Posted without readable text
👍1

Channel
@yrisprudencia
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
23,661subscribers
-118 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001702190331 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yrisprudencia |
| Description | Ежедневные новости законодательства, судебная практика, наука. А также много интересного для ознакомления на досуге из мира юриспруденции. По вопросам @A077MP1777 https://m.vk.com/yrisprudencia. Регистрация в перечне РКН: https://clck.ru/3Fnumj |
| Created | 31 October 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yrisprudencia |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 13:22 | 23,661 | -35 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 12:00 | 23,696 | +2 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 12:38 | 23,694 | -4 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 06:58 | 23,698 | +7 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 04:59 | 23,691 | +4 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 01:38 | 23,687 | -12 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 09:38 | 23,699 | +4 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 19:09 | 23,695 | -5 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:38 | 23,700 | -10 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 20:55 | 23,710 | +2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 17:53 | 23,708 | -5 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 19:58 | 23,713 | +2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 16:26 | 23,711 | -5 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:33 | 23,716 | -4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:25 | 23,720 | -5 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 03:07 | 23,725 | -8 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 12:47 | 23,733 | -2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 14:54 | 23,735 | -9 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 13:09 | 23,744 | -8 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:12 | 23,752 | first reading |
115 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 79 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 115 (28 July 2026 – 30 September 2026) |
| Views total | 37,083 |
| Reactions total | 217 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 30 Sept 2026, 07:57 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
713 reactions across 113 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 309 | 43.3% | |
| 👍 | 262 | 36.7% | |
| 🔥 | 73 | 10.2% | |
| 👎 | 16 | 2.24% | |
| 🤔 | 10 | 1.40% | |
| 🤡 | 10 | 1.40% | |
| 🙈 | 7 | 0.982% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 0.561% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 0.421% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 0.281% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 0.281% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 0.281% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 0.281% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 0.281% | |
| 🤨 | 2 | 0.281% | |
| 🤬 | 2 | 0.281% | |
| 🫡 | 2 | 0.281% | |
| 😨 | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 🥴 | 1 | 0.14% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 115 of the 115 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 730 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 115 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 30 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| CQH36pWzJqDgH9TeiMoGoqpoCiHKdtBYHPzgTeiz2tfKFS | 1 | 27 August 2026 | 27 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 115 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 30 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Posted without readable text
👍1
КС РФ защитил права уволенных за отказ от работы в иной местности госслужащих Суд рассмотрел дело о предоставлении отдельных гарантий таким работникам. Судебный акт опубликован на официальном сайте КС РФ (постановление Конституционного Суда Российской Федерации от 29 сентября 2026 г. № 56-П "По делу о проверке конституционности пункта 1 части 2 статьи 24, части 1 статьи 29 и пункта 7 части 1 статьи 33 Федерального…
👍4
Появление в личном кабинете госуслуг чужого долга не означает нарушения прав Пожилая семейная пара обратилась в суд с жалобой на действия ФССП – судебные приставы разместили в ЛК на Госуслугах каждого из истцов информацию о том, что у них имеются судебные задолженности на значительную сумму (Определение Конституционного Суда РФ от 30 июня 2026 г. № 2062-О). В действительности, никаких догов ни перед кем у истцов н…
👍2👎2🤨2❤1🔥1🤔1😨1
Posted without readable text
❤3
Введен мораторий на проверки пострадавшего от атак бизнеса Любые производственные объекты, которые с 1 января 2026 года получили ущерб от атак средствами огневого воздействия, теперь не подпадают под плановые надзорные мероприятия по Закону о госконтроле. Внеплановые процедуры проводят лишь в ряде случаев, например: истек срок исполнения предписания; возникла ЧС природного или техногенного характера; есть достове…
❤4👍1👎1
Строительная организация не смогла взыскать со школы 11 млн за ремонт асфальта Школа обратилась в администрацию города с письмом о необходимости благоустройства территории из-за износа асфальтового покрытия. По версии общества-истца, администрация через свое должностное лицо устно обратилась к нему как к строительной организации, с которой она ранее работала по муниципальным контрактам, с просьбой выполнить работы…
🎉3❤1👍1🥴1
Моральные страдания за клопов в номере санатория суды оценили в 15 тыс. руб. Иск о компенсации морального вреда предъявила пациентка санатория: она приехала на лечение вместе с сыном по путевке "Мать и дитя", но на месте оказалось, что в ее номере обитают также и клопы. После трех дней такого "отдыха" администрация санатория переселила истца и ее ребенка в другой номер, без насекомых, но "осадочек остался": после…
👍4
Posted without readable text
👍2
Работник указал, что отозвать заявление об уходе помешал больничный, – суды его не восстановили Сотрудник попросил расторгнуть с ним договор по собственному желанию. За день до предполагаемого ухода он взял больничный и сообщил об этом работодателю. Тот оформил увольнение. Сотрудник через суд потребовал восстановить его в должности. Он заявил, что хотел отозвать заявление об уходе, однако не смог из-за временной н…
❤3
Суды обязали клинику вернуть пациентке деньги за неудачную пластику век и губ Пациентке провели комплекс хирургических вмешательств: блефаропластику и операцию по увеличению губ ("булхорн"), а заодно липолифтинг кистей рук. За красивый результат девушка заплатила 400 000 руб. Однако результаты операции были ужасными: правый глаз и рот не закрывались, стало сложно разговаривать, словом, лицо оказалось обезображенны…
❤6👍2
Суд: сообщать о конфликте интересов нужно, даже если у работников-родственников нет привилегий Руководитель автономного учреждения взял на работу свою жену и супругу брата. О возможном конфликте интересов директор не заявлял. После проверки, не дожидаясь увольнения из-за утраты доверия, директор подалзаявление об уходе по собственному желанию. Прокурор потребовал изменить основание увольнения. Кассация его поддерж…
👍3❤2
Ответственность за просрочку платежа Общество хотело взыскать долг по договору лизинга и проценты за просрочку. В ходе разбирательства контрагент ликвидировал основную задолженность. Договором была предусмотрена неустойка. Суды отказали во взыскании процентов, так как истец неверно квалифицировал финансовую санкцию. Кассация потребовала пересмотра. Позиция судов: Истец заявил о взыскании процентов по ст. 395 ГК …
❤3👍2🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 115 posts we hold for @yrisprudencia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 17 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 20 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ЮРИСПРУДЕНЦИЯ” (@yrisprudencia), 23,661 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yrisprudencia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.