Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Азиза хейтит AI

@legaldesigner

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

8,663subscribers

-8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001772925064
TypeChannel
Username@legaldesigner
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/legaldesigner

Growth

8,6598,6718,6656 August 2026 — 8,671 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,671 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,659 subscribers13 August 2026 — 8,663 subscribers8,6636 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,657–8,673 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 08:278,663+4
10 Aug 2026, 12:118,659-12
7 Aug 2026, 06:268,671no change
6 Aug 2026, 15:498,671first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 14 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.2%
avg views ÷ 8,663 subscribers
Avg views / post
969
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
8
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held14 (14 June 202611 August 2026)
Views total7,750
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 16:08 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
16m 09s
Average length
16m 09s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 17:02 UTC489 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Захожу в ПравоКонсультант, а тут внезапная новая функция. Протестирую и вам расскажу.

8 Aug 2026, 10:49 UTC887 viewsread 12 August 2026

Мой друг Владимир сделал очень забавную игру: если вы когда-нибудь играли в «правление», где надо держать баланс между показателями, то это именно этот формат. Игра про жизнь арбитражного управляющего, мне кажется, отличный способ увлечь аудиторию. Очень здорово, что нейросети позволяют юридическим командам делать более интересные маркетинговые события быстро и креативно.

7 Aug 2026, 10:21 UTC761 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

IT-специалисты: как нанимать, контролировать и не терять права на разработки Работа с IT-персоналом требует особого подхода: высокие зарплаты, удалённый формат, интеллектуальная собственность и кандидаты, которые знают свои права лучше работодателя. Ошибки на любом из этапов — от найма до увольнения — оборачиваются многомиллионными исками и потерей продукта. На вебинаре «Риски работы с IT-персоналом: от трудовых ко

3 Aug 2026, 09:20 UTC≈1,030 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

Обещанный обзор и попытка поймать ПравоКонсультант на каверзных вопросах! Рекомендую смотреть на х 1,5, потому что это длинный ролик, но я уверена, вам понравится. Спросила, можно ли все таки устно отозвать заявление об увольнении. Каверза вопроса в том, что обращаясь к судебной практике получить ответ «да, можно» достаточно непросто. 🔗6 КСОЮ в определении от 22.08.2024 по делу №88-20785/2024 «…Трудовой кодекс Рос

31 Jul 2026, 15:26 UTC908 viewsread 12 August 2026

ПравоТех смельчаки 😏 Когда Кирилл Кондратенко мне рассказал об этой их акции, я сказала, что это прием камикадзе для продвижения. А я сегодня взяла и нашла спорный ответ! Выложу обзор ответа на днях.

31 Jul 2026, 15:16 UTC865 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @pravotechPhoto

💼 Справится ли ИИ с вашей юридической задачей? ПравоКонсультант готовит заключение с выводами, аргументами и судебной практикой. Но финальное решение все равно остается за юристом. Запустили конкурс: передайте ПравоКонсультант реальную задачу и проверьте ответ. Если найдете существенную ошибку и подтвердите ее судебной практикой — получите 4 000 ₽ за каждый засчитанный кейс. Как участвовать — рассказали в карточк

20 Jul 2026, 19:06 UTC≈1,450 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

Cнова зову вас: с вебинара на вебинар (как с корабля на бал). На этот раз снова говорим про оптимизацию штата: как законно менять условия труда и сокращать персонал при внедрении ИИ и автоматизации На вебинаре разберем, как в условиях новых бизнес-процессов работать с сокращениями и менять условия трудового договора по причинам, связанным с изменением организационных или технологических условий труда. Обсудим ключе

29 Jun 2026, 15:01 UTC≈2,300 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Муки выбора обложки к нашему новому руководству... что ж делать, что ж делать... P.S. Это отсылка к "волчарам", кто в рекрутерском сообществе крутится, тот знает, о чем речь

29 Jun 2026, 10:19 UTC≈3,690 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Сейчас работаем над важным мероприятием для наших клиентов из ИТ-сегмента. Тема очень болезненная: трудовой экстремизм, ИТ-работники (и не только они), которые нашли новый способ топить и без того страдающий в 2026 году бизнес. Они называют себя «волками». Мы называем их «волками в овечьих шкурах». Это ИТ-специалисты, которые покупают популярные на рынке услуги по поддержке работника в трудоустройстве. Но поддерж

25 Jun 2026, 13:47 UTC≈2,060 viewsread 12 August 2026

Продолжаю следить за «отечественным производством». Это я снова про Нейроюриста. Сейчас на ПМЮФ прошла дискуссия с пикантным названием «7 грехов искусственного интеллекта для юристов». На дискуссии выступала Юлия Попелышева, директор по правовым вопросам Яндекса. Она сделала обзор причин некачественного внедрения нейросетей в юрдепы: — сопротивление юристов, — закупка лигал-тех продуктов, несовместимых с общей ИТ-а

25 Jun 2026, 13:08 UTC≈1,700 viewsread 12 August 2026

Слушаю панели ПМЮФ. На панели про дипфейки спикеры не знают, что такое дипфейки... ну че такое-то?

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @legaldesigner. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 128,176 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Азиза хейтит AI” (@legaldesigner), 8,663 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/legaldesigner.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.