Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

НеАланШор

@Nealanshore

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

572subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001193821964
TypeChannel
Username@Nealanshore
Created27 April 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Nealanshore

Growth

5727 Aug 2026, 11:02 — 572 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 13:12 — 572 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 11:027 Aug 2026, 13:12
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 571–573 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 13:12572no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:02572first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

163 reactions across 16 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍5735.0%
3320.2%
🔥3320.2%
🤩2414.7%
🤯84.91%
🙏53.07%
💯21.23%
10.613%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 163reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 December 2025 to 20 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Jun 2026, 07:38 UTC173 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Включил любимую с детства передачу «100 к 1». Вопрос, что людьми ценится больше всего, сделанное из бумаги?». Один из самых популярных ответов: «облигации и акции». Всех с добрым утром! А я пойду искать бумажные голубые акции газпрома.

🔥14🤩6👍311

Signed Vadim Borodkin

16 Jun 2026, 09:30 UTC237 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @probankrotstvoruPhoto

ВС защитил права компании при взыскании ущерба с экс-директора Яков Шарыгин, занимая пост генерального директора «Кооп-Агро», перевел 71,6 млн рублей общества на счет подконтрольной ему компании. Долгопрудненский городской суд признал действия Якова Шарыгина злоупотреблением полномочиями, но гражданский иск общества «Кооп-Агро» оставил без рассмотрения. После этого «Кооп-Агро» обратилось в суд общей юрисдикции за вз

Signed Vadim Borodkin

1 Jun 2026, 13:18 UTC233 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @orchards_lawPhoto

Когда из-за недостатков решения суда компания сможет его отменить? 🌳 Вадим Бородкин, партнёр Orchards, и Максим Миронов, юрист Orchards, разобрали, в каких ситуациях компания может воспользоваться простой невнимательностью суда и отменить судебный акт из-за его технического недостатка, например: 📌Мотивировка и резолютивная часть противоречат друг другу 📌Оглашено одно — в решении другое 📌Подписал не тот судья 📌Суд н

3

Signed Vadim Borodkin

25 Mar 2026, 05:19 UTC394 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

КС РФ опубликовал важное Постановление, которое если смотреть между строк касается не только погашения облигаций при реорганизации должника, но и может распространиться на ряд иных правоотношений, которые сейчас регулируются очень буквально и топорно. Дал небольшой комментарий по этому делу Коммерсант. Вообще хочу по этой теме написать статью. Начиная с аналогичного по сути подхода по отказу в исках о выкупе акций н

7🔥2

Signed Vadim Borodkin

12 Mar 2026, 11:47 UTC396 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @orchards_law

🏢 Верховный суд РФ продолжает ужесточать подход к должникам, которые ведут себя недобросовестно. Прецедентное решение вынесено в деле Дениса Полонского, инициировавшего своё банкротство в декабре 2015 года. Экономколлегия ВС РФ отказалась списать долги гражданину, который подал на свое банкротство и за девять лет процедуры даже не пытался официально трудоустроиться. Вместо этого должник посетил восемь стран, пытался

👍9

Signed Vadim Borodkin

20 Feb 2026, 13:53 UTC401 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @probankrotstvoruPhoto

ТОП-5 кейсов недели Мы спросили топов банкротства, что зацепило их на этой неделе и что точно нужно узнать и вам. 🔺 Вадим Бородкин из Orchards Про кейс о субординации требований кредитора при наличии аффилированности. 🔺 Андрей Яковлев из Target Litigation Про спор о субсидиарной ответственности за возможный перевод бизнеса. 🔺 Ольга Удальцова — экс-начальник Службы по работе с проблемными активами «Россельхозбанк»

4

Signed Vadim Borodkin

20 Feb 2026, 13:53 UTC428 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

В надежде изменения сомнительной судебной практики ↕️

3

Signed Vadim Borodkin

20 Jan 2026, 10:25 UTC491 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

После утверждения Президиумом ВС РФ 25.12.2019 Обзора судебной практики по некоторым вопросам применения законодательства о хозяйственных обществах, в котором появился спорный пункт 3, не основанный на судебной практике, решения единственного участника пришлось нотариально удостоверять. Однако распространялась ли позиция ВС в Обзоре на решения единственного акционера было до конца неясно. В 2022 году я попытался объя

👍14

Signed Vadim Borodkin

31 Dec 2025, 15:53 UTC499 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

С наступающим, друзья! Пусть все загаданное исполнится!

👍13🤩8🙏5

Signed Vadim Borodkin

26 Dec 2025, 09:08 UTC584 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

И опубликовано Постановление Пленума по субординации: https://vsrf.ru/documents/own/35292/

🔥3

Signed Vadim Borodkin

26 Dec 2025, 09:06 UTC569 viewsread 7 August 2026

Внесены изменения в Постановление Пленума 53 по субсидиарной ответственности: https://vsrf.ru/documents/own/35293/

Signed Vadim Borodkin

17 Dec 2025, 09:14 UTC706 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @dihotomyaFile

❗️💣 КС РФ высказался об уголовных арестах в банкротстве. Целый ряд норм признан не соответствующими Конституции порождается возможность абсолютизации значения либо наложенного в уголовном деле ареста (чем, по существу, полностью отрицаются интересы кредиторов, среди которых могут быть и граждане, чьим жизни или здоровью причинен вред), либо требования о максимальном наполнении конкурсной массы, которое достигается

👍8

Signed Vadim Borodkin

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Nealanshore. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 Dec 2025, 13:33 UTCAnonymous Poll677 voters

Какое Определение ждем от ВС по "делу Долиной"

  1. Судебные акты отменить, в иске отказать45%
  2. Судебные акты оставить в силе1%
  3. Отменить в части реституции. Обязать вернуть деньги покупателю51%
  4. Отменить в связи с нарушением подсудности2%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 December 2025 to 20 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,062,597 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“НеАланШор” (@Nealanshore), 572 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Nealanshore.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.