Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Бінарний XOR

@binary_xor

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,931subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001258321268
TypeChannel
Username@binary_xor
Created15 May 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/binary_xor

Growth

1,9301,9311,930.56 August 2026 — 1,930 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,930 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,931 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 6 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,930–1,931 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 05:461,931+1
7 Aug 2026, 05:031,930no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:181,930first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 22 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
42.9%
avg views ÷ 1,931 subscribers
Avg views / post
828
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.76%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held21 (22 April 20267 August 2026)
Views total4,967
Reactions total137
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

494 reactions across 20 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁21643.7%
13126.5%
👍346.88%
😎244.86%
😭234.66%
🔥132.63%
❤‍🔥102.02%
🤡102.02%
🤔81.62%
💔61.21%
🎃51.01%
👏51.01%
👎20.405%
🥰20.405%
🎅10.202%
🙏10.202%
🤣10.202%
🤨10.202%
🫡10.202%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 494reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 22 April 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 06:04 UTC233 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @RMRFgroupPhoto

Минув рік… Як же швидко минає час. Рік, як Ares не стало. Але він досі з нами: у коді, який писав, у знаннях, якими ділився, в ідеях, які подарував, і в пам'яті всіх, хто його знав. Завдяки вам нам вдалося зібрати кошти на пам'ятник. Якщо чесно, ми навіть зібрали більше, ніж планували. Кожен донат, кожне добре слово стали частиною цієї справи. Завдяки вам ми змогли гідно вшанувати пам'ять Ares. Як і обіцяли, хочем

😭23💔3😁1🙏1

27 Jul 2026, 20:42 UTC996 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Залетів донат 14 880 гривень, питають, таки декриптиться чи нє 🦍

😁25

27 Jul 2026, 20:12 UTC973 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026

якісь люді без декріптора задонатілі 12к 🥳

😁20🔥21

27 Jul 2026, 19:46 UTC≈1,030 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Від каналу "Бінарний XOR" оголошую додатковий розіграш з призами за донат на дружню банку до цього збору 🙂 https://send.monobank.ua/jar/5WMDaKarv9 За найбільший донат через дружню банку ви отримаєте оцю чудову брендову банку M&Ms від DC8044! Обов'язково вказуйте свій телеграм нікнейм, чи інший спосіб зв'язку, в коментарі до поповнення дружньої банки, якщо претендуєте на приз.

6

27 Jul 2026, 19:42 UTC605 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @DC8044_InfoPhoto

DC8044 оголошує великий збір. У військовий підрозділ, де з початку війни проходять службу два відомі амбасадори нашої спільноти, критично потрібна інженерна техніка. Мова йде про закупівлю невеликого екскаватора для того, щоб побудувати фортифікації для підрозділу на одному з горячих напрямків фронту: це Запоріжжя. Ми обов'язково зробимо кілька цікавих розіграшів за ці донати. Але зараз просто немає часу для того,

❤‍🔥5🫡1

22 Jul 2026, 16:52 UTC≈1,130 views49 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁40🎃4🥰2🎅1👏1🤨1

4 Jul 2026, 10:37 UTC≈1,670 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Хороші друзі шукають АІ/ML спеціаліста з сильними навичками в computer vision. https://jobs.dou.ua/companies/clarity-ai/vacancies/363923/ Корисна справа, від якої в русні бомбить

10👎1😁1

27 Jun 2026, 13:32 UTC≈2,020 views45 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁40👏4🤔1

22 Jun 2026, 15:22 UTC≈2,020 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Привіт, бінарний чатік! Щось у нас так стрімко міняється кібербез, шо кожен день є теми на потриндіть, а часу на це нема. Тому трошки асинхронно рішив робить. Кожен будній день я тепер викладаю короткий відос про те що у мене в кібербезпеці. Глибокого і потужного реверс інженірінгу там не буде. Бо чесно кажучи я і не дуже реверсер, хоча і можу с певною періодичністю оверфлоунути буфер або пару буферів. Я скоріше п

11🔥4

17 Jun 2026, 10:53 UTC≈1,280 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Народ, ищу человека в команду 🙌 Нужен аналитик по threat intelligence - тот, кто кайфует копаться в отчётах по хакерским группам, разбирать их инструменты, наработки и тактики. Читать, что публикуют Mandiant, ESET, GReAT и прочие, вытаскивать оттуда суть и складывать в нормальную картину: кто, чем, как работает. Что важно: 1.уже шаришь в теме, можешь сам вести исследование, а не только читать чужое 2. знаешь MITRE

4

16 Jun 2026, 21:16 UTC812 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @cyber_anarchy_squad

Wassup підписники. Ми давно не робили постів, проте за цей час було проведено більше 5 атак на неназвані компанії в сферах IT, держ. структур, та холдинги з різних секторів включаючи торгівлю та будівництво. Оскільки абсолютно прозоро й відкрито проводити атаки стало важче через більш прискіпливу увагу зі сторони силових структур та ЗМІ - ми не могли майже нічого висвітлювати на загал. Але в зв'язку з останніми поді

👍124🤡3🔥1🤔1

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @binary_xor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 928,393 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Бінарний XOR” (@binary_xor), 1,931 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/binary_xor.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.