AggrNews: BITCOIN BREAKS $109,358 SETTING NEW ALL-TIME HIGH ———————————— 2025-05-21 23:05:54

Channel
Finsight 핀사이트
@F_insight
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
813subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001222004763 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @F_insight |
| Created | 12 November 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/F_insight |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:20 | 813 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:04 | 813 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:53 | 814 | first reading |
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 11 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈4,080
- Videos
- ≈93
- Links
- ≈2,310
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
#Ethereum Pectra 업그레이드 중단 위기. 알려지지 않은 공격자가 토큰 전송 에지 케이스를 악용하여 빈 블록 채굴을 유발 사실 큰 기대는 없었다. https://x.com/Cointelegraph/status/1899036758630903808
22:30 비농업고용지수 159k -> 151k 22:30 실업률 4.0% -> 4.1% 비농업고용지수 하회, 실업률 상승. 파월 의장은 고용 시장의 안정성을 강조 오늘나온 고용 지표는 경제의 성장 둔화 가능성을 시사 금리 인하 확률은 올라가지만 파월은 과연..
#eth 이더리움 PoS 전환 전인 2022년 9월 수준의 인플레이션으로 회귀 이더리움 공급량이 머지 이후 첫 순증가세를 보이며, 현재 +16,577 ETH의 순공급이 발생 https://ultrasound.money/?timeFrame=d1
2주 후 첫 FTX 상환 예정 *FTX 바하마 상환, 2월 18일 시작: 채권자 *FTX 바하마 편의 클래스(<$50,000) 채권자들은 2월 18일 이메일 usd로 주기로 했기 때문에..... 매도세는 나오지 않을 듯 싶습니다. https://x.com/tier10k/status/1886797316457127958
BWENEWS: MEXICAN PRESIDENT SHEINBAUM SAYS TARIFFS ARE PAUSED FOR A MONTH FROM NOW - RTRS BWENEWS: 멕시코 대통령 셰인바움, 관세가 한 달 동안 중단된다고 발표 - RTRS ———————————— 2025-02-03 23:25:16
Virtuals_io x SovrunOfficial 버츄얼 뜨고 바로 x3 https://x.com/ReadyGamer_AI/status/1876294721913684360
✅a16z 2025년 암호화폐에 대한 기대되는몇가지 사항 -AI가 독립적으로 활동하기 위해서는 자체 지갑이 필요 -'분산형 자율 챗봇' 등장 -AI 사용이 증가함에 따라, 고유한 개인 증명이 필요해질 것 -예측 시장에서... 모든 것에 대한 더 나은 정보 집계로 발전 -기업들이 스테이블코인을 결제수단으로 점차 수용 -각국이 정부 채권의 온체인화 탐색 -미국의 블록체인 네트워크를 위한 새로운 --산업 표준인 'DUNA'의 채택 증가 -온라인 유동 민주주의가 물리적 영역으로 확장 -개발자들이 인프라를 단순 재발명이 아닌 재사용 -암호화폐 기업들이 인프라가 UX를 결정하게 하는 대신 사용자 경험을 우선으로 시작 -기술적 복잡성을 숨기는 UX 혁신으로 Web3의 획기적인 앱 등장 기대 -암호화폐 산업이 마침내 자체 앱스토어와 검…
#gpt #perplexity 지나가다가 발견한 이벤트 공유... 아침에 일어나서 인스타 보는데 신기해서 봤음. SKT 사용자라면 아마 통화가 에이닷으로 전환됐을 거임. 에이닷에서 Perplexity 1년 구독 이벤트를 하는데 이거 홍보도 안 하고 다들 모르는 거 같음.. 이런 건 찍먹해야 하는 거 아닌가.. 1년에 200불 쿠폰인데.. GPT와 차이점이라면 Perplexity는 검색엔진에서 요약해서 찾아주는 거고 GPT는 AI가 학습해서 알려주는 것. 그냥 공짜로 1년 Pro 이용시켜 주는 거니까 좋은 것 같아서 공유함. #광고아니여..
https://x.com/WuBlockchain/status/1867522527171686586
#arthurhayes 아서헤이즈 에세이 gpt 뚝딱뚝딱 넣어서 살짝 손본 번역본. The Cure 1. 암호화폐 성장의 3가지 주요 동인: - 정부 포획 - 대기업과 권력의 중앙화에 대한 대안으로서의 탈중앙화 - 혁신적 기술 - 비트코인과 블록체인의 검증된 안정성 - 탐욕 - 사용자들의 부의 창출 기회 2. 현재 암호화폐 자금조달의 문제점: - VC(벤처캐피탈) 중심의 투자 구조로 인한 높은 초기 가치평가 - 일반 투자자들의 수익 기회 제한 - 중앙화된 거래소(CEX)의 과도한 영향력 3. ICO(Initial Coin Offering)의 장점: - 더 민주적인 자금조달 방식 - 조기 투자자들의 높은 수익 잠재력 - 게이트키퍼 없는 직접적인 시장 참여 가능 - 기술적 잠재력과 밈…
FTT 주요 내용 FTX CEO John J. Ray III: "2025년 초 배분이 시작될 것임을 발표하게 되어 기쁘다." "FTX의 채권자 및 고객을 위해 이미 수십억 달러를 회수했으며, 최대한 빨리 배분을 진행하기 위해 모든 작업에 전력을 다하고 있다." 배분 일정 업데이트: 2024년 12월 초: 전 세계 고객들에게 회수 자금을 배분할 **배분 에이전트(Distribution Agents)**와 최종 협의 완료 예정. 고객 포털을 통해 배분 계정을 설정하기 위한 안내를 제공. 2024년 12월 말: 법원이 분쟁 클레임 준비금(Disputed Claims Reserve Amount)을 승인한 뒤 계획 발효 날짜 발표. 2025년 1월 초: 재조정 계획 발효. 최초 배분(Initial Distribution): 계획 내 허용된 …
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @F_insight. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 950,772 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@F_insight named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Finsight 핀사이트” (@F_insight), 813 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/F_insight.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.