Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Рунетлекс

Channel

Рунетлекс

@runetlex

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,574subscribers

-72 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001169835380
TypeChannel
Username@runetlex
Description12 лет решаем юридические задачи IT, digital, e-com. Пишем документы понятно. Вместо слова «нельзя» говорим стоимость и вероятность наступления риска. Консультации: runetlex.ru/feedback https://runetlex.ru
Created27 April 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/runetlex

Topic

Job listings — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

8,5748,6498,611.56 August 2026 — 8,646 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,646 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,645 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,647 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,649 subscribers22 August 2026 — 8,644 subscribers25 August 2026 — 8,638 subscribers28 August 2026 — 8,630 subscribers1 September 2026 — 8,625 subscribers4 September 2026 — 8,615 subscribers10 September 2026 — 8,613 subscribers14 September 2026 — 8,612 subscribers18 September 2026 — 8,631 subscribers27 September 2026 — 8,624 subscribers5 October 2026 — 8,608 subscribers12 October 2026 — 8,617 subscribers15 October 2026 — 8,614 subscribers20 October 2026 — 8,612 subscribers23 October 2026 — 8,608 subscribers26 October 2026 — 8,597 subscribers29 October 2026 — 8,598 subscribers1 November 2026 — 8,594 subscribers4 November 2026 — 8,590 subscribers7 November 2026 — 8,588 subscribers11 November 2026 — 8,574 subscribers6 August 202611 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 97 days, net -72. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,563–8,660 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 09:558,574-14
7 Nov 2026, 09:078,588-2
4 Nov 2026, 10:498,590-4
1 Nov 2026, 10:558,594-4
29 Oct 2026, 04:168,598+1
26 Oct 2026, 11:218,597-11
23 Oct 2026, 13:288,608-4
20 Oct 2026, 21:308,612-2
15 Oct 2026, 13:318,614-3
12 Oct 2026, 03:578,617+9
5 Oct 2026, 12:198,608-16
27 Sept 2026, 03:368,624-7
18 Sept 2026, 06:558,631+19
14 Sept 2026, 04:588,612-1
10 Sept 2026, 10:398,613-2
4 Sept 2026, 20:568,615-10
1 Sept 2026, 03:158,625-5
28 Aug 2026, 16:288,630-8
25 Aug 2026, 11:148,638-6
22 Aug 2026, 21:548,644first reading

Engagement

50 posts held, back to 23 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 46 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.1%
avg views ÷ 8,574 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,810
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.43%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 50 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held50 (23 June 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total18,090
Reactions total259
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 13:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
508
Videos
14
Links
672

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

1,551 reactions across 49 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤61339.5%
🔥59838.6%
😁19612.6%
🍓543.48%
💯533.42%
custom 5452081362997634105221.42%
👍100.645%
🌚50.322%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 49 of the 50 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,551 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 49 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @runetlex. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 50 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 June 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 10 posts held from the last 30 days (10.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 12:34 UTC300 views10 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Сертификат СТ-1 за 7 рабочих дней вместо 6 недель К нам обратился производитель SIM-карт, которому нужно было попасть в реестр Минпромторга: без этого его не допускали к закупкам телеком-оператора. Производство полного цикла у клиента работало, но не было технических условий, чертежей и технологических карт. За пять месяцев мы с нуля собрали пакет для торгово-промышленной палаты. Посреди проекта пришлось сменить ко…

🔥10

9 Nov 2026, 10:06 UTC750 views15 reactions5 Starsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @ilovedocs

Напоминаю, что через неделю у нас начинается 8 поток курса по нейросетям. Как всегда — есть новинки и отличия. На чем мы сосредоточились в этот раз: 1. Сжать программу до одного месяца, чтобы занятые люди смогли быстро освоить современные способы работы с нейросетями. 2. Давать агентов сразу, вместе с основами. Агенты — новая норма, а не только для продвинутых пользователей. 3. Дать еще больше практики. Все через…

❤8🔥5👍2

6 Nov 2026, 07:37 UTC≈1,430 views17 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Что изменилось в интернет-маркетинге за год — разберем 12 ноября На вебинаре вместе с коллегами из Pressfeed расскажем, за что и кого штрафуют, о каких законах забыли регуляторы, а также к чему готовиться в 2027 году. А также обсудим практику: 1️⃣ Маркировки рекламы и рассылок: что проверяет Роскомнадзор, кого штрафуют чаще всего и когда рассылка считается рекламой, а когда информированием; 2️⃣ Закона о русском я…

❤13🔥4

3 Nov 2026, 11:04 UTC≈1,650 views32 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Однажды наш СММ-отдел начитался на ночь юридических каналов и утром выдал такой заголовок: «Что НЕЛЬЗЯ загружать в нейросеть» Но потом пришли коллеги, открыли форточку, чай налили, по плечу похлопали, в общем, привели в чувство. Тут и статья Евгения Вихрова «Что вы выдаете нейросети вместе с рабочим файлом» подоспела. В ней о том, как не раскрыть чужие данные и условия сделки, если хотите проверить документ в нейр…

❤23😁7🌚1👍1

30 Oct 2026, 06:20 UTC≈2,130 views26 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Что есть у интернет-магазина, чего нет у обычного сайта? Дизайнер ответит: «Карточек товаров». Программист: «Платежного шлюза». Юрист: «Десяти обязательных пунктов на сайте и штрафов до миллиона рублей». Владимир Ганин подготовил большой чек-лист: что интернет-магазин обязан разместить на сайте, нормы и чем грозят нарушения. Бегом проверять интернет-магазин конкурента.

🔥26

28 Oct 2026, 06:22 UTC≈2,050 views48 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Большой релиз: обновленное руководство по аккредитации ИТ-компании в Минцифры В 2024 году мы выпустили руководство по государственной аккредитации ИТ-компаний — PDF на 35 страниц с требованиями, чек-листами и пошаговыми инструкциями. За два года правила изменились, а мы подкопили практику и все полностью переработали — теперь это большой онлайн-гайд с актуальными требованиями 2026 года, удобной навигацией и практич…

❤26🔥16👍5🍓1

26 Oct 2026, 07:03 UTC≈1,970 views20 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Льготы ИТ-компании трудно получить, легко потерять и невозможно забыть. Освобождение от НДС, налог на прибыль 5% и пониженные взносы могут исчезнуть из-за неудачной формулировки в договоре, рекламного блока в программе или реорганизации. А если аннулируют аккредитацию или исключат ПО из реестра, компания теряет все льготы разом. Как этого избежать? Можно прочитать статью Екатерины Сухининой с разбором самых частых …

❤12🌚4👍2💯2

22 Oct 2026, 07:01 UTC≈2,800 views38 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Ищем подрядчика для юридических задач Это не совсем вакансия, но предложение сотрудничества. Ищем юристов, которым сможем доверить задачи клиентов и получить результат в согласованный срок. Работать можно удаленно, из любой страны и города, а также совмещать с другими проектами, клиентами, работой для души и хобби. Главное — уверенно решать задачи в тех направлениях, за которые беретесь, быть предсказуемым и соблю…

🔥26❤9🍓3

21 Oct 2026, 06:31 UTC≈2,640 views26 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Telegram-бот для бизнеса нуждается в документах А именно: оферте, политике обработки персональных данных и отдельном согласии на рассылки. Еще нужно разобраться с авторизацией, локализацией данных, уведомлениями в Роскомнадзор и правилами рекомендательных технологий. Анастасия Рязанова собрала все требования и штрафы в одной статье. Там же — пример первого сообщения бота и набор обязательных команд.

❤17🔥8💯1

13 Oct 2026, 07:16 UTC≈2,370 views27 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @ilovedocs

Что можно делать с помощью нейросетей? Разноеее. Вот список того, что сделал Рунетлекс для себя и для других юридических команд. Можно использовать для вдохновения) Переработка договоров по принципам юридического дизайна с помощью нейросети Написали скилл, который анализирует условия договора, сверяет его с утвержденными шаблонами, делает отчет по расхождениям с рекомендациями по переработке, перерабатывает текст …

❤19🔥8

7 Oct 2026, 09:49 UTC≈2,080 views28 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @ilovedocsFile

Рунетлекс в лице Евгения Вихрова подготовил комплексный материал для всех, кто сейчас размышляет как урегулировать использование ИИ в компании. В гайде найдете: – как выявить сценарии использования ИИ и оценить риски; – что прописать в политике по ИИ; – восемь вопросов поставщику до подписания договора; – как закрепить права на созданное с ИИ; – формулировки для договоров с подрядчиками и клиентами; – обучен…

🔥24❤4

1 Oct 2026, 07:30 UTC≈2,680 views8 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Через час начинаем вебинар «Экспертиза в спорах о ПО» совместно с экспертной группой Veta. Обсудим, как эксперт определяет качество продукта, выявляет сходства и заимствования, а также то, как обратить судебную экспертизу в процессе в свою пользу. Еще можно успеть зарегистрироваться и получить запись.

🔥7❤1

Showing the 12 most recent of 50 posts we hold for @runetlex. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @runetlex as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
18 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
22 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
25 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ilovedocs
@ilovedocs · 19,312
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 October 2026
СУДЕБНАЯ ПРАКТИКА IP и IT
@sudpraktik_IPIT_demo · 22,978
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 September 2026
Клуб правообладателей
@bchlaw · 27,121
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 September 2026
ФАС России | FAS Russia
@fasrussia · 33,607
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 4 September 2026
Loader from SVO
@loaderfromSVO · 40,420
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 30 August 2026
Юридические вакансии
@legal_jobs · 36,227
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
Мы́тарь
@mytar_rf · 27,353
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 September 2026
Поворот на Право
@povorotnapravo · 50,665
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 25 August 2026
Судебная практика СКЭС ВС РФ
@vs_court · 56,518
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 23 August 2026
Private Law Library | PLL Право
@privlawlib · 34,339
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
Всё о рекламе и маркировке: законы, новости, практика
@adv_system · 29,755
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 7 September 2026
Право.ru
@pravo_pravo · 57,928
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 23 August 2026
Дмитрий Мирончук | Закон и право
@ruslaw · 25,195
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 September 2026
Privacy Advocates
@prv_adv · 21,842
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 22 September 2026
Корпоративные споры • Case by Case
@corplawpro · 23,632
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 September 2026
Субсидиарная ответственность • Case by Case
@subsidiarka_kdl · 21,090
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 25 September 2026
Доктор Права
@doktorprava · 20,819
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 25 September 2026
Налоговые споры
@nalogi_sud · 23,344
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 September 2026
РУЛЬФЫ, ИЛЬФЫ И ИНХАУСЫ
@LawFirms · 21,680
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 September 2026
РоскомнадZор
@rkn_tg · 61,948
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 21 August 2026
Библиотека юриста
@library_lawyer · 25,755
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 14 September 2026
КонсультантПлюс
@consultant_plus · 45,027
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 27 August 2026
ТРУДОВЫЕ СПОРЫ
@sudpraktik_trud · 26,769
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 September 2026

This channel appears in 23 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Рунетлекс” (@runetlex), 8,574 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/runetlex.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.