Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 100x Calls πŸ’Ž

Channel

100x Calls πŸ’Ž

@x100xcallz

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry

24,127subscribers

+378 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001745062642
TypeChannel
Username@x100xcallz
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/x100xcallz

Growth

23,74824,56624,1577 August 2026 β€” 23,749 subscribers7 August 2026 β€” 23,749 subscribers8 August 2026 β€” 23,748 subscribers9 August 2026 β€” 23,947 subscribers10 August 2026 β€” 24,167 subscribers11 August 2026 β€” 24,208 subscribers12 August 2026 β€” 24,343 subscribers13 August 2026 β€” 24,409 subscribers14 August 2026 β€” 24,395 subscribers16 August 2026 β€” 24,376 subscribers17 August 2026 β€” 24,340 subscribers18 August 2026 β€” 24,334 subscribers19 August 2026 β€” 24,528 subscribers20 August 2026 β€” 24,566 subscribers21 August 2026 β€” 24,550 subscribers23 August 2026 β€” 24,518 subscribers24 August 2026 β€” 24,476 subscribers25 August 2026 β€” 24,448 subscribers26 August 2026 β€” 24,406 subscribers28 August 2026 β€” 24,370 subscribers29 August 2026 β€” 24,348 subscribers30 August 2026 β€” 24,325 subscribers31 August 2026 β€” 24,297 subscribers31 August 2026 β€” 24,280 subscribers1 September 2026 β€” 24,264 subscribers3 September 2026 β€” 24,232 subscribers4 September 2026 β€” 24,209 subscribers7 September 2026 β€” 24,127 subscribers24,1277 August 20267 September 2026
28 measurements spanning 31 days, net +378. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,625–24,689 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 02:5724,127-82
4 Sept 2026, 09:1724,209-23
3 Sept 2026, 00:4324,232-32
1 Sept 2026, 20:3424,264-16
31 Aug 2026, 22:0824,280-17
31 Aug 2026, 00:1424,297-28
30 Aug 2026, 00:2524,325-23
29 Aug 2026, 00:2624,348-22
28 Aug 2026, 00:3324,370-36
26 Aug 2026, 22:3324,406-42
25 Aug 2026, 19:1324,448-28
24 Aug 2026, 21:1424,476-42
23 Aug 2026, 09:1724,518-32
21 Aug 2026, 21:2824,550-16
20 Aug 2026, 13:4324,566+38
19 Aug 2026, 15:4424,528+194
18 Aug 2026, 15:1224,334-6
17 Aug 2026, 14:2924,340-36
16 Aug 2026, 09:0824,376-19
14 Aug 2026, 17:5424,395first reading

Engagement

31 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR Β· 30 days
13.7%
avg views Γ· 24,127 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,310
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.69%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 31 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held31 (25 July 2026 – 28 August 2026)
Views total33,120
Reactions total559
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface β€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 11:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than β€œcorrecting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β€” 8.12K, 3.7M β€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,393 reactions across 31 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❀97169.7%
πŸ”₯1218.69%
⚑745.31%
❀‍πŸ”₯543.88%
🍾332.37%
πŸ‘312.23%
πŸ₯°231.65%
🀩171.22%
😁130.933%
🐳120.861%
😎100.718%
😈80.574%
πŸ‘€60.431%
πŸŽ‰50.359%
πŸ€—50.359%
πŸ˜‡40.287%
πŸ•Š30.215%
🫑30.215%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 1,393 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 14:36 UTCβ‰ˆ1,520 views64 reactionsread 3 September 2026

I have a lot of videos that i've cooked up where i'm going to share the alpha of my trading mindset, how i find good plays, how to protect your capital, how to set a stop loss, limit orders, etc. I'm going to hand out my entire playbook, which has helped me consistently make money every single year in memecoins without having to be a streamer who dumps on your head on 20K toppers. show some support so i know if i s…

❀49⚑9πŸ˜‡4πŸŽ‰2

25 Aug 2026, 23:23 UTCβ‰ˆ2,030 views20 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Another insane call live for everyone to see https://x.com/100xgemfinder/status/2092392319022510517?s=46&t=E4giYcspoU1vBuJJFa9Rcg

πŸ”₯13❀7

25 Aug 2026, 14:57 UTCβ‰ˆ2,060 views30 reactionsread 3 September 2026

one of my goals was to figure out an algo that can hit every top runner, we've done that, and we're continously improving it. but now, the next thing I wanted to solve was building a feed that's main goal isn't 100x's it's simply to help people be profitable from flips. we've now achieved that. read more below https://x.com/100xgemfinder/status/2092264644966556152?s=20

πŸ‘13❀11πŸ”₯3πŸ₯°3

21 Aug 2026, 20:33 UTCβ‰ˆ3,010 views121 reactionsread 3 September 2026

ever since i came into this space in 2020, the problem of saturation of coins has existed. for many many years this has been the reality of the trenches. with the rise of pumpfun and their success, saturation of new launches got 10,000x worse than ever before. imagine being a normie and trying to pick between 50 "KImchi" coins today. it is unplayable. i have worked to not just solve that problem using machine learnin…

❀103πŸ₯°9🍾7⚑2

16 Aug 2026, 19:31 UTCβ‰ˆ3,930 views130 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Closer and closer to trading and auto trading release for gem bot. The goal is to offer this to EVERYBODY even if not premium. Premium auto trader will get the calls earlier of course Non premium will only be able to auto buy trending calls ❀️ if you’re hyped. ⚑️ if you like the new UI (spent so much time making it perfect)

❀99⚑31

15 Aug 2026, 20:14 UTCβ‰ˆ3,660 views31 reactionsread 3 September 2026

HUGE UPGRADES ON THE WAY to the speed and UI. trading is loading and all chains with bnb and robinhood are almost done. Our beta tester for trading just hit this insane banger. Another giveaway ending Sunday so make sure you’re tapped in. https://x.com/gembotio/status/2088720450641932345/video/1?s=46

❀21πŸ”₯7❀‍πŸ”₯3

12 Aug 2026, 17:19 UTCβ‰ˆ4,380 views46 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

You never have to wonder if something is a rug again. 99% accuracy on rug detection with Gembot.io just view the chart

❀32⚑8πŸ”₯6

12 Aug 2026, 01:05 UTCβ‰ˆ4,180 views48 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

if you aren't monitoring the site and telegram chat for alerts what are you doing??? back to back days of 50x and 100x calls for absolutely free 😴

πŸ”₯31❀9❀‍πŸ”₯7⚑1

11 Aug 2026, 14:56 UTCβ‰ˆ4,240 views47 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Going to be posting short form guides teaching all of you for free how I hit huge plays early. So you can replicate my exact process. Hit the follow! β€οΈπŸ™ https://www.tiktok.com/@100xgemfinderr

❀35πŸ‘8πŸ₯°4

11 Aug 2026, 14:33 UTCβ‰ˆ4,110 views22 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

64% on 2x+ today Gembot.io is cooking

❀19🐳3

8 Aug 2026, 15:16 UTCβ‰ˆ4,910 views34 reactionsread 3 September 2026

106x now in under an hour early as always show some love for a chance… πŸ‘€πŸ’Ž https://x.com/100xgemfinder/status/2086103568155890101?s=46&t=E4giYcspoU1vBuJJFa9Rcg

❀31😁3

6 Aug 2026, 16:19 UTCβ‰ˆ4,910 views100 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Has anyone ever wanted to paper trade / test out paper auto trading memecoins? If so… stay tuned and tapped into my X because we may be rolling this out to the world very very soon to the world. ❀️ if you’d use it and hone your skills

❀84❀‍πŸ”₯8πŸ₯°7πŸŽ‰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @x100xcallz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β€” each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Ram's Gems Calls ✨
@ramcalls Β· 41,258
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 73 here β€” alongside 72 others β€” read 29 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one β€” see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œ100x Calls πŸ’Žβ€ (@x100xcallz), 24,127 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/x100xcallz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.