Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Lost Dogs Co Eng

Channel

Lost Dogs Co Eng

@lostdogscoeng

Not marked by Telegram, checked 10 September 2026

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry

1,228,763subscribers

-153,241 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among the largest entries.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001820442890
TypeChannel
Username@lostdogscoeng
DescriptionLost Dogs: The Way game: https://t.me/lost_dogs_bot/lodoapp Lost Dogs Collection: https://getgems.io/collection/EQAl_hUCAeEv-fKtGxYtITAS6PPxuMRaQwHj0QAHeWe6ZSD0
Created16 February 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held64
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/lostdogscoeng

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. This entry also forms a group of 2 channels linked by matching posts. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@lostdogscoeng/177 · this entry14 Nov 2024, 11:57 UTC@lostdogsrare/32714 Nov 2024, 11:59 UTC1.0072 seconds
@lostdogscoeng/178 · this entry20 Nov 2024, 11:01 UTC@lostdogsrare/33220 Nov 2024, 22:31 UTC1.0012 hours
@lostdogscoeng/179 · this entry22 Nov 2024, 14:57 UTC@lostdogsrare/33322 Nov 2024, 15:03 UTC1.006 minutes
@lostdogscoeng/186 · this entry2 Dec 2024, 16:59 UTC@lostdogsrare/3343 Dec 2024, 10:57 UTC1.0018 hours
@lostdogscoeng/189 · this entry24 Dec 2024, 15:05 UTC@lostdogsrare/33625 Dec 2024, 08:59 UTC1.0018 hours
@lostdogscoeng/190 · this entry3 Jan 2025, 15:38 UTC@lostdogsrare/3373 Jan 2025, 19:40 UTC1.004.0 hours
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@lostdogsrare7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0012 hoursthis entry (7–0)
@notcoin11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0087 minutesthis entry (9–2)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 2 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 330 comparable posts for this entry, running 16 February 2023 to 21 February 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 2 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @lostdogscoeng — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

1,228,7631,382,0041,305,383.56 August 202612 November 2026
64 measurements spanning 98 days, net -153,241. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,205,777–1,404,990 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 00:101,228,763-2,190
9 Nov 2026, 23:411,230,953-1,816
8 Nov 2026, 13:071,232,769-2,433
7 Nov 2026, 04:091,235,202-854
6 Nov 2026, 05:011,236,056-1,572
5 Nov 2026, 04:181,237,628-1,380
4 Nov 2026, 07:011,239,008-1,280
3 Nov 2026, 06:561,240,288-1,167
2 Nov 2026, 05:301,241,455-1,650
1 Nov 2026, 04:411,243,105-1,561
31 Oct 2026, 03:361,244,666-2,137
30 Oct 2026, 00:411,246,803-1,563
29 Oct 2026, 02:171,248,366-1,385
28 Oct 2026, 00:451,249,751-1,378
26 Oct 2026, 22:261,251,129-1,406
25 Oct 2026, 22:271,252,535-939
24 Oct 2026, 21:361,253,474-1,383
24 Oct 2026, 00:051,254,857-1,180
23 Oct 2026, 02:361,256,037-1,687
22 Oct 2026, 00:341,257,724first reading

Engagement

403 posts held, back to 16 February 2023 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 249 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 403 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
332
Videos
9
Links
240

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

1,405 reactions across 20 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👾1,405100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 400 of the 403 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 838,929 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 403 most recent posts we hold, published 16 February 2023 to 21 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
70
across the posts below
Posts paid on
18
of 400 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
13
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lostdogscoeng. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 403 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 February 2023 to 21 February 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

21 Feb 2026, 09:24 UTC≈39,000 views125 reactions13 Starsread 12 November 2026
Photo

gwoof Pack 🐺 Quick Signals status: ⏳ Only 14 days left until the End 🌸 WOOLTS staking for $WOOF – blooming and smelling good 🔧 Still, bugs are being hunted. Rough edges – polished. Now, let's get to the real talk part. We see all your questions, and the hottest one is: “What’s next?”. Answer: we’re waiting for the right moment. To relaunch REX. To launch new games 🏆 Why? 😪 Because building at full speed while the…

👾125

6 Feb 2026, 14:19 UTC≈37,900 views56 reactions4 Starsread 12 November 2026
Photo

gwoof Pack! 🐺 The first days since our new game launch hit like this: lots of Signals… and lots of feedback... 📡 Your reports, notes, and screenshots have been collected – so we’re rolling out fixes for the bugs and small rough edges you’ve spotted. Oh, and in case you missed it: if you're a Lost Dogs NFT holder, you can get free WOOLTS in Signals. And yes, we heard you loud and clear, our next step: free WOOLTS …

👾56

4 Feb 2026, 15:01 UTC≈25,800 views42 reactions3 Starsread 12 November 2026
Photo

NEW. BIG. GAME. Lost Dogs: Signals is LIVE! 📡 https://t.me/wooltbot 📡 ⏳ One day = one round. 🐶 Earn $WOOF / $TON as you shape the story. 🐺 Invite friends to get free WOOLTS. Help the detective crack the case. 🔍 And try not to lose your mind along the way…

👾42

30 Jan 2026, 16:57 UTC≈28,400 views53 reactions4 Starsread 12 November 2026
Photo

His apartment was the kind Dogtown forgets on purpose. 🌧️ A one-room box above a shop that never opened on time. Smoke soaked into the curtains. Cheap cigarettes. Cheaper skotch. And there, right in the middle of the table, stood that thing… A radio. 📻 Old. Dusty. Cracked. He stared at it for days. Weeks. Months… but it kept staying quiet. Night after night, he waited. For a small hiss of static. For at leash som…

👾53

22 Jan 2026, 15:33 UTC≈24,900 views56 reactions1 Starread 12 November 2026
Photo

Inner Circle testers: assembled. The "sniff test": begun. Rainy Dogtown. Mysterious murder. A detective on the edge... The first Signals are already being sent. 📡 Y'all know what it means: Big. Game. Soon. 👁️👁️

👾56

21 Jan 2026, 09:51 UTC≈21,700 views44 reactions4 Starsread 12 November 2026
Photo

He wasn’t always like this... Before the trench coat and the smell of cheap cigarettes, he was a truly “good boy”. Young, collar clean, eyes sharp — the kind of dog who still believed truth had weight. 😵‍💫 He started where all good detectives start: listening. Behind bar counters. Under stage lights. Outside penthouse doors. Later, he became the one, who could find anything... Lost trinkets. Lost lovers. Lost dogs.…

👾44

14 Jan 2026, 08:14 UTC≈20,000 views46 reactions2 Starsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Back then, Dogtown built idols and superstars the way it built lies – fast, glossy, expensive. But she...she was the brightest of them all. 🌟 A face on every screen. A name in every mouth. She flew close enough to the penthouses, to hear secrets through velvet curtains. And then, one night, the superstar fell from the sky. ☠️ That’s when THIS case has started... The kind that eats sleep first… and sanity right aft…

👾46

12 Jan 2026, 12:42 UTC≈20,800 views29 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

The Pack had Dogtown streets. The Pack has Portals and Bazaar. And the Pack has its own Inner Circle. Where the most loyal dogs reside and the biggest $WOOF believers gather. The place from where some can touch things a bit earlier than others... 👀

👾29

7 Jan 2026, 13:18 UTC≈25,300 views68 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Before Dogtown fell… the rain never stopped. It washed the streets. 😓 But not the dog's sins... The corrupt elites howled from their penthouses. The rest learned to listen. Listen for Signals. 📡 Every billboard promised heaven – reality brought damnation. Dogtown looked eternal. Until it wasn’t. 💨

👾68

31 Dec 2025, 17:04 UTC≈32,600 views155 reactions2 Starsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Happy New Woof! 🐺

👾155

8 Dec 2025, 10:02 UTC≈39,600 views113 reactions1 Starread 12 November 2026
Photo

gwoof Pack! 🐺 What Lost Dog are you today?

👾113

Showing the 12 most recent of 403 posts we hold for @lostdogscoeng. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 22 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Domains linked from posts

7 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.

getgems.io35 posts · 7 August 2025 – 2 November 2025 · example post
x.com17 posts · 11 August 2025 – 1 November 2025 · example post
bento.me1 post · 5 September 2025 – 5 September 2025 · example post
lostdogs.xyz1 post · 30 September 2025 – 30 September 2025 · example post
markusrichard.notion.site1 post · 22 August 2025 – 22 August 2025 · example post
app.ston.firegistrable domain: ston.fi1 post · 2 October 2025 – 2 October 2025 · example post
tonviewer.com1 post · 31 October 2025 – 31 October 2025 · example post

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Lost Dogs Co Eng” (@lostdogscoeng), 1,228,763 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lostdogscoeng.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.