Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

PulSe

@Pulsechanel

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

19,846subscribers

+10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001393745037
TypeChannel
Username@Pulsechanel
DescriptionOSINT, информационная безопасность и всё что с этим связанно Оглавление: https://t.me/Pulsechanel/495 #инструменты #теория #тренировка #совет #полезное Приватка - https://t.me/Pulsechanel/604 По рекламе - @DStoun
Created4 January 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Pulsechanel

Growth

19,83619,85319,844.56 August 2026 — 19,836 subscribers6 August 2026 — 19,836 subscribers6 August 2026 — 19,840 subscribers7 August 2026 — 19,843 subscribers8 August 2026 — 19,837 subscribers9 August 2026 — 19,844 subscribers10 August 2026 — 19,853 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19,846 subscribers19,8466 August 202611 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 5 days, net +10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,833–19,856 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 17:5319,846-7
10 Aug 2026, 15:5119,853+9
9 Aug 2026, 13:1119,844+7
8 Aug 2026, 13:1319,837-6
7 Aug 2026, 15:2219,843+3
6 Aug 2026, 14:1519,840+4
6 Aug 2026, 09:5119,836no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:4919,836first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 18 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.9%
avg views ÷ 19,846 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,950
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.754%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held16 (18 February 202611 August 2026)
Views total15,780
Reactions total119
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 13:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
78
Videos
7
Links
328

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
23s
Average length
23s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

827 reactions across 16 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍39647.9%
19623.7%
🔥19223.2%
😁212.54%
🤔70.846%
🤝70.846%
👌50.605%
👎20.242%
🤬10.121%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 827reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 18 February 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
23
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 16 we hold a reading for · 69%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Pulsechanel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 February 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 13:06 UTC≈3,540 views29 reactionsread 13 August 2026

#инструменты | сайт 💻 В раздел "Сайты" в подборке https://hacker-basement.com/osint-list/ добавил актуальные инструменты для сбора информации о сайте: ➡️ https://dnsdumpster.com - онлайн сервис для анализа инфраструктуры домена. Умеет находить поддомены, записи DNS, сканировать порты (nmap), определять работающие сервисы, обратный поиск. В бесплатной версии: 50 запросов в день и 50 поддоменов ➡️ https://github.co

15👍12🔥2

30 Jul 2026, 10:19 UTC≈4,760 views19 reactions1 Starread 13 August 2026

#новости OSINT / 3️⃣ / 30.07.2026 ➡️Расследование OCCRP и Guardian Australia про блокчейн-сеть AB Само расследование нишевое. Но его интересно почитать с точки зрения подхода, методов изучения компаний и анализа информации. Они там четыре месяца изучали сайты, соцсети, фотографии, документы и данные перелётов что бы разложить деятельность, структуру и сдеанонить тех кто стоит за очередной амбициозной "крипто-компа

🔥13👍51

16 Jul 2026, 11:59 UTC≈5,540 views40 reactionsread 13 August 2026

#новости OSINT / 2️⃣ / 16.07.2026 ➡️Pegasus Project: расследование OCCRP и технический разбор от Amnesty 16 июля OCCRP и Forbidden Stories опубликовали расследование, основанное на показаниях бывшего сотрудника марокканской DGST (агентство внутренней разведки и госбезопасности Марокко). В расследовании рассказывается, что Марокко использовало Pegasus с 2017 года, закупая доступ через частного посредника, чтобы скр

🔥1910👍9😁2

9 Jul 2026, 08:23 UTC≈5,780 views54 reactions3 Starsread 13 August 2026

#новости OSINT / 1️⃣ / 09.07.2026 🟡Для разнообразия ввожу новую рубрику "Новости". Буду раз или два в неделю рассказывать что там нового в осинте или около него с моими краткими комментариями. ➡️Pegasus и их друг, бывший евродепутат из комитета PEGA Суть: Citizen Lab 3 июля 2026 опубликовали статью, что бывший депутат Европарламента и журналист Стелиос Кулоглу был взломан Pegasus минимум трижды в 2022–2023 годах,

👍35🔥124🤝2😁1

8 Jul 2026, 18:54 UTC≈5,620 views33 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🔔Циферки показывают, что моими приложениями пользуются, что даёт повод сделать вывод о их полезности, что, в свою очередь, не может не радовать. А значит есть повод поделиться и другими моими штуками. ➖➖➖➖➖➖ Quiz Generator | by Pulse нэйминг, как всегда, без лишних отсылок, скромен и аскетичен 🎯 Quiz Generator - это визуальный конструктор интерактивных тестов и опросников. Приложение работает в браузере и генерирует

👍1814😁1

8 Jul 2026, 10:00 UTC≈5,400 views36 reactionsread 13 August 2026

🎞 МИФЫ и РЕАЛЬНОСТЬ про ИИ. Использование в OSINT ➡️ https://youtu.be/8d-W-YAQuSY

👍305😁1

11 May 2026, 15:19 UTC≈10,600 views100 reactions1 Starread 13 August 2026

🧡Не мог я пройти мимо. ⏩Мне зачем-то на глаза попался срач вокруг Палантира. Он уже какое-то время длится, но я не особо интересуюсь подобными темами, потому узнал только сегодня, так как имел неосторожность посмотреть видео про это, а потом Ютуб доблестно продемонстрировал мне “многообразие” мнений по этому вопросу. Справедливости ради отмечу что есть весьма адекватные взгляды.⏪ 🔣 Кто пропустил, то чувак из компани

46👍24🔥23🤝4😁2🤔1

24 Apr 2026, 11:58 UTC≈11,000 views27 reactions3 Starsread 13 August 2026

🎞 OSINT Stividor. Обзор возможностей и интерфейса ➡️ https://youtu.be/RAALDuenPgo

👍234

5 Apr 2026, 18:53 UTC≈18,800 views118 reactions4 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

#инструменты | OSINT Stividor ➡️Сделал новое приложение для OSINT. Началось всё, как обычно, с небольшого скрипта, но потом начали появляться идеи и, в итоге, получилось очень круто, а главное - полезно в реальной работе. Ну и, что важно, ничего подобного и при этом бесплатного не существует. OSINT Stividor | by Pulse 🟡Это приложение для накопления и анализа информации. Всё хранится локально в папке проекта. Интер

👍6630🔥19🤔2😁1

15 Mar 2026, 20:06 UTC≈13,500 views85 reactions4 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🟨🟨🟨 Сделал большую обнову Links Overseer ✔️Теперь он умеет собирать с сайта документы и извлекать из них метаданные. ⏩Главная проблема подобных утилит (например Metagoofil) всегда была в том, что они использовали дорки гугла для поиска документов, и всё работало ровно до того момента, пока не упиралось в капчу. Я понимаю почему разработчики так делали - это сильно проще, но нам не нужно проще, нам нужно чтобы работ

👍41🔥2019👌4😁1

6 Mar 2026, 13:47 UTC≈10,300 views40 reactions2 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🔔НАБОР ЗАКРЫТ Набор новой группы на обучение OSINT. ❔Для кого подойдёт? Это базовый курс, благодаря которому можно быстро научится эффективно собирать и анализировать информацию, на уровне достаточном для комфортного входа в профессию. А также понять куда двигаться дальше и как развивать свои навыки. Т.е. курс идеально подойдёт как тем, кто только начал (или планирует начать) изучать OSINT, так и тем кто уже что-то

👍25😁76👌1🤝1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @Pulsechanel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,170,681 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Social Engineering
@Social_engineering · 125,168
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 August 2026
Этичный Хакер
@hack_less · 227,302
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PulSe” (@Pulsechanel), 19,846 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Pulsechanel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.