Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
10 measurements spanning 22 days, net -338. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,646–12,086 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 05:57
11,697
-120
17 Sept 2026, 05:19
11,817
-24
15 Sept 2026, 08:22
11,841
-19
13 Sept 2026, 20:41
11,860
-40
12 Sept 2026, 01:00
11,900
-37
9 Sept 2026, 13:40
11,937
-51
6 Sept 2026, 07:39
11,988
-40
4 Sept 2026, 04:17
12,028
-7
3 Sept 2026, 18:22
12,035
no change
3 Sept 2026, 17:47
12,035
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 5 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 January 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
268 reactions across 20 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
98
36.6%
🔥
90
33.6%
🤝
80
29.9%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 268 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 November 2024 to 28 January 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
157
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 20 we hold a reading for · 75%
Most on one post
17
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cryptperry. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 November 2024 to 28 January 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Eyes wide shut 👁
What I am about to explain is an experience gained by time and tremendous losses, but giving you the opportunity to observe objective reality in the current moment, which is perhaps more valuable than those sums of losses of the past. You have the opportunity not to make mistakes, but to take the routes already taken:
1.Market analysis:
If you analyze the fundamentals and circumstances, you'll dev…
There is no tomorrow or the day after tomorrow. You have asked so many times for a sign - here it is, right in front of you. BUY ALTS NOW❗️
Here is the chance you've been waiting for, nurturing and cherishing. JUST DO IT, BUY IT, AND GET OUT FOR THE HOLIDAYS.
With those who buy today we'll meet on yachts on the Cote d'Azur this spring.
➡️ bingx.com/partner/1
CRYPTO | PERRY
Guys, this is your last chance.
Further there will be the kind of growth your grandchildren will read about in books and ask: - Grandpa, why didn't you become a multi-millionaire
Lack of patience
Another week in our crypto world that throws off newbies who don't understand what's going on. So many people seeing BTC on the rise over $100k the whole week and alts slowly but surely bleeding. Even though BTC took a hit in the last 24 hours due to Powell comments after FRS meeting, the dominance chart (BTC.D) is on the rise. Which means that most of the capital is still being held in bitcoin an…
And just in a week from my previous post on that topic, we've got another discount in the market. Hopefully some of you had stables allocated just for that, as the market is already rebounding. Such days will continue to happen even when the bull will roar, as it is needed to keep market conditions healthy
As many say, and it's true, in bull or pre-bull market you should buy red days. These are the days that make …
FOMO
If you spent at least couple of months in crypto related field, you are well aware of the FOMO concept. For those unlucky souls, who still has no idea what that means - it means fear of missing out, a term coined in crypto long time ago. And this concept has so many examples and illustrations of its work, that sometimes you wonder how people still make the same mistakes
And now, when BTC hit whooping $104,…
Market discounts
When everything seems to be slowly or rapidly growing and you are full of FOMO, you should be ready to act once market gives you a chance. Such chances can be objective market corrections or some black swan events. I'm sure, you are able to differentiate between two
Today we've got US gov moving some bitcoins and flash-crash in South Korea thanks to their president declaring martial law in the …
🔥5🤝5👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cryptperry. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
CRYPTO TREYSI @cryptotreysi · 33,978 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 3 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CRYPTO | PERRY” (@cryptperry), 11,697 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptperry.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
