Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Азиза хейтит AI

Channel

Азиза хейтит AI

@legaldesigner

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,629subscribers

-42 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001772925064
TypeChannel
Username@legaldesigner
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/legaldesigner

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

8,6298,6718,6506 August 2026 — 8,671 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,671 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,659 subscribers13 August 2026 — 8,663 subscribers17 August 2026 — 8,667 subscribers24 August 2026 — 8,662 subscribers27 August 2026 — 8,658 subscribers30 August 2026 — 8,657 subscribers2 September 2026 — 8,652 subscribers6 September 2026 — 8,644 subscribers11 September 2026 — 8,632 subscribers25 September 2026 — 8,629 subscribers6 August 202625 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 49 days, net -42. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,623–8,677 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 00:578,629-3
11 Sept 2026, 02:208,632-12
6 Sept 2026, 07:558,644-8
2 Sept 2026, 00:348,652-5
30 Aug 2026, 08:578,657-1
27 Aug 2026, 11:468,658-4
24 Aug 2026, 06:548,662-5
17 Aug 2026, 10:098,667+4
13 Aug 2026, 08:278,663+4
10 Aug 2026, 12:118,659-12
7 Aug 2026, 06:268,671no change
6 Aug 2026, 15:498,671first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 14 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
16m 47s
Average length
8m 24s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Advertising

Ad load
7.69%
1 of 13 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
505
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
1,560
over 12 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
CQH36pWzJqDgH9TeiMoGoqpoCiHKdtBYHPzgTeiz2tfKFS127 August 202627 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 14 June 2026 to 27 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

27 Aug 2026, 10:34 UTC505 viewsread 28 August 2026
Advertisementerid CQH36pWzJqDgH9TeiMoGoqpoCiHKdtBYHPzgTeiz2tfKFSVideo

Нейроюрист теперь работает прямо в Microsoft Word Больше не нужно переключаться между вкладками, переносить фрагменты текста туда-обратно и вручную вносить правки из чата в файл. Нейроюрист поможет работать над документом там, где вы его уже редактируете — внутри файла. Что можно делать, не выходя из Word: • Задавать вопросы по файлу— например, попросить кратко объяснить суть соглашения или собрать все сроки и ш…

11 Aug 2026, 17:02 UTC≈1,290 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Захожу в ПравоКонсультант, а тут внезапная новая функция. Протестирую и вам расскажу.

8 Aug 2026, 10:49 UTC≈1,550 viewsread 28 August 2026

Мой друг Владимир сделал очень забавную игру: если вы когда-нибудь играли в «правление», где надо держать баланс между показателями, то это именно этот формат. Игра про жизнь арбитражного управляющего, мне кажется, отличный способ увлечь аудиторию. Очень здорово, что нейросети позволяют юридическим командам делать более интересные маркетинговые события быстро и креативно.

3 Aug 2026, 09:20 UTC≈1,510 viewsread 28 August 2026
Video

Обещанный обзор и попытка поймать ПравоКонсультант на каверзных вопросах! Рекомендую смотреть на х 1,5, потому что это длинный ролик, но я уверена, вам понравится. Спросила, можно ли все таки устно отозвать заявление об увольнении. Каверза вопроса в том, что обращаясь к судебной практике получить ответ «да, можно» достаточно непросто. 🔗6 КСОЮ в определении от 22.08.2024 по делу №88-20785/2024 «…Трудовой кодекс Рос…

31 Jul 2026, 15:26 UTC≈1,090 viewsread 28 August 2026

ПравоТех смельчаки 😏 Когда Кирилл Кондратенко мне рассказал об этой их акции, я сказала, что это прием камикадзе для продвижения. А я сегодня взяла и нашла спорный ответ! Выложу обзор ответа на днях.

31 Jul 2026, 15:16 UTC≈1,030 viewsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @pravotechPhoto

💼 Справится ли ИИ с вашей юридической задачей? ПравоКонсультант готовит заключение с выводами, аргументами и судебной практикой. Но финальное решение все равно остается за юристом. Запустили конкурс: передайте ПравоКонсультант реальную задачу и проверьте ответ. Если найдете существенную ошибку и подтвердите ее судебной практикой — получите 4 000 ₽ за каждый засчитанный кейс. Как участвовать — рассказали в карточк…

29 Jun 2026, 15:01 UTC≈2,520 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Муки выбора обложки к нашему новому руководству... что ж делать, что ж делать... P.S. Это отсылка к "волчарам", кто в рекрутерском сообществе крутится, тот знает, о чем речь

29 Jun 2026, 10:19 UTC≈3,810 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Сейчас работаем над важным мероприятием для наших клиентов из ИТ-сегмента. Тема очень болезненная: трудовой экстремизм, ИТ-работники (и не только они), которые нашли новый способ топить и без того страдающий в 2026 году бизнес. Они называют себя «волками». Мы называем их «волками в овечьих шкурах». Это ИТ-специалисты, которые покупают популярные на рынке услуги по поддержке работника в трудоустройстве. Но поддерж…

25 Jun 2026, 13:47 UTC≈2,150 viewsread 28 August 2026

Продолжаю следить за «отечественным производством». Это я снова про Нейроюриста. Сейчас на ПМЮФ прошла дискуссия с пикантным названием «7 грехов искусственного интеллекта для юристов». На дискуссии выступала Юлия Попелышева, директор по правовым вопросам Яндекса. Она сделала обзор причин некачественного внедрения нейросетей в юрдепы: — сопротивление юристов, — закупка лигал-тех продуктов, несовместимых с общей ИТ-а…

25 Jun 2026, 13:08 UTC≈1,770 viewsread 28 August 2026

Слушаю панели ПМЮФ. На панели про дипфейки спикеры не знают, что такое дипфейки... ну че такое-то?

17 Jun 2026, 12:15 UTC≈1,740 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Коллеги, как поживают ваши понятные договоры? Кажется, к пункту про разрешение споров "на ножах" можно добавить вот такой: будут гармонично смотреться. Эта прелесть из наших материалов дела.

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @legaldesigner. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Loader from SVO
@loaderfromSVO · 40,385
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 30 August 2026
KALOY.RU
@akaloy · 53,269
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 24 August 2026
Доктор Права
@doktorprava · 20,941
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 25 September 2026
Корпоративные споры • Case by Case
@corplawpro · 23,596
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 September 2026
Юстиграм
@yustigram · 30,864
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 6 September 2026
Библиотека юриста
@library_lawyer · 25,605
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 14 September 2026
Private Law Library | PLL Право
@privlawlib · 33,771
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
Право.ru
@pravo_pravo · 57,676
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 23 August 2026
Народный Юрист
@PeopleIsLawyer · 23,756
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 17 September 2026
Налоговые споры
@nalogi_sud · 23,385
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 September 2026
Дмитрий Мирончук | Закон и право
@ruslaw · 25,359
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 September 2026
Субсидиарная ответственность • Case by Case
@subsidiarka_kdl · 21,000
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 25 September 2026
ТРУДОВЫЕ СПОРЫ
@sudpraktik_trud · 26,893
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 September 2026
Судебная практика по банкротству
@sudpraktik_bankrot_demo · 26,842
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 11 September 2026
СУДЕБНАЯ ПРАКТИКА IP и IT
@sudpraktik_IPIT_demo · 22,966
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 September 2026
Судебная практика СКЭС ВС РФ
@vs_court · 56,204
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 23 August 2026
Юридические вакансии
@legal_jobs · 35,736
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
Поворот на Право
@povorotnapravo · 50,806
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 25 August 2026
Новости ВС РФ
@vsrf_ru · 59,883
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
Прокурорские будни
@anon_prok_press · 20,574
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 26 September 2026
Мы́тарь
@mytar_rf · 27,487
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 September 2026

This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Азиза хейтит AI” (@legaldesigner), 8,629 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/legaldesigner.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.