Channel
@enlawreport
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
7,342subscribers
+36 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001145121649 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @enlawreport |
| Description | Английское право, судебная стратегия и коммерческие споры. Коротко, точно, практично. Кейсы, арбитраж, shipping, insurance, SQE, AI x Law. Для сотрудничества: @aibek_ahmedov |
| Created | 3 October 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/enlawreport |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:34 | 7,342 | +36 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:12 | 7,306 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:35 | 7,304 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:17 | 7,306 | first reading |
32 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 22 of 32 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 32 (26 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 11,583 |
| Reactions total | 44 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 17:41 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
40 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 17 | 42.5% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 25.0% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 17.5% | |
| 😱 | 5 | 12.5% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 2.50% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 44reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🆕📺📺📺📺 Подготовили для вас самые горячие темы недели: яркие ответы на важные вопросы, свежие новости и интересные идеи 💻💻💻 ➡️ Победа в суде — это только начало: как обжалование судебных расходов может привести к значительному увеличению компенсации. Не позволяйте произвольным решениям судов уменьшать вашу правоту — боритесь за свои права до конца. 🤩 Новая инициатива: компенсация аренды жилья для молодых семей при ро…
⁉️ Устал искать интересные каналы с юридическими новостями? 📁 СОХРАНИ СЕБЕ ЧТОБЫ НЕ ПОТЕРЯТЬ В этой папке собраны каналы про юриспруденцию, которые помогают быстрее разобраться в сфере, находить идеи и экономить время на поиске информации. 🔥 Каналы ведут практики и лучшие знатоки сферы: 🤩 Адвокат Екатерина Ильина - Индивидуальный подход и полное юридическое сопровождение. Срочные консультации и эффективная защита…
😁1
Илон Маск в шутку поинтересовался в X о сумме, за которую мог бы приобрести Великобританию. Так он отреагировал на публикацию сатирического издания The Babylon Bee, которое опубликовало фейковую новость о том, что «сегодня Илон Маск неожиданно приобрел всю территорию Соединенного Королевства, чтобы вновь предоставить гражданам свободу слова, которой они когда-то пользовались». «Сколько это стоит?», — ответил Маск. …
⚡️Высокий суд Англии и Уэльса разрешил SOCAR продолжить в Англии разбирательство о выводе активов турецкой судоходной группой Palmali, якобы осуществленном в целях неисполнения арбитражных решений The State Oil Company of the Republic of Azerbaijan & Ors v Mansimov & Ors К вопросу об использовании английского права в контрактах, который в последнее время вновь начал активно обсуждаться в России. Даже если вы из Тур…
❤2
📁 Юриспруденция / Банкротство / Право Папка с полезными каналами по праву от практиков. Только актуальные новости, судебная практика и разбор реальных кейсов. Что внутри: — ⚖️ Банкротство (ФЛ/ИП/ООО): этапы, риски, сроки, расходы, защита активов — 💳 Долги и взыскание: работа приставов, аресты, ограничения, способы оспаривания — 🏛 Судебная практика: стратегии, доказательства, позиции Верховного суда — 🧾 Договоры и б…
❤2
☝️Вопрос подписчикам: В какой момент юридическое исследование или анализ доказательств с использованием искусственного интеллекта перерастает в деятельность по вынесению решений (adjudicative activity), способную подпасть под действие регулирования систем ИИ высокого риска? Свое мнение оставьте в песочнице английского права.
🔥1
LCIA и 15 институтов проводят разграничение между административным и выносящим решения ИИ (administrative и adjudicative AI) LCIA возглавил подготовку совместной позиции 16 арбитражных институтов и институтов по разрешению споров в отношении проекта руководящих принципов (draft guidelines) Европейской комиссии к Закону об искусственном интеллекте ЕС (EU AI Act). Главный тезис носит очень практический характер: арби…
👍2
Высокий суд приостанавливает исполнение мальтийских судебных решений во избежание утраты смысла апелляции Aerotron проиграла предыдущую попытку воспрепятствовать признанию и исполнению двух решений судов Мальты и подала апелляцию. Hermes уже предъявила сертификат по статье 53 (Article 53 certificate), потребовала осуществления платежа и пригрозила иском о ликвидации компании (winding-up petition). Aerotron ходатайст…
🔥1
Известная британская юридическая фирма Fieldfisher успешно обжаловала решение лондонского суда по трудовым спорам о несправедливом увольнении старшего юриста фирмы Джамшида Рустамбекова из-за обвинений в сексуальных домогательствах и неподобающем поведении по отношению к коллегам-женщинам на рабочих мероприятиях. Обвинения касались того, что в январе 2023 года он неоднократно призывал одну коллегу-женщину (C1) отмен…
❤1👍1
🏛 Сенат одобрил закон о центре Enterprise Uzbekistan с особым режимом на принципах английского права. #EnterpriseUzbekistan #ITPark
Дизельгейт продолжается: Высокий суд отказывается приостановить судебное разбирательство по иску к Mercedes о размере ущерба Высокий суд постановил, что запланированное на 26 октября 2026 года судебное заседание по вопросу определения размера ущерба (quantum trial) в отношении компании Mercedes должно состояться, несмотря на предполагаемую апелляцию по более раннему решению о запрещенных устройствах, снижающих эффек…
👍1
Общие заявления о мошенничестве не заменяют надлежащий pleading Окружной суд Лидса прекратил иск франчайзи на сумму около £3,4 млн и вынес summary judgment по встречному требованию франчайзера примерно на £849 000. Истец утверждал, что перед заключением франчайзингового договора ему сообщили о предельном бюджете проекта, ожидаемой доходности, надежности подрядчика и возможности привлечь дополнительное финансировани…
Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @enlawreport. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 207,745 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 18 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“English Law Report” (@enlawreport), 7,342 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/enlawreport.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.