Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Корпоративные споры • Case by Case

Channel

Корпоративные споры • Case by Case

@corplawpro

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

23,596subscribers

+31 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001067606629
TypeChannel
Username@corplawpro
DescriptionСайт www.corplaw.club. Обратная связь @yulia_mikhalchuk, с др. аккаунтов пишут мошенники. Личный канал @Mikhalchuk_Yulia и канал о субсидиарной ответсвенности @subsidiarka_kdl #KHDK3 Канал внесен в реестр https://www.gosuslugi.ru/snet/674067821039886b1d1
Created21 June 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/corplawpro

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

23,52423,60523,564.55 August 2026 — 23,565 subscribers6 August 2026 — 23,565 subscribers6 August 2026 — 23,563 subscribers9 August 2026 — 23,561 subscribers10 August 2026 — 23,556 subscribers11 August 2026 — 23,552 subscribers12 August 2026 — 23,553 subscribers13 August 2026 — 23,556 subscribers15 August 2026 — 23,543 subscribers16 August 2026 — 23,538 subscribers17 August 2026 — 23,536 subscribers18 August 2026 — 23,534 subscribers20 August 2026 — 23,535 subscribers21 August 2026 — 23,530 subscribers23 August 2026 — 23,524 subscribers25 August 2026 — 23,559 subscribers26 August 2026 — 23,578 subscribers27 August 2026 — 23,589 subscribers28 August 2026 — 23,592 subscribers31 August 2026 — 23,590 subscribers1 September 2026 — 23,589 subscribers2 September 2026 — 23,594 subscribers3 September 2026 — 23,590 subscribers5 September 2026 — 23,591 subscribers8 September 2026 — 23,587 subscribers11 September 2026 — 23,585 subscribers13 September 2026 — 23,587 subscribers15 September 2026 — 23,597 subscribers16 September 2026 — 23,605 subscribers19 September 2026 — 23,600 subscribers26 September 2026 — 23,596 subscribers23,5965 August 202626 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 51 days, net +31. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,512–23,617 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 00:3823,596-4
19 Sept 2026, 07:1723,600-5
16 Sept 2026, 19:4223,605+8
15 Sept 2026, 01:1923,597+10
13 Sept 2026, 08:3923,587+2
11 Sept 2026, 12:1523,585-2
8 Sept 2026, 18:2023,587-4
5 Sept 2026, 10:4223,591+1
3 Sept 2026, 10:4823,590-4
2 Sept 2026, 03:5823,594+5
1 Sept 2026, 02:0523,589-1
31 Aug 2026, 00:2423,590-2
28 Aug 2026, 01:3423,592+3
27 Aug 2026, 00:1223,589+11
26 Aug 2026, 01:4823,578+19
25 Aug 2026, 00:1323,559+35
23 Aug 2026, 14:3623,524-6
21 Aug 2026, 22:1723,530-5
20 Aug 2026, 17:3523,535+1
18 Aug 2026, 21:2823,534first reading

Engagement

69 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 63 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.18%
avg views ÷ 23,596 subscribers
Avg views / post
750
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.455%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 69 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held69 (29 July 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total12,757
Reactions total51
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Sept 2026, 00:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,150
Videos
≈48
Links
≈3,720

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

254 reactions across 55 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤11244.1%
👍4216.5%
🔥4116.1%
👏155.91%
🙏145.51%
🥰114.33%
😁72.76%
❤‍🔥62.36%
⚡10.394%
🆒10.394%
💘10.394%
💯10.394%
🤔10.394%
🤷‍♀10.394%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 57 of the 69 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 258 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 69 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 67 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @corplawpro. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 69 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
1.45%
1 of 69 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
768
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
1,080
over 66 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
CQH36pWzJqVJ3LveMwiVeCA6xyx2PLjZHAEAkC46tFHzo4131 August 202631 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 69 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 26 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

26 Sept 2026, 14:20 UTC344 viewsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Вчера в Клубе корпоративных споров прошла дискуссия «ИИ в корпоративных спорах и структурировании сделок: от data room до зала суда». Говорили о том, как ИИ уже меняет работу юристов — от анализа больших массивов документов и подготовки к переговорам до due diligence и работы с судебной практикой. Но вместе с ускорением появляются новые риски: галлюцинации, вымышленные судебные акты, утечка конфиденциальных данных и…

26 Sept 2026, 09:00 UTC402 views1 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

📣 Подготовили дайджест самых интересных судебных кейсов и новостей по корпоративному праву за эту неделю! 📎 Одной отметки о неудачной попытке вручения письма недостаточно, чтобы считать КДЛ надлежаще извещенным о споре 📎 Спор об отчуждении акций без согласия супруга не становится корпоративным только потому, что его предметом являются акции 📎 Неудачная попытка вручения письма еще не означает, что КДЛ был надлежаще…

❤1

25 Sept 2026, 06:01 UTC710 viewsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Признаки сговора и недействительности сделки нельзя оценивать изолированно: суд должен проверить их совокупность и экономический смысл операций #недействительность_сделок АО «Моспроект-3» оспаривало два договора с ООО «СТК» на проектные работы и соглашение от 20.09.2022, в результате которого обязательства на сумму 1,76 млрд руб. были перераспределены между АО «Моспроект-3», ООО «СТК» и ООО «Сиарсиси Рус». Истец сс…

24 Sept 2026, 14:53 UTC756 views10 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Forwarded from @Mikhalchuk_Yulia

Опционы на доли в ООО. Пять кейсов, которые стоит учесть при подготовке сделки Каждый раз готовя документы к сделке надо думать не только о периоде сделки, но и будущем, которое может омрачиться банкротными рисками одной из сторон. Делюсь интересной практикой. 1️⃣ Два опциона на одну долю (дело № А55-40803/2023) «Апсис Актив» заплатило 50 млн рублей за опцион на 100% доли в «Брокере». Продавец заверил, что других …

❤6👍2🥰1🙏1

24 Sept 2026, 06:01 UTC863 views4 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Косвенный иск участника может быть предъявлен не только к директору, но и к лицу, участвовавшему в выводе и использовании имущества общества #корпоративные_споры Участник ООО «РосСтрой» Адис А.Н. обратился с косвенным иском о взыскании в пользу общества убытков, связанных с использованием принадлежащей ему строительной техники и транспорта без надлежащего встречного предоставления. Между участниками общества длите…

🔥4

23 Sept 2026, 06:02 UTC892 views4 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Неудачная попытка вручения письма еще не означает, что КДЛ был надлежаще извещен о споре #субсидиарная_ответственность Оглоблина Е.В. потребовала взыскать с Позднякова М.Б. 120 тыс. руб. в порядке субсидиарной ответственности по обязательствам ООО «Аврора Групп». Суд первой инстанции иск удовлетворил. Поздняков М.Б. в рассмотрении дела не участвовал. О вынесенном решении, по его словам, он узнал только после получ…

❤2👍2

22 Sept 2026, 10:12 UTC792 views8 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Forwarded from @Mikhalchuk_YuliaPhoto

Аргументация в спорах по модели Грэма. Нас этому не учили, но я вам расскажу Читаю разную литературу о том, как вести дискуссии и спорить. Есть много разных моделей и теорий – и во многих из них можно найти полезное зерно для своей работы. Спорить с оппонентом можно по-разному. И от того, как именно мы это делаем, во многом зависит результат разговора. Один из подходов к построению аргументации – пирамида несоглас…

❤8

3 Sept 2026, 06:02 UTC482 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Решение ФНС само по себе не доказывает субсидиарную ответственность бывшего директора #субсидиарная_ответственность ФНС потребовала солидарно взыскать с бывших руководителей ООО «Производители инженерных систем» Тетерина Д.А. и Тетерина А.А. 113,49 млн руб. в порядке субсидиарной ответственности. Налоговый орган ссылался на создание фиктивного документооборота с контрагентами для уменьшения НДС, а также последующе…

2 Sept 2026, 13:00 UTC687 views4 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

7 октября в Москве пройдет ежегодная конференция «Корпоративное право 2026» Корпоративная практика в 2026 году стала заметно шире привычной работы с уставами, собраниями и сделками. В одной плоскости сегодня сходятся раскрытие информации и работа с нерезидентами, новые модели корпоративного управления, личные фонды и преемственность бизнеса, трансграничные M&A, цифровые финансовые инструменты и корпоративные конфлик…

❤4

2 Sept 2026, 06:01 UTC778 views0 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Отсутствие формальной аффилированности не исключает сговор директора с контрагентом при заключении невыгодной сделки #оспаривание_сделок ООО «Солид Спецавтотехлизинг» — единственный участник ООО «Солид-Лизинг» — оспорило семь договоров займа, заключенных в 2024 году между ООО «Солид-Лизинг» и ООО «Станколизинг». По договорам заемщику было передано в общей сложности 49 млн руб. под 23–25% годовых. Срок возврата зай…

1 Sept 2026, 11:02 UTC852 views5 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Что судебный юрист может сделать через нотариуса: 36 инструментов в одном гайде Нотариальный осмотр переписки и сайта – самые очевидные инструменты. На практике возможностей значительно больше. Мы собрали в одном материале 36 нотариальных действий, которые могут пригодиться при подготовке к судебному спору. В гайде разобрали, в частности: 🌀как фиксировать сайты, соцсети, маркетплейсы, электронную почту, групповые …

🙏3👍1🥰1

1 Sept 2026, 06:01 UTC804 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Продажа имущества директором в ущерб обществу: когда применяется годичный, а не трёхлетний срок давности #корпоративные_споры Участник ООО «Файтай» Сафина Н.Н., владеющая 50% долей, потребовала признать недействительным договор купли-продажи пяти земельных участков от 07.12.2022, заключённый директором общества Курамшиной Р.Г. с ИП Халиловым И.Р. по цене в 2 раза ниже кадастровой стоимости. Первая и апелляционная …

❤1

Showing the 12 most recent of 69 posts we hold for @corplawpro. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

27 Aug 2026, 14:56 UTCAnonymous Poll116 voters

Коллеги, нужна ваша помощь! Мы планируем бесплатную дискуссию на сентябрь и хотим посвятить ее цифровым активам. Стоит ли нам проводить эту дискуссию, будет ли вам интересно? Также можете предложить свой вариант темы в комментариях

  1. Чем цифровой рубль отличается от других цифровых активов32%
  2. Как устроен рынок криптовалюты: участники и их взаимодействие49%
  3. Изъятие криптовалюты27%
  4. Не интересует20%

The shares total 128%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 69 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 26 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Юлия Михальчук • Адвокат
@Mikhalchuk_Yulia · 16,702
#1
Субсидиарная ответственность • Case by Case
@subsidiarka_kdl · 21,000
#2
Практическое КУ
@corp_practice · 8,287
#3
Private Law Library | PLL Право
@privlawlib · 33,771
#4
Denuo
@denuolaw · 4,837
#5
ilovedocs
@ilovedocs · 19,300
#6
Право.ru
@pravo_pravo · 57,676
#7
Закон.ру
@zakon_news · 16,014
#8
Доктор Права
@doktorprava · 20,941
#9
Завтра собес!
@zavtrasobes · 11,698
#10
PROбанкротство
@probankrotstvoru · 15,130
#11
ШОРТРИД для юристов
@shortreadlaw · 12,663
#12
М-Логос
@m_logos · 8,919
#13
Журнал "Цивилистика"
@privlaw_journal · 7,921
#14
💀 Анатомия убытков
@damagesanatomy · 8,483
#15
Ничего нового для образованного юноши
@educatedyoungman · 6,038
#16
Ольга Новикова | Документы юриста
@novikovalaw · 7,738
#17
BIRCH LEGAL
@BIRCHLEGAL · 3,606
#18
Правильные сделки | "Томашевская и партнеры"
@corporate_law_m_a_tp · 1,570
#19
VERBA LEGAL🐝
@verbalegal · 3,340
#20
Melling, Voitishkin & Partners
@mvplegal · 5,028
#21
Дмитрий Мирончук | Закон и право
@ruslaw · 25,359
#22
Pepeliaev Group | Пепеляев Групп
@pgp_official · 5,332
#23
Азиза хейтит AI
@legaldesigner · 8,629
#24
КОРПОРАТИВНЫЙ СЕКРЕТАРЬ
@NOKC1 · 1,820
#25
Банкротный Волк
@bankrotwolf · 11,102
#26
Simplawyer
@simplawyer · 6,323
#27
Сделано для юриста
@made4lawyers · 7,544
#28
PRO Семейные права
@prosemuy · 20,311
#29
Корпоративный юрист
@korpurist_ru · 10,512
#30
Марина Ивановна
@Marina_Gubenkolaw · 1,831
#31
efremov.online
@vefremovonline · 1,222
#32
Арбитражный процесс для бизнеса
@arbitrium_processus · 7,914
#33
Loader from SVO
@loaderfromSVO · 40,385
#34
РУЛЬФЫ, ИЛЬФЫ И ИНХАУСЫ
@LawFirms · 21,544
#35
Судебная практика СКЭС ВС РФ
@vs_court · 56,204
#36
Shokobear (Олег Зайцев о банкротстве)
@Shokobear · 10,298
#37
AVE in Law
@lawegorov · 13,811
#38
Анонимный Молотников 🎓
@AMolotnikov2020 · 9,043
#39
Юридические вакансии
@legal_jobs · 35,736
#40
Никифоров || Юридический менеджмент
@AlexeyNikiforov_Legalmanagement · 6,325
#41
ККМП.connect
@kkmpconnect · 4,914
#42
M&A Новости
@dealsma · 9,929
#43
SOCIETAS
@societas_AK · 6,886
#44
Томашевская!
@tomashevskaya_zhanna · 4,027
#45
ALUMNI Partners
@alumnipartnerslawfirm · 3,263
#46
Legal Talents | Legal Jobs & CVs
@legaltalents · 9,522
#47
СУДЕБНАЯ ПРАКТИКА
@sudpraktik · 49,039
#48
m_tserkovnikov
@tserkovnikov · 5,591
#49
Поворот на Право
@povorotnapravo · 50,806
#50
Новости ВС РФ
@vsrf_ru · 59,883
#51
To Hunt a Lawyer
@tohuntalawyer · 8,682
#52
Дихотомия права
@dihotomya · 13,869
#53
Soft Law Community
@soft_law · 3,223
#54
LegalTech
@Lgltech · 15,431
#55
СУДЕБНАЯ ПРАКТИКА IP и IT
@sudpraktik_IPIT_demo · 22,966
#56
Судебная практика по банкротству
@sudpraktik_bankrot_demo · 26,868
#57
Pro IP
@ipmir · 9,713
#58
Первый радиоканал АУ и юристов
@orpauradio · 7,532
#59
M&A на Гоголевском
@ma_nagogolevskom · 1,052
#60
Всё будет M&A!
@alumnimna · 1,571
#61
M&A | IB
@sdelkiMnA · 2,311
#62
Библиотека юриста
@library_lawyer · 25,605
#63
Better Chance
@betterchance_ru · 2,296
#64
Судебная практика АС Московского округа
@arbitrationpractice · 14,072
#65
English Law Report
@enlawreport · 7,471
#66
Рунетлекс
@runetlex · 8,624
#67
Ликвидация и банкротство
@a_d_v_o_k_a_t_RUSSIA · 8,292
#68
РИА Новости: дела арбитражные
@zarbitrazhy · 4,219
#69
Безбашенный Протектор | "Томашевская и партнеры"
@tplaw_protector_blog · 2,489
#70
The Sanctions Law
@lawsanctions · 12,682
#71
На мушке 🪰
@namushkee · 12,410
#72
Банкротный Клуб
@BankruptcyClub · 4,874
#73
Все цивильно
@VseCivilno · 7,293
#74
Compliance practice
@Compliance_Practice · 9,703
#75
Цифровое право
@digital_law_trends · 13,485
#76
Вакансии для юристов Lue Sky Legal Recruitment
@LueSkyLegalRecruitment · 7,942
#77
Правовой лекторий
@lexedu · 10,644
#78
Субсидиарная ответственность, Кейсы
@AlenaShlegel · 1,892
#79
Частное право от Евгения Суворова
@insolvencylaw · 3,389
#80
Коммерсантъ
@kommersant · 294,027
#81
Говорит Нотарь
@notariat · 29,641
#82
Блиц Гриц
@DeanIBL · 5,406
#83
Юстиграм
@yustigram · 30,864
#84
ЛИЧНЫЕ НАЛОГИ
@persontaxes · 31,488
#85
Вакансии младших юристов
@legal_jobs_junior · 8,158
#86
Илья Жарский печатает...
@i_zharskiy · 2,938
#87
Юридические Вакансии
@CareerLaw · 6,750
#88
Банкста
@banksta · 438,371
#89
Банкротные шутейки
@BANKRO_S · 5,581
#90
Ты ж Юрист
@you_lawyers · 13,755
#91

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Субсидиарная ответственность • Case by Case
@subsidiarka_kdl · 21,000
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 25 September 2026
Дмитрий Мирончук | Закон и право
@ruslaw · 25,359
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 September 2026
Доктор Права
@doktorprava · 20,941
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 25 September 2026
Библиотека юриста
@library_lawyer · 25,605
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 14 September 2026
Private Law Library | PLL Право
@privlawlib · 33,771
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
Право.ru
@pravo_pravo · 57,676
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 23 August 2026
СУДЕБНАЯ ПРАКТИКА IP и IT
@sudpraktik_IPIT_demo · 22,966
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 September 2026
Судебная практика по банкротству
@sudpraktik_bankrot_demo · 26,868
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 11 September 2026
Юстиграм
@yustigram · 30,864
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 6 September 2026
Налоговые споры
@nalogi_sud · 23,385
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 September 2026
Судебная практика СКЭС ВС РФ
@vs_court · 56,204
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 23 August 2026
Конституционный Суд
@ksrf_ru · 28,068
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 September 2026
Новости ВС РФ
@vsrf_ru · 59,883
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
ЮРИСПРУДЕНЦИЯ
@yrisprudencia · 23,661
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 17 September 2026
Loader from SVO
@loaderfromSVO · 40,385
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 30 August 2026
Поворот на Право
@povorotnapravo · 50,806
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 25 August 2026
ТРУДОВЫЕ СПОРЫ
@sudpraktik_trud · 26,893
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 September 2026
Юридические вакансии
@legal_jobs · 35,736
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
Народный Юрист
@PeopleIsLawyer · 23,756
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 17 September 2026
ЛИЧНЫЕ НАЛОГИ
@persontaxes · 31,488
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 6 September 2026
РУЛЬФЫ, ИЛЬФЫ И ИНХАУСЫ
@LawFirms · 21,544
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 September 2026
Мы́тарь
@mytar_rf · 27,487
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 September 2026
Законодатель
@zaconodatel · 21,777
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 September 2026
Закупки и тендеры по 44-ФЗ, 223-ФЗ
@zakupki44fz · 48,891
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 24 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Корпоративные споры • Case by Case” (@corplawpro), 23,596 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/corplawpro.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.