2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 373–375 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 06:18
374
no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:54
374
first reading
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 8 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
50.4%
avg views ÷ 374 subscribers
Avg views / post
189
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.75%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
16 (8 June 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
1,131
Reactions total
65
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 06:18 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
296
Videos
12
Links
73
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
52s
Average length
52s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
197 reactions across 16 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
79
40.1%
👍
34
17.3%
❤
29
14.7%
👏
14
7.11%
💯
11
5.58%
😱
8
4.06%
⚡
7
3.55%
😁
6
3.05%
🤔
5
2.54%
🤯
2
1.02%
🤷
2
1.02%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 197reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 16 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dmitrysalko. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Все! Землю стадиона «Пионер» окончательно вернули Иркутску
Верховный суд РФ отказал в пересмотре дела и оставил в силе решения нижестоящих инстанций по поводу стадиона площадью около одного гектара. Об этом журналисту IRK.ru рассказал участник инициативной группы жителей Дмитрий Салко.
Борьба за сохранение спортивного объекта велась с 2019–2020 годов. После приватизации и продажи земли предпринимателю, жители не со…
Восемь месяцев без новостей
С декабря 2025 года я не читаю новости. Чтобы удовлетворять новостной голод смотрю раз в неделю полтора блоггера-аналитика по узким темам. На этом мое знакомство с новостной повесткой закончилось.
Я не могу влиять на эти новости. И они не особо влияют на мою жизнь, кроме поднятия уровня тревожности. А нам такое не надо. Зато без новостей жизнь становится ярче и интереснее.
Поэтому новос…
Навык будущего: умение не работать
Кажется, ИИ забирает у нас не только рутину, но и возможность отдыхать
После сложного решения мозгу нужна простая работа.
Не обязательно лежать на диване. Можно разбирать почту, отвечать на сообщения, ехать за рулём, мыть посуду, делать какие-то механические задачи.
Мозг в этот момент продолжает работать, но уже без высокой нагрузки и на автопилоте. И постепенно перезагружается.…
64 заявки по 400 рублей за две недели
На этой неделе разбирали результаты по одному из наших проектов - санаторию.
За две недели получили 64 заявки из таргета примерно по 400 рублей. Это приблизительно по 5 заявок в день.
Но главное - обратная связь от клиента: после запуска таргета он практически сразу почувствовал прирост заявок. Уже на первой неделе пришла первая продажа. И это при среднем чеке - больше 100 тыс…
Каналы в Максе: возможность подключать комментарии и делать нормальное имя
В Максе появилась возможность делать нормальные адреса каналов для всех. Для этого нужно в настройках изменить приватный канал на публичный. Пока много свободных красивых адресов - успевайте занимать. Один профиль может создавать 5 публичных каналов.
Не могу не заметить странность: зачем-то в префиксе адреса стоит зачем-то "channel_". Это из…
Еще одно подтверждение того, что мы видим на любом проекте: много чего есть, но целой картины не видно. Мы же идем структурно и последовательно.
На скриншоте - сообщение из рабочего чата. Компания работает на всю Россию, успешна в маркетплейсах и сейчас выстраивает собственный интернет-магазин. Чтобы не было хаоса и развитие шло "постоянно и неумолимо" сначала настраиваем сбор всех цифр и фиксируем точку А. Чтобы че…
Иллюзия маркетинга
Многие мои знакомые предприниматели большие молодцы - и сайт сделали, и аналитику настроили, и соцсети ведут, и коллтрекинг подключили, и CRM внедрили, и рекламу в Яндексе и ВК запустили, и даже CDP-системы интегрировали. Молодцы без шуток и иронии. Реально молодцы!
Но почти на каждом проекте, куда мы заходим и где уже много чего сделано и внедрено выясняется любопытное. Часть систем не работает …
Как в стройке привлекли заявки более чем на 300 миллионов рублей
Многие B2B-компании до сих пор думают, что маркетинг для сложных продуктов не работает. Но когда цикл сделки длится месяцами, чеки на миллионы, а клиентов на рынке мало, маркетинг нужен не меньше, а больше.
Разобрал в новом кейсе, как мы выстроили систему привлечения для производителя модульных зданий: от упаковки и позиционирования до квалифицированн…
В день в пробках на заправки сгорает половина бюджета Иркутска
В Иркутске 16 заправок Роснефти. Это единственная сеть, которая отпускает топливо. По сообщениям иркутян люди стоят в очередях от 3 до 8 часов. Возьмем среднее - 5 часов. Число машин в пробке на каждую АЗС - плюс-минус 300. То есть, всего в очередях на АЗС тратится в сутки: 16 АЗС * 300 машин * 5 часов * (24/5=4,8 - столько раз очередь полностью обновляе…
Когда анализируешь много интернет-магазинов, ко всему, кажется, готов.
Но эта метрика удивила даже бывалых.
На скриншоте - сколько времени проводят в Интернет-магазине те, кто активнее всего покупает.
Треть посетителей этого магазина проводит на сайте от 10 минут до 9 (!!!) часов. Есть и те, кто просматривает на сайте до 48 страниц, представляете?
Если покупатель провел на сайте больше часа, то вероятность его покупк…
Статистика по сторитейлам
Итак, прошло 24 часа и теперь можно увидеть полную статистику просмотров сторисов:
1. Инст: 198
2. Телега: 259
3. ВК: 165
Лидирует телега, но удивительно, что и инст несмотря ни на что показывает хорошие показатели. И секрет такого долголетия под санкциями вполне понятен.
Так же вспомнил, что сторисы были еще и в ватсапе. Загрузил туда тоже, чисто посмотреть. 6 просмотров за 6 часов. Дума…
🔥7👍1👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @dmitrysalko. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 202,717 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Точный рекламщик - Дмитрий Салко” (@dmitrysalko), 374 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dmitrysalko.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
