Канал хакерів з науково популярним, пізнавальним і технічним контентом з акцентом на кібербезпеку, а іноді і без. Гротеск, з описом, поганим гумором, помилками і купою оціночних суджень, для соціопатів #rtfm
Звʼязок: https://t.me/hymsupport_bot
Created
2 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 41% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
36 measurements spanning 51 days, net +1,499. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 46,294–48,243 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 12:36
48,018
+231
19 Sept 2026, 12:56
47,787
+107
17 Sept 2026, 03:17
47,680
+146
15 Sept 2026, 06:19
47,534
+75
13 Sept 2026, 16:40
47,459
+92
11 Sept 2026, 18:21
47,367
+159
9 Sept 2026, 02:59
47,208
+62
5 Sept 2026, 21:16
47,146
+32
3 Sept 2026, 21:17
47,114
-3
2 Sept 2026, 13:23
47,117
-16
1 Sept 2026, 12:07
47,133
+7
31 Aug 2026, 08:43
47,126
-18
30 Aug 2026, 07:04
47,144
+4
29 Aug 2026, 09:13
47,140
+7
28 Aug 2026, 10:28
47,133
+22
27 Aug 2026, 10:03
47,111
+3
26 Aug 2026, 13:04
47,108
-7
25 Aug 2026, 16:07
47,115
-17
24 Aug 2026, 17:24
47,132
-51
23 Aug 2026, 00:44
47,183
first reading
Engagement
306 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 103 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
17.4%
avg views ÷ 48,018 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,380
174 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.57%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
174
of 306 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 173 of 174 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held
306 (3 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total
1,457,810
Reactions total
22,737
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
26 Sept 2026, 16:21 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈9,480
Videos
≈1,920
Links
≈7,560
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
53m 45s
Average length
1m 25s
Measured directly from 38 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
37,238 reactions across 295 posts, in 39 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
7,442
20.0%
😁
6,617
17.8%
❤
5,343
14.3%
🔥
3,884
10.4%
🤣
3,439
9.24%
💯
2,619
7.03%
🤬
1,377
3.70%
🤔
952
2.56%
👀
743
2.00%
🤪
532
1.43%
🤩
505
1.36%
🤯
505
1.36%
👏
382
1.03%
❤🔥
378
1.02%
🤷♂
354
0.951%
🫡
346
0.929%
😡
343
0.921%
😱
283
0.76%
🤗
167
0.448%
👌
166
0.446%
19 further kinds
861
2.31%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 305 of the 306 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37,690 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 306 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
54
across the posts below
Posts paid on
31
of 306 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hackyourmom. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 306 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
0.327%
1 of 306 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
8,190
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
8,120
over 305 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 306 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Оцей сюжет EuroNews крутять в усіх країнах ЄС, в ньому Україну на пряму звинувачують в затягуванні реформ в тому числі щодо протидії відмивання грошей і пояснюють, що надання грошей НА ПРЯМУ привʼязано до реформ.
В той самий час, «потужний» лідер, на уріномарафоні каже про «КОСМІЧНИЙ ДЕФІЦИТ БЮДЖЕТУ», але продовжує призначати своїх друзів без конкурсів всюди та блокувати реформи монобільщістю слуг урода.
За каденці…
Як ви мабуть чули, нещодавно ми роздали по 1000$ пʼятьом розумникам які здали НМТ з математики на 200 балів 😉 стимулюємо Вас вчити математику краще за МОН, але це не точно і лише за версією мамкіних хакерів
Точно що, плануємо робити це щорічно, якщо буде вистачати на це коштів, звісно. Щоб ви вчили математику!
А поки от Вам 5 переможців (двоє з них - пара тому відео 4)
На відео вони розказують вам як підготуватися…
💳 Понад 600 тисяч банківських карток, сотні атак і лише близько $25 витрат на одну ціль.
Китайськомовний хакер використовує автономних ШІ-агентів, які практично без участі людини знаходять вразливості в інтернет-магазинах, проникають у системи та викрадають платіжні дані. #cybernews
Промт челендж, щоб ви краще розуміли те, що про Вас вже знає ChatGpt/Claude чи будь який інший ШІ
Ви щодня туди щось відсилаєте, аналізуєте результати поки де-факто система аналізує Вас
Ми топимо тут за розвиток цифрової гігієни та відповідальний підхід до персональних даних, тому вирішили провести експеримент.
Написали в ChatGpt Бородатого промти:
Розкажи все що тобі відомо про користувача який тобі ставить цю з…
🎙 Українська компанія оснастила FPV-дрони мікрофонами для виявлення цілей за звуком
Також БПЛА отримали функцію "Мультиждун", яка дозволяє тримати кілька безпілотників у режимі очікування та швидко реагувати на появу цілі.
До однієї наземної станції можна під'єднати необмежену кількість дронів у режимі очікування. Водночас технічні подробиці роботи нової функції виробник публічно не розкриває – їх надають представн…
🍏 Apple Intelligence почала з’їдати десятки гігабайтів на iPhone навіть у тих, хто не користується ШІ-функціями.
Окремі власники після оновлення до iOS 27 втратили до 16 ГБ сховища.
Очевидного способу звільнити цей простір немає, тому роздратовані власники iPhone звертаються до Reddit у пошуках обхідних рішень, які хоча б частково допомагають. #cybernews
Їбать це потужно: ГПУ РОЗСЛІДУЄ ЯК ГЕНПРОКУРОР КРАВЧЕНКО ВИПИСАВ СОБІ ВІДРОДЖЕННЯ 🤦♂️
Як, як, сука ідіоти: РУКАМИ, бо він тоді був ГЕНПРОКУРОРОМ 🤦♂️ і ми з вами за це платимо нашими податками! Нахуй нам такі «розслідувачі»? Може краще його майно в ОАЕ пошукати?
Суспільство цікавлять інші розслідування:
Хто з КіберПоліції та СБУ був причетний до тієї злочинної організації та проводив обшуки та слідчі дії в колл-ц…
Дівчата, інструкція по тому як не за3,14здітися, та чому НЕ варто викладати все своє життя в соціальні мережі і ТИМПАЧЕ приймати будь яку участь в шоу найбільш деградаційного кАналу СТБ
Про СТБ ми неодноразово писали: саме ці виблядки (оціночне судження як і все інше) відповідальні за магічне мислення значної частини країни. Саме ці моральні уроди з СТБ показували Вам всяку єрєсь, битви екстрасенсів та інше
А потім…
🔞 Discord запустив нову систему перевірки віку, яка сама визначає вікову групу користувача за його активністю та поведінкою на платформі.
Але старт вийшов не надто гладким, система почала помилятися навіть із дорослими користувачами та закривати їм доступ до серверів із віковими обмеженнями. #cybernews
Доречі про мамонтів 🦣
Нам пишуть, що вся жіноча частина інстаСрам обговорює історію чергової інфоциганки (оціночне судження) яка звинуватила свого чоловіка - класного керівника в шахрайстві, чомусь одразу після того, як виявилося що її «бізнеси» мають борги. В боргах вона звинувачує його. Він там теж не святий…
Зазвичай ми не коментуємо цей театр із людей, але тут розкручується історія ледь не Голівудськього сюжету…
❤101👍44😁19🔥5👾1🤪1
Showing the 12 most recent of 306 posts we hold for @hackyourmom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@hackyourmom edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
4 September 2026
Most recent edit
25 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 26 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
OsintFlow ✙ @osintflow · 30,196 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 7 September 2026
КІБЕРБЕЗ @cybersecurity_ua · 53,265 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 24 August 2026
IT ARMY of Ukraine @itarmyofukraine2022 · 106,210 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026
Це не баг, а фіча @fixabug · 57,712 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 25 August 2026
Разведка в интернете @razvedka_v_internete · 36,398 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 2 September 2026
Molfar про OSINT @molfar_global · 51,742 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 25 August 2026
IT Ukraine @ITUkraineNow · 22,916 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 19 September 2026
BRAMA @brama_channel · 110,947 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026
Ооо нейромережеве🐱 @oooneuro · 26,240 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 September 2026
Victory Drones @VictoryDrones2023 · 23,292 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 18 September 2026
Держспецзв’язку @dsszzi_official · 59,264 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 22 August 2026
dev.ua | IT України @devukraine · 30,467 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 7 September 2026
Task No Face @TaskNoFace · 29,506 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 8 September 2026
БЕРЛІНСЬКА @MariaBerlinska · 20,595 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 26 September 2026
EPAM Campus UA @epamuniprogua · 32,124 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 5 September 2026
InformNapalm @informnapalm · 131,350 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 August 2026
Сергій FLASH | Про технології @serhii_flash · 167,719 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“HackYourMom - мамкіни хакери України 🇺🇦” (@hackyourmom), 48,018 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hackyourmom.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.