولِ نیوتن میگوید بدونِ وارد کردنِ آگاهانهی یک …
❤78👍38🍾4💯1
داستایوفسکی مینویسد: «بزرگترین مجازاتِ انسان این است که در گذشتهاش حبس شود.» هر بار که میگویی «اگر آن کار را نکرده بودم…»، داری به گذشته باج میدهی. حقیقت این است که گذشته، طلبکاری است که هرگز تسویه حساب نمیکند؛ هرچه بیشتر به او فکر کنی، بیشتر از سهمِ امروزت را میبلعد. تنها راهِ تسویه با گذشته، اعلامِ ورشکستگی است: بپذیر که آن نسخه از تو اشتباه کرد، بها را پرداخت کن و پرونده را ببند... @SoulofDream✅
👍113❤56💔11💯11❤🔥1👀1
ژان بودریار، فیلسوفِ فرانسوی، مفهومی دارد به نام «وانموده» (Simulacra)؛ نسخههای بدلی که جای واقعیت را میگیرند. امروز ما در انبوهی از ارتباطات غرق شدهایم: پیامهای فوری، ریپلایها، لایکها و بازدیدها. ما فکر میکنیم متصلیم، اما در واقع فقط «سیگنال» رد و بدل میکنیم. صمیمیتِ واقعی نیاز به حضور، سکوتهای مشترک و دیدنِ لرزشِ چشمها دارد. وقتی ارتباط را به کدهای دیجیتال خلاصه میکنی، در حالِ تغذیهی روحت با غذای پلاستی…
❤108👍55🔥5💋4💔1🤔1
نیچه ایدهی «تکرار ابدی» را مطرح کرد؛ اینکه اگر مجبور باشی زندگیات را با تمامِ جزئیاتش بینهایت بار زندگی کنی، آیا شاد خواهی شد یا نابود؟ این سوال را از خودت بپرس: اگر قرار باشد همین رابطهای که الان داری، همین شغلی که از آن بیزاری و همین مکالماتِ بیهوده را تا ابد تکرار کنی، چقدر دوام میآوری؟ اگر پاسخِ تو وحشت است، یعنی همین حالا هم در جهنمِ خودساختهات زندگی میکنی. تغییر را شروع کن، پیش از آنکه تکرارِ ابدی، تو را…
❤70👍36🤝9💔1
چارلز داروین و بعدها فیلسوفانِ زیستشناس روی یک اصل توافق داشتند: بقا متعلق به قویترینها نیست؛ متعلق به کسانی است که بهتر «تطبیق» مییابند. اما در روانشناسیِ انسان، این تطبیق یک بهای پنهان دارد. گاهی آنقدر خودت را با محیطهای سمی، آدمهای اشتباه و شرایطِ تحقیرآمیز تطبیق میدهی، که وقتی بالاخره همهچیز تمام میشود، متوجه میشوی برای بقای فیزیکیات، «منِ» واقعیات را قربانی کردهای. گاهی بقا، خودش نوعی خودکشیِ تدری…
❤67👍40😢6🔥4💔1
قیمت بعضی از خونه های بالاشهر تهران از هزار میلیارد تومن هم عبور کرده. ۱۳۰۰ میلیارد یا ۱۷۰۰ میلیارد رو حتی نمیتونم تصور کنم چقدره؛ چه برسه بخوام بهش برسم.😐 @SoulofDream✅
💔68😢18🤣8❤3😭3🍾1
از نظر علمی، شواهد قابلاعتمادی نداریم که بگه مثلاً «آبانیا مرموزن» یا «اسفندیا احساساتیترن» 😒 اما بعضی پژوهشها نشون دادن که فصل تولد ممکنه با تفاوتهای خیلی کوچیکی در بعضی ویژگیهای روانی و خلقوخو ارتباط داشته باشه. ✅💡 دلیل احتمالی هم نه ستارهها و طالعبینی، بلکه چیزهای زمینیتری مثل میزان نور خورشید، دما و شرایط محیطی دوران بارداری و ماههای اول زندگیه. 👶 البته این اثرها اونقدر کوچیک و پیچیدهان که اصلاً ن…
👍11😢3❤2
تولستوی در مرگ ایوان ایلیچ نشان میدهد فاجعه همیشه با مرگ شروع نمیشود؛ با «بیحسی» شروع میشود. آدم وقتی زنده است که هنوز از بعضی چیزها دلش به هم بخورد. اگر همهچیز برایت عادی شد، اگر زشتی دیگر آزارت نداد، اگر دروغ دیگر بو نداشت، همانجا دارد چیزی در تو خاموش میشود. بیحسی، مرگِ مؤدبانه است... @SoulofDream✅
👍55❤21😢15💔8💯3
کافکا را که بخوانی، میفهمی وجدان همیشه فریاد نمیزند؛ گاهی فقط یک حضورِ خنثی و آزاردهنده است. نه اجازه میدهد آرام دروغ بگویی، نه میگذارد کاملاً راحت زندگی کنی. وجدان، آن مهمانِ مؤدبی است که هیچوقت نمیرود، اما هر بار هم که زنگ میزند، دقیقاً میفهمی چرا حوصلهاش را نداشتی... @SoulofDream✅
❤60👍25💯5💅4🍾1😢1
Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @SoulofDream. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 46,025 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Soul of Dream️️” (@SoulofDream), 169,132 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SoulofDream.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.