Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Корпоративные споры • Case by Case

@corplawpro

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

23,553subscribers

-12 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001067606629
TypeChannel
Username@corplawpro
DescriptionСайт www.corplaw.club. Обратная связь @yulia_mikhalchuk, с др. аккаунтов пишут мошенники. Личный канал @Mikhalchuk_Yulia и канал о субсидиарной ответсвенности @subsidiarka_kdl #KHDK3 Канал внесен в реестр https://www.gosuslugi.ru/snet/674067821039886b1d1
Created21 June 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/corplawpro

Growth

23,55223,56523,558.55 August 2026 — 23,565 subscribers6 August 2026 — 23,565 subscribers6 August 2026 — 23,563 subscribers9 August 2026 — 23,561 subscribers10 August 2026 — 23,556 subscribers11 August 2026 — 23,552 subscribers12 August 2026 — 23,553 subscribers23,5535 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 7 days, net -12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,550–23,567 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 14:5723,553+1
11 Aug 2026, 12:0323,552-4
10 Aug 2026, 13:4123,556-5
9 Aug 2026, 16:2623,561-2
6 Aug 2026, 13:2223,563-2
6 Aug 2026, 02:0323,565no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:4023,565first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.85%
avg views ÷ 23,553 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,140
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.267%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 20 of 24 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held25 (29 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total27,408
Reactions total63
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 22:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,040
Videos
48
Links
3,650

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

59 reactions across 18 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3050.8%
🔥711.9%
❤‍🔥610.2%
👍58.47%
😁35.08%
👏23.39%
🙏23.39%
🥰23.39%
💯11.69%
🤷‍♀11.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 63reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 24 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @corplawpro. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 25 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC718 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🏛 ЦБ РФ готов освободить известных рынку эмитентов от проспектов, упростив для них выпуск бондов Банк России после обсуждения с рынком опубликовал итоговые предложения по упрощению эмиссии облигаций. Регулятор, в частности, готов освободить от составления проспектов хорошо известных рынку эмитентов, которые регулярно раскрывают информацию. Доклад "Допуск финансовых инструментов на рынок: направления оптимизации" с

1👏1🙏1

12 Aug 2026, 06:04 UTC795 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Неоплата имущества по договору купли-продажи может подтверждать притворность сделки, если стороны изначально не собирались рассчитываться #недействительность_сделок Акционеры ОАО «Стройдеталь» обратились в интересах общества с иском об оспаривании сделок 2017–2019 годов по отчуждению недвижимости — базы отдыха, земельных участков, столовой, автомойки и магазина стройматериалов — и возврате имущества обществу. По ве

1🤷‍♀1

11 Aug 2026, 11:05 UTC781 views0 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Когда семейные причины могут оправдать отказ от наследства в банкротстве Должник отказывается от наследства в пользу матери, сестры или брата. Для кредиторов такая ситуация выглядит достаточно однозначно — имущество могло попасть в конкурсную массу и использоваться для погашения долгов, но осталось внутри семьи. Суды смотрят на такие споры шире. В центре оценки оказываются причины поведения должника и то, насколько

11 Aug 2026, 06:05 UTC749 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Подписанная накладная может подтвердить передачу имущества при реорганизации, даже если договор поставки впоследствии аннулирован #реорганизация ООО «СтройБизнес» было создано в результате выделения из ООО «БИЗНЕССТРОЙ». Передаточным актом предусматривалась обязанность правопредшественника передать новому обществу 2 328 540 руб. — денежные средства за товарно-материальные ценности и обеспечительные платежи. ООО «С

1👍1

10 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC883 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Новые правила листинга ценных бумаг: проект положения Банк России обновил требования к допуску ценных бумаг на организованные торги. В основу проекта положения легли зарекомендовавшие себя практики, которые сложились на рынке. Предлагается ввести минимальный объем первичных размещений акций для котировальных списков. Доля бумаг в свободном обращении будет зависеть от размера собственного капитала эмитента. Эмитен

1👍1😁1

10 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC891 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Долю главы КФХ нельзя увеличить до 71,2% без проверки оснований перераспределения имущества между всеми членами хозяйства #корпоративный_контроль Члены КФХ «Гофман А.Ф.» Поляков Е.А., Моргачева Т.А., Моргачев Н.А. и Шульц Н.Н. оспорили решения общего собрания от 11.07.2025 и внесённые на их основании изменения в ЕГРЮЛ. На собрании был утверждён состав членов хозяйства и определены размеры их долей. За Гофманом А.Я

2

8 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC912 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

📣 Подготовили дайджест самых интересных судебных кейсов и новостей по корпоративному праву за эту неделю! 📎 Акт взаимозачёта, подписанный директором — единственным участником, может быть и решением о выдаче доли в натуре, и признанием долга 📎 К субсидиарной ответственности применяется редакция закона, действовавшая в момент совершения правонарушения 📎 Экс-акционер взыскивает 2 млрд руб. убытков из-за размытой доли

7 Aug 2026, 14:34 UTC949 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Публичные выступления юриста — как превратить сцену в профессиональный инструмент Сегодня в Клубе корпоративных споров обсудили публичные выступления юриста с Ольгой Суботой — адвокатом, основателем LegalConf и создателем форума «Бизнес. Право». Модерировала дискуссию Юлия Михальчук. Говорили о том, как выбирать площадки, готовить выступление, запоминаться аудитории и использовать конференции для построения професс

7 Aug 2026, 06:02 UTC≈1,130 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Бывший супруг, получивший долю при разделе имущества, не становится участником ООО без согласия остальных участников #переход_доли После смерти участника ООО «СИАЛ» Доценко А.М., владевшего долей 14,286%, суд общей юрисдикции признал долю совместно нажитым имуществом и выделил его бывшей супруге Соколовой Г.В. 7,143% уставного капитала. Устав предусматривал, что переход доли к бывшему супругу допускается с согласи

4🔥2

6 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTC≈1,040 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @Mikhalchuk_Yulia

Сегодня утром была в гостях на вебинаре у Виктора Вяткина. Говорили о корпоративных конфликтах и наследственном планировании для состоятельных доверителей. Успели обсудить много разных вопросов, но одну мысль мне хочется оставить здесь. Делюсь. Последнее время я все чаще думаю о том, что одна из важнейших задач юриста на сложном проекте – не только найти правильное правовое решение, но и добиться осмысленного включ

❤‍🔥61

6 Aug 2026, 06:03 UTC≈1,160 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Ежегодный взнос в фонд СРО может оказаться ничтожным, если его установил совет вместо общего собрания #корпоративные_решения Арбитражный управляющий Кушниренко С.В. оспорил решение дисциплинарного комитета ПАУ «Содружество» и потребовал вернуть 100 тыс. рублей взносов. Основанием для спора стало решение совета СРО от 13.01.2021. Совет обязал членов организации ежегодно вносить по 50 тыс. рублей в резервный фонд по

2

5 Aug 2026, 06:03 UTC≈1,160 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Срок давности по иску к ликвидатору течёт с даты ликвидации общества #корпоративные_споры #убытки #ликвидация_общества Колчанов С.В. (бывший участник и директор ООО «РСГ» с долей 50%) обратился с иском к ИП Присяжных Т.И. (ликвидатор общества, наследник второго участника с долей 25%) о взыскании убытков в размере 7 133 313,73 руб., причинённых недобросовестной ликвидацией общества при наличии невыплаченной действит

👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @corplawpro. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 13,094 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Корпоративные споры • Case by Case” (@corplawpro), 23,553 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/corplawpro.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.