Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Все цивильно

Channel

Все цивильно

@VseCivilno

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,273subscribers

-31 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001638255839
TypeChannel
Username@VseCivilno
DescriptionКанал, в котором обозревается лучшая и не очень юридическая литература, прочитанная мною на досуге По поводу рекламы, сотрудничества, права, просто поболтать: @MaximZarechin Чат канала: https://t.me/+_5MZTR391Wg3ZTdi
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held23
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/VseCivilno

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,2707,3047,2876 August 2026 — 7,304 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,302 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,298 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,296 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,290 subscribers22 August 2026 — 7,295 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,298 subscribers1 September 2026 — 7,295 subscribers6 September 2026 — 7,291 subscribers11 September 2026 — 7,295 subscribers14 September 2026 — 7,294 subscribers19 September 2026 — 7,293 subscribers29 September 2026 — 7,289 subscribers6 October 2026 — 7,297 subscribers12 October 2026 — 7,298 subscribers15 October 2026 — 7,300 subscribers17 October 2026 — 7,297 subscribers20 October 2026 — 7,285 subscribers30 October 2026 — 7,281 subscribers2 November 2026 — 7,280 subscribers5 November 2026 — 7,273 subscribers8 November 2026 — 7,270 subscribers12 November 2026 — 7,273 subscribers7,2736 August 202612 November 2026
23 measurements spanning 98 days, net -31. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,265–7,309 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 10:577,273+3
8 Nov 2026, 14:167,270-3
5 Nov 2026, 10:467,273-7
2 Nov 2026, 10:267,280-1
30 Oct 2026, 06:197,281-4
20 Oct 2026, 21:087,285-12
17 Oct 2026, 23:597,297-3
15 Oct 2026, 09:117,300+2
12 Oct 2026, 16:597,298+1
6 Oct 2026, 08:167,297+8
29 Sept 2026, 14:427,289-4
19 Sept 2026, 00:397,293-1
14 Sept 2026, 20:377,294-1
11 Sept 2026, 09:177,295+4
6 Sept 2026, 07:177,291-4
1 Sept 2026, 22:047,295-3
29 Aug 2026, 16:127,298+3
22 Aug 2026, 22:347,295+5
19 Aug 2026, 10:587,290-6
16 Aug 2026, 07:257,296first reading

Engagement

43 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 34 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.5%
avg views ÷ 7,273 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,710
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.91%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 43 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 22 of 23 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held43 (28 July 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total39,376
Reactions total715
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 12:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
431
Videos
7
Links
337

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

1,349 reactions across 41 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤43432.2%
🔥22416.6%
❤‍🔥21916.2%
👍1077.93%
💔936.89%
😁725.34%
🥰584.30%
💩261.93%
🥴261.93%
🙏201.48%
🤡120.89%
🍓110.815%
👎110.815%
💯80.593%
🎉50.371%
💋30.222%
🤔30.222%
👏20.148%
💘20.148%
😢20.148%
8 further kinds110.815%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 43 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,349 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 43 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @VseCivilno. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 43 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 12 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 23 posts held from the last 30 days (4.35%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

12 Nov 2026, 07:59 UTC486 views14 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Фабула: ведение дел и сроки для юристов Экран «Сегодня» показывает ближайшие сроки и заседания с отсчётом дней. Утром тот же список приходит письмом, а календарь напоминает за день до срока и за 2 часа до заседания. Карточки дел в районных судах Фабула проверяет каждое утро: вставляете ссылку с сайта суда, и стороны с заседаниями появляются в деле. Арбитражное дело ищется по номеру или ИНН, сведения из КАД перенося…

❤6❤‍🔥4🔥4

5 Nov 2026, 15:32 UTC≈1,370 views20 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Когда ну очень надо: "существо законодательного регулирования" Только прочитал определение по делу Грундфос🥴 И оно, вроде, должно вызывать удивление, но ситуация, скорее, из разряда "а я же говорил!" Если совсем кратко, Грундфос — иностранный производитель оборудования, который не так давно прекратил поставки на территорию России, а потому его российские дочки остались ни с чем Две дочерние организации заключили…

❤12🔥5👍2😁1

4 Nov 2026, 18:19 UTC≈1,410 views45 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤20🔥10🥰9😁6

4 Nov 2026, 18:19 UTC≈1,440 views31 reactionsread 12 November 2026

И.С. Чупрунов "Система оснований недействительности (дефектов) решений собраний" (2026) У всех ведь регулярно возникает желание написать в сборник статей к юбилею А.В. Егорова целую диссертацию вместо статьи? Вот и у меня пока не было такого. Хорошо, что Иван Сергеевич радует нас столь подробными работами на 170 (!!!) страниц У человека, не знакомого с трудами автора, может даже сложиться первичное впечатление, чт…

❤20🔥7🥰4

3 Nov 2026, 15:37 UTC≈1,350 views0 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Дорогие друзья, бот подвёл итоги. Поздравляю!

3 Nov 2026, 04:21 UTC≈1,540 views48 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤30🥰12🔥3🤔3

1 Nov 2026, 15:34 UTC≈1,790 views43 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Ноябрьский розыгрыш! 🦊🦊 На календаре 1 ноября, световой день всё быстрее прощается с нами, солнце видно всё реже (и то из окна офиса). Как тут не хандрить? Правильно: пополнив книжную полку В "Белом кролике" допечатали одну замечательную книгу, поэтому разыграем именно её Призовой фонд: монография С.В. Третьякова "Развитие учения о субъективном частном праве в зарубежной цивилистике" (2022) Победитель: один Рас…

❤‍🔥20❤10🍓8🔥3💋2

30 Oct 2026, 12:34 UTC≈1,550 views37 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @lawyers_memPhoto

Напоминаем: у КМП есть футболки 😎 Их можно заказать себе или подарить коллеге, который уже получил почетное звание главного душнилы офиса. Стоимость — 3 000 рублей, доставка включена. Состав: 95% хлопок, 5% лайкра. Принт нанесен методом высококачественной DTF-печати: надпись получается четкой, плотной и устойчивой к стирке. Узнать подробности и оформить заказ можно у @kafedra_mp

🥴13❤‍🔥5💩4🔥4🍓3❤2👎2🤮2

30 Oct 2026, 12:34 UTC≈1,450 views4 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Эргаш дошил партию футболок. Отличный повод порадовать себя к новому году)

❤4

29 Oct 2026, 16:48 UTC≈1,600 views9 reactionsread 12 November 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

👍5❤‍🔥2🔥2

29 Oct 2026, 16:48 UTC≈1,680 views23 reactionsread 12 November 2026

А.И. Савельев "Направления эволюции свободы договора под влиянием современных информационных технологий" (2016) Вообще от тем в духе "право и цифровизация", "смартификация права" и прочих подобных меня слегка подёргивает. Обычно авторы выдают спектр мыслей от тотального неолудизма до "киборги, они поработили планету и гражданский процесс". Либо же читаешь с мыслью, что первая часть ГК прошла мимо некоторых людей З…

❤‍🔥15👍5❤3

29 Oct 2026, 06:08 UTC≈1,680 views74 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @andlawforall

Я всегда говорю о том, что есть связь между качествами человека и его отношением к праву. Хорошие люди не бывают формалистами. Сергей Васильевич Сарбаш был ярким примером этого тезиса. Посмотрите, какие прекрасные слова он сказал в одном из интервью: Люди ожидают от суда, что он применит к ним закон так, как там написано, и не применит к ним ничего неожиданного из своей головы. Да, это первая ступень, но на этом лес…

❤‍🔥56👍9🔥6❤2😭1

Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @VseCivilno. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@VseCivilno edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
4 November 2026
Most recent edit
4 November 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @VseCivilno as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
12 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
18 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
8 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ilovedocs
@ilovedocs · 19,312
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 October 2026
Loader from SVO
@loaderfromSVO · 40,420
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 30 August 2026
Доктор Права
@doktorprava · 20,819
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 25 September 2026
Поворот на Право
@povorotnapravo · 50,665
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 25 August 2026
Библиотека юриста
@library_lawyer · 25,755
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 14 September 2026
Дмитрий Мирончук | Закон и право
@ruslaw · 25,192
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 September 2026
Судебная практика СКЭС ВС РФ
@vs_court · 56,518
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 23 August 2026
Private Law Library | PLL Право
@privlawlib · 34,339
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
Юридические вакансии
@legal_jobs · 36,227
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
РУЛЬФЫ, ИЛЬФЫ И ИНХАУСЫ
@LawFirms · 21,680
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 September 2026
Субсидиарная ответственность • Case by Case
@subsidiarka_kdl · 21,088
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 25 September 2026
Право.ru
@pravo_pravo · 57,928
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 23 August 2026
Корпоративные споры • Case by Case
@corplawpro · 23,632
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 September 2026

This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Все цивильно” (@VseCivilno), 7,273 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VseCivilno.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.