28 measurements spanning 31 days, net +378. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean βno change observedβ, never βinterpolatedβ. The vertical axis spans 23,625β24,689 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Sept 2026, 02:57
24,127
-82
4 Sept 2026, 09:17
24,209
-23
3 Sept 2026, 00:43
24,232
-32
1 Sept 2026, 20:34
24,264
-16
31 Aug 2026, 22:08
24,280
-17
31 Aug 2026, 00:14
24,297
-28
30 Aug 2026, 00:25
24,325
-23
29 Aug 2026, 00:26
24,348
-22
28 Aug 2026, 00:33
24,370
-36
26 Aug 2026, 22:33
24,406
-42
25 Aug 2026, 19:13
24,448
-28
24 Aug 2026, 21:14
24,476
-42
23 Aug 2026, 09:17
24,518
-32
21 Aug 2026, 21:28
24,550
-16
20 Aug 2026, 13:43
24,566
+38
19 Aug 2026, 15:44
24,528
+194
18 Aug 2026, 15:12
24,334
-6
17 Aug 2026, 14:29
24,340
-36
16 Aug 2026, 09:08
24,376
-19
14 Aug 2026, 17:54
24,395
first reading
Engagement
31 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR Β· 30 days
13.7%
avg views Γ· 24,127 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,310
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.69%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 31 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held
31 (25 July 2026 β 28 August 2026)
Views total
33,120
Reactions total
559
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 11:50 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
1,393 reactions across 31 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 1,393 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
I have a lot of videos that i've cooked up where i'm going to share the alpha of my trading mindset, how i find good plays, how to protect your capital, how to set a stop loss, limit orders, etc.
I'm going to hand out my entire playbook, which has helped me consistently make money every single year in memecoins without having to be a streamer who dumps on your head on 20K toppers.
show some support so i know if i sβ¦
one of my goals was to figure out an algo that can hit every top runner, we've done that, and we're continously improving it.
but now, the next thing I wanted to solve was building a feed that's main goal isn't 100x's it's simply to help people be profitable from flips.
we've now achieved that. read more below
https://x.com/100xgemfinder/status/2092264644966556152?s=20
ever since i came into this space in 2020, the problem of saturation of coins has existed. for many many years this has been the reality of the trenches. with the rise of pumpfun and their success, saturation of new launches got 10,000x worse than ever before. imagine being a normie and trying to pick between 50 "KImchi" coins today. it is unplayable. i have worked to not just solve that problem using machine learninβ¦
Closer and closer to trading and auto trading release for gem bot. The goal is to offer this to EVERYBODY even if not premium.
Premium auto trader will get the calls earlier of course
Non premium will only be able to auto buy trending calls
β€οΈ if youβre hyped.
β‘οΈ if you like the new UI (spent so much time making it perfect)
HUGE UPGRADES ON THE WAY to the speed and UI. trading is loading and all chains with bnb and robinhood are almost done.
Our beta tester for trading just hit this insane banger. Another giveaway ending Sunday so make sure youβre tapped in.
https://x.com/gembotio/status/2088720450641932345/video/1?s=46
Going to be posting short form guides teaching all of you for free how I hit huge plays early. So you can replicate my exact process. Hit the follow! β€οΈπ
https://www.tiktok.com/@100xgemfinderr
106x now in under an hour early as always show some love for a chanceβ¦ ππ
https://x.com/100xgemfinder/status/2086103568155890101?s=46&t=E4giYcspoU1vBuJJFa9Rcg
Has anyone ever wanted to paper trade / test out paper auto trading memecoins?
If so⦠stay tuned and tapped into my X because we may be rolling this out to the world very very soon to the world.
β€οΈ if youβd use it and hone your skills
β€84β€βπ₯8π₯°7π1
Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @x100xcallz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegramβs recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
Ram's Gems Calls β¨ @ramcalls Β· 41,258 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 73 here β alongside 72 others β read 29 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 β this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
β100x Calls πβ (@x100xcallz), 24,127 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/x100xcallz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.