Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Grigòr, the Creator

Channel

Grigòr, the Creator

@grigor

Verified by Telegram2 usernames

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

15,775subscribers

-110 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001063157959
TypeChannel
Usernames@digital_bdsm @grigor
Created23 June 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held65
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/grigor

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 42% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

15,76515,88515,82515,7755 August 202625 September 2026
65 measurements spanning 51 days, net -110. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,747–15,903 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 65
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 20:0015,775-10
24 Sept 2026, 20:2015,785-24
19 Sept 2026, 01:1915,809no change
18 Sept 2026, 17:1915,809-9
16 Sept 2026, 15:2115,818-3
16 Sept 2026, 12:4015,821-1
14 Sept 2026, 20:3615,822no change
14 Sept 2026, 19:1615,822+4
13 Sept 2026, 07:3915,818+1
13 Sept 2026, 03:2115,817+51
11 Sept 2026, 09:1715,766+1
11 Sept 2026, 06:3915,765-6
8 Sept 2026, 17:2115,771-3
8 Sept 2026, 10:1715,774-11
5 Sept 2026, 08:5615,785-1
5 Sept 2026, 05:5715,786-14
3 Sept 2026, 10:5715,800-1
3 Sept 2026, 10:2415,801-3
2 Sept 2026, 03:5715,804no change
2 Sept 2026, 02:4515,804first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.59%
avg views ÷ 15,775 subscribers
Avg views / post
567
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.24%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held24 (6 July 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total2,834
Reactions total35
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 10:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 18s
Average length
39s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

233 reactions across 23 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤7833.5%
👍5322.7%
😁3213.7%
🔥3012.9%
💩2611.2%
👏73.00%
👎52.15%
👌10.429%
😎10.429%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 233 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 24 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @grigor. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 24 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 16:17 UTC297 views13 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Сделал такой ролик. Не знаю, как вам, а я просто кайфую. Решил попробовать, завис на 8 часов над этим роликом. Как обычно про такие ролики пишут ютуб-блогеры: «Сейчас я вам расскажу как сделать такой же ролик за 5 минут абсолютно бесплатно». И это чистой воды пиздеж. Как бы такие видео назывались честно: «Я могу за 2-3 часа рассказать, как за 8-10 часов сделать такой же ролик, потратив всего лишь 50 баксов. И хер…

🔥7👏2😁2❤1😎1

2 Sept 2026, 14:09 UTC359 views4 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Малый бизнес получил визуальные возможности больших компаний — но не их мышление Сделать какой-то визуал, который выглядит, как голливудский блокбастер (именно выглядит) может и малый бизнес, и крупный бизнес. В общем и целом, шансы здесь равны с появлением искусственного интеллекта. Но. Если одеть бомжа в костюм Brioni за 10 тысяч баксов — через месяц этот костюм будет такой же, как и был до этого. Если надеть н…

💩3👍1

31 Aug 2026, 15:44 UTC813 views6 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Если вы думаете, что Ai-продакшн сильно отличается от обычного продакшена, то… вы правы. Но только с технической стороны. Вместо съемок и затрат на съемочные дни у вас генерация и трата токенов. Однако пока что вы не можете получить в ии-продакшене то же, что и в обычном крутом продакшене. Но и стоимость в разы дешевле. Трата денег на токены даже рядом не стоит с зарплатами за съемочные дни, декорации, реквизиты и т…

❤5👍1

31 Aug 2026, 13:58 UTC740 views8 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Итак, я осваиваю новое направление. Как и всё сейчас (ну практически всё) связано с искусственным интеллектом. А конкретно аудиовизуальный продакшн через искусственный интеллект. Поэтому в этом канале будут появляться материалы, связанные с этим. Сейчас на рынке есть три основных типа видео, которые создаются через ИИ. 1. Так называемый нейрослоп. Это дешевый в производстве низкокачественный контент, которого сей…

❤4👍2🔥2

31 Aug 2026, 09:52 UTC625 views4 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Скоро мы перестанем ходить к нейросети. Она придёт сама Смотрите, как это устроено сегодня. Вы работаете в документе. Или в таблице, или в презентации. Появляется задача для модели — и вы идёте к ней. Открываете вкладку, копируете кусок, получаете ответ, возвращаетесь, вставляете. Двадцать таких походов за день. Каждый — секунд сорок. Умножьте. Но дело даже не в минутах. Дело в том, что модель каждый раз видит вы…

👍2🔥2

21 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC≈2,680 views5 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Как надоели посты и видео в духе «ЧатГпт убил Клод» или «Кодекс больше не нужен». Этот кликбейтный бред уже даже не смешно смотреть. Они актуальны минут 30. Сначала один что-то выпускает, потом второй, потом третий. Важно понимать одно. Строить постоянный процесс на одной нейросети — очень рискованно. Задача в том, чтобы выстроить правильную маршрутизацию. Скажем, ГПТ ищет материалы, создано планы, работают как ас…

👍3❤2

21 Aug 2026, 13:40 UTC≈2,230 views11 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Собираю мини-ролик для Saint Laurent. Они, конечно, не просили, но…

🔥6👍3👏2

10 Aug 2026, 11:12 UTC≈4,390 views4 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Чат с нейросетью — это ещё не внедрение ИИ, считает директор по маркетингу Mindbox. О внедрении можно говорить, когда есть эффект на бизнес. Например, редакция выпускает материалы вдвое быстрее. При этом команда не выросла, а за часть работ больше не платят подрядчику — получается экономия. Как системно встроить ИИ в процессы, маркдир рассказывает в интервью. Это один из трех выпусков в цикле про трансформации бизн…

❤3👍1

4 Aug 2026, 14:10 UTC≈5,110 views16 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Кто-то может объяснить, в чем смысл платных курсов по ИИ, если их актуальность пропадает через 3 дня с выходами новой модели?

😁12👎2💩2

4 Aug 2026, 10:45 UTC≈4,980 views7 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Бизнес — ваше главное произведение. Но должен ли он остаться единственным? Предприниматель создает компанию. Продукт. Команду. В каком-то смысле он создает язык коммуникации компании, создает правила, культуру, правила игры внутри компании. Регулирует взаимоотношения между людьми. Решает, что в этой компании будет существовать, а что нет. В каком-то смысле это и есть произведение. Сначала нет ничего. Просто холст…

❤5👎1💩1

4 Aug 2026, 08:46 UTC≈3,180 views7 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Большинству экспертов не нужен ещё один курс по Telegram Уже достаточно информации и можно что-то сделать очень быстро. Все, что нужно сделать — это за короткий срок собрать позиционирование, первый пул контента, несколько якорных постов, которые будут все объяснять на протяжении хотя бы месяца, несколько настроенных инструментов для ускорения работы или для того, чтобы работа не останавливлась. Просто потому что н…

❤4👍1👎1💩1

3 Aug 2026, 14:04 UTC≈2,370 views7 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Почему я постоянно начинаю больше, чем физически могу закончить? Уверен, многие задаются этим вопросом. Меня ИИ этим подколол, писал об этом тут. А я хочу задать другой вопрос. Если ты часто начинаешь больше, чем можешь закончить, может ли ИИ помочь так, чтобы ты все таки впервые закончил все, что начал? А в прошлом посте я писал, что буду проводит эксперименты, на что реально способен ИИ в руках обычного человек…

❤3👍2👏1🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @grigor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

В школе этому не учат | Бизнес & Digital
@delaumoney · 53,221
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 24 August 2026
Психология Маркетинга
@marketpsy · 174,202
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 12 August 2026
Саша Чижов
@blogsmm · 38,252
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 31 August 2026
Карты, тексты, два ствола
@remingtonist · 27,235
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 11 September 2026
SMM с Дамиром Халиловым
@damirkhalilov · 23,304
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 September 2026
Текст в тексте
@textvtexte · 22,321
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 21 September 2026
Корнеев | Первый Маркетинговый
@pervmarketing · 135,148
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 13 August 2026
Цепляющий контент
@smm_eng · 22,392
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 20 September 2026
99 франков. Маркетинг
@marketolog_marketing · 82,438
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 August 2026
Полезный Парфун
@ParfunA · 21,948
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 22 September 2026
Маркетинг / Диджитал
@marketingj · 22,513
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 September 2026

This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Grigòr, the Creator” (@grigor), 15,775 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/grigor.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.