Channel
@onfleek419
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
37,067subscribers
+1,673 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001397019275 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @onfleek419 |
| Description | 🖋Автор канала - Залим Сохов @onfleek024 👤 Профиль в Т-Инвестициях: https://clck.ru/3QxjCi Регистрация в Роскомнадзор № 4776840221. #4F8OT |
| Created | 21 November 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 65 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/onfleek419 |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
41,300 average views per post against 37,334 subscribers — an engagement rate of 110.7%. Across the 8,315 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,623–99,997 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.08% and 20.8%, with a median of 10.5%.
| Window | 30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 15 of 15 published in the window (0 exact, 15 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 619,800 |
| Mature posts only | 110.7% over 15 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 37,334 measured 5 November 2026 |
| Cohort | b31623:rus · 8,315 channels · p10 2.60% · p25 5.08% · p50 10.5% · p75 20.8% · p90 35.5% |
| Position in cohort | 99.759th percentile · 10.5× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.079% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Russian · 100.0% of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 23:01 | 37,067 | +227 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 09:00 | 36,840 | -282 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 03:11 | 37,122 | +153 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 01:56 | 36,969 | +197 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 01:57 | 36,772 | -562 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 02:44 | 37,334 | +53 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 03:47 | 37,281 | +305 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 06:28 | 36,976 | -1,592 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 06:26 | 38,568 | +630 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 06:07 | 37,938 | +331 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 08:57 | 37,607 | -2,654 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 06:30 | 40,261 | +196 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 03:37 | 40,065 | +79 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 03:36 | 39,986 | -1,312 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 03:51 | 41,298 | -13 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 02:17 | 41,311 | +96 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 22:47 | 41,215 | -707 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 23:19 | 41,922 | +112 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 01:16 | 41,810 | +177 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 23:06 | 41,633 | first reading |
62 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 176 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 62 (16 July 2026 – 10 November 2026) |
| Views total | 715,800 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 02:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 7 of 18 posts held from the last 30 days (38.9%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
💳 Т-ТЕХНОЛОГИИ × ЦИАН 📱 Еще 6 ноября Т-Технологии опубликовали пресс-релиз с предложением выкупить Циан по 993,05 руб за акцию. Сегодня на конференц-коле Игорь Герасимов отвечал на ряд вопросов по поводу этой сделки, а их было довольно много. И вот что мне показалось важным из его слов: ➖Видят сделку стратегически важной, сравнивают со сделкой по АВТО.РУ; ➖Оценка ЦИАН исходит из его высоких исторических темпов рост…
💸 Яндекс $YDEX: АКРА улучшило прогноз по рейтингу Яндекс Банка до «Позитивного» 👉 Ключевое в оценке агентства: банк продолжает увеличивать бизнес, сохраняет положительный финансовый результат и располагает запасом прочности на случай финансовых шоков. АКРА отмечает, что банк вышел из инвестиционной стадии и начал генерировать капитал собственными силами. Прибыль по МСФО за 2025 год превысила 4 млрд руб., за 1П26 — …
Вот, к примеру, Алроса…. 📌 Закрытый канал | 💬 Телеграм |💳 Пульс |
Вот таким образом отторговал ралли в акциях ВК в своём закрытом канале - увеличивая и сокращая позицию во фьючерсах. С момента последней продажи акции еще на пару десятков процентов выросли, но со второй планки выйти из игры - не такая уж и ошибка, я считаю. Весьма доволен результатом 😇. На текущий момент в этой бумаге у меня нет спекулятивного интереса, но есть в некоторых других 😉. Присоединиться к закрытому канал…
🏹РОСИМУЩЕСТВО ВЫШЛО НА ОХОТУ Росимущество объявило отбор организатора для продажи 7,8% минус одна акция Совкомфлота. Формальность, но по сути — первый конкретный шаг к давнему желанию снизить долю в компании до 75% плюс одна акция. 📊 Структура акционеров сейчас: ➖ РФ — 82,8%; ➖ free float — 15,5%; ➖ квазиказначейский пакет — около 1,7%. 📉В моменте акции падали на 5%. В памяти еще свеж прецедент с ЮГК. Тогда было ч…
💳 ВТБ $VTBR отчитался за 9 мес 2026 года Ключевое: рекордная в истории группы чистая прибыль за 9 месяцев, превысившая результаты сильного прошлого года. Как ранее банк и планировал, в 3 квартале прибыль существенно ускорилась. С учетом того, что банковский бизнес, как правило, концентрирует доходы в 4 квартале, менеджмент подтверждает ориентир по чистой прибыли на 2026 год в размере ~600 млрд руб. ▫️Результаты за …
🏠 ДОМ.РФ $DOMRF отчитался за 9 мес 2026 года Прошел неполный год с момента начала торгов акциями ДОМРФ на бирже и это одно из немногих размещений когда участникам дали заработать. С момента IPO акции выросли на 22% + был выплачен дивиденд в размере 246,88 руб. 📊 Ключевые цифры: За 9 мес. 2026 года: ➖Чистые процентные доходы: 152,8 млрд руб. (+31,8% г/г); ➖Чистые комиссионные доходы: 15 млрд руб. (+65,9% г/г); ➖Чист…
💬 VK $VKCO результаты по итогам 3кв26 и 9М26. - Выручка за 9М26: +15% год к году до 128 млрд руб. Стоит отметить, что новые продукты, запущенные 1-2 года назад, принесли 10,4 млрд руб. или >8% выручки - конкретно это VK Видео (ин-стрим реклама при показе видео, развивают с 2024) за 9 мес. дала 7,6 млрд руб. (+44% г/г), социальная коммерция (запустили в 2025) - 2,1 млрд (+65% г/г) и MAX (запустили в 2025) - первая в…
1️⃣ Краткий обзор новых размещений: Долговой рынок восстанавливается после выхода инфляционных ожиданий, аукционов Минфина и недельного принта по инфляции, но остается под давлением из-за неопределенности. На этой неделе внимание привлекли 2 эмитента из промышленного сектора — «Борец» и «Воксис». Размещения проходят на фоне роста долговой нагрузки у большинства заемщиков и ухудшения операционных денежных потоков. 1…
Лично я докупил фьючи на НЛМК и Аэрофлот на снижении рынка после объявления ключевой ставки. 🤞 Всем хороших выходных!
🗝Ключевая ставка - 14% ✅ Банк России второй раз подряд сохранил ключевую ставку на уровне 14%. Последний раз ставку снижали в июле, до топливного кризиса, индексаций ЖКХ и прочего. Тогда же в июле был дан среднесрочный прогноз, посмотрим, что изменилось: ➖Ключевая ставка: средняя за 2026 год — 14,6% (с учётом фактической динамики). На 2027 год прогноз повышен до 12,5–13,5% годовых; ➖Инфляция на конец 2026 г.: подн…
Неожиданным бенефициаром сложившейся ситуации может стать Ростелеком $RTKM 🙃. Вероятно, увидим это по результатам 4-го квартала. Атаки БПЛА на ЦОДы российских компаний усугубили и без того затяжной дефицит дата-центровой инфраструктуры. Потеря около 115 МВт мощностей «Яндекса» на рынке, где неудовлетворенный спрос еще до инцидентов оценивался в 150–200 МВт, усиливает нехватку железа, электроэнергии и стоек. Одноврем…
Showing the 12 most recent of 62 posts we hold for @onfleek419. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@onfleek419 edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 1 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 74 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Залим Сохов - ON FLEEK investing” (@onfleek419), 37,067 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/onfleek419.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.