International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 26% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
59 measurements spanning 97 days, net +266. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,500–12,853 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 06:49
12,809
+1
9 Nov 2026, 10:46
12,808
+5
8 Nov 2026, 00:11
12,803
-1
6 Nov 2026, 21:09
12,804
-3
5 Nov 2026, 22:57
12,807
-2
4 Nov 2026, 22:51
12,809
-3
3 Nov 2026, 22:59
12,812
+11
1 Nov 2026, 20:18
12,801
+1
31 Oct 2026, 22:38
12,800
+2
31 Oct 2026, 00:28
12,798
-2
29 Oct 2026, 22:10
12,800
+3
29 Oct 2026, 01:40
12,797
+3
27 Oct 2026, 22:10
12,794
-1
26 Oct 2026, 18:50
12,795
-1
25 Oct 2026, 16:56
12,796
+1
24 Oct 2026, 19:56
12,795
+1
23 Oct 2026, 18:27
12,794
+1
22 Oct 2026, 21:56
12,793
+3
21 Oct 2026, 16:51
12,790
+2
20 Oct 2026, 16:20
12,788
first reading
Engagement
119 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 66 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
17.2%
avg views ÷ 12,809 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,210
44 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.443%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
44
of 119 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held
119 (24 July 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total
97,041
Reactions total
430
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Nov 2026, 08:31 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈285
Videos
≈4
Links
≈3,000
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
1,423 reactions across 116 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
331
23.3%
🤣
259
18.2%
👍
201
14.1%
😁
191
13.4%
👌
131
9.21%
🔥
129
9.07%
👏
77
5.41%
🍾
21
1.48%
🙏
19
1.34%
😱
16
1.12%
🤔
16
1.12%
🤯
16
1.12%
💯
13
0.914%
🎉
3
0.211%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 119 of the 119 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,455 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 119 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 119 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lawsanctions. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 119 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 12 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 44 posts held from the last 30 days (4.55%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
«Опоздавших не ждут» // Санкции не освобождают от неустойки за позднюю поставку
7 октября 2026 ⚖️ 13ААС 🇷🇺 постановил оставить в силе решение о взыскании 858,5 тыс. рублей неустойки с ООО «Пластавиа» за несвоевременную поставку оборудования 🇷🇺 ФГБУ «Институт Карпинского» (дело № А56-47066/2026).
🇷🇺 Общество должно было поставить радиовысотомер в мае 2024, однако исполнило обязательство лишь в феврале 2025.
В апелл…
«Отвечать будет Александр Друзь» // «Дочка» COSCO вышла из дела о потопленном судне
В феврале 2024 йеменские хуситы пустили на дно Красного моря судно Rubymar вместе с грузом удобрений (сульфат-фосфат аммония) стоимостью более 💲10 миллионов.
Его владелец и бенефициар Хассан Шахадех на основании законов RICO и «О борьбе с терроризмом» подали иск к 19 ответчикам в ⚖️ федеральный суд округа Колумбия 🇺🇸
По их утвержде…
⚡️ «На исполнении!» // Александру Пумпянскому не удалось доказать бездействие Совета
В деле Т-583/25 🇨🇭 Александр Пумпянский требовал признать 🇪🇺 Совет незаконно не принявшим меры по исполнению решения от 02.04.2025 по делу T-221/24 и компенсацию морального вреда, который ему был причинён из-за такого бездействия.
На этот раз он не просил проведения устных слушаний. 11 ноября ⚖️ 8-я палата СЕСОЮ 🇪🇺 вынесла решение …
"Погнали!" // В деле о несостоявшихся 🏎 Гран-при в Сочи обеспечены судебные издержки
АНО «Росгонки» потребовало в ⚖️ Высоком суде 🇬🇧 у правообладателя Формулы 1 вернуть 💲24 млн промоутерского взноса за отмененный Гран-при 🇷🇺 России 2022 в Сочи плюс проценты.
F1 подала встречный иск о взыскании с «Росгонок» суммы, в 4 (!) раза больше за несостоявшиеся Гран-при 2022 и 2023 вместе с ходатайством об обеспечении судебны…
Суд ЕС разберётся в субъективной стороне правонарушения при поставке «санкционки» по неосторожности
🇱🇹 Компания Vilpra UAB на условиях EXW Инкотермс 2020 (самовывоз) продала 🇰🇬 киргизской компании партию кондиционеров.
🇱🇻 Таможенный брокер оформил вывоз в 🇧🇾 Беларусь. За это 🇱🇹 Таможенное управление Вильнюса оштрафовало продавца на 30,000 евро – он не проследил прибытие товара в страну назначения – 🇰🇬 Кыргызстан.
…
Анонс мероприятия
17 ноября пройдёт Legal Charity Pro Bono Day – III Российский день юридической благотворительности.
Цель форума – популяризировать юридическую благотворительность и объединять тех, кто готов помогать своими знаниями и опытом. Он содействует юристам, бизнесу и НКО узнать об этой возможности и найти друг друга.
В программе 3 три ключевых направления:
1️⃣ госрегулирование и господдержка в сфере бес…
«Сопротивление бесполезно» // 🇧🇾 Белорусская стройкомпания отозвала иск из Суда ЕС
3 ноября 2026 ⚖️ Суд ЕС общей юрисдикции 🇪🇺 вынес определение о прекращении производства по делу T-288/25 Dana Astra v Council в связи с отказом истца от иска. При этом заявление было подано еще 24 сентября.
🇧🇾 Строительная компания «Дана Астра» оспаривала продление блокирующих санкций 🇪🇺 от 24 февраля 2025, ссылаясь на явную ошибку …
Обзор РАА за второе полугодие 2025
Коллеги из Российской арбитражной ассоциации подготовили очередной, уже 12-й по счёту, обзор по вопросам арбитража и трансграничных разбирательств.
Обзор охватывает споры за второе полугодие 2025. Дела, связанные с санкциями и ограничительными мерами, начинаются с 51 страницы.
Обзор за первое полугодие 2025 здесь.
Новая редакция обзора продолжает делиться практикой 🇺🇿 Узбекистан…
“Exotique” // Банк из Лаоса оспорил антироссийские санкции
В 20-м пакете 🇪🇺 ЕС в Приложение XLV к Регламенту 833 по статье 5ad попал "Совместный банк развития" из 🇱🇦 Лаоса.
Вместо индивидуального обоснования приведены диспозиция статьи и название Приложения – перечень кредитных и финансовых организаций, а также иных субъектов, предоставляющих услуги, связанные с криптоактивами, или платежные услуги, которые учрежде…
Окружной суд Амстердама уважил МКАС при ТПП
16.12.2025 ⚖️ МКАС при ТПП 🇷🇺 окончательным решением солидарно взыскал с 🇹🇷 Mostrade Danışmanlık Ticaret Limited Şirketi вместе с поручителем в пользу 🇭🇰 Akida Trading Limited свыше 500 млн евро задолженности, уступленной Московским Кредитным Банком.
В рамках экзекватуры этого решения в 🇳🇱 Нидерландах был наложен арест на активы 🇹🇷 компании и её бенефициара 🇹🇷 Мустафы Йиг…
Верховный суд Швейцарии защитил право Александра Пумпянского быть выслушанным
23.06.2025 ⚖️ Федеральный административный суд 🇨🇭 отказал Александру Пумпянскому:
1️⃣ в иске о снятии санкций: включение основано на достоверных доказательствах экономической связи с отцом и, таким образом, истец получал от этого выгоду. Заморозка его активов, по крайней мере косвенно, усилит давление на Россию, а также увеличит издержки …
Процесс по 248.2 АПК спасёт от раскрытия недружественному суду
До судебного запрета Татьяне Пегановой по статье 248.2 АПК продолжать разбирательства в ⚖️ отделении по семейным делам Высокого суда Лондона 🇬🇧 её экс-супруг получил в своём ⚖️ домашнем АС 🇷🇺 обеспечительные меры:
экс-супруге и её 🇬🇧 юридическим представителям запрещено запрашивать, как по уже поданному запросу о раскрытии, так и в будущем, любую информ…
❤1👌1👍1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 119 posts we hold for @lawsanctions. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 24 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 23 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Private Law Library | PLL Право @privlawlib · 34,339 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
РУЛЬФЫ, ИЛЬФЫ И ИНХАУСЫ @LawFirms · 21,680 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 September 2026
Loader from SVO @loaderfromSVO · 40,420 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 30 August 2026
Гражданин мира @globalpass · 19,586 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 30 September 2026
🌍 Nomad @astonspassport · 29,286 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 8 September 2026
Frank Media @frank_media · 32,160 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 5 September 2026
Право.ru @pravo_pravo · 57,928 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 23 August 2026
Юридические вакансии @legal_jobs · 36,227 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
Forbes Russia | The Globals @forbesglobalrus · 23,106 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 September 2026
Консульский департамент МИД России @kd_mid · 27,682 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 September 2026
Корпоративные споры • Case by Case @corplawpro · 23,632 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 September 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Sanctions Law” (@lawsanctions), 12,809 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lawsanctions.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.