Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Кот Эльвиры

@KotElviry

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

48,805subscribers

+187 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001061574166
TypeChannel
Username@KotElviry
DescriptionДля связи @KotElviry_bot Заявка на включение в реестр Роскомнадзора № 4945340308
Created29 August 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/KotElviry

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@KotElviry/8009 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 14:50 UTC@busines_circles/19666 Aug 2026, 17:48 UTC0.993.0 hours
@KotElviry/8001 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 14:47 UTC@busines_circles/19534 Aug 2026, 14:52 UTC0.995 minutes
@KotElviry/8008 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 12:20 UTC@busines_circles/19656 Aug 2026, 14:38 UTC0.992.3 hours
@KotElviry/8007 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 09:46 UTC@busines_circles/19636 Aug 2026, 11:35 UTC0.991.8 hours
@KotElviry/8002 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 07:05 UTC@busines_circles/19555 Aug 2026, 07:07 UTC0.992 minutes
@KotElviry/8003 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 09:44 UTC@busines_circles/19575 Aug 2026, 10:17 UTC0.9933 minutes
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@busines_circles12 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.991.9 hoursthis entry (120)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 28 comparable posts for this entry, running 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @KotElviry — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

48,57148,94648,758.55 August 2026 — 48,618 subscribers6 August 2026 — 48,618 subscribers6 August 2026 — 48,608 subscribers7 August 2026 — 48,571 subscribers7 August 2026 — 48,705 subscribers9 August 2026 — 48,820 subscribers9 August 2026 — 48,946 subscribers10 August 2026 — 48,875 subscribers11 August 2026 — 48,782 subscribers12 August 2026 — 48,678 subscribers13 August 2026 — 48,805 subscribers48,8055 August 202613 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 8 days, net +187. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 48,515–49,002 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 23:4548,805+127
12 Aug 2026, 18:1448,678-104
11 Aug 2026, 18:0248,782-93
10 Aug 2026, 20:4148,875-71
9 Aug 2026, 21:3148,946+126
9 Aug 2026, 00:5548,820+115
7 Aug 2026, 23:2648,705+134
7 Aug 2026, 01:0148,571-37
6 Aug 2026, 03:4048,608-10
6 Aug 2026, 01:4648,618no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:2948,618first reading

Engagement

48 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.2%
avg views ÷ 48,805 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,800
48 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
48
of 48 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held48 (30 July 202614 August 2026)
Views total518,970
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Aug 2026, 11:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
475
Videos
33
Links
1,310

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 09:34 UTC≈2,540 viewsread 14 August 2026

🏦 Доля российских компаний и ИП с просрочкой по кредитам достигла рекорда На 1 июля просроченные платежи по банковским кредитам имели более 196 тыс. российских компаний и индивидуальных предпринимателей — 27,6% всех заемщиков. Это максимальный показатель за время наблюдений. За год доля заемщиков с просрочкой выросла с 23%, а с 2023 года — более чем вдвое, с 13%. Только в июне в просрочку перешли еще около 6 тыс. к

14 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC≈4,880 viewsread 14 August 2026

🇷🇺 Россияне ежегодно теряют до 2 трлн рублей из-за шринкфляции Жители РФ ежегодно теряют до 2 трлн рублей из-за скрытого сокращения объема товаров в упаковках при сохранении или росте цен (шринкфляции), говорится в исследовании аналитической группы при вице-спикере Госдумы Борисе Чернышове. В среднем упаковки за год становятся легче на 5%, а в отдельных категориях сокращение достигает 20–22%. Реальная инфляция с уч

13 Aug 2026, 15:10 UTC≈10,000 viewsread 14 August 2026

🏦 ЦБ оценил уровень инвестиционной активности в России Общий уровень инвестиционной активности в России остается высоким, а снижение инвестиций в начале 2026 года нельзя назвать драматичным, заявил советник главы ЦБ РФ Кирилл Тремасов. По его словам, инвестиционный бум последних лет вывел страну на исторические максимумы инвестиционной активности. Однако, являются ли эти уровни оптимальными для российской экономики

13 Aug 2026, 12:33 UTC≈13,000 viewsread 14 August 2026

🇷🇺 Каждый четвертый россиянин хочет создать финансовую подушку безопасности Финансовые накопления есть у половины россиян, 27% хотят их создать, а 23% не имеют денежной подушки и не видят смысла копить, говорится в совместном исследовании Роскачества и сервиса «Финансы Mail». Идеальной финансовой подушкой 53% россиян считают сумму в размере годового дохода. Еще 22% назвали оптимальной сумму в 6–12 месячных доходов,

13 Aug 2026, 10:24 UTC≈9,980 viewsread 14 August 2026

🏦 Число МФО в России впервые за пять лет выросло до 803 компаний Количество микрофинансовых организаций в России выросло впервые за пять лет: на начало августа 2026 года их число превысило 800 компаний, рассказали в сервисе «Контур.Фокус». На 1 августа 2026 года в стране работало 803 компании с основным ОКВЭД «Микрофинансовая деятельность» — на 8,4% больше, чем годом ранее. С 2022 года их количество беспрерывно сни

13 Aug 2026, 07:06 UTC≈9,970 viewsread 14 August 2026

🇷🇺 Объем застрахованных банковских вкладов в первом полугодии вырос на 2% Общий объем подлежащих страхованию средств на банковских вкладах с начала 2026 года увеличился на 1,9% и составил 87,3 трлн рублей, сообщает Агентство по страхованию вкладов. Вклады населения выросли на 1,9% — до 66,4 трлн рублей. Средства на счетах юридических лиц, подлежащих страхованию, увеличились на 3,3% — до 10,4 трлн рублей. Наибольший

12 Aug 2026, 14:54 UTC≈10,100 viewsread 14 August 2026

📈 Средняя максимальная ставка по вкладам в топ-10 банков выросла до 12,89% Средняя максимальная ставка по вкладам десяти банков России, привлекающих наибольший объем депозитов физлиц в рублях, по итогам первой декады августа выросла на 0,04 процентного пункта — до 12,89% годовых, следует из материалов Банка России. В конце июля ЦБ снизил ключевую ставку до 14% годовых, однако банки не спешат уменьшать ставки по вкл

12 Aug 2026, 12:48 UTC≈10,000 viewsread 14 August 2026

📈 Рост корпоративного кредитования в июле ускорился Рост корпоративного кредитования в июле ускорился и был сопоставим с майским уровнем, тогда как розничное кредитование росло медленнее, чем месяцем ранее, следует из данных Банка России. В июне рост кредитования компаний резко замедлился — до 0,1% после 1,5% в мае. Годовой темп прироста требований к организациям снизился до 11,4% с 11,9%. При этом розничное креди

12 Aug 2026, 09:27 UTC≈18,900 viewsread 14 August 2026

🔴 Рост рублевых депозитов населения в июле замедлился Рост рублевых депозитов населения в июле сохранился, но оказался слабее июньского, сообщили в Банке России. В июне объем рублевых средств граждан в банках вырос на 0,6% после снижения на 0,6% в мае. Основной приток пришелся на текущие счета и краткосрочные депозиты, тогда как средства на долгосрочных вкладах сократились. На фоне снижения ставок и роста интереса

12 Aug 2026, 07:18 UTC≈13,000 viewsread 14 August 2026

❌ Доля отказов по потребкредитам в июле выросла до 73,3% Банки в июле 2026 года отклонили 73,3% заявок на потребительские кредиты, сообщили в НБКИ. За месяц доля отказов выросла на 0,9 п.п. и увеличивается второй месяц подряд. При этом в годовом выражении показатель снизился на 2,3 п.п. — в июле 2025 года он составлял 75,6%. Наибольшая доля отказов среди 30 регионов с максимальным числом заявок зафиксирована в Кем

11 Aug 2026, 14:55 UTC≈10,200 viewsread 14 August 2026

🏗 Ипотечный заемщик в России — чаще всего 30–40-летний семейный человек Среднестатистический ипотечный заемщик в России — человек в возрасте 30–40 лет, состоящий в браке и зарабатывающий 100–200 тыс. рублей в месяц, рассказали в крупнейших банках. По данным «Домклика», 85% ипотечных заемщиков находятся в возрасте от 26 до 50 лет, а на группу 31–40 лет приходится 46,5% сделок. Почти 69% заемщиков состоят в браке, ме

11 Aug 2026, 12:50 UTC≈10,100 viewsread 14 August 2026

🏦 Коллекторы выкупили 92,1% выставленных МФО просроченных долгов В первом полугодии 2026 года коллекторы приобрели 92,1% просроченных долгов, выставленных на продажу микрофинансовыми организациями (МФО). Это максимальная доля за последние три года, следует из данных сервиса ID Collect. Объем выставленной МФО задолженности вырос на 8% год к году, до 63,4 млрд рублей. Коллекторы выкупили долгов на рекордные 58,4 млрд

Showing the 12 most recent of 48 posts we hold for @KotElviry. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 303,808 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Мысли-НеМысли
@mislinemisli · 152,681
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 12 August 2026
Труба под Неглинной
@trubapodneglinnoy · 133,407
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Кот Эльвиры” (@KotElviry), 48,805 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KotElviry.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.